Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #636836

Re: accelerating affecting mass?

From "F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: accelerating affecting mass?
Date 2017-06-18 16:02 +0000
Organization NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID <oi687902j5c@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <LDc1B.48316$qd4.28202@fx13.fr7>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 02:18:47 +1000, Jevan Pipitone wrote:

> I found the following writing on quora.
>

The quora post is way off base (not incorrect but way of base).

The idea that nothing can move faster than light speed
is equivalent to the fact that there can be no frame of
reference in which light would appear stationary.

OK?  Do you got that?  The two statements are EXACTLY the
same.  So forget about "speed of light" viewpoints and
instead consider frames of reference in which light is
stationary.

What would stationary light, light that does not move,
be like?  It is an absurd idea and could not possibly
exist or ever be observed.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

accelerating affecting mass? Jevan Pipitone <nospam@jevan.com.au> - 2017-06-18 02:18 +1000
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-18 16:02 +0000
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:25 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 20:02 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-19 19:16 -0400
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:17 -0700
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:52 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-21 19:38 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-21 19:46 -0700
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-21 21:28 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-22 15:08 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2017-06-22 15:19 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 19:29 -0700
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? Jevan Pipitone <nospam@jevan.com.au> - 2017-06-21 01:58 +1000
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-20 17:28 +0000
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-20 17:34 +0000
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? Eshiki Orakut <usa@iwikuh.ki> - 2017-06-20 17:37 +0000
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:24 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:47 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:38 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 18:29 -0700
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:45 -0700
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-22 18:35 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-20 12:39 -0500
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-20 13:19 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-20 15:53 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 17:30 -0700
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-21 21:31 -0400
          Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-22 02:22 +0000
            Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-22 18:13 -0400
              Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 01:53 +0000
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 12:58 -0400
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 18:33 +0000
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 15:19 -0400
                Re: accelerating affecting mass? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2017-06-23 21:09 +0000
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 10:25 -0700
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 20:03 -0700
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-20 09:41 -0700
  Re: accelerating affecting mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 03:13 -0400
    Re: accelerating affecting mass? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-21 01:59 -0700
      Re: accelerating affecting mass? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-06-21 21:47 -0400
        Re: accelerating affecting mass? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-06-22 16:45 +0000

csiph-web