Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.net.news.management > #17781 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 73 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.net.news.management
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:21 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 16:13 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 17:53 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 18:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:23 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 22:50 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:23 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 21:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:44 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:26 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 15:47 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 11:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:48 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Algernon Goss-Custard <Ben@nowhere.com> - 2023-01-21 15:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 15:51 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:28 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 10:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 15:49 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-21 14:20 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Pamela <uklm@permabulator.33mail.com> - 2023-01-21 14:27 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-21 20:01 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-21 22:28 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-22 09:22 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:01 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 11:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-21 18:30 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 21:08 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-22 02:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-22 08:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 01:20 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:04 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2023-01-23 13:17 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:34 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roland Perry <roland@perry.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 06:37 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 08:55 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-23 13:36 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-27 00:35 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-27 17:09 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-29 19:25 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> - 2023-01-30 00:52 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-01-30 01:21 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis JNugent <jenningsandco@mail.com> - 2023-01-21 17:18 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-21 11:13 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 12:15 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-01-21 12:47 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> - 2023-01-21 14:11 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> - 2023-01-21 14:18 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> - 2023-01-22 15:59 +0000
Re: Engineered constitutional crisis Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> - 2023-01-27 13:06 +0000
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 17:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Engineered constitutional crisis |
| Message-ID | <hGmmJYFQhXyjFwzD@this.machine> |
In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>> >>>> >>>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>ition-will-end-court/ >>>> >>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic decision of >>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>> >>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>> not "unable to accept" it, >> >> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >> law either. > >If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. > >> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >> towards them, > >Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >by any other party. And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in uk.legal.moderated -- Bryan Morris
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1q4thsl.14w0ko1vftvmN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #17781 |
Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote:
> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens
> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes
> >On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:
> >> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> >>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative
> >>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn
> >>>>ition-will-end-court/
> >>>>
> >>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long
> >>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage),
> >>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue
> >>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept
> >>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic decision of
> >>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row
> >>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?"
> >>>
> >>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories,
> >>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories
> >>> not "unable to accept" it,
> >>
> >> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish
> >> law either.
> >
> >If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure.
> >
> >> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred
> >> towards them,
> >
> >Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current
> >topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're
> >fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any
> >other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory
> >scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run
> >by any other party.
>
> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in
> uk.legal.moderated
He does appear to be somewhat immoderate.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe – My pet rock Gordon just is.
No plan survives contact with the enemy.
~ Slava Ukraini ~
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 21:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17782 |
On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: > Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: > >> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic decision of >>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>> >>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>> >>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>> law either. >>> >>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>> >>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>> towards them, >>> >>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>> by any other party. >> >> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >> uk.legal.moderated > > He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally inappropriate newsgroup. -- Roger Hayter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 21:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t5gVmRJLvbyjFwxo@this.machine> |
| In reply to | #17783 |
In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> writes >On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: > >> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >> >>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic decision of >>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>> >>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>> >>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>> law either. >>>> >>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>> >>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>> towards them, >>>> >>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>> by any other party. >>> >>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>> uk.legal.moderated >> >> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. > >At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >inappropriate newsgroup. > What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? -- Bryan Morris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 22:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k2tt3qF88t6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17784 |
On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: > In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter > <roger@hayter.org> writes >> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >> >>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>> >>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic decision of >>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>>> law either. >>>>> >>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>> >>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>> towards them, >>>>> >>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>>> by any other party. >>>> >>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>> uk.legal.moderated >>> >>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >> >> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >> inappropriate newsgroup. >> > > What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate > personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. -- Roger Hayter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-19 22:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> |
| In reply to | #17785 |
On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: > On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>> >>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic decision of >>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>>>> law either. >>>>>> >>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>>>> by any other party. >>>>> >>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>> >>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>> >>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>> >> >> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate >> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? > > A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 01:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XsNLzqL+7eyjFwmW@this.machine> |
| In reply to | #17786 |
In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >>> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic >>>>>>>>>>decision of >>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>>>>> law either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>>>>> by any other party. >>>>>> >>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>>> >>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>>> >>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >>>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>>> >>> >>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate >>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? >> >> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. > >Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise. Oh you're a Corbynista too? -- Bryan Morris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 01:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> |
| In reply to | #17787 |
On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: > In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens ><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and Conservative >>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag to the blue >>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic >>>>>>>>>>>decision of >>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a political row >>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by the Tories, >>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are the Tories >>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>>>>>> law either. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but the current >>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action the Tory >>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>>>>>> by any other party. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>>>> >>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>>>> >>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >>>>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate >>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? >>> >>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. >> >>Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise. > Oh you're a Corbynista too? So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate outburst. Why am I not surprised?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 02:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <WsWLDIOSifyjFwWU@this.machine> |
| In reply to | #17788 |
In message <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >> In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >>>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, >>>>>>>>Jon Ribbens >>>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and >>>>>>>>>>>>Conservative >>>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic >>>>>>>>>>>>decision of >>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a >>>>>>>>>>>>political row >>>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by >>>>>>>>>>>the Tories, >>>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>>>>>>> law either. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but >>>>>>>>>the current >>>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action >>>>>>>>>the Tory >>>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>>>>>>> by any other party. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>>>>> >>>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >>>>>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate >>>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? >>>> >>>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. >>> >>>Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise. >> Oh you're a Corbynista too? > >So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate >outburst. Why am I not surprised? Yes I know you think Starmer is a shithead. No doubt you share Corbyn's views on matters that keep him outside the Labour whip -- Bryan Morris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 02:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrntsjvo7.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> |
| In reply to | #17789 |
On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: > In message <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens ><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>> In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >>>>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, >>>>>>>>>Jon Ribbens >>>>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and >>>>>>>>>>>>>Conservative >>>>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gender-recogn >>>>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex marriage), >>>>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable to accept >>>>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic >>>>>>>>>>>>>decision of >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>political row >>>>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by >>>>>>>>>>>>the Tories, >>>>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with the Scottish >>>>>>>>>>> law either. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but >>>>>>>>>>the current >>>>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking so they're >>>>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action >>>>>>>>>>the Tory >>>>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is *not* run >>>>>>>>>> by any other party. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >>>>>>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate >>>>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? >>>>> >>>>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. >>>> >>>>Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise. >>> Oh you're a Corbynista too? >> >>So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate >>outburst. Why am I not surprised? > > Yes I know you think Starmer is a shithead. No doubt you share Corbyn's > views on matters that keep him outside the Labour whip I'm sorry to report that you are even worse at reading minds than you are at reading words.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-20 19:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fePpfGE2IvyjFwUl@this.machine> |
| In reply to | #17790 |
In message <slrntsjvo7.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >> In message <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>> In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>>><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" >>>>>><nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >>>>>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, >>>>>>>>>>Jon Ribbens >>>>>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Conservative >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has always / long >>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>decision of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>political row >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by >>>>>>>>>>>>>the Tories, >>>>>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with >>>>>>>>>>>>the Scottish >>>>>>>>>>>> law either. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then sure. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your hatred >>>>>>>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but >>>>>>>>>>>the current >>>>>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was run by any >>>>>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action >>>>>>>>>>>the Tory >>>>>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is >>>>>>>>>>>*not* run >>>>>>>>>>> by any other party. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a totally >>>>>>>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting inappropriate >>>>>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? >>>>>> >>>>>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific person. >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise. >>>> Oh you're a Corbynista too? >>> >>>So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate >>>outburst. Why am I not surprised? >> >> Yes I know you think Starmer is a shithead. No doubt you share Corbyn's >> views on matters that keep him outside the Labour whip > >I'm sorry to report that you are even worse at reading minds >than you are at reading words. I read OK, is English not your first language? As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in uk.legal.moderated" -- Bryan Morris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Fleming <mike@tauzero.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 02:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17791 |
On 20/01/2023 19:57, Bryan Morris wrote: > In message <slrntsjvo7.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens > <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >> On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>> In message <slrntsjsvi.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens >>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>> On 2023-01-20, Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>> In message <slrntsjg5i.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon >>>>> Ribbens >>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>> On 2023-01-19, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 21:53:15 GMT, "Bryan Morris" >>>>>>> <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>>>> In message <k2trepF81n5U1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter >>>>>>>> <roger@hayter.org> writes >>>>>>>>> On 19 Jan 2023 at 18:25:23 GMT, "Sn!pe" <Sn!pe> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In message <slrntsddch.cr0.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, >>>>>>>>>>> Jon Ribbens >>>>>>>>>>> <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/01/2023 14:35, Jon Ribbens wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-17, notya...@gmail.com <notyalckram@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently a row between the SNP Scottish government and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conservative >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UK one that looks headed to the courts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/23225604.one-way-gen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ition-will-end-court/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The row appears contrived. Whilst Scottish law has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always / long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed marriage at 16 (now including I presume same sex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their gender change law appears to be set up as a red rag >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bulls in London in that the ERG / Tories would be unable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of its provisions and seek to overturn the democratic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish government. The result a court case and a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> political row >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "who rules Scotland - London or Edinburgh?" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about? The row has been confected by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tories, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because they are stupid and evil, not the SNP. Not only are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not "unable to accept" it, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get the impression UK Labour are that happy with >>>>>>>>>>>>> the Scottish >>>>>>>>>>>>> law either. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If by that you mean Keir Starmer is a cowardly shithead then >>>>>>>>>>>> sure. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think it's just the Tories, or is this just your >>>>>>>>>>>>> hatred >>>>>>>>>>>>> towards them, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, obviously any decent human being hates the Tories, but >>>>>>>>>>>> the current >>>>>>>>>>>> topic of conversation is the actions the Tories are taking >>>>>>>>>>>> fairly inevitably involved. If the current government was >>>>>>>>>>>> run by any >>>>>>>>>>>> other party then they would certainly not be taking the action >>>>>>>>>>>> the Tory >>>>>>>>>>>> scum say they are, and regardless, the current government is >>>>>>>>>>>> *not* run >>>>>>>>>>>> by any other party. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And this piece of s..t is deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>>>>>>>> uk.legal.moderated >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> He does appear to be somewhat immoderate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At least he is not posting a constitutional legal question in a >>>>>>>>> totally >>>>>>>>> inappropriate newsgroup. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What is constitutionally legal in that shithead posting >>>>>>>> inappropriate >>>>>>>> personal comments in a newsgroup of which he is a moderator? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A personal comment would normally have to be about a specific >>>>>>> person. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps "Bryan Morris" is secretly Keir Starmer in disguise. >>>>> Oh you're a Corbynista too? >>>> >>>> So you didn't even read the message that prompted your immoderate >>>> outburst. Why am I not surprised? >>> >>> Yes I know you think Starmer is a shithead. No doubt you share Corbyn's >>> views on matters that keep him outside the Labour whip >> >> I'm sorry to report that you are even worse at reading minds >> than you are at reading words. > > I read OK, is English not your first language? > > As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in > uk.legal.moderated" What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his ability to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 08:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <xn0nx3won44fdvs005@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17792 |
On 21/01/2023 in message <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> Mike Fleming wrote: >>As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in >> uk.legal.moderated" > >What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his ability >to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated? That is a tautology. Moderators in ulm often make highly offensive remarks about our properly elected government which indicates their views are too extreme for them to have impartial views on other matters. The group seems to exist to pour socialist dogma down people's throats and whine about Brexit. -- Jeff Gaines Dorset UK Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his friends for his life. (Jeremy Thorpe, 1962)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 09:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k31p6jFqcsjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17793 |
On 21 Jan 2023 at 08:41:48 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: > On 21/01/2023 in message <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> Mike Fleming > wrote: > >>> As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>> uk.legal.moderated" >> >> What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his ability >> to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated? > > That is a tautology. Moderators in ulm often make highly offensive remarks > about our properly elected government which indicates their views are too > extreme for them to have impartial views on other matters. The group seems > to exist to pour socialist dogma down people's throats and whine about > Brexit. Making highly offensive remarks about a properly elected government seems to be a pretty normal activity in our democracy, whichever party is in power. -- Roger Hayter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 10:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qpdUyaI867yjFwRj@this.machine> |
| In reply to | #17794 |
In message <k31p6jFqcsjU1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter <roger@hayter.org> writes >On 21 Jan 2023 at 08:41:48 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: > >> On 21/01/2023 in message <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> Mike Fleming >> wrote: >> >>>> As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>> uk.legal.moderated" >>> >>> What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his ability >>> to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated? >> >> That is a tautology. Moderators in ulm often make highly offensive remarks >> about our properly elected government which indicates their views are too >> extreme for them to have impartial views on other matters. The group seems >> to exist to pour socialist dogma down people's throats and whine about >> Brexit. > >Making highly offensive remarks about a properly elected government seems to >be a pretty normal activity in our democracy, whichever party is in power. > And highly offensive remarks from uk.legal.moderated moderators seems to be a pretty normal activity in that group. They act with impunity, posting stuff they wouldn't accept from non Guardian readers, Bryan Morris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Todal <the_todal@icloud.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 11:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17796 |
On 21/01/2023 10:30, Bryan Morris wrote: > In message <k31p6jFqcsjU1@mid.individual.net>, Roger Hayter > <roger@hayter.org> writes >> On 21 Jan 2023 at 08:41:48 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 21/01/2023 in message <k311g1Fms1bU3@mid.individual.net> Mike Fleming >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> As I asked "are you deemed worthy of being a moderator in >>>>> uk.legal.moderated" >>>> >>>> What have his very reasonable political views got to do with his >>>> ability >>>> to be a moderator in uk.legal.moderated? >>> >>> That is a tautology. Moderators in ulm often make highly offensive >>> remarks >>> about our properly elected government which indicates their views are >>> too >>> extreme for them to have impartial views on other matters. The group >>> seems >>> to exist to pour socialist dogma down people's throats and whine about >>> Brexit. >> >> Making highly offensive remarks about a properly elected government >> seems to >> be a pretty normal activity in our democracy, whichever party is in >> power. >> > > And highly offensive remarks from uk.legal.moderated moderators seems to > be a pretty normal activity in that group. > > They act with impunity, posting stuff they wouldn't accept from non > Guardian readers, > > Bryan Morris Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 11:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <xn0nx40s849xg9s00b@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17799 |
On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The Todal wrote: >Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen any. Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said in the quotes. -- Jeff Gaines Dorset UK There are 3 types of people in this world. Those who can count, and those who can't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 14:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrntsns3u.3rma.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> |
| In reply to | #17802 |
On 2023-01-21, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: > On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The Todal wrote: >>Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen any. > > Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said in the > quotes. Excellent, so this is your opportunity to explain what moderation policy or policies my post contravened.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bryan Morris <nospam@this.machine> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 14:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <WsYLjvMoL$yjFw2q@this.machine> |
| In reply to | #17807 |
In message <slrntsns3u.3rma.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >On 2023-01-21, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: >> On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The Todal wrote: >>>Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen any. >> >> Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said in the >> quotes. > >Excellent, so this is your opportunity to explain what moderation >policy or policies my post contravened. If you don't know you don't deserve to be a moderator -- Bryan Morris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-21 14:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <xn0nx45ke4gf3s000e@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #17809 |
On 21/01/2023 in message <WsYLjvMoL$yjFw2q@this.machine> Bryan Morris wrote: >In message <slrntsns3u.3rma.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>, Jon Ribbens ><jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes >>On 2023-01-21, Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote: >>>On 21/01/2023 in message <k31uuaFr523U1@mid.individual.net> The Todal >>>wrote: >>>>Please post some examples here. As many as you like. I've not seen any. >>> >>>Presumably that's a joke? Look at the example of what Ribbens said in the >>>quotes. >> >>Excellent, so this is your opportunity to explain what moderation >>policy or policies my post contravened. > >If you don't know you don't deserve to be a moderator Precisely. -- Jeff Gaines Dorset UK That's an amazing invention but who would ever want to use one of them? (President Hayes speaking to Alexander Graham Bell on the invention of the telephone)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | uk.net.news.management
csiph-web