Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #144207 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-05-16 13:54 +0000 |
| Last post | 2020-05-16 15:06 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.comp.sys.mac
Forums Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2020-05-16 13:54 +0000
Re: Forums Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2020-05-16 15:06 +0100
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-05-16 13:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Forums |
| Message-ID | <hia9l1F795vU5@mid.individual.net> |
I'm subscribed to a number of forums, with f'rinstance https://ifnotnil.com being a typical example. I have to say that their layout and navigation appear to me to be strange and haphazard. I compare them to phpBB that I used in earlier times, where it seemed a lot easier to see what threads there were, which ones had unread messages, and the whole set fitted onto one screen with ease (itself being smaller than modern screens, too). What has changed to make these more recent apparitions be preferred? -- Tim
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-05-16 15:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8En*zZ-Rx@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
| In reply to | #144207 |
Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: > I'm subscribed to a number of forums, with f'rinstance https://ifnotnil.com > being a typical example. I have to say that their layout and navigation appear > to me to be strange and haphazard. I compare them to phpBB that I used in > earlier times, where it seemed a lot easier to see what threads there were, > which ones had unread messages, and the whole set fitted onto one screen with > ease (itself being smaller than modern screens, too). What has changed to make > these more recent apparitions be preferred? That's Discourse. It's intended to be primarily a customer support channel - user asks a question, N replies, end of topic. It's currently fashionable, but it doesn't work very well as a general purpose discussion forum. Although it works better on mobiles than traditional phpBB, which tends towards tiny unclickable text or the avatars/signatures/etc waste a lot of space. Theo
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | uk.comp.sys.mac
csiph-web