Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #180705

Posting name is different! Who changed that?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 17/03/2025 23:43, David wrote:
> On 14/03/2025 20:31, David wrote:
>> On 14/03/2025 09:45, David wrote:
>>> *I asked ChatGPT* ......
>>>
>>> Can you explain what "etresoft" meant?
>>>
>>> etresoft
>>> User level: Level 9
>>> 53,118 points
>>>
>>> Posted on Mar 12, 2025 5:07 AM
>>>
>>>      kpavel wrote:
>>> If this update is critical for security
>>>
>>> *It isn't*.
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Here's the thread:- https://discussions.apple.com/thread/256004656? 
>>> sortBy=rank
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> ChatGPT said ....
>>>
>>> "Etresoft" is the developer name used by John Daniel, who created 
>>> EtreCheck — a macOS diagnostic tool designed to identify common 
>>> issues on Macs. On the Apple Support Communities (ASC) forums, 
>>> "etresoft" was also John Daniel's username. He was a frequent and 
>>> high-level contributor, often responding to users' technical 
>>> questions about macOS.
>>>
>>> His posts sometimes included recommendations to use EtreCheck to 
>>> generate system reports. However, his presence on ASC became 
>>> controversial due to concerns about how his posts were handled by 
>>> moderators, and there were reports of his content being manipulated.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you want to dive deeper into any part of this!
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> I asked - "Yes - why would he say that an update is NOT critical for 
>>> security?"
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> That’s a great question. When "etresoft" (John Daniel) said an update 
>>> wasn’t critical for security, it could have been for several reasons:
>>>
>>> 1. **Personal Opinion or Interpretation**: He might have believed 
>>> that the specific update didn't address any major vulnerabilities, so 
>>> it wasn’t urgent for users to install it right away. Sometimes 
>>> updates focus more on bug fixes or feature improvements than on 
>>> patching security holes.
>>>
>>> 2. **Lack of Immediate Threat**: If the update fixed a vulnerability 
>>> that wasn’t actively being exploited, he might have downplayed its 
>>> urgency. Security updates can patch theoretical risks, but not all of 
>>> them address active attacks.
>>>
>>> 3. **Misinformation or Bias**: Given the controversies surrounding 
>>> John Daniel, it’s possible he had his own agenda — perhaps trying to 
>>> appear authoritative or dismiss concerns without fully explaining the 
>>> risks.
>>>
>>> 4. **Apple's Lack of Transparency**: Sometimes, Apple releases 
>>> updates without clearly stating whether they fix security issues. If 
>>> etresoft didn’t have detailed information about what the update 
>>> fixed, he might have guessed it wasn’t critical.
>>>
>>> 5. **Encouraging Users to Rely on EtreCheck**: There’s a chance he 
>>> wanted users to depend more on his tool for diagnosing problems 
>>> rather than focusing on Apple’s updates. This could subtly push 
>>> people towards his software.
>>>
>>> It’s a bit suspicious to flat-out dismiss a security update without 
>>> explanation. Would you like me to check what that particular update 
>>> was about, or do you want to dig into his pattern of responses on ASC?
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> I said - "yes!".
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> On March 11, 2025, Apple released iOS 18.3.2 and iPadOS 18.3.2 to 
>>> address a critical WebKit vulnerability (CVE-2025-24201) that was 
>>> actively exploited in sophisticated attacks. This flaw allowed 
>>> malicious web content to bypass system security protections, posing a 
>>> significant risk to users. citeturn0search3
>>>
>>> Security experts emphasized the urgency of installing this update to 
>>> protect personal data and maintain device security. citeturn0search6
>>>
>>> Given the severity of the vulnerability, it's crucial to apply such 
>>> security updates promptly to safeguard against potential threats.
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Link to original conversation:- https://chatgpt.com/ 
>>> share/67d3f9a7-8fec-8013-a89f-b50bfb16a197
>>>
>>> If there is a simple explanation for the misinformation provided by 
>>> "etresoft", please let me know.
> 
>>
>> I'd really like to know WHY the thread was removed.
>>
>> Any ideas? ....... *anyone*?
> 
> RESULT!  :-D
> 
> *The question has been reinstated*!

"Pavlo" and "Pavel" are both given names that share the same origin.

     Pavlo (Павло) is the Ukrainian form of the name.
     Pavel (Павел) is the Russian, Bulgarian, Czech, Slovak, and Serbian 
form of the name.

Both names derive from the Latin Paulus, meaning "small" or "humble." 
They are essentially the same name but adapted to different languages 
and cultures.

Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Etresoft said ...... David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-14 09:45 +0000
  Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-14 20:31 +0000
    Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 13:34 -0700
    Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-03-14 21:28 +0000
      Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-03-14 22:24 +0000
        Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:37 -0700
        Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-15 08:55 +0000
      Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:36 -0700
      Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-14 23:04 +0000
        Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-03-15 00:45 +0000
          Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-15 08:42 +0000
            Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-03-16 00:10 +0000
              Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-03-16 12:09 +0000
              Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) David <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-04-08 09:19 +0100
    Re: Thread has been removed from the ASC forum (Was - Etresoft said ......) David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-17 23:43 +0000
      Posting name is different! Who changed that? David <David.is@home.today> - 2025-03-19 09:20 +0000

csiph-web