Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #146141
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.sys.mac |
| Subject | Re: iMac Refresh |
| Date | 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hp5oneF7uljU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <060820200830585327%nospam@nospam.invalid> <rghlnu$t73$1@gioia.aioe.org> <070820200905284583%nospam@nospam.invalid> <hp55g2F3s4pU2@mid.individual.net> <070820201520064390%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <hp55g2F3s4pU2@mid.individual.net>, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone like to talk me out of it? :-) >>>>> >>>>> it's *already* obsolete. >>>> >>>> In the sense that I expect it to work, to do the things I want it to do, it >>>> won't be obsolete for me. Or I suspect pretty much everyone else who buys >>>> one. >>>> And I'm not sure how something can become obsolete before the replacement >>>> is >>>> announced. >>> >>> it will certainly work, however, based on past transitions, it won't be >>> supported as long, won't be as fast and will have fewer features than >>> apple silicon macs. some software will require apple silicon, with no >>> intel counterpart. >> >> True. But if you buy a first generation Silicon Mac it will be superseded >> by more advanced ones later. Tech will keep moving forward. > > of course, but as usual, you miss the point. > > apple silicon is a *significant* step forward, not an incremental one. > > one simple example out of many is the ability to run ios apps on apple > silicon macs, something that's impossible on an intel mac, thereby > adding nearly 2 million apps to one's coffers. Did the voice in your head deny that feature? >>> the future is apple silicon. intel is the past (and in more ways than >>> one). >> >> There will also be future Intel Macs. Some were just released. > > nothing substantial and severely crippled by intel's incompetence, plus > any future intel macs have been in the pipeline for a while. Did the voice in your head say otherwise? >>> the only reason to buy an intel mac is if you absolutely need something >>> *now* and cannot wait under any circumstances (e.g., existing mac >>> failed and it must be replaced *today*), or for some reason, you need >>> to natively run both windows and mac os. >> >> I am happy you learned what I was telling you before about the Intel Macs >> almost surely handling running Windows better. Excellent! Nospam cannot handle that he learned. Oy. > get off your high horse and stop trolling, twisting and projecting. > >>>>> wait for apple silicon. >>>> >>>> Yes, I would have done if it was due in the next year. But really, I'm not >>>> that curious. >>> >>> the first apple silicon mac(s) will be released by the end of 2020, >>> likely announced in october, approximately 2.5 months from now. >> >> Sure. But not the whole range. Likely portables first. Maybe something >> else. > > nobody said the whole range. Did the voice in your head say someone did? > apple stated the transition would take two years. > > history indicates it will be complete in about one year, with the bulk > of it likely within six months. Fairly likely. Which would be great. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-06 06:16 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh bob <email@domain.com> - 2020-08-06 10:29 +0200
Re: iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-06 08:42 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-06 08:30 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh bob <email@domain.com> - 2020-08-06 16:51 +0200
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-06 12:53 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-06 17:26 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 09:05 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 14:06 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 15:20 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2020-08-06 21:11 +0100
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 09:05 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2020-08-07 23:27 +0100
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 19:36 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-06 19:30 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 08:41 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> - 2020-08-07 10:03 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 12:01 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 09:05 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 14:06 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 15:20 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-07 15:06 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 15:20 -0400
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh Ray <amos-jones@outlook.com> - 2020-08-08 07:25 +0000
Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-08 08:57 +0000
csiph-web