Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #588674 > unrolled thread

Candy issue requires physics :-)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-10 19:37 -0500
    Candy issue requires physics :-) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 17:42 -0700
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 20:40 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 22:26 -0500
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:28 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-13 10:11 -0500
            Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-16 15:17 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:13 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-10 22:36 -0400
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-07-10 23:22 -0400
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:40 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-11 03:03 +0000
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:45 -0500
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-13 20:46 -0700
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-14 09:06 -0500
            Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:03 -0700
    Re: Use the edge of a spoon to scrape off the foil. ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:42 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-07-14 07:59 -0700
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:24 -0700

#588674 — Candy issue requires physics :-)

I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
bit later I needed the glass container for something
else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#588675

Throw them out

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588681

On 7/10/2016 7:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
> bit later I needed the glass container for something
> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>

freeze one,
then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588693

On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/10/2016 7:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>
>
> freeze one,
> then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.
>

Let us know which solution works

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588943

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:26:39 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 7/10/2016 7:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>>
>>
>> freeze one,
>> then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.
>>
> 
> Let us know which solution works

Ok. Smashing it didn't help cause only the powdery
part comes off. The rest mostly are still stuck with
aluminum. But breaking it into four parts helped
reduce removal to about three minutes for each candy.
Still rather messy. Amazing how fast it absorbs
moisture.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589061

On 7/12/2016 3:28 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:26:39 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>
>> On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 7/10/2016 7:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>>>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>>>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>>>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>>>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>>>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>>>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>>>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>>>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>>>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>>>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>>>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>>>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>>>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>>>
>>>
>>> freeze one,
>>> then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.
>>>
>>
>> Let us know which solution works
>
> Ok. Smashing it didn't help cause only the powdery
> part comes off. The rest mostly are still stuck with
> aluminum. But breaking it into four parts helped
> reduce removal to about three minutes for each candy.
> Still rather messy. Amazing how fast it absorbs
> moisture.
>


hmm..

how about hard freezing, then put warm water on alu foil,  idea is the 
foil expansion from cold to warm would help seaperate it from still cold 
candy ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589566

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:11:22 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 7/12/2016 3:28 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:26:39 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 7/10/2016 7:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>>>>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>>>>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>>>>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>>>>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>>>>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>>>>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>>>>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>>>>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>>>>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>>>>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>>>>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>>>>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>>>>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>>>>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> freeze one,
>>>> then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Let us know which solution works
>>
>> Ok. Smashing it didn't help cause only the powdery
>> part comes off. The rest mostly are still stuck with
>> aluminum. But breaking it into four parts helped
>> reduce removal to about three minutes for each candy.
>> Still rather messy. Amazing how fast it absorbs
>> moisture.
>>
> 
> 
> hmm..
> 
> how about hard freezing, then put warm water on alu foil,  idea is the 
> foil expansion from cold to warm would help seaperate it from still cold 
> candy ?

I'll give that a try and will let you know. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588940

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:40:21 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> freeze one,
> then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.

You mean smash it into pieces? What's good about candy
if its smashed into pieces? I froze them and still the
aluminum wouldn't come apart. I'll break one to see if
that helps just for the heck of it. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588687

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:37:54 -0500, ClutterFreak wrote:

>I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>bit later I needed the glass container for something
>else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?

If you have any metal fillings, follow John's advice: "Throw them out"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588692

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:37:54 -0500, ClutterFreak wrote:

> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?

They must be really good if you spend over 1.5 hours for each piece.

I have never had this exact problem. Perhaps you will need to
experiment. Vacuum freeze drying might work.

Any chemicals I know of that can dissolve aluminum will have an adverse
effect on the flavour.

The only other thing I can think of would be to load up a sandblaster
with sugar.

-- 
http://mduffy.x10host.com/index.htm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588948

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 23:22:42 -0400, Mike Duffy wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:37:54 -0500, ClutterFreak wrote:
> 
>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
> 
> They must be really good if you spend over 1.5 hours for each piece.
> 

It meant to be 10 not 100 minutes

> I have never had this exact problem. Perhaps you will need to
> experiment. Vacuum freeze drying might work.
> 

I don't know how to do that. I tried desiccants and it
didn't help. Water has become part of a very thin
layer of candy surface turning it into glue, and it
doesn't let the water out no matter what. 

> Any chemicals I know of that can dissolve aluminum will have an adverse
> effect on the flavour.
> 
> The only other thing I can think of would be to load up a sandblaster
> with sugar.
> 

I don't have a sandblaster and turning aluminum into a
powdery thing mixed with air is probably not healthy. 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588695

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
> bit later I needed the glass container for something
> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?

Warm water.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588950

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:03:59 -0000,
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

> ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
> 
> Warm water.
> 
> 

This sounds promising. If it works then at least I'll
have the candy minus its original surface, scattered
separately on a plate in a form that I could still
call them candy, left to enjoy. I'll tell you if it
worked or not.  

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589177

<clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak"
who used to yodel his "Allah Akbar" as "ExcelFreak",
"BioFreak" or <"MathFreak"@FakeAddress.com> is
Mehram Maleki, aka Maldrecki, is the irate, black and
gay Iranian Islame Muslime, who cluttered:
>>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>>> candy last year ... I wrapped them individually with 
>>> aluminum foil. Then I found that the aluminum foil 
>>> are badly stuck with the candies and  to remove 
>>> them piece by piece requiring 100 to 15 minutes 
>>> of work for each. Do you know how I could expedite 
>>>  the removal of the foils?
>> 
hanson wrote:
The Iranian Govt Officials fuck with the US negotiators, 
Kerry et. al, in the sane genre and fashion as does poster
Maldrecki here in s.p.
For 3 days now the Iranain Islame Muslime Maldrecki, who
hates Westerners, Amis, Hindus, Buddhists, (even Sunnis) 
had a slew of well meaning but pitifully gullible poster going, 
who gave Maldrecki their loving advice on how to salvage a 
few bucks worth of candies... and fashion themselves to
be physicists and engineers... ROTFLMAO.... however... 
>
The juniors in the Solid State Operations Div of the org.
quickly went to our legal department and filed a patent
application ... "for use of (CHO)x, specifically Sucrose
solution, to create conversion coatings that act as the
interface between Aluminum surfaces and Paint 
on aircraft aluminum surfaces"  which are notoriously 
hard to get paint to stick to the aluminum properly.\
>
The patent app is filed as an enviro friendly substitute
for the currently used  toxic conversion coatings which
contain Fluorides and or Hex-Chrome components.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589210

On 7/13/2016 10:46 PM, hanson wrote:
> <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak"
> who used to yodel his "Allah Akbar" as "ExcelFreak",

> hanson wrote:
> The Iranian Govt Officials fuck with the US negotiators, Kerry et. al,
>

Kerry should be fucked by all, including camels,  he is a twit that 
married into rich and testified before congress in the 70's that he 
killed women and babies in Vietnam.

I congradulate All Iranian Govt Officials that boofooed Kerry, yes it is 
easy to do,

  but for what Kerry did to our Vietnam Vets, he need further rectal 
"treatments" and put in a home for Alzhimers with hillary the drunk.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589231

AHAHAHAHA... "Sergio" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> hanson wrote:
>> <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> "ClutterFreak"
>> who used to yodel his "Allah Akbar" as "ExcelFreak",
> 
>> hanson wrote:
>> The Iranian Govt Officials fuck with the US negotiators, Kerry et. al,
>>
"Sergio" wrote:
> Kerry should be fucked by all, including camels,  he is a twit that 
> married into rich and testified before congress in the 70's that he 
> killed women and babies in Vietnam.
> 
> I congradulate All Iranian Govt Officials that boofooed Kerry, yes it is 
> easy to do,
> 
>  but for what Kerry did to our Vietnam Vets, he need further rectal 
> "treatments" and put in a home for Alzhimers with hillary the drunk.
> 
hanson wrote:
.... ahahahahaha... That political  side-bar issue got you, Sarge, really
going up the banana tree. Understandably. Mind you though that the
Clusterfreaky Maldrecki hates and despises you and he will show it by 
giving you some of his candies... Muslimes always smile when they fuck
someone. Their Koran tells them to do so.
>
I though hope that reposting the following will crank & clutter Maldrecki.
>
The juniors in the Solid State Operations Div of the org.
quickly went to our legal department and filed a patent
application ... "for use of (CHO)x, specifically Sucrose
solution, to create conversion coatings that act as the
interface between Aluminum surfaces and Paint 
on aircraft aluminum surfaces"  which are notoriously 
hard to get paint to stick to the aluminum properly.
>
The patent app is filed as an enviro friendly substitute
for the currently used  toxic conversion coatings which
contain Fluorides and or Hex-Chrome components.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588949 — Re: Use the edge of a spoon to scrape off the foil.

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:41:15 -0700 (Seattle),
Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> Mr. Freak, 
> Use the edge of a spoon to scrape off the foil.

I've tried that (and knife, blade, etc). Very messy
and the pressure crushes the surface layer turning it
into a white opaque substance with aluminum mixed in
without being seen! Doesn't work.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589224

On 7/10/2016 5:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
> bit later I needed the glass container for something
> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
Stick yer noggin' down the shitter.
LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589236

"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> wrote:
> ClutterFreak, the Iranian Muslime Candyman, Maldrecki wrote:
>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>
"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" wrote:
> Maldrecki, Stick yer noggin' down the shitter. LOL
>
hanson wrote:
I love your 1-liner-commands. Military short-speak; especially 
when you referred to communist and free loader "Double-A" 
<double-a3@hush.com> as "Double-Asshole", ... who also
posts as "Abner Afterduft", the "Alcoholic Addict" & doubles 
as the criminal "Anon Yidd Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid>.
Thanks for the laughs, dude.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web