Re: Candy issue requires physics :-)

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Candy issue requires physics :-)
Date	2016-07-14 08:24 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nm8asc$re7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<1qhsih50b9xeb.1hbma9faw8mwj.dlg@40tude.net> <8NNhz.1608$qZ4.851@fx30.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> wrote:
> ClutterFreak, the Iranian Muslime Candyman, Maldrecki wrote:
>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>
"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" wrote:
> Maldrecki, Stick yer noggin' down the shitter. LOL
>
hanson wrote:
I love your 1-liner-commands. Military short-speak; especially 
when you referred to communist and free loader "Double-A" 
<double-a3@hush.com> as "Double-Asshole", ... who also
posts as "Abner Afterduft", the "Alcoholic Addict" & doubles 
as the criminal "Anon Yidd Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid>.
Thanks for the laughs, dude.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-10 19:37 -0500
  Candy issue requires physics :-) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 17:42 -0700
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 20:40 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 22:26 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:28 -0500
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-13 10:11 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-16 15:17 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:13 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-10 22:36 -0400
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-07-10 23:22 -0400
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:40 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-11 03:03 +0000
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:45 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-13 20:46 -0700
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-14 09:06 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:03 -0700
  Re: Use the edge of a spoon to scrape off the foil. ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:42 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-07-14 07:59 -0700
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:24 -0700

csiph-web