Re: Candy issue requires physics :-)

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Candy issue requires physics :-)
Date	2016-07-10 22:26 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nlv3le$78g$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<1qhsih50b9xeb.1hbma9faw8mwj.dlg@40tude.net> <nlute2$q0$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/10/2016 8:40 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/10/2016 7:37 PM, ClutterFreak wrote:
>> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
>> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
>> bit later I needed the glass container for something
>> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
>> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
>> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
>> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
>> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
>> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
>> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
>> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
>> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
>> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
>> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?
>>
>
> freeze one,
> then brake it apart with something to see if it flakes off the foil.
>

Let us know which solution works

Thread

Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-10 19:37 -0500
  Candy issue requires physics :-) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 17:42 -0700
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 20:40 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 22:26 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:28 -0500
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-13 10:11 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-16 15:17 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:13 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-10 22:36 -0400
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-07-10 23:22 -0400
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:40 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-11 03:03 +0000
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:45 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-13 20:46 -0700
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-14 09:06 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:03 -0700
  Re: Use the edge of a spoon to scrape off the foil. ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:42 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-07-14 07:59 -0700
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:24 -0700

csiph-web