Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #582302 > unrolled thread

King Tut

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:06 -0700
    King Tut john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:29 -0700
      King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:37 -0700
    Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 11:57 -0400
      Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:22 -0700
        Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:59 -0700
          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:29 -0700
            Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:52 -0700
              Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:03 -0700
                Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:21 -0700
                  Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:13 -0700
                    Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:31 -0700
                      Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:10 -0700
                        Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:49 -0700
                        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:13 -0400
                  Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:09 -0400
                    Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:25 -0700
                      Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:10 -0400
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:06 -0400
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:59 -0400
          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:21 -0700
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:14 -0400
          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:21 -0700
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:15 -0400
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:56 -0400
            Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:19 -0700
              Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0400
        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:45 -0400
      Re: King Tut Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-02 12:12 -0500
      Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-02 17:41 +0000
        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:04 -0400
          Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-02 23:57 +0000
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:20 -0400
              Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-03 02:28 +0000
    Re: King Tut Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-02 14:20 -0700
    Re: King Tut Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0700
      Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 22:36 -0700
        Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 01:33 -0500
        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 03:18 -0400
          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 04:13 -0700
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 09:44 -0400
              Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 07:33 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 10:45 -0400
          Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:10 -0700
            Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 17:13 -0500
              Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:07 -0700
              Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:44 -0700
                Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 19:22 -0500
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 00:00 -0400
                  Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:26 -0700
                    Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 13:44 -0400
                      Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 13:24 -0500
                      Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 11:39 -0700
                        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 23:12 -0400
                          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:09 -0700
                            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-05 12:15 -0400
              Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:55 -0400
                Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 11:16 -0500
                  Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 14:26 -0400
                    Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 14:52 -0500
                      Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 15:50 -0700
                        Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 18:29 -0500
                    Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 02:04 +0000
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:16 -0400
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:44 -0400
              Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:01 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 13:44 -0400
                  Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 11:38 -0700
                    Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 23:12 -0400
                      Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:02 -0700
                        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-05 12:13 -0400
                          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 12:07 -0700
                            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-06 00:53 -0400
                              Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 23:16 -0700
                                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-06 10:26 -0400
                                  Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:16 -0700
                                    Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-07 13:23 -0400

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#582393

Maple Lips
I have a right and or privilege to exist. Silence is no part of it. 

Come on bitchHVAC, I will set you straight, I'm in DC these days... 
Bring your tennis racket or that hulaHoop you wear... dance for me... 
------------

Holy shit...We used to use that instead of waterboarding on the hard cases.
(Just kidding, BJ)

Note: I fucking hate DC 

Hate

Burning hate for that city

Damn hippies

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582445

On 06/02/2016 04:21 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Maple Lips
> I have a right and or privilege to exist. Silence is no part of it.
>
> Come on bitchHVAC, I will set you straight, I'm in DC these days...
> Bring your tennis racket or that hulaHoop you wear... dance for me...
> ------------
>
> Holy shit...We used to use that instead of waterboarding on the hard cases.
> (Just kidding, BJ)
>
> Note: I fucking hate DC
>
> Hate
>
> Burning hate for that city
>
> Damn hippies

Come on, HVAC. DC has the FINEST homeless bums of ANY city in America.

Give them some credit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582394

Maple Lips
I have a right and or privilege to exist. Silence is no part of it. 

Come on bitchHVAC, I will set you straight, I'm in DC these days... 
Bring your tennis racket or that hulaHoop you wear... dance for me... 
------------

Holy shit...We used to use that instead of waterboarding on the hard cases.
(Just kidding, BJ)

Note: I fucking hate DC 

Hate

Burning hate for that city

Damn hippies

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582446

On 06/02/2016 04:21 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Maple Lips
> I have a right and or privilege to exist. Silence is no part of it.
>
> Come on bitchHVAC, I will set you straight, I'm in DC these days...
> Bring your tennis racket or that hulaHoop you wear... dance for me...
> ------------
>
> Holy shit...We used to use that instead of waterboarding on the hard cases.
> (Just kidding, BJ)
>
> Note: I fucking hate DC
>
> Hate
>
> Burning hate for that city
>
> Damn hippies
>

Server error 202 (repeat post)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582435

On 06/02/2016 12:59 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 12:22:19 PM UTC-4, HVAC wrote:
>> BJ quacked
>>
>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs
>> to be ridiculed and suppressed
>> -------------
>> Here we see a display of BJ's 'science'. On top of all the other
>> kooky shit, he also believes in ancient aliens.
>
> We? We who HVAC? Your imaginary readers/followers? Ancient aliens?
> You HVAC are just like a preacher that blah Blah BLAHs forever.
> Can I get a Selfie of you in a pink/purple miniskirt, thong optional.
>
>> Koo koo ca choo!
>
> Four pretty women, with perfect haircuts, in miniskirts with legs crossed
> surround a bald guy to gang bang... what's with women and bald gays?
>
> What other people believe is really not your concern/problem HVAC.
> Your problem/concern HVAC is that you are a brainDeadBitch. Period.
>
> Who in Hell ever said Teachers/Preachers/Politicians/... know best?!

Loops, HVAC is as ignorant as a box of hammers like all journalists.
He thinks he could build the pyramids today using modern methods. He'd 
be wrong. That just shows how little he knows of facts and how much he 
lives in a fantasy world like all journalists. So his fantasy is ancient 
aliens building things and the idea of an advanced civilization (like 
say ours) crashing and burning is way outside his fence even though he 
tries as hard as he can to help it happen. He has NO idea how near to 
instability high civilizations are. He's quite the moron and like 
Wormley may kill us all if anyone listens to him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582448

BJ quacked
So his fantasy is ancient 
aliens building things and the idea of an advanced civilization (like 
say ours) crashing and burning is way outside his fence even though he 
tries as hard as he can to help it happen. He has NO idea how near to 
instability high civilizations are. He's quite the moron and like 
Wormley may kill us all if anyone listens to him
-----------

Hahaha. You're a few fries short of a happy meal, BJ 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582457

On 06/02/2016 07:19 PM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
> So his fantasy is ancient
> aliens building things and the idea of an advanced civilization (like
> say ours) crashing and burning is way outside his fence even though he
> tries as hard as he can to help it happen. He has NO idea how near to
> instability high civilizations are. He's quite the moron and like
> Wormley may kill us all if anyone listens to him
> -----------
>
> Hahaha. You're a few fries short of a happy meal, BJ
>
As usual HVAC has nothing to say.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582430

On 06/02/2016 12:22 PM, HVAC drooled:
> BJ observed
> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to be ridiculed and suppressed
> -------------
>
> Here we see a display of BJ's 'science'. On top of all the other kooky shit, he also believes in ancient aliens.
>
> Koo koo ca choo!
>
As usual, Science Fiction authority, HVAC, sees "aliens" when nobody 
else ever mentioned them. Probably used his "ESP".

All life to him is "fiction".

Folks this is a guy who thinks a bathroom mirror works by "gravity"!
That is Herb Glazier level "science"!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582353

On 6/2/2016 10:57 AM, benj wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's
>> mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since
>> their discovery in the 1920s.
>>
>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along
>> with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>
>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be
>> meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used
>> X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's
>> knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal
>> Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other
>> meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>
>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic
>> iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the
>> article said
>
> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to
> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and
> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
>
>
>

That metorite, say some,was attracted directly by Tut's magnetic 
personality/field and zonked him in the noggin DOA.  To celebrate this 
event, his minions made him a cool knife and gave it to his after-life 
self. This event, say some, was the start of Global Worming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582356

benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
>>
>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>
>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>
>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said
> 
> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to 
> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and 
> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
 
What "Advanced technology" would that be?

Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want?

As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582439

On 06/02/2016 01:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
>>>
>>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>>
>>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>>
>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said
>>
>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to
>> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and
>> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
>
> What "Advanced technology" would that be?

That would be any technology that does not fit the pat, stone age, 
bronze age, iron age, story science sells. Ancient electric batteries 
would be an example or cyclopean walls. (The walls are pretty hard to 
hide, though but we got HVAC to ridicule anyone who tries to talk about 
them.

> Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want?
>
> As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end.

Thinks so? I take it you have never tried to publish a serious paper on 
a topic that is out of favor? Do you REALLY believe that science 
operates open and free of politics the way it's supposed to? You born 
yesterday?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582455

benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 01:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
>>>>
>>>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>>>
>>>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>>>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>>>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>>>
>>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>>>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said
>>>
>>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to
>>> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and
>>> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
>>
>> What "Advanced technology" would that be?
> 
> That would be any technology that does not fit the pat, stone age, 
> bronze age, iron age, story science sells. Ancient electric batteries 
> would be an example or cyclopean walls. (The walls are pretty hard to 
> hide, though but we got HVAC to ridicule anyone who tries to talk about 
> them.

Both ancient batteries and Cyclopean masonry are well known; try again.

>> Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want?
>>
>> As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end.
> 
> Thinks so? I take it you have never tried to publish a serious paper on 
> a topic that is out of favor? Do you REALLY believe that science 
> operates open and free of politics the way it's supposed to? You born 
> yesterday?

Have you ever seen anyone about your paranoia?

I take it by "out of favor" you mean things proven wrong.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582461

On 06/02/2016 07:57 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>> On 06/02/2016 01:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>>>> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>>>>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>>>>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>>>>
>>>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>>>>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said
>>>>
>>>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to
>>>> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and
>>>> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
>>>
>>> What "Advanced technology" would that be?
>>
>> That would be any technology that does not fit the pat, stone age,
>> bronze age, iron age, story science sells. Ancient electric batteries
>> would be an example or cyclopean walls. (The walls are pretty hard to
>> hide, though but we got HVAC to ridicule anyone who tries to talk about
>> them.
>
> Both ancient batteries and Cyclopean masonry are well known; try again.

Now, that the batteries have been accepted as dogma. Point is that 
before it's accepted suggesting ancient use of electricity would have 
gotten you haw far?  A big blast form HVAC would be about it. Cyclopean 
masonry all over the planet is obviously too big to hide, but it is 
dismissed without explaining the ancient technology used to produce it.

>>> Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want?
>>>
>>> As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end.
>>
>> Thinks so? I take it you have never tried to publish a serious paper on
>> a topic that is out of favor? Do you REALLY believe that science
>> operates open and free of politics the way it's supposed to? You born
>> yesterday?
>
> Have you ever seen anyone about your paranoia?

Paranoia?  What am I afraid of? You or HVAC not "liking" me?
How could that be important? Obviously you have not publishd anything 
significant.

> I take it by "out of favor" you mean things proven wrong.

I take it by "proven wrong" you mean has not been accepted and approved 
as allowable by the establishment. "Proven wrong" means that there is 
data and measurement to the contrary. "Out of favor" means those in 
authority do no approve of the idea with no data or measurements 
required. In fact, actual data or measurement or data that goes against 
the dogma is simply dismissed as "wrong"...usually without even reading it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582476

benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 07:57 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2016 01:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>>>>>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>>>>>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>>>>>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said
>>>>>
>>>>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to
>>>>> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and
>>>>> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
>>>>
>>>> What "Advanced technology" would that be?
>>>
>>> That would be any technology that does not fit the pat, stone age,
>>> bronze age, iron age, story science sells. Ancient electric batteries
>>> would be an example or cyclopean walls. (The walls are pretty hard to
>>> hide, though but we got HVAC to ridicule anyone who tries to talk about
>>> them.
>>
>> Both ancient batteries and Cyclopean masonry are well known; try again.
> 
> Now, that the batteries have been accepted as dogma.

Nope, not dogma, just established fact.

Just like the fact that your use of the word 'dogma' betrays you as a kook.

> Point is that 
> before it's accepted suggesting ancient use of electricity would have 
> gotten you haw far?  A big blast form HVAC would be about it.

Pure babble.

> Cyclopean 
> masonry all over the planet is obviously too big to hide, but it is 
> dismissed without explaining the ancient technology used to produce it.

No one has ever tried to hide it and how it is produced is trivial, well
understood, and still done today.

>>>> Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want?
>>>>
>>>> As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end.
>>>
>>> Thinks so? I take it you have never tried to publish a serious paper on
>>> a topic that is out of favor? Do you REALLY believe that science
>>> operates open and free of politics the way it's supposed to? You born
>>> yesterday?
>>
>> Have you ever seen anyone about your paranoia?
> 
> Paranoia?  What am I afraid of? You or HVAC not "liking" me?
> How could that be important? Obviously you have not publishd anything 
> significant.

Paranoid as in thinking someone is trying to hide something when no one
actually is.

>> I take it by "out of favor" you mean things proven wrong.
> 
> I take it by "proven wrong" you mean has not been accepted and approved 
> as allowable by the establishment. "Proven wrong" means that there is 
> data and measurement to the contrary.

Your first sentence demonstrates your paranoia.

Your second sentence is what I indeed meant before your paranoia took hold.

> "Out of favor" means those in 
> authority do no approve of the idea with no data or measurements 
> required. In fact, actual data or measurement or data that goes against 
> the dogma is simply dismissed as "wrong"...usually without even reading it.
 
Yet more paranoid babble: "those inauthority do no approve", "dogma".
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582410

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 4:06:47 AM UTC-7, HVAC wrote:
> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
> 
> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
> 
> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
> 
> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said


Nefertiti's tomb might be just behind a wall!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3514551/Does-King-Tutankhamun-s-tomb-hold-Queen-Nefertiti-s-remains-Radar-experts-cast-new-doubts-discovery-hidden-chambers.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nefertiti

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582482

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 9:06:47 PM UTC+10, HVAC wrote:
> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said

Given that bronze is better than iron for making daggers (NB: iron is not the same as hardened steel), functional superiority isn't why this dagger was made from iron. Nor was functional superiority why its partner was made from gold. "Sky-iron" is a classy metal, used to display wealth. (The gold dagger was probably the cheaper one of the pair.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582513

On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 8:09:24 PM UTC-7, Timo wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 9:06:47 PM UTC+10, HVAC wrote:
> > The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
> > "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron
> > for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article
> > said
> 
> Given that bronze is better than iron for making daggers (NB: iron is not the
> same as hardened steel),

  Well, it was typical meteoric alloy of iron, nickel, and cobalt but had no carbon, which is what makes steel steel.

> functional superiority isn't why this dagger was made from iron. Nor was
> functional superiority why its partner was made from gold. "Sky-iron" is a
> classy metal, used to display wealth.

  Rare always equals expensive, not to mention the then-important religious component of their politics.

> (The gold dagger was probably the cheaper one of the pair.)

  Yeah, probably, but I'm sure both were intended to be ceremonial rather than functional. I especially like the rock crystal pommel on the iron one:

http://swordsite.tumblr.com/post/108721846580/ancientegypt-egypt-pharoah-tutankhamen


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582518

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 22:36:44 -0700 (PDT), nuny@bid.nes
wrote:

> Yeah, probably, but I'm sure both were intended to be ceremonial 
> rather than functional. I especially like the rock crystal pommel 
> on the iron one:
> 
> http://swordsite.tumblr.com/post/108721846580/ancientegypt-egypt-pharoah-tutankhamen

How do you know that's rock crystal? May be they'd
discovered plastics too :) Or dried transparent rubber
from a rubber tree. And the iron blade seems to have
dried blood on it, possibly from an unfortunate
parochial man who'd caused him his last rage. 
--

     "doshmane dAnA ke ghame jAn bovad
      behtar az An dust ke nAdAn bovad"

                        - Nezami

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582523

On 06/03/2016 01:36 AM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 8:09:24 PM UTC-7, Timo wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 9:06:47 PM UTC+10, HVAC wrote:
>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using. "We
>>> suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to
>>> meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or
>>> ceremonial objects," the article said
>>
>> Given that bronze is better than iron for making daggers (NB: iron
>> is not the same as hardened steel),
>
> Well, it was typical meteoric alloy of iron, nickel, and cobalt but
> had no carbon, which is what makes steel steel.
>
>> functional superiority isn't why this dagger was made from iron.
>> Nor was functional superiority why its partner was made from gold.
>> "Sky-iron" is a classy metal, used to display wealth.
>
> Rare always equals expensive, not to mention the then-important
> religious component of their politics.
>
>> (The gold dagger was probably the cheaper one of the pair.)
>
> Yeah, probably, but I'm sure both were intended to be ceremonial
> rather than functional. I especially like the rock crystal pommel on
> the iron one:
>
> http://swordsite.tumblr.com/post/108721846580/ancientegypt-egypt-pharoah-tutankhamen

You sure it is quartz and not glass?  That would take some serious 
sanding. Of course there is plenty of evidence for advanced quartz 
carving technology in the ancient world. I refer you to the famous 
crystal skulls.

(HVAC believes they were carved by ancient astronauts)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#582528

BJ quacked
You sure it is quartz and not glass?  That would take some serious 
sanding. Of course there is plenty of evidence for advanced quartz 
carving technology in the ancient world. I refer you to the famous 
crystal skulls. 
-------------

I'm afraid that I've steered the SS BJ right off the cliff. While it has been my intention all along to point up how kooky BJ actually is, I honestly didn't mean to cause him to have the sort of mental breakdown seen here.

BJ from now on I'm going to ease off on the needling. I don't want to cause further damage to your emotional well being

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web