Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #582455
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: King Tut |
| Date | 2016-06-02 23:57 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kot62d-dpl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <39f9491c-8e0f-494c-badb-1d64b9318c32@googlegroups.com> <57505752$0$27588$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> <vn762d-9hj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5750bb85$0$59604$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> |
benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote: > On 06/02/2016 01:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote: >>> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s. >>>> >>>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites. >>>> >>>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used. >>>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science. >>>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin." >>>> >>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using. >>>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said >>> >>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to >>> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and >>> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology. >> >> What "Advanced technology" would that be? > > That would be any technology that does not fit the pat, stone age, > bronze age, iron age, story science sells. Ancient electric batteries > would be an example or cyclopean walls. (The walls are pretty hard to > hide, though but we got HVAC to ridicule anyone who tries to talk about > them. Both ancient batteries and Cyclopean masonry are well known; try again. >> Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want? >> >> As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end. > > Thinks so? I take it you have never tried to publish a serious paper on > a topic that is out of favor? Do you REALLY believe that science > operates open and free of politics the way it's supposed to? You born > yesterday? Have you ever seen anyone about your paranoia? I take it by "out of favor" you mean things proven wrong. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:06 -0700
King Tut john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:29 -0700
King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:37 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 11:57 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:22 -0700
Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:59 -0700
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:29 -0700
Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:52 -0700
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:03 -0700
Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:21 -0700
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:13 -0700
Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:31 -0700
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:10 -0700
Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:49 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:13 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:09 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:25 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:10 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:06 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:59 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:21 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:14 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:21 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:15 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:56 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:19 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:45 -0400
Re: King Tut Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-02 12:12 -0500
Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-02 17:41 +0000
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:04 -0400
Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-02 23:57 +0000
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:20 -0400
Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-03 02:28 +0000
Re: King Tut Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-02 14:20 -0700
Re: King Tut Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0700
Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 22:36 -0700
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 01:33 -0500
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 03:18 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 04:13 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 09:44 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 07:33 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 10:45 -0400
Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:10 -0700
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 17:13 -0500
Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:07 -0700
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:44 -0700
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 19:22 -0500
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 00:00 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:26 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 13:44 -0400
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 13:24 -0500
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 11:39 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 23:12 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:09 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-05 12:15 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:55 -0400
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 11:16 -0500
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 14:26 -0400
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 14:52 -0500
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 15:50 -0700
Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 18:29 -0500
Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 02:04 +0000
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:16 -0400
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:44 -0400
Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:01 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 13:44 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 11:38 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 23:12 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:02 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-05 12:13 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 12:07 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-06 00:53 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 23:16 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-06 10:26 -0400
Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:16 -0700
Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-07 13:23 -0400
csiph-web