Re: King Tut

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: King Tut
Date	2016-06-03 02:28 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ak672d-imm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <57505752$0$27588$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> <vn762d-9hj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5750bb85$0$59604$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com> <kot62d-dpl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5750cd4c$0$18147$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 07:57 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2016 01:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <nobodyxx@gmail> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/02/2016 07:06 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>>> Archaeologists and historians have been fascinated by King Tut's mummified remains and the mysterious objects found in his tomb since their discovery in the 1920s.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the past, scientists have claimed that an iron dagger, found along with a gold blade in King Tut's tomb, may have come from meteorites.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other ancient Egyptian iron artifacts have also been suspected to be meteoritic, since smelted iron was rarely used.
>>>>>> But now, researchers from Italy and the Egyptian Museum have used X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to accurately find out what King Tut's knife was made of, according to an article published in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
>>>>>> They found its makeup of iron, nickel and cobalt matched other meteorites in a database, and "strongly suggests its meteoritic origin."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The authors said the Egyptians knew what they were using.
>>>>>> "We suggest that ancient Egyptian attributed great value to meteoritic iron for the production of fine ornamental or ceremonial objects," the article said
>>>>>
>>>>> Advanced technology in prehistory is a "forbidden topic" that needs to
>>>>> be ridiculed and suppressed. The dagger should have been taken away and
>>>>> hidden in the basement with the other prehistoric technology.
>>>>
>>>> What "Advanced technology" would that be?
>>>
>>> That would be any technology that does not fit the pat, stone age,
>>> bronze age, iron age, story science sells. Ancient electric batteries
>>> would be an example or cyclopean walls. (The walls are pretty hard to
>>> hide, though but we got HVAC to ridicule anyone who tries to talk about
>>> them.
>>
>> Both ancient batteries and Cyclopean masonry are well known; try again.
> 
> Now, that the batteries have been accepted as dogma.

Nope, not dogma, just established fact.

Just like the fact that your use of the word 'dogma' betrays you as a kook.

> Point is that 
> before it's accepted suggesting ancient use of electricity would have 
> gotten you haw far?  A big blast form HVAC would be about it.

Pure babble.

> Cyclopean 
> masonry all over the planet is obviously too big to hide, but it is 
> dismissed without explaining the ancient technology used to produce it.

No one has ever tried to hide it and how it is produced is trivial, well
understood, and still done today.

>>>> Beating on something found on the ground until it is the shape you want?
>>>>
>>>> As for "forbidden topic", you really have gone off the deep end.
>>>
>>> Thinks so? I take it you have never tried to publish a serious paper on
>>> a topic that is out of favor? Do you REALLY believe that science
>>> operates open and free of politics the way it's supposed to? You born
>>> yesterday?
>>
>> Have you ever seen anyone about your paranoia?
> 
> Paranoia?  What am I afraid of? You or HVAC not "liking" me?
> How could that be important? Obviously you have not publishd anything 
> significant.

Paranoid as in thinking someone is trying to hide something when no one
actually is.

>> I take it by "out of favor" you mean things proven wrong.
> 
> I take it by "proven wrong" you mean has not been accepted and approved 
> as allowable by the establishment. "Proven wrong" means that there is 
> data and measurement to the contrary.

Your first sentence demonstrates your paranoia.

Your second sentence is what I indeed meant before your paranoia took hold.

> "Out of favor" means those in 
> authority do no approve of the idea with no data or measurements 
> required. In fact, actual data or measurement or data that goes against 
> the dogma is simply dismissed as "wrong"...usually without even reading it.
 
Yet more paranoid babble: "those inauthority do no approve", "dogma".
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:06 -0700
  King Tut john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:29 -0700
    King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 04:37 -0700
  Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 11:57 -0400
    Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:22 -0700
      Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 09:59 -0700
        Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:29 -0700
          Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 10:52 -0700
            Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:03 -0700
              Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:21 -0700
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:13 -0700
                Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 12:31 -0700
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:10 -0700
                Re: King Tut Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:49 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:13 -0400
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:09 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:25 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:10 -0400
              Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:06 -0400
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:59 -0400
        Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:21 -0700
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:14 -0400
        Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:21 -0700
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:15 -0400
        Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:56 -0400
          Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 16:19 -0700
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0400
      Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 18:45 -0400
    Re: King Tut Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-02 12:12 -0500
    Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-02 17:41 +0000
      Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 19:04 -0400
        Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-02 23:57 +0000
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-02 20:20 -0400
            Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-03 02:28 +0000
  Re: King Tut Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-02 14:20 -0700
  Re: King Tut Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-06-02 20:09 -0700
    Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 22:36 -0700
      Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 01:33 -0500
      Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 03:18 -0400
        Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 04:13 -0700
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 09:44 -0400
            Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 07:33 -0700
              Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 10:45 -0400
        Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 12:10 -0700
          Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 17:13 -0500
            Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:07 -0700
            Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 16:44 -0700
              Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-03 19:22 -0500
              Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 00:00 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:26 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 13:44 -0400
                Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 13:24 -0500
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 11:39 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 23:12 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:09 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-05 12:15 -0400
            Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:55 -0400
              Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 11:16 -0500
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 14:26 -0400
                Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 14:52 -0500
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 15:50 -0700
                Re: King Tut ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-04 18:29 -0500
                Re: King Tut jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-05 02:04 +0000
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:16 -0400
          Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-03 23:44 -0400
            Re: King Tut "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:01 -0700
              Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 13:44 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 11:38 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-04 23:12 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 00:02 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-05 12:13 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 12:07 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-06 00:53 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 23:16 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-06 10:26 -0400
                Re: King Tut HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:16 -0700
                Re: King Tut benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-07 13:23 -0400

csiph-web