Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #535584 > unrolled thread

Happy Thanksgiving

Started byHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-26 05:30 -0800
Last post2015-11-26 16:39 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 105 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Happy Thanksgiving HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 05:30 -0800
    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 09:10 -0600
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 07:44 -0800
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 17:51 +0000
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 12:00 -0600
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 11:29 -0800
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-26 18:27 -0600
    Re: Happy Thanksgiving benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:28 -0500
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 12:47 -0800
    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 21:01 +0000
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 15:31 -0600
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 22:19 +0000
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 16:41 -0600
            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 23:20 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 17:53 -0600
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 02:14 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 02:46 +0000
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 03:45 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 05:18 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-27 14:06 +0000
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 15:55 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 10:01 -0600
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 16:38 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-27 16:55 +0000
                        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 20:06 +0000
                          Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 20:32 +0000
                            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 20:56 +0000
                              Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 23:14 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-28 14:26 +0000
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-27 11:26 -0500
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-28 14:26 +0000
      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-26 17:08 -0500
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-26 22:24 +0000
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-26 18:50 -0500
            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 02:20 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-26 21:29 -0500
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-27 11:09 +0000
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 05:31 -0800
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:02 -0500
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-28 14:18 -0800
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 15:39 +0000
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 09:46 -0600
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 16:12 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 10:22 -0600
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-27 11:27 -0500
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-27 16:53 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 19:09 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-05 20:21 -0600
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 10:47 -0500
                    Re: Happy Thanksgiving Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> - 2015-11-27 16:25 +0000
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Edward Stansfield <stansfield5REM6@linuxmail.org> - 2015-11-27 11:27 -0500
                      Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 11:57 -0500
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-27 19:07 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 08:45 -0500
                Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 08:13 -0600
                  Re: Happy Thanksgiving benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 11:05 -0500
              Re: Free PCs. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-28 14:16 -0800
                Re: I prefer (urban) walking. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 10:17 -0800
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 10:40 -0800
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 03:10 -0500
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 05:16 -0800
                      Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 09:40 -0600
                        Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 09:35 -0800
                Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-30 14:28 -0800
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 18:59 -0800
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:06 -0500
                  Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 21:04 -0600
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:09 -0500
                    Re: .64 cents per cig, after tax/shipping. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 23:11 -0500
                    Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 07:36 -0500
                      Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 04:51 -0800
                        Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 18:10 -0500
                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 05:50 -0800
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-12-02 09:36 -0600
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:29 -0500
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-04 05:09 -0800
                                Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-04 15:13 -0500
                                  Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 10:16 -0800
                                    Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 14:15 -0500
                                      Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 17:06 -0800
                                        Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 20:30 -0500
                                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 05:28 -0800
                                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-06 08:56 -0500
                      Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 08:05 -0800
                        Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 08:48 -0800
                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:24 -0800
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:36 -0800
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:57 -0800
                                Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 10:04 -0800
                                  Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 10:27 -0800
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 09:37 -0800
                          Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 18:23 -0500
                            Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 05:53 -0800
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 06:36 -0800
                              Re: Usenet isn't just fun, it's funny. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 14:29 -0500
                    Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-01 14:39 -0800
                      Re: I prefer (urban) walking. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 16:54 -0600
                      Re: I prefer (urban) walking. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 16:52 -0800
                  Re: Lower eXpenses make me "richer". Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-12-01 14:37 -0800
                    Re: Lower eXpenses make me "richer". Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 16:57 -0600
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-26 21:26 -0500
            Re: Happy Thanksgiving Marly Parlor <lingdingwah@teachers.org> - 2015-11-27 16:35 +0000
              Re: Happy Thanksgiving Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 12:04 -0500
          Re: Happy Thanksgiving chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-30 08:26 -0600
        Re: Happy Thanksgiving Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 16:39 -0600

Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →


#535584 — Happy Thanksgiving

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 05:30 -0800
SubjectHappy Thanksgiving
Message-ID<86b1d9a8-ab58-495e-ac49-2e38abbcef84@googlegroups.com>
Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

Family, food, friends and football!

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#535613

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 09:10 -0600
Message-ID<Yp-dnWvnocN8vcrLnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#535584
On 11/26/15 7:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
>
> Family, food, friends and football!
>


   There are the haves and the have-nots. If you are a have, open your
   hearts and homes to the have-nots. The world will be a better place.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0XBXJjoXJ4



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535621

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 07:44 -0800
Message-ID<f85a86db-b33a-43f9-878a-b5af93e159d3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#535613
Well, I just handed out 3 cell phones with 200 minutes each to people at the soup kitchen.

Now it's on to thanksgiving dinner with my family.

I love Thanksgiving!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535655

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-26 17:51 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.26.17.51.31@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535613
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:10:25 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> 
> If you are a have, open your
> hearts and homes to the have-nots.
>

Well then get your guest room ready.  I have several Syrian refugees
that are looking for a sap ... er ... benefactor to provide them
with shelter and sustenance.

This will give you a chance to put your preaching into practice, for
all too often the golden words of the social progressive are nothing
more than just that, i.e. words.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535657

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-11-26 12:00 -0600
Message-ID<n37hch$1q1$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#535613
On 11/26/2015 9:10 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 11/26/15 7:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
>>
>> Family, food, friends and football!
>>
>
>
>    There are the haves and the have-nots. If you are a have, open your
>    hearts and homes to the have-nots. The world will be a better place.
>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0XBXJjoXJ4
>
>
>

roasting that turkey released 2,000 cubic feet of CO2, and release of 
heat raised the average global temperature of the earth by at least +1 * 
10^(-16) degree C causing even more HOT Global Worming!

and then the stuffing.........!

Extra point Question:
How much extra gas will be released ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535685

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 11:29 -0800
Message-ID<60187b69-252e-4722-8b52-83f9ec629c77@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#535657
On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 1:01:00 PM UTC-5, gilber34 wrote:
> On 11/26/2015 9:10 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 11/26/15 7:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
> >> Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
> >>
> >> Family, food, friends and football!
> >
> >    There are the haves and the have-nots. If you are a have, open your
> >    hearts and homes to the have-nots. The world will be a better place.
> >
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0XBXJjoXJ4
> 
> roasting that turkey released 2,000 cubic feet of CO2, and release of 
> heat raised the average global temperature of the earth by at least +1 * 
> 10^(-16) degree C causing even more HOT Global Worming!
> 
> and then the stuffing.........!
> 
> Extra point Question:
> How much extra gas will be released ?

Turkey is good for shooting down plane Russian birds?!

-- Mahipal "IPMM... When all I've got is one joke Joke JOKE?!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535764

Fromgilber34 <fafa@invalid.com>
Date2015-11-26 18:27 -0600
Message-ID<n38824$4n8$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#535685
On 11/26/2015 1:29 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 1:01:00 PM UTC-5, gilber34 wrote:
>> On 11/26/2015 9:10 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> On 11/26/15 7:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>> Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
>>>>
>>>> Family, food, friends and football!
>>>
>>>     There are the haves and the have-nots. If you are a have, open your
>>>     hearts and homes to the have-nots. The world will be a better place.
>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0XBXJjoXJ4
>>
>> roasting that turkey released 2,000 cubic feet of CO2, and release of
>> heat raised the average global temperature of the earth by at least +1 *
>> 10^(-16) degree C causing even more HOT Global Worming!
>>
>> and then the stuffing.........!
>>
>> Extra point Question:
>> How much extra gas will be released ?
>
> Turkey is good for shooting down plane Russian birds?!
>
> -- Mahipal "IPMM... When all I've got is one joke Joke JOKE?!"
>

bird had too much stuffing to fly correctly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535638

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 12:28 -0500
Message-ID<4jH5y.213740$nL.133407@fx25.iad>
In reply to#535584
On 11/26/2015 08:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
>
> Family, food, friends and football!

Which in HVAC's case is reduced to just food and football.

Just kidding Harlow!  You know we really love you!

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone, even to you!



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535707

From"nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 12:47 -0800
Message-ID<fd5a1d77-e4f5-4f66-88f2-91d363067bc4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#535638
On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 9:28:39 AM UTC-8, benj wrote:
> On 11/26/2015 08:30 AM, HVAC wrote:
> > Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
> >
> > Family, food, friends and football!

  Football, meh. I'm a WWE fan. Smackdown, baby!

  Three out of four ain't bad though.

> Which in HVAC's case is reduced to just food and football.
> 
> Just kidding Harlow!  You know we really love you!

  For some, online friends are the only ones they have.

> Happy Thanksgiving to everyone, even to you!

  Oh, and since you and HV can't stop tossing "gay" at each other:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/11/19/george-takei-seven-things-am-thankful-for.html


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535709

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-26 21:01 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.26.21.02.00@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535584
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:30:19 -0800, HVAC wrote:

> ...
> 

We are thankful, immeasurably, for the GNU/Linux OS.

We also give a big "Fsck You!" to MS Windows, Apple,
and all of their adherents.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535713

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 15:31 -0600
Message-ID<krCdnccc0_ig58rLnZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#535709
On 11/26/15 3:01 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> We are thankful, immeasurably, for the GNU/Linux OS.


   1988
     Unix (SGI, DEC)
   2000
     Linux (Redhat)
   2007
     Apple Unix
   Present

   Those environments are so similar -- What's the point of knocking
   one over the other?


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535728

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-26 22:19 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.26.22.18.07@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535713
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:31:41 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> 
> What's the point of knocking
> one over the other?
>

Unix --> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Apple --> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

GNU/Linux -->	Free(dom) and Choice and everything else that
		appeals to a sophisticated modern computer user.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535735

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 16:41 -0600
Message-ID<krCdnf4c0_gdF8rLnZ2dnUU7-L8AAAAA@giganews.com>
In reply to#535728
On 11/26/15 4:19 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:31:41 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>
>> What's the point of knocking
>> one over the other?
>>
>
> Unix --> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
> Apple --> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
>
> GNU/Linux -->	Free(dom) and Choice and everything else that
> 		appeals to a sophisticated modern computer user.
>


   Give us a cost estimate for equal performance systems using these
   three OSs.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535743

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-26 23:20 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.26.23.20.50@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535735
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:41:04 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> 
> a cost estimate for equal performance systems
>

Equal performance?  What does that mean?

Intrinsically, there is no difference, but the nearly infinite
configurability of a GNU/Linux system can potentially achieve
greater performance with respect to many specific situations
(e.g. real-time processing).

Greater performance in off-the-shelf software may be seen
in MSFT/Apple products but that is only because these companies,
and those that support them, refuse to program in universal
standards.  Indeed, their staff programmers have not the
competence to do so.

By this time in computing history, software should have
become a commodity, but both MSFT and Apple continue to
build their exclusionary "walled gardens."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535756

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-26 17:53 -0600
Message-ID<krCdnfQc0_jzBsrLnZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#535743
On 11/26/15 5:20 PM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:41:04 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>
>> a cost estimate for equal performance systems
>>
>
> Equal performance?  What does that mean?
>
> Intrinsically, there is no difference, but the nearly infinite
> configurability of a GNU/Linux system can potentially achieve
> greater performance with respect to many specific situations
> (e.g. real-time processing).
>
> Greater performance in off-the-shelf software may be seen
> in MSFT/Apple products but that is only because these companies,
> and those that support them, refuse to program in universal
> standards.  Indeed, their staff programmers have not the
> competence to do so.
>
> By this time in computing history, software should have
> become a commodity, but both MSFT and Apple continue to
> build their exclusionary "walled gardens."
>

   How much of the market do these "walled gardens" have, and why?


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535808

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-27 02:14 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.27.02.14.39@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535756
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:53:18 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

> 
> How much of the market do these "walled gardens" have, and why?
>

Of course, MSFT/Apple enjoy the vast majority of the market
share.

Why?  Because the average computer user, both individual and
corporate, is a PROFOUND IDIOT that understands little about
computing beyond pointing and clicking. 

GNU/Linux, however, in spite of having virtually no advertising,
marketing, or public relations dollars behind it has attracted
a significant following of users based on its competence as
as OS alone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535826

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-11-27 02:46 +0000
Message-ID<tpskic-e85.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#535808
Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:53:18 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
>> 
>> How much of the market do these "walled gardens" have, and why?
>>
> 
> Of course, MSFT/Apple enjoy the vast majority of the market
> share.
> 
> Why?  Because the average computer user, both individual and
> corporate, is a PROFOUND IDIOT that understands little about
> computing beyond pointing and clicking. 

A user has no need to understand anything other than the operation
of the applications they use just as the driver of a car doesn't
have to understand anything about a car other than the operation.



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535832

FromLester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info>
Date2015-11-27 03:45 +0000
Message-ID<pan.2015.11.27.03.44.08@thorpe.info>
In reply to#535826
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 02:46:53 +0000, jimp wrote:

> 
> A user has no need to understand
>

One must distinguish between a computer user from a software user.

A computer user MUST understand.  A software user does not
need to understand.

MSFT/Apple are designed largely for software users.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535842

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-11-27 05:18 +0000
Message-ID<9l5lic-526.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#535832
Lester Thorpe <lt11@thorpe.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 02:46:53 +0000, jimp wrote:
> 
>> 
>> A user has no need to understand
>>
> 
> One must distinguish between a computer user from a software user.
> 
> A computer user MUST understand.  A software user does not
> need to understand.

Well, that depends on what you mean by "user", doesn't it?

If someone is using the computer as a paper weight, they have no need
to understand anything about it.

If someone is using the computer to run applicatons, they have no need
to understand anything about it.

If someone is using the computer as a software development platform,
they do usually need to know a little something about it, but not very
much in this day and age of high level languages. High level languages
hide most all of the underlying details and that is as it should be.

> MSFT/Apple are designed largely for software users.
 
As that is where the major market for computers is, what else would you
expect?

Long gone are the days when everything was in assembly and you had to
toggle in the boot loader on the front panel to load the secondary
boot from paper tape.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#535880

Fromjmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com>
Date2015-11-27 14:06 +0000
Message-ID<PM000525865ABF4F2A@aca42324.ipt.aol.com>
In reply to#535743
Lester Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:41:04 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>
>> a cost estimate for equal performance systems
>>
>
> Equal performance?  What does that mean?
>
> Intrinsically, there is no difference, but the nearly infinite
> configurability of a GNU/Linux system can potentially achieve
> greater performance with respect to many specific situations
> (e.g. real-time processing).
>
> Greater performance in off-the-shelf software may be seen
> in MSFT/Apple products but that is only because these companies,
> and those that support them, refuse to program in universal
> standards.  Indeed, their staff programmers have not the
> competence to do so.
>
> By this time in computing history, software should have
> become a commodity, but both MSFT and Apple continue to
> build their exclusionary "walled gardens."
>
A system owner who uses the computer as a tool does not
want, nor need, to know about anything other than how
to use the app(s) s/he needs to get the work done.
They do not want, nor need, to know how to install patches.
MS and Apple provide that service.

With the advent of the PC, human computer users had to learn
about hard/software and do the work which system analysts,
operators, field servants, computer administrators, network
support groups, purchasing, and other work related to
keeping a computer system functional.  Requiring thses
same people to know monitor, compiler, and app internals
is too much.  Anyone who denigrates system owners who don't
know about machine language is a snob and, therefore,
cannot be a good OS, compiler, or app developer because
of an incapability of knowing what their customers need.

/BAH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 6  [1] 2 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web