Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #722301 > unrolled thread

AP's physics thoughts as of 5JAN2019// so this year is the new edition of Atom Totality-- especially increase the radioactivity discussion

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  AP's physics thoughts as of 5JAN2019// so this year is the new edition of Atom Totality-- especially increase the radioactivity discussion Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 19:33 -0800
    AP's physics thoughts as of 5JAN2019// so this year is the new edition of Atom Totality-- especially increase the radioactivity discussion Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 21:07 -0800
      Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-06 05:55 +0000
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-06 06:28 +0000
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 00:17 +0000

#722301 — AP's physics thoughts as of 5JAN2019// so this year is the new edition of Atom Totality-- especially increase the radioactivity discussion

Last night I noticed my compass needle from decades ago, and noticed it glowed in the dark.

So I do not know what element is that radioactive light.

But with the new found knowledge-- proton = 840MeV with electron=muon=105MeV and that tiny particle JJ Thomson discovered is not the electron but is a Dirac magnetic monopole. Monopoles can come in various sizes and in charge of neutral, or open charge or closed charge. 

0 or +1 charge is Open charge

-1 charge is Closed charge

In New Physics we have no negative numbers at all.

We have to rewrite all of Radioactivity of Old Physics. It is not the electron that is emitted for the electron = muon is busy with its attendant proton in doing the Faraday Law of producing new magnetic monopoles.

If Radioactivity really involved the electrons of atoms, then the atoms would decay in a matter of hours or days, faster than a battery decays. But instead, radioactive atoms are producing magnetic monopoles and emit these monopoles and thus we see a glow of light in the dark. This is the reason a subtance like radium glows in the dark for thousands and thousands of years-- because the glow is the turning of Space into magnetic monopoles in the Faraday Law of muon thrusting through its attendant proton.

When you look back at physics history to Becquerel then Curie then others, and think that radioactivity is the emission of electrons of atoms, is really really a goofy idea. Because if the electrons of atoms are so easily lost, then then atoms themselves are easily dissolved into lower atomic elements. You would have radium melt into lead in front of your eyes as you see butter melt into a liquid in the hot day sun.

The longevity of Radioactivity is explained by the fact that muons and their attendant protons are doing a Faraday Law producing .5MeV particles which then are emitted and allows the atoms to emit forever without decay.

AP


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#722312

If beta decay were the true electron of atoms in decay, then you soon would have the dissolution of all atoms.

The true electron inside atoms is the muon and it never leaves its attendant proton, but rather performs a Faraday law by thrusting though the proton and converting space into a magnetic monopole. This monopole is that glow in the dark of radioactivity.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722317 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137

>No progress, none at all

Of course not. You started off with a conclusion and are trying to find
any proof of the conclusion. A real mathematician or scientist would
start off with a hypothesis and look for evidence that the hypothesis
is either false or true.

That is why the governor of South Dakota has declared that Archimedes 
Plutonium is the official State Math and Physics Failure of South Dakota.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722324 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: AP's physics thoughts as of 5JAN2019// so this year is the new edition of Atom Totality-- especially increase the radioactivity discussion

>Last night I noticed my compass needle from decades ago, and noticed it glowed in the dark.

>but is a Dirac magnetic monopole. Monopoles can come in various sizes and 
>in charge of neutral, or open charge or closed charge.

>0 or +1 charge is Open charge

>-1 charge is Closed charge
>In New Physics we have no negative numbers at all.

So why did you decide to come up with this spectacular failure?

It seems that standard positive and negative charges work out just fine
because the math of negative numbers can be used. Otherwise we would be
left with stupidities like this: "Open + Closed = 0". How dumb and stoopid
is that?  Fortunately, you are a Nobody of Physics and no actual
scientist would ever do anything as dumb and stoopid as that.

>We have to rewrite all of Radioactivity of Old Physics.

Again, "we"??? Don't you think that walking around with a mouse in your
pocket is a bad idea? Why don't you give it to one of your cats?
I didn't know that your mouse could write, either. Do you have a tiny
keyboard for it or does it use a teeny tiny pen and paper?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#722445 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:28:12 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure

No, no, no. I already told you you have to quote properly. It is supposed to be:
>>Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

And again I see you are still too dumb and stoopid to not attack me.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web