Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Date | 2019-01-06 05:55 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <q0s590$m0u$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <9cd9cb9f-de10-465a-a9f7-61cf80b93df1@googlegroups.com> <f14b3fed-8aee-4069-b955-10a68825d281@googlegroups.com> <a9fc89fb-2d94-4fe1-a1de-768cd83791f2@googlegroups.com> <c7bb0ee8-54f6-43b8-b0b5-56ef4ebda510@googlegroups.com> <da43b2a3-4ec5-4850-8d82-e09fa6668a93@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Subject: Re: researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 >No progress, none at all Of course not. You started off with a conclusion and are trying to find any proof of the conclusion. A real mathematician or scientist would start off with a hypothesis and look for evidence that the hypothesis is either false or true. That is why the governor of South Dakota has declared that Archimedes Plutonium is the official State Math and Physics Failure of South Dakota.
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
AP's thoughts as of 5JAN2019// three proofs that ellipse is never a conic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 07:19 -0800
Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-05 17:48 +0000
Re: Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-01-05 18:58 +0000
Re: Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-05 19:44 +0000
Re: Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:15 +0000
Re: Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-01-07 03:15 +0000
Re: Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 04:44 +0000
Re: Legitimate geometry question on cone-plane intersection Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-05 20:13 +0000
My third proof ellipse is never a conic is that the tip end of cone and bottom flared-out end can never yield a 1000to1 ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 13:44 -0800
try wrapping a ellipse in a cone wrapper Re: My third proof ellipse is never a conic is that the tip end of cone and bottom flared-out end can never yield a 1000to1 ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 14:24 -0800
Re: try wrapping a ellipse in a cone wrapper Re: My third proof ellipse is never a conic is that the tip end of cone and bottom flared-out end can never yield a 1000to1 ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 14:40 -0800
researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 17:37 -0800
researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 21:13 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-06 05:55 +0000
not even a constant percentage in the rectangles Re: researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 21:59 -0800
no percentage formula Re: researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 22:14 -0800
not even rectangles Re: no percentage formula Re: researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 23:02 -0800
directrix Re: not even rectangles Re: no percentage formula Re: researching if the ellipse has an internal universal constant of 1/137 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 23:34 -0800
understanding the Ellipse well,is the same as understanding angular momentum of physics well Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-05 23:51 -0800
Re: understanding the Ellipse well,is the same as understanding angular momentum of physics well Me <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 03:10 -0800
Re: My third proof ellipse is never a conic is that the tip end of cone and bottom flared-out end can never yield a 1000to1 ellipse Me <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 03:08 -0800
Re: My third proof ellipse is never a conic is that the tip end of cone and bottom flared-out end can never yield a 1000to1 ellipse Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-01-06 11:17 +0000
Re: My third proof ellipse is never a conic is that the tip end of cone and bottom flared-out end can never yield a 1000to1 ellipse moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-06 18:42 +0000
Re: AP's thoughts as of 5JAN2019// three proofs that ellipse is never a conic Jan <filmart@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 21:47 -0800
csiph-web