Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #564067 > unrolled thread

Re: Fazer maths for fakey

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 06:44 +0100
    Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 14:50 +0800
      Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:36 +0100
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:22 -0400
          Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:36 +0100
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 11:27 -0600
          Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:38 -0400
          Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:01 +0100
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:42 +0800
          Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:47 +0100
            Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 15:19 +0800
              Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 03:50 -0400
                Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:02 +0800
                  Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 12:54 -0400
              Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:21 +0100
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0000

#564067 — Re: Fazer maths for fakey

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:gcsteblrjrit1gqf0r1cn46ptt90b899em@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> For Ersatzietta's benefit, here is how to calculate the L-L
> potential difference from two phases of 3-phase 120v RMS
> L-N, using simple phasor arithmetic.
> 
> Everyone but fakey may ignore this poast, as you are either
> totally not interested, or you understand this already.
> 
> Let A be the amplitude of PhaseA and PhaseB.
>     A = 120v * sqrt(2)
> 
> Let Va and Vb be the voltages of PhaseA and PhaseB:
>     Va = A sin(wt),
>     Vb = A sin(wt - 120°)
>      (keeping with the convention that Va leads Vb leads Vc)
>   or, in phasor notation,
>     Va = A < 0°,
>     Vb = A < -120°
> 
> Let x^ and y^ be the unit vectors in the x and y directions.
> Let w = omega = angular frequency = 2 pi (60 hz)
> 
> Calculate Vab, the L-L potential DIFFERENCE (hello?) between
> L-N voltages Va and Vb.
> 
> Vab = Va - Vb
>     = A<0° - A<-120°
> convert from polar to rectangular coordinates:
>   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
>   = A[1 x^ + 0 y^] - A[-½ x^ - ½ sqrt(3) y^]
> perform the subtraction:
>   = A[1.5 x^ + ½ sqrt(3) y^]
> convert back to polar coordinates:
>   the magnitude is
>     A sqrt{x² + y²}
>   = A sqrt{[1.5]² + [½ sqrt(3)]²}
>   = A sqrt{2.25 + 0.25(3)}
>   = A sqrt{3}
>   the phase angle is
>     arctan{y/x}
>   = arctan{[½ sqrt(3)] / 1.5}
>   = arctan{[sqrt(3)] / 3}
>   = arctan{1 / sqrt(3)}
>   = +30°
> So, therefore,
> Vab    =  A sqrt(3) < 30°
>        =  120v sqrt(2) sqrt(3) < 30°
>        = ~207.8v RMS < 30°
>        = ~293.9v sin(wt + 30°)
> 
> Ding ding ding!
> 
> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
> 
> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
> 
> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.

Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.

So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.

Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:

\left(170\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot
x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)+\frac{\left(170\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)+170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi
\cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)}{\left(2\right)}

SPNAK!

Still can't fathom how constructive and destructive interference
works, huh, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard.

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at 
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping 
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like 
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he 
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because 
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line 
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical 
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal 
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to 
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called 
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the 
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity 
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and 
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and 
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for 
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on 
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition 
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits 
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's 
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum 
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two 
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third 
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always 
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show 
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple 
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave 
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the 
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the 
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line 
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87 
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result 
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh... 
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at 
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave 
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably 
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge 
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been 
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your 
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you 
bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#564081

Fakey wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

> > Ding ding ding!
> > 
> > No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
> > 
> > No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
> > 
> > Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.
> 
> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
> 
> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.

Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
undergrad also did it right.

But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.

> Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
> produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
> You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:

What you've been graphing all along... Lol.  You have been
graphing wrong sinewaves for weeks now.  The fact that you
finally got one graph right is pretty much expected, being a
broken clock is right twice a day etc...

Did you solve for 'd' yet, snickerturd?  ROFL... you are
never going to live that one down, ignoramus.

-- 
"But a derivative is dy/dx, you halfwitted Mathematical
Moron. So one would *have* to solve for 'd' in your moronic
equation because it's not a derivative, but you didn't
define 'd'"
  --Fakezoid bleats his unabashed ignorance

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564156

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:cv5veb10d8mtp9tc8odj60icgkvepf8sca@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

>>> Ding ding ding!
>>> 
>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.

He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

Yeah, folks, he's Shiny Tinfoil Brain, Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
LOL

>>> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
>>> 
>>> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.

>> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
>> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
>> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
>> 
>> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.

> Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
> the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
> undergrad also did it right.
> 
> But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
> know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.

Except I did, Moron. I've been correctly graphing it all along,
starting with the 170 volt peak L-N, deriving the 120 volt RMS L-N
from that, and deriving the 208 volt RMS L-L from that. I note you've
thus far failed to produce even one graph, Mathematical Moron. LOL

>> Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
>> produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
>> You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:

> What you've been graphing all along... Lol.  You have been
> graphing wrong sinewaves for weeks now.  The fact that you
> finally got one graph right is pretty much expected, being a
> broken clock is right twice a day etc...

Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
(akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
*primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
*primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.

> Did you solve for 'd' yet, snickerturd?  ROFL... you are
> never going to live that one down, ignoramus.

You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).

Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.

And you did it all while you're backpedaling away from having defended
DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation for a month, because
you're the moron who *still* can't grasp constructive and destructive
interference.

So your blather is just your attempt at diverting attention away from
your being a Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at 
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping 
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like 
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he 
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because 
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line 
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical 
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal 
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to 
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called 
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the 
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity 
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and 
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and 
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for 
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on 
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition 
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits 
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's 
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum 
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two 
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third 
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always 
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show 
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple 
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave 
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the 
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the 
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line 
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87 
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result 
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh... 
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at 
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave 
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably 
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge 
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been 
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your 
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you 
bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUNNNNN!!!!

Bwahahahahaaaa!

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564189

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:36:38 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> <news:cv5veb10d8mtp9tc8odj60icgkvepf8sca@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
>
>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>
>>>> Ding ding ding!
>>>>
>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
>
> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

the one i've been using for three months?  LOL

>
> Yeah, folks, he's Shiny Tinfoil Brain, Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
> LOL
>
>>>> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
>>>>
>>>> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.
>
>>> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
>>> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
>>> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
>>>
>>> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.
>
>> Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
>> the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
>> undergrad also did it right.
>>
>> But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
>> know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.
>
> Except I did, Moron. I've been correctly graphing it all along,
> starting with the 170 volt peak L-N, deriving the 120 volt RMS L-N
> from that, and deriving the 208 volt RMS L-L from that. I note you've
> thus far failed to produce even one graph, Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
>>> Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
>>> produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
>>> You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:
>
>> What you've been graphing all along... Lol.  You have been
>> graphing wrong sinewaves for weeks now.  The fact that you
>> finally got one graph right is pretty much expected, being a
>> broken clock is right twice a day etc...
>
> Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
> who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
> (akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
> of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
> is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
> or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
> *primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
> *primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
> volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
> how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.
>
>> Did you solve for 'd' yet, snickerturd?  ROFL... you are
>> never going to live that one down, ignoramus.
>
> You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).
>
> Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
> shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.
>
> And you did it all while you're backpedaling away from having defended
> DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation for a month, because
> you're the moron who *still* can't grasp constructive and destructive
> interference.
>
> So your blather is just your attempt at diverting attention away from
> your being a Mathematical Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
> a coward and ran away from.
>
> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>
> <snicker>
>
> ===============================================================
> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>
> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
> =====================================================
> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
> components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal
> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
> =====================================================
>
> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
> this topic...
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>
> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>
> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
> will hopefully understand...
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>
> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
> Blue: Red + Green
>
> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>
> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
> equal zero.
>
> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>
> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
> Red and the Green lines.
>
> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
> volts.
>
> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
> that point on the X axis.
>
> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>
> But wait! It gets even better!
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>
> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>
> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>
> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>
> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>
> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
> moronic asses across Usenet.
>
> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>
> SPNAK!
>
> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>
> <snicker>
>
> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
> formulas used:
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>
> SPNAK!
>
> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>
> <snicker>
> ===============================================================
>
> You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you
> bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>
> <snicker>
>
> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUNNNNN!!!!
>
> Bwahahahahaaaa!
>


-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564378

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yeoqkbc4tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:36:38 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>> <news:cv5veb10d8mtp9tc8odj60icgkvepf8sca@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
>> first into the wood chipper again:

>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

>>>>> Ding ding ding!
>>>>>
>>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.

>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

> the one i've been using for three months?  LOL

Wrong. Whereas the Euler sinewave summation equation has been in use
by scientists and engineers since 1748, your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation has been in use for only three months and by only
one thoroughly confused Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL

>> Yeah, folks, he's Shiny Tinfoil Brain, Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
>> LOL

>>>>> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
>>>>>
>>>>> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.

>>>> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
>>>> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
>>>> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
>>>>
>>>> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.

>>> Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
>>> the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
>>> undergrad also did it right.
>>>
>>> But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
>>> know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.

>> Except I did, Moron. I've been correctly graphing it all along,
>> starting with the 170 volt peak L-N, deriving the 120 volt RMS L-N
>> from that, and deriving the 208 volt RMS L-L from that. I note you've
>> thus far failed to produce even one graph, Mathematical Moron. LOL

>>>> Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
>>>> produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
>>>> You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:

>>> What you've been graphing all along... Lol.  You have been
>>> graphing wrong sinewaves for weeks now.  The fact that you
>>> finally got one graph right is pretty much expected, being a
>>> broken clock is right twice a day etc...

>> Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
>> who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
>> (akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
>> of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
>> is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
>> or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
>> *primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
>> *primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
>> volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
>> how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.

>>> Did you solve for 'd' yet, snickerturd?  ROFL... you are
>>> never going to live that one down, ignoramus.

>> You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).
>>
>> Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
>> shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.
>>
>> And you did it all while you're backpedaling away from having defended
>> DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation for a month, because
>> you're the moron who *still* can't grasp constructive and destructive
>> interference.
>>
>> So your blather is just your attempt at diverting attention away from
>> your being a Mathematical Moron.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
>> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
>> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
>> a coward and ran away from.
>>
>> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
>> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
>> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
>> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>>
>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
>> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
>> =====================================================
>> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
>> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
>> components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal
>> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
>> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
>> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
>> =====================================================
>>
>> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
>> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
>> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
>> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
>> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
>> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
>> this topic...
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
>> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
>> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>>
>> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>>
>> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
>> will hopefully understand...
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>>
>> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
>> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
>> Blue: Red + Green
>>
>> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
>> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
>> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
>> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>>
>> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
>> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
>> equal zero.
>>
>> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>>
>> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
>> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
>> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
>> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
>> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
>> Red and the Green lines.
>>
>> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
>> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
>> volts.
>>
>> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
>> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
>> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
>> that point on the X axis.
>>
>> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>>
>> But wait! It gets even better!
>>
>> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>>
>> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
>> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
>> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>>
>> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
>> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>>
>> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
>> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
>> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>>
>> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>>
>> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
>> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>>
>> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
>> moronic asses across Usenet.
>>
>> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
>> formulas used:
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
>> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
>> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
>> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
>> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>>
>> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>>
>> <snicker>
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you
>> bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUNNNNN!!!!
>>
>> Bwahahahahaaaa!

<crickets> LOL!

WHUUUUHHHHH? :D LOL

SPNAK!

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564193

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:36:38 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
>who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
>(akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
>of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
>is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
>or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
>*primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
>*primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
>volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
>how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.



Why does everyone except you say you are wrong? Why are you now the
kicktoy for AUK?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564198

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:27:41 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:36:38 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
>> who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
>> (akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
>> of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
>> is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
>> or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
>> *primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
>> *primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
>> volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
>> how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.
>
> Why does everyone except you say you are wrong? Why are you now the
> kicktoy for AUK?

it's because emmett is "busy" at the moment.  HTH

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564386

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing
Wife-Beating Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist
High-School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum (aka
Tony Ray Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58,
Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked up as Skeet, in
<news:4nb0fb5esgpbno3uosgdnj0ctki845b4k6@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:36:38 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
>> who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
>> (akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
>> of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
>> is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
>> or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
>> *primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
>> *primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
>> volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
>> how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.

> Why does everyone except you say you are wrong? Why are you now the
> kicktoy for AUK?

Because they're morons, as I've proven.

Pissbum. LOL

> <http://imgur.com/xt9bcTq>
> 
> I were a execyootive reegunal sailes man making deleverys.
> Now I are a toofless unemployalbe pissbum.

<snicker>

> I just found out today. Maybe a year. I love you all.
> My shits fucked up anyboby givs a damn?

No.

Lying Drug-Abusing Woman-Beating Pissbum Trailer Trash Tony Ray Eaks.

<snicker>

-- 

Proof that Lamey (aka Skeeter) is Anton Ray Eaks:
Message-ID: <kus7dj$bh0$1@news.mixmin.net>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/alt.usenet.kooks/messageid$3Akus7dj$24bh0$241@news.mixmin.net/alt.usenet.kooks/MLAQo_O73UM>

Pissbum hard at work to earn his drug-money:
<http://i.imgur.com/hr4eMvS.jpg> <--- LOL!

Just say no to drugs and alcohol, kids!
<http://i.imgur.com/uoZbsGI.jpg> <--- LOL!

It's Howdy Doody Time!:
<http://i.imgur.com/1myBylb.jpg> <--- LOL!

The Pissbum Clan:
<http://i.imgur.com/cixImyq.jpg> <--- LOL!

MID: <81670ab47076fa4432bc62e70914ee31@dizum.com>

Thanks for admitting you live in single-wide trailer #58 at the Lamp
Lighter Mobile Home Park on Raintree Boulevard in Canon City,
Colorado, Pissbum. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20150301045717/http://coloradovoters.info/by_number/0005/59023_anton_ray_eaks.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20150224004840/http://coloradovoters.info/by_address/81212.html>
600 Raintree Blvd. #58
Canon City, CO 81212

Another single-wide? Of course it is... the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home
Park only has single-wide trailers. LOL

And you get caught in your "I don't do FaceBook" lie again, not to
mention your "I'm not Tony Eaks" lie:

A drug-addled loserly pissbum wrote:
Message-ID: <c30abe10716ad5092ff377450c199bae@dizum.com>
"It's dump day today, woke up to fire trucks across the street, seems
the house caught fire. What a view I have now...LOL"

<https://www.facebook.com/CanonCityDailyRecord?hc_location=timeline>
"Tony Eaks - Right across the street from me, Woke up to flames and
lights."

<https://web.archive.org/web/20150122055700/http://www.canoncitydailyrecord.com/ci_27053304/early-morning-fire-destroys-home-at-lamp-lighter>

And before he was a Canon City, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling
unemployable pissbum, he was a Fairplay, CO single-wide
trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum. LOL

In Fairplay, CO he mooched his mother to an early death... now he's
mooching his ultra-ugly transsexual Howdy Doody wife Beverly Jean
Johnson-Eaks, who is forced to work two minimum-wage jobs (cashier at
Alco, cashier at Dollar Tree) to support Trailer Trash Tony's drug
habit. LOL

Message-ID: <96a8a62d10d76cd522bcf86bbaef274d@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <91a9d7e35f68d22eef5b72f79ef505c0@dizum.com>
Unit 66. Trailer Trash Tony is a single-wide pissbum! Bwahahahaaa!
============================================================
Trailer Trash Tony wrote:
> Can you prove this single wide trailer thing? Or is it
> just another attempt to try and "act" better than me?  LOL

Yeah, I can now prove "this single wide trailer thing", Trailer Trash
Tony. Which by your own admission makes me better than you. LOL

So I was right about everything I wrote about you... which makes you a
pissbum, Pissbum. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20140724093727/http://coloradovoters.info/0005/59023.html>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Anton Ray Eaks was born in 1953 and he registered to vote, giving his
address as 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66, FAIRPLAY, PARK COUNTY, COLORADO
80440. His telephone number is 1-719-477-3574. His voting status is:
Active. He is unaffiliated.
RESIDENTIAL_ADDRESS:	 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66
RESIDENTIAL_CITY:	 FAIRPLAY
RESIDENTIAL_STATE:	 CO
RESIDENTIAL_ZIP_CODE:	 80440
REGISTRATION_DATE:	 07/31/2012
BIRTH_YEAR:	 1953
PHONE_NUM:	 719-477-3574
MAILING_ADDRESS_1:	 PO BOX 473
MAILING_CITY:	 FAIRPLAY
MAILING_STATE:	 CO
MAILING_ZIP_CODE:	 80440
MAILING_ZIP_PLUS:	 0473
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

NOTE: That phone number is the Alcoholics Anonymous hot-line at South
Park Christian Chapel:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20150131161807/http://www.southparkevents.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:on-going-activities-for-the-month-&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=54>
"Alcoholics Anonymouis meeting 7-8pm at So Pk Christian Chapel
719-477-3574"

Trailer Trash Tony is *such* a drunkard that when he registered to
vote, he put down the AA DrunkieLine as his phone number! LOL

A map of the gravel quarry / junkyard / trailer park where Trailer
Trash Tony rented his shitty single-wide trailer for only $675 / month
(and still couldn't pay the rent, and got evicted! LOL):
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/21980+Hwy+285+%2366,+Fairplay,+CO+80440/@39.2157874,-105.9922529,346m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x876ae8155a400885:0xfb9ff5490348163d>

Unit 66:
This is a 3 bd/2ba single-wide trailer.
<https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.318572058245476.1073741834.131803693588981&type=1&_fb_noscript=1>

SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm)

<snicker>
============================================================

Lamey (aka Skeeter) the alcoholic wife-beating outer-filthing
drug-addict:
Message-ID: <lfjfe7$b3t$4@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <1b7ef90407a4295786c3f1338e80d553@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <c39bc1cce43a9e6860b642e72943f3ce@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <ae39676e2ac093e5259ccf8210ecbb25@dizum.com>

Trailer Trash Tony makes a multi-pronged confession:
MID: <k9m2ca5g26l46qb2t9h05ff87skcjiov1o@4ax.com>
"Yup, I can take 4 or 5 percs and roof your house. It's called the
paradoxical affect."

Pissbum groveled. LOL
Pissbum lost. LOL!
Message-ID: <lchuas$q96$4@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <c92bbbbfefed840db0563eb29f2d6498@dizum.com>

Cowardly Pissbum gets caught in lie after lie. LOL!
Message-ID: <l0rfde$hv8$2@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l0smsq$fcq$2@news.mixmin.net>

Lamey (aka Skeeter) the forger, busted and scrambling for cover like a
coward:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/RE_35HZp8qAJ>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/-RZxQp6TAe4J>
Message-ID: <db92667a7bac368fab1b8ff5085f8b2e@dizum.com>

Pissbum gets kicked so hard he's *still* bouncing around Usenet like a
SuperBall:
============================================
Message-ID: <kv42gb$vd8$1@news.mixmin.net>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/ZyzzhJiku3c/Q0c2J9_Jc5YJ>

Message-ID: <kuatrj$b2g$1@news.mixmin.net>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/N91lSABoN2s/JYDwKwwIZn4J>
============================================

Trailer Trash Tony the Single-Wide Trailer-Dwelling Pissbum is driven
so insane by my truthiness that he's forced by his psychiatric
professional to take Seroquel, a strong anti-psychotic that its maker
(Astra Zeneca) only indicates for use in treating schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder:
==================================================
Lamey (aka Skeeter) admits he now takes Seroquel "to sleep"... it's a
prescription medication for the treatment of mania and depression
associated with bipolar disease and schizophrenia. I've driven him
mad. LOL

Pissbum tries to k'lame his doctor-recommended dosage is only half of
the smallest tablet Astra Zeneca produces for Seroquel:
MID: <3elg2aduthcn6j92jlledhg6sa4ibnbro1@4ax.com>:
"Just like seriquil, I take it for sleep at night, 12.5 mg"

I shred Pissbum Tony's lies and prove he's gone batty:
MID: <0c4a46b95e1b8983104047001ec4e05f@dizum.com>
MID: <11715d7d5e802fb4248513f981621812@dizum.com>
MID: <3bb2754531e630d89eb7330623ee6281@dizum.com>
MID: <8bc988e4842e4338432ad962f84a89d4@dizum.com>
==================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564227

Fakey wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> 
> > Fakey wrote:
> 
> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> 
> >>> Ding ding ding!
> >>> 
> >>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
> 
> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
Did you see any complex numbers?

The resolution of vectors into orthogonal components using
sines & cosines was going on for a long, long time before
Euler.

> >>> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
> >>> 
> >>> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.
> 
> >> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
> >> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
> >> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
> >> 
> >> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.
> 
> > Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
> > the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
> > undergrad also did it right.
> > 
> > But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
> > know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.
> 
> Except I did, Moron. I've been correctly graphing it all along,
> starting with the 170 volt peak L-N, deriving the 120 volt RMS L-N
> from that,

That very statement, which i've corrected you on many
multiple times, betrays your lack of understanding of basic
electric principles.

I realize it's pointless to try to enlighten you.  But you
are good for LOLs.

You don't seem to understand that some people actually
understand all this shit that you just googled up over the
past few weeks.  They are all laughing at you, fakey.

> >> Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
> >> produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
> >> You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:
> 
> > What you've been graphing all along... Lol.  You have been
> > graphing wrong sinewaves for weeks now.  The fact that you
> > finally got one graph right is pretty much expected, being a
> > broken clock is right twice a day etc...
> 
> Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one

LOL!  You graph a sinewave with a peak amplitude of 120v,
and call it 120v RMS.  You are clueless, dweebazoid.

<snip pasted screed>

-- 
"3-phase AC power constitutes a closed loop!"
  --Fakey demonstrates his mastery of Kirchoff's Law

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564400

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:sjc0fbtpjnjl4f5bgnl5kr8b3bg2kt11rq@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>>> Ding ding ding!
>>>>> 
>>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.

>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
> Did you see any complex numbers?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
"The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
Formula"

Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

Euler wrote:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
which you'll run away.

> The resolution of vectors into orthogonal components using
> sines & cosines was going on for a long, long time before
> Euler.

And it's still known as the Euler-Fourier Formula, SpankTard. LOL

>>>>> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.

>>>> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
>>>> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
>>>> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
>>>> 
>>>> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.

>>> Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
>>> the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
>>> undergrad also did it right.
>>> 
>>> But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
>>> know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.

>> Except I did, Moron. I've been correctly graphing it all along,
>> starting with the 170 volt peak L-N, deriving the 120 volt RMS L-N
>> from that,
> 
> That very statement, which i've corrected you on many
> multiple times, betrays your lack of understanding of basic
> electric principles.

Liar. You've gotten SPNAK!d non-stop and run away from it all. LOL

> I realize it's pointless to try to enlighten you.  But you
> are good for LOLs.
> 
> You don't seem to understand that some people actually
> understand all this shit that you just googled up over the
> past few weeks.  They are all laughing at you, fakey.

You've proven nothing except that you're a Mathematical Moron, a
coward, a lying backpedaling kook and a spankard. LOL

And as my .sig and the below SPNAK!s prove, you GoogleRaped hard
enough to find a strawman to prop up as means of diverting attention
from your running away from the SPNAK! you took for proving yourself a
Mathematical Moron, in so doing proving yourself a Mathematical Moron
again. LOL

SPNAK! #1:
=========================================================
>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
> Did you see any complex numbers?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
"The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's 
Formula"

Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

Euler wrote:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using 
Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from 
which you'll run away.
=========================================================


SPNAK! #2:
=========================================================
> Does 2sin(x)cos(x) = cos(x) ?
> 
> Oh yes... yes, it does, for the fortuitous case of
> 2sin(x)=1, which, like a broken clock, and like you, is
> right twice per cycle.

Wrong. 2sin(x)cos(x) will never coincide with cos(x) when 2sin(x)=1:
<http://i.imgur.com/8mSBxeg.png>

SPNAK!

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard's response?

> Who cares what you can graph, or if you can even graph it
> right.  You can't understand any of it.

Translation:
"I'm wrong. Who cares? I'm a Mathematical Moron. Who cares? I can't 
understand any of it, let alone graph it. Who cares? <backpedal> 
<backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"

SPNAK!
=========================================================


SPNAK! #3:
=========================================================
Keep proving you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron. Why are 
you running scared from that giant whomping SPNAK! as detailed below, 
Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at 
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping 
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like 
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he 
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because 
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line 
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical 
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal 
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to 
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called 
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the 
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity 
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and 
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and 
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for 
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on 
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition 
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits 
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's 
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum 
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two 
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third 
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always 
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show 
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple 
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave 
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the 
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the 
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line 
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87 
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result 
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh... 
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at 
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave 
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably 
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge 
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been 
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your 
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!

RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!

> I ignore all your re-run screed.  It's just meaningless,
> WRONG blither-blather in a desperate effort to save face.

Translation:
"I'll continue running away from those *two* SPNAK!s because I've 
proven myself a mathematical moron *twice*, because I believe in 
proving myself a backpedaling coward and equal number of times which I 
prove myself a Mathematical Moron." LOL!

> But your face is gone, fakezoid.  ROFL!
> 
> <snip re-ran screed>

RUUUUUUNNN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RRRRRRUUUUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!

Bwahahahaaa!

Spankard.

> <snip pasted screed>

Translation:
"<Cowardly snip-n-run from that which proves me WRONG>"

Coward. Spankard. Mathematical Moron. LOL

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564402

Fakey wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
> 
> > Fakey wrote:
> 
> >>>>> Ding ding ding!
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
> 
> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
> 
> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
> > Did you see any complex numbers?
> 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
> Formula"

Wrong again, fakey.  Why do you never understand anything
you google?  Oh... it's because you're a maffemagickal
maroon.  LOL.

They are explaining the fourier transform, and how they use
euler's theorem to substitute [cos(x)-jsin(x)] for
exp(-jwt).  You, of course, can't understand that, because
you are a maffemagickal buffoon.  So you see instead
whatever your bleary bloodshot eyes wish to see.

> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
> >   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

Right, some maffemagickal maroon wrote that.  What I wrote
was

  = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

YOU, for reasons probably related to the fact that you don't
know how to use your newsreader, added in the  thangies.

Fakey, have you solved for 'd' yet?

Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
glow-in-the-daylight re-re-re-re-SPNAKed ass?

-- 
"The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector
summation of sinusoids. Moron."
  --Phakester offers instruction in the use of Sooper Hi
    Maths

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564404

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 03:19:22 -0400, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass  
<bender@the.future> wrote:

> Fakey wrote:
>
>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
>>
>> > Fakey wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Ding ding ding!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
>>
>> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
>>
>> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
>> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
>> > Did you see any complex numbers?
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>> Formula"
>
> Wrong again, fakey.  Why do you never understand anything
> you google?  Oh... it's because you're a maffemagickal
> maroon.  LOL.
>
> They are explaining the fourier transform, and how they use
> euler's theorem to substitute [cos(x)-jsin(x)] for
> exp(-jwt).  You, of course, can't understand that, because
> you are a maffemagickal buffoon.  So you see instead
> whatever your bleary bloodshot eyes wish to see.
>
>> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>> >   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
>
> Right, some maffemagickal maroon wrote that.  What I wrote
> was
>
>   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

he'll say "they look fine on my reader" and that *your* reader added them.

>
> YOU, for reasons probably related to the fact that you don't
> know how to use your newsreader, added in the  thangies.

he's probably copying text and not "pasting without formatting".

>
> Fakey, have you solved for 'd' yet?
>
> Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
> red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
> glow-in-the-daylight re-re-re-re-SPNAKed ass?
>

his proctologist has to wear a welding helmet.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564413

"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 03:19:22 -0400, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass  
> <bender@the.future> wrote:
> 
> > Fakey wrote:
> >
> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
> >>
> >> > Fakey wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>>> Ding ding ding!
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
> >>
> >> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
> >>
> >> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
> >> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
> >> > Did you see any complex numbers?
> >>
> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
> >> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
> >> Formula"
> >
> > Wrong again, fakey.  Why do you never understand anything
> > you google?  Oh... it's because you're a maffemagickal
> > maroon.  LOL.
> >
> > They are explaining the fourier transform, and how they use
> > euler's theorem to substitute [cos(x)-jsin(x)] for
> > exp(-jwt).  You, of course, can't understand that, because
> > you are a maffemagickal buffoon.  So you see instead
> > whatever your bleary bloodshot eyes wish to see.
> >
> >> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
> >> >   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
> >
> > Right, some maffemagickal maroon wrote that.  What I wrote
> > was
> >
> >   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
> 
> he'll say "they look fine on my reader" and that *your* reader added them.
> 
> >
> > YOU, for reasons probably related to the fact that you don't
> > know how to use your newsreader, added in the  thangies.
> 
> he's probably copying text and not "pasting without formatting".

The Extended Character Set is pretty standard.  Who knows
what confusion lurks in the "mind" of the faketard.

> > Fakey, have you solved for 'd' yet?
> >
> > Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
> > red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
> > glow-in-the-daylight re-re-re-re-SPNAKed ass?
> >
> 
> his proctologist has to wear a welding helmet.

LOL.  It could be the reason why fakey's pants are on fire.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564531

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:02:09 -0400, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass  
<bender@the.future> wrote:

> "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave.,
> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907
> Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 03:19:22 -0400, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
>> <bender@the.future> wrote:
>>
>> > Fakey wrote:
>> >
>> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
>> >>
>> >> > Fakey wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>>>> Ding ding ding!
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all  
>> transformers.
>> >>
>> >> >> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL
>> >>
>> >> > It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
>> >> > totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
>> >> > Did you see any complex numbers?
>> >>
>> >>  
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>> >> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is...  
>> Euler's
>> >> Formula"
>> >
>> > Wrong again, fakey.  Why do you never understand anything
>> > you google?  Oh... it's because you're a maffemagickal
>> > maroon.  LOL.
>> >
>> > They are explaining the fourier transform, and how they use
>> > euler's theorem to substitute [cos(x)-jsin(x)] for
>> > exp(-jwt).  You, of course, can't understand that, because
>> > you are a maffemagickal buffoon.  So you see instead
>> > whatever your bleary bloodshot eyes wish to see.
>> >
>> >> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>> >> >   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
>> >
>> > Right, some maffemagickal maroon wrote that.  What I wrote
>> > was
>> >
>> >   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]
>>
>> he'll say "they look fine on my reader" and that *your* reader added  
>> them.
>>
>> >
>> > YOU, for reasons probably related to the fact that you don't
>> > know how to use your newsreader, added in the  thangies.
>>
>> he's probably copying text and not "pasting without formatting".
>
> The Extended Character Set is pretty standard.  Who knows
> what confusion lurks in the "mind" of the faketard.
>
>> > Fakey, have you solved for 'd' yet?
>> >
>> > Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
>> > red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
>> > glow-in-the-daylight re-re-re-re-SPNAKed ass?
>> >
>>
>> his proctologist has to wear a welding helmet.
>
> LOL.  It could be the reason why fakey's pants are on fire.

chicken or the egg problem?

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564486

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:drr1fb1ie10rdk3v4gjprledj60prudq9r@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

Have you figured out that "within 10% error" does not equal "10%
error" yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL

I sure hope you're ready to get SPNAK!d silly, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard.
LOL

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in

>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>>>>> Ding ding ding!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.

>>>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

>>> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
>>> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
>>> Did you see any complex numbers?

>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
>> "The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
>> Formula"

> Wrong again, fakey.

Oh, that's right, you're the Mathematical Moron who's repeatedly
insisted that the Euler Formula has nothing to do with sinewaves. LOL

Have you figured out that atomic number does not equal effective
nuclear charge yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL

> Why do you never understand anything you google?  Oh... it's because
> you're a maffemagickal maroon.  LOL.

Translation:
"He's spanked me *again*. MUST BACKPEDAL AND LIE *HARDER*!" LOL!

What a spankard! What a drop-kick! What a slack-jawed furrow-browed
utterly confused mathematical moron!

> They are explaining the fourier transform, and how they use
> euler's theorem

Bwahahaaa! You backpedaling moron. You've just admitted they're using
Euler's Formula.

Bwahahaaa! You backpedaling moron. You've just admitted that the Euler
Formula *is* a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, which you denied prior.

"It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard."

DUUURRRHH! Moron.

SPNAK!

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers. They
are the forms originally used by Joseph Fourier and are still
preferred in some applications, such as signal processing or
statistics."

You know, like with sinewaves. Moron.

> to substitute [cos(x)-jsin(x)] for exp(-jwt).

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard needs new glasses *and* a new brain. LOL

To do *what*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? Go on, say it...

Have you figured out that formulas are math yet, Mathematical Moron?
LOL

<snicker>

cos(x)+isin(x) is the trigonometric method for describing a circle and
transforming it to a sinewave, you nong. Euler's formula.

SPNAK!

<http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-understanding-of-eulers-formula/>
==========================================================
Euler's formula describes two equivalent ways to move in a circle.

Starting at the number 1, see multiplication as a transformation that
changes the number: 1 * e^i*pi

Regular exponential growth continuously increases 1 by some rate;
imaginary exponential growth continuously rotates a number

Growing for "pi" units of time means going pi radians around a circle.
Therefore, e^i*pi means starting at 1 and rotating pi (halfway around
a circle) to get to -1.
==========================================================

>  You, of course, can't understand that, because

Have you figured out that a sinusoid is a transform of a circle yet,
Mathematical Moron? LOL

> you are a maffemagickal buffoon.  So you see instead

Have you figured out that "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic" yet,
Mathematical Moron? LOL

> whatever your bleary bloodshot eyes wish to see.

Says the moron who got the exponent wrong above because his bleary
bloodshot eyes are too weary to see correctly. That all-day all-night
GoogleRaping is a bitch, ain't it, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

>> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>>>   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

> Right, some maffemagickal maroon wrote that.

Right. You wrote that. LOL

SPNAK!

Have you figured out that wave interference works the same for
standing and traveling waves yet, Mathematical Moron? LOL

>  What I wrote was
> 
>   = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

That's what you wrote, and that's Euler's Formula, Spankard.

But you've yet again fucked it up:
170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)+\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(-120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)+\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(-120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

<http://i.imgur.com/veVLHuI.png>

Whaaaaaat??? Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation produces 416.413
volts L-L from 170 volt peak L-N, Shiny Tinfoil Brain! Obviously
you're a Mathematical Moron blathering on about shit you don't
understand. LOL

SPNAK!

Uh-oh... take a look at this, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard:
<http://i.imgur.com/nWBbVbS.png>

You'll note *your* fucked up equation gets ~294 volts RMS L-L from 120
volt RMS L-N.

Did... did I just fix your fucked up equation *and* derive the correct
~208 volts RMS L-L from 120 volts RMS L-N? With the *correct* 30
degree lead phase shift? Yeah... yeah I did. LOL

SPNAK!

And *that* is going on the SPNAK!-pile, from which you'll run like a
coward. LOL

I note you cowardly snipped out the proof that you've yet again proven
yourself to be a Mathematical Moron:

Euler wrote:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa! That's going into the SPNAK!-pile from
which you'll run away.

> YOU, for reasons probably related to the fact that you don't
> know how to use your newsreader, added in the  thangies.

It looks fine on my end. Perhaps you're *such* a moron you can't even
properly run your newsreader, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL

> Fakey, have you solved for 'd' yet?

You mean d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x)? Your desperate backpedaling strawman
which you propped up and kicked down as means of diverting attention
away from that giant whomping SPNAK! you took because you'd proved
you're a Mathematical Moron... and in so doing, proved *again* that
you're a Mathematical Moron? LOL!!

> Fakey, what's the effective temperature of the 700 nm
> red-body radiation from your cherry-red,
> glow-in-the-daylight re-re-re-re-SPNAKed ass?

I wouldn't know... you're the one furiously pounding out your
backpedaling bleatfarts by the light of your incandescently-spanked
ass, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL

Now, prove to the world that you're Usenet's biggest coward by running
away from your stupidity. Again. Spankard.

SPNAK! #1:
=========================================================
A Mathematical Moron wrote:
===========================
> "Sin^2 is a sine"... what a moroon.  LOL.
===========================

FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
===========================
<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL
===========================
=========================================================


SPNAK! #2:
=========================================================
>> Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
>>> = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

> Right, some maffemagickal maroon wrote that.

Right. You wrote that. LOL

SPNAK!

> What I wrote was
> 
> = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

That's what you wrote, and that's Euler's Formula, Spankard.

But you've yet again fucked it up:
170\left(\cos \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)+\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-170\left(\cos
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(-120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)+\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(-120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

<http://i.imgur.com/veVLHuI.png>

Whaaaaaat??? Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation produces 416.413
volts L-L from 170 volt peak L-N, Shiny Tinfoil Brain! Obviously
you're a Mathematical Moron blathering on about shit you don't
understand. LOL

Uh-oh... take a look at this, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard:
<http://i.imgur.com/nWBbVbS.png>

You'll note your fucked up equation gets ~294 volts RMS L-L from 120
volt RMS L-N. How's *that* work, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

Did... did I just fix your fucked up equation *and* derive the correct
~208 volts RMS L-L from 120 volts RMS L-N? With the *correct* 30
degree lead phase shift? Yeah... yeah I did, Mathematical Moron. LOL

And you have no idea how I fixed it, huh, Mathematical Moron. LOL

SPNAK!
=========================================================


SPNAK! #3:
=========================================================
>> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

> It's not Euler's Theorem, faketard.  I realize phasors
> totally mystify you, so you think it's all magic.  It's not.
> Did you see any complex numbers?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms#Relation_with_complex_exponentials>
"The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's
Formula"

Some Mathematical Moron wrote:
> = A[cos(0°)x^ + sin(0°)y^] -A[cos(-120°)x^ + sin(-120°)y^]

Euler wrote:
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/4/2/e4285d1d4bd15710afcc2753c9ed3095.png>

SPNAK! on the Mathematical Moron, who didn't even realize he was using
Euler's Formula. Bwahahahaaa!
=========================================================


SPNAK! #4:
=========================================================
Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
===================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
===================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
moronic asses across Usenet.

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

Your inability to understand, let alone refute, that reality stands as
your tacit admission that you are Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

SPNAK!

RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!!

> -- 
> "The Euler-Fourier Formulas are used to perform vector
> summation of sinusoids. Moron."

Have you figured out that formulas are math yet, Mathematical Moron?
LOL

>   --Phakester offers instruction in the use of Sooper Hi
>     Maths

<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
"The Fourier Transform takes a specific viewpoint: What if any signal
could be filtered into a bunch of circular paths?"

"The Fourier Transform is about circular paths (not 1-d sinusoids) and
Euler's formula is a clever way to generate one:"

"If you enjoy using 10-dollar words to describe 10-cent ideas, you
might call a circular path a "complex sinusoid"."

SPNAK! on Shiny Tinfoil Brain, who yet again backpedals,
blither-blathers, bleatfarts and proves himself to be Usenet's
Mathematical Moron. LOL

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com>
That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564327

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:36:38 +0100, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
> 
> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> <news:cv5veb10d8mtp9tc8odj60icgkvepf8sca@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:

>> Did you solve for 'd' yet, snickerturd?  ROFL... you are never going to
>> live that one down, ignoramus.
> 
> You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).
> 
> Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
> shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.

He's done more than that -- and what's got anybody with Math 1 under 
their belt shaking their head is that you don't know what the derivative 
computes for the sine wave.

But maybe you're right, and I shouldn't be off discussing tangents.  
Please continue with your "spnaking", or whatever it is you're doing.

-- 
 -v

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web