Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550411 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 97 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 02:05 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-03 23:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-04 18:16 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-04 23:50 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-04 21:30 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 13:58 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Batty <bat@belfry.invalid> - 2016-02-08 14:08 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-05 07:30 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-05 14:14 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 11:19 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-05 14:49 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:09 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 18:55 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 17:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:50 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 01:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:51 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:51 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:26 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:41 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 07:53 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 18:49 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 13:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:40 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 06:17 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 01:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-09 06:27 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 16:42 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:21 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 07:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-09 17:14 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:23 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 10:57 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-10 05:27 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 05:45 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:42 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 13:53 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:29 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-09 23:47 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:22 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-09 10:25 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-09 15:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-08 11:57 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-08 10:06 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 18:38 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 02:02 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 02:16 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-06 02:20 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:44 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:59 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:04 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:57 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 11:26 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 16:56 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 00:54 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 20:16 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-07 06:05 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-07 20:39 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:06 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-08 00:34 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-08 06:58 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-07 21:55 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-06 05:17 -0500
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-06 03:57 -0700
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-06 03:07 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 21:46 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-10 20:53 -0800
Re: Questions ko0ky runs away from really fast "Skip" <skip@dont-email.me> - 2016-02-05 01:18 +0100
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 18:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3310aad590cbb1d628ed79dc2da8a2e0@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550847 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Trailer Trash Tony the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing Wife-Beating Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist High-School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum (aka Tony Ray Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree Blvd #58, Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked up as Skeeter, in <news:49dbbbl4019v36qs3nj7ml47l4jnhv22d6@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 06:50:33 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Chimpy D. PickleTickler (aka Checkmate the Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon), >> in <news:MPG.311ec6e32fe7f10998c54c@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump >> head first into the wood chipper again: >>> Same reason he thought he could tell a licensed electrical contractor >>> with decades in the business about electrical services... Fakey knows >>> everything about everything, and he's willing to distort and argue about >>> it 'til the cows come home and shit on his lawn. >> You mean this, Chimpy? >> >> Chimpy's latest SPNAK!, in his own words: >> ==================================================== >> "they're 240 volt legs" (Chimpy's words) >> "either ONE of the 240 volt lines" (Chimpy's words) >> "120 volt neutral" (Chimpy's words) >> "New residential service is 240 volts, with a 120 volt neutral center >> tap" (Chimpy's words) >> >> Chimpy k'lames each leg running into a house is 240 volts, and neutral >> is 120 volts. What a *moron*. LOL! >> >> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ >> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> <https://www.blackhillsenergy.com/sites/default/files/bhe-coe-rules-regs.pdf> >> ======================================= >> All new installations of three (3) or more circuits must be wired for >> 120/240 volt, 3-wire when secondary distribution is single-phase >> except when distribution is connected wye, the voltage will be >> 120/208." >> ======================================= >> >> <https://www.blackhillspower.com/rates> >> ======================================= >> Type of Service - Residential >> Alternating current, 60 hertz, single phase, at nominal voltages of >> _120_ _or_ 120/240 volts. >> ======================================= >> What kind of backpedaling *moron* is Chimpy that he k'lames a utility >> doesn't provide a service that they have a rate listed for? Of course, >> Chimpy's such a *moron* he can't possibly conceive of a separate 120 >> volt-only service for an outbuilding, separate from a residence. LOL >> >> Message-ID: <096001b11e397e1ce81972fa1a687e0c@dizum.com> >> ======================================= >> >>>> I proved via a quote directly from *your* utility that >> >>>> they provide a 120 volt-only service. >> >> >>> They didn't say they would provide it. They merely defined it, >> >> >> You lying, backpedaling pathetic piece of shit. >> >> >> >> <https://www.blackhillspower.com/rates> >> >> ======================================= >> >> Type of Service - Residential >> >> Alternating current, 60 hertz, single phase, at nominal voltages of >> >> _120_ _or_ 120/240 volts. >> >> ======================================= >> >> >> >> What's that URL say, you fucking *moron*... *rates*. That's the >> >> *rates* *page*, how much they *charge* for that *service*. >> >> (Chimpy's best lie ever)! LOL! >> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ >> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> >> Chimpy: "it's NOT 120 volts, it's 120/240", when in fact, 120 volts is >> ALL it is. Two oppositely-phased legs, each running at 120 volts, and >> the 240 volt "service" is only created by tapping across those two 120 >> volt hot legs. So Chimpy's doubly wrong. LOL >> >> Chimpy: "Normal residential service is single phase 240 volts." when >> in fact it's split-phase 120 volts. The 240 volts is only achieved >> in-house by connecting across the oppositely-phased 120 volt legs. LOL >> ==================================================== >> >> Chimpy thinks each leg running into a house is 240 volts: "they're 240 >> volt legs" (Chimpy's words), and the neutral is 120 volts: "120 volt >> neutral" (Chimpy's words), because he's a *moron*. >> >> Chimpy *still* can't figure out the difference between "single-phase" >> and "split-phase midpoint-neutral", which is why he was talking about >> that guy who called him and talked about "split-phase", which Chimpy >> conflated to "2-phase", which Chimpy was making fun of, because >> Chimpy's a *moron*. LOL >> >> In fact, Chimpy's demonstrated that he's *such* a bad electrician he >> doesn't know the meaning of the word "electrics"... he thinks it's a >> misspelling: "Electrics [sic]" (Chimpy's words). LOL! >> >> It's called a "3-wire midpoint-neutral split-phase" system for a >> reason, you *moron*. LOL >> >> Chimpy's a bad electrician, a bleatfarting backpedaling spankard and a >> *moron*. >> >> Melt, Chimpy, melt. >> Froth, Chimpy, froth. >> Dance, Chimpy, dance! >> Muahahaha, etc. >> >> <snicker> > Little pieces to the whole thing. Typical fakey only posts the words > he needs to tell a lie. > He never said that. That's exactly what he said *and* *reiterated* several times, Pissbum. How pathetic is Chimpy that I've so crippled him that he has to get a drug-addled old pissbum to backpedal for him? What'd he do, pay you in prescription pills so you could get high and "float around the room" (Pissbum's words)? LOL! > I just found out today. Maybe a year. I love you all. > My shits fucked up anyboby givs a damn? No. Lying Drug-Abusing Woman-Beating Pissbum Trailer Trash Tony Ray Eaks. <snicker> -- Proof that Lamey (aka Skeeter) is Anton Ray Eaks: Message-ID: <kus7dj$bh0$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/alt.usenet.kooks/messageid$3Akus7dj$24bh0$241@news.mixmin.net/alt.usenet.kooks/MLAQo_O73UM> Pissbum hard at work to earn his drug-money: <http://i.imgur.com/hr4eMvS.jpg> <--- LOL! Just say no to drugs and alcohol, kids! <http://i.imgur.com/uoZbsGI.jpg> <--- LOL! It's Howdy Doody Time!: <http://i.imgur.com/1myBylb.jpg> <--- LOL! The Pissbum Clan: <http://i.imgur.com/cixImyq.jpg> <--- LOL! MID: <81670ab47076fa4432bc62e70914ee31@dizum.com> Thanks for admitting you live in single-wide trailer #58 at the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home Park on Raintree Boulevard in Canon City, Colorado, Pissbum. LOL <https://web.archive.org/web/20150301045717/http://coloradovoters.info/by_number/0005/59023_anton_ray_eaks.html> <https://web.archive.org/web/20150224004840/http://coloradovoters.info/by_address/81212.html> 600 Raintree Blvd. #58 Canon City, CO 81212 Another single-wide? Of course it is... the Lamp Lighter Mobile Home Park only has single-wide trailers. LOL And you get caught in your "I don't do FaceBook" lie again, not to mention your "I'm not Tony Eaks" lie: A drug-addled loserly pissbum wrote: Message-ID: <c30abe10716ad5092ff377450c199bae@dizum.com> "It's dump day today, woke up to fire trucks across the street, seems the house caught fire. What a view I have now...LOL" <https://www.facebook.com/CanonCityDailyRecord?hc_location=timeline> "Tony Eaks - Right across the street from me, Woke up to flames and lights." <https://web.archive.org/web/20150122055700/http://www.canoncitydailyrecord.com/ci_27053304/early-morning-fire-destroys-home-at-lamp-lighter> And before he was a Canon City, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum, he was a Fairplay, CO single-wide trailer-dwelling unemployable pissbum. LOL In Fairplay, CO he mooched his mother to an early death... now he's mooching his ultra-ugly transsexual Howdy Doody wife Beverly Jean Johnson-Eaks, who is forced to work two minimum-wage jobs (cashier at Alco, cashier at Dollar Tree) to support Trailer Trash Tony's drug habit. LOL Message-ID: <96a8a62d10d76cd522bcf86bbaef274d@dizum.com> Message-ID: <91a9d7e35f68d22eef5b72f79ef505c0@dizum.com> Unit 66. Trailer Trash Tony is a single-wide pissbum! Bwahahahaaa! ============================================================ Trailer Trash Tony wrote: > Can you prove this single wide trailer thing? Or is it > just another attempt to try and "act" better than me? LOL Yeah, I can now prove "this single wide trailer thing", Trailer Trash Tony. Which by your own admission makes me better than you. LOL So I was right about everything I wrote about you... which makes you a pissbum, Pissbum. LOL <https://web.archive.org/web/20140724093727/http://coloradovoters.info/0005/59023.html> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Anton Ray Eaks was born in 1953 and he registered to vote, giving his address as 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66, FAIRPLAY, PARK COUNTY, COLORADO 80440. His telephone number is 1-719-477-3574. His voting status is: Active. He is unaffiliated. RESIDENTIAL_ADDRESS: 21980 HWY 285 UNIT 66 RESIDENTIAL_CITY: FAIRPLAY RESIDENTIAL_STATE: CO RESIDENTIAL_ZIP_CODE: 80440 REGISTRATION_DATE: 07/31/2012 BIRTH_YEAR: 1953 PHONE_NUM: 719-477-3574 MAILING_ADDRESS_1: PO BOX 473 MAILING_CITY: FAIRPLAY MAILING_STATE: CO MAILING_ZIP_CODE: 80440 MAILING_ZIP_PLUS: 0473 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ NOTE: That phone number is the Alcoholics Anonymous hot-line at South Park Christian Chapel: <https://web.archive.org/web/20150131161807/http://www.southparkevents.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48:on-going-activities-for-the-month-&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=54> "Alcoholics Anonymouis meeting 7-8pm at So Pk Christian Chapel 719-477-3574" Trailer Trash Tony is *such* a drunkard that when he registered to vote, he put down the AA DrunkieLine as his phone number! LOL A map of the gravel quarry / junkyard / trailer park where Trailer Trash Tony rented his shitty single-wide trailer for only $675 / month (and still couldn't pay the rent, and got evicted! LOL): <https://www.google.com/maps/place/21980+Hwy+285+%2366,+Fairplay,+CO+80440/@39.2157874,-105.9922529,346m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x876ae8155a400885:0xfb9ff5490348163d> Unit 66: This is a 3 bd/2ba single-wide trailer. <https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.318572058245476.1073741834.131803693588981&type=1&_fb_noscript=1> SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) <snicker> ============================================================ Lamey (aka Skeeter) the alcoholic wife-beating outer-filthing drug-addict: Message-ID: <lfjfe7$b3t$4@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <1b7ef90407a4295786c3f1338e80d553@dizum.com> Message-ID: <c39bc1cce43a9e6860b642e72943f3ce@dizum.com> Message-ID: <ae39676e2ac093e5259ccf8210ecbb25@dizum.com> Trailer Trash Tony makes a multi-pronged confession: MID: <k9m2ca5g26l46qb2t9h05ff87skcjiov1o@4ax.com> "Yup, I can take 4 or 5 percs and roof your house. It's called the paradoxical affect." Pissbum groveled. LOL Pissbum lost. LOL! Message-ID: <lchuas$q96$4@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <c92bbbbfefed840db0563eb29f2d6498@dizum.com> Cowardly Pissbum gets caught in lie after lie. LOL! Message-ID: <l0rfde$hv8$2@news.mixmin.net> Message-ID: <l0smsq$fcq$2@news.mixmin.net> Lamey (aka Skeeter) the forger, busted and scrambling for cover like a coward: <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/RE_35HZp8qAJ> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/2oWKmfnSPEA/-RZxQp6TAe4J> Message-ID: <db92667a7bac368fab1b8ff5085f8b2e@dizum.com> Pissbum gets kicked so hard he's *still* bouncing around Usenet like a SuperBall: ============================================ Message-ID: <kv42gb$vd8$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/ZyzzhJiku3c/Q0c2J9_Jc5YJ> Message-ID: <kuatrj$b2g$1@news.mixmin.net> <https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=alt.usenet.kooks/N91lSABoN2s/JYDwKwwIZn4J> ============================================ Trailer Trash Tony the Single-Wide Trailer-Dwelling Pissbum is driven so insane by my truthiness that he's forced by his psychiatric professional to take Seroquel, a strong anti-psychotic that its maker (Astra Zeneca) only indicates for use in treating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: ================================================== Lamey (aka Skeeter) admits he now takes Seroquel "to sleep"... it's a prescription medication for the treatment of mania and depression associated with bipolar disease and schizophrenia. I've driven him mad. LOL Pissbum tries to k'lame his doctor-recommended dosage is only half of the smallest tablet Astra Zeneca produces for Seroquel: MID: <3elg2aduthcn6j92jlledhg6sa4ibnbro1@4ax.com>: "Just like seriquil, I take it for sleep at night, 12.5 mg" I shred Pissbum Tony's lies and prove he's gone batty: MID: <0c4a46b95e1b8983104047001ec4e05f@dizum.com> MID: <11715d7d5e802fb4248513f981621812@dizum.com> MID: <3bb2754531e630d89eb7330623ee6281@dizum.com> MID: <8bc988e4842e4338432ad962f84a89d4@dizum.com> ==================================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 10:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2fccbbhf4njmtdr57mek91f6glpsn49cag@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550914 |
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:46 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Little pieces to the whole thing. Typical fakey only posts the words >> he needs to tell a lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 16:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4qaabbdtq45a5f8jq7rajpqif7l2upot32@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550769 |
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:41:10 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >i think we all now more fully understand fakey's minimal grasp of applied >mathematics after witnessing his two week screed of horrible triangle >"sine" wave scribblings on command and his demonstrated inability to >comprehend how to mathematically measure a voltage drop between two sine >waves. > >maybe he'll have the unmitigated audacity to tell us why he thought that >someone who is building a bass amp and also a stereo amplifier from >scratch didn't know how electricity works? This post is worthy of at least 200 lines of fakey foam and a bit of copy/paste.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 06:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <81e00084f6f35e9743a254fe07fdf5b5@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550769 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ycdqiwbvtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > i think we all now more fully understand fakey's minimal grasp of applied > mathematics And you'd be wrong, DildoRider... but then, you *are* the moron who bragged about how much money your house was now "worth"... until it was revealed you'd only profited by ~$36/month for every month you'd owned it, not taking into account upkeep and maintenance, so you're likely taking a bath on that shanty. LOL > after witnessing his two week screed of horrible triangle > "sine" wave scribblings on command and his demonstrated inability to > comprehend how to mathematically measure a voltage drop between two sine > waves. I drew the second best sinewave of them all, DildoRider, whereas you spammed bad sinewave after bad sinewave, even resorting to spamming imgur.com with them. Because you're pwned like that. LOL > maybe he'll have the unmitigated audacity to tell us why he thought that > someone who is building a bass amp and also a stereo amplifier Would that be from a 9-volt transistor radio and a cheap USB speaker? Because that'd likely *improve* your shitty emo-goth elevator music. Maybe if you overlay the 'cheap electronics' distortion with the 'untalented musictard' distortion, they'll constructively interfere into something that doesn't make people's ears bleed. LOL > from scratch Translation: "I'm too poor to buy quality commercially-produced electronics. I wasted all my money on feather boas, hooker heels and fishnets, only to find I can't even give it away, let alone sell it because I look like a crack addict with AIDS." LOL! > didn't know how electricity works? Says the Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 02:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7ddbbbtke1p59k8n9lsieb7bq3v1cdv5j5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550834 |
>> after witnessing his two week screed of horrible triangle >> "sine" wave scribblings on command and his demonstrated inability to >> comprehend how to mathematically measure a voltage drop between two sine >> waves. > >I drew the second best sinewave of them all, DildoRider, whereas you >spammed bad sinewave after bad sinewave, even resorting to spamming >imgur.com with them. Because you're pwned like that. LOL "second best" LOL Fakey has to backtrack, what happened to "only" ? You moron. > >> maybe he'll have the unmitigated audacity to tell us why he thought that >> someone who is building a bass amp and also a stereo amplifier > >Would that be from a 9-volt transistor radio and a cheap USB speaker? >Because that'd likely *improve* your shitty emo-goth elevator music. >Maybe if you overlay the 'cheap electronics' distortion with the >'untalented musictard' distortion, they'll constructively interfere >into something that doesn't make people's ears bleed. LOL Nice spin and avoidance. >I'm too poor to buy quality commercially-produced electronics. I >wasted all my money on feather boas, hooker heels and fishnets, only >to find I can't even give it away, let alone sell it because I look >like a crack addict with AIDS. His own words folks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 16:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.ycdp5jx6tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #550736 |
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:14:21 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > wrote: > >>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf >> >> Bwahahahaaa! A high school > > Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or > something? > >> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14 >> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared >> atmospheric window > > So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok. > >>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered. > > *noisy crickets* > >>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with >>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) - >>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient >>> of it in negatively-curved space.) >> >> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day >> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead. the projection with this one is quite heavy. tell us all about what my gables look like through google, dimwit. > > Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link > to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did > plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really > shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase > from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than > Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go > on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as > your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without > any truth to it whatsoever. > > Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the > triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of > three great circles: > > First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as > one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the > sphere, divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces. The > sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the > curvature is 4*pi divided by its surface area. If the triangle's area is > x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is > x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established > was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi = > curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just > area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum > = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees. > > What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any* > triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the > whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that > area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can > tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed > octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a > triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same > area will do likewise. > > Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized > *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to > be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly > spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my > next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you > don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded. > > *snicker* > -- i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-05 16:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <doaabbpu1hm97k44v42v0j41ogp7o65cqi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550762 |
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:33:09 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >the projection with this one is quite heavy. tell us all about what my >gables look like through google, dimwit. You know he's just gonna say "jus trollen guv".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 07:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <008a3402c4f6472527242ba346c10ad4@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550762 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.ycdp5jx6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > the projection with this one is quite heavy. DildoRider "weighs" projection the same as he weighs a man's balls... with his uvula. LOL > tell us all about what my gables look like through google, dimwit. The gables on *top* of your roof, that you took pictures of? DildoRider doesn't know what a gable is. LOL DildoRider's so pwned I've got him running around taking pictures of random parts of his crapshack half-a-house. LOL Your check-throats are deteriorated, too, DildoRider, and your cricket needs reflashing. <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 06:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.ycetn8eytm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #550835 |
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:17:01 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.ycdp5jx6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> the projection with this one is quite heavy. > > DildoRider "weighs" projection the same as he weighs a man's balls... > with his uvula. LOL well, that's exactly ONE more time that you've thought about men's balls and homosexual erotica today than i have... and i'm bi. is there something you'd like to tell us fakey? hey, at least you're winning at something even if it's only in conjuring up your true carnal desires and over-sharing them on alt.usenet.kooks. >> tell us all about what my gables look like through google, dimwit. > > The gables on *top* of your roof, that you took pictures of? no, the imaginary "porch gables" that you invented and said were in disrepair during your whole little "gable fable" fiasco where you pathetically pretended that you had stopped by my house and "knocked on my door" (when there's a doorbell). did you forget about that story? you ran out of things around my property that you could describe here on usenet that google street view could show you and made up some horse shit about gables - probably because you confused my house with the neighbors' two doors down, whose porch actually does have a gable over it that could use some work - but probably not - you're just that stupid, i think. i couldn't resist sharing a pic of my flat porch roof to not only prove you wrong, but to also send you into another months-long frothy backpedaling tailspin, which is where we find you today. http://imgur.com/FTuE0oq "You should fix the porch gable." - FNVWe the Lying Spinning Fucktard in message <7507f92ee1071e24fa5024ee6d7e80d8@dizum.com> <remainder of your snickerTurds flushed> -- i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 19:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9d663ab28e10998161c0db2af6ab9224@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550868 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.ycetn8eytm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:17:01 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.ycdp5jx6tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:
>>> the projection with this one is quite heavy.
>> DildoRider "weighs" projection the same as he weighs a man's balls...
>> with his uvula. LOL
> well, that's exactly ONE more time that you've thought about men's balls
> and homosexual erotica today than i have... and i'm bi. is there
> something you'd like to tell us fakey? hey, at least you're winning at
> something even if it's only in conjuring up your true carnal desires and
> over-sharing them on alt.usenet.kooks.
Nicely gargled, DildoRider. LOL
>>> tell us all about what my gables look like through google, dimwit.
>> The gables on *top* of your roof, that you took pictures of?
> no, the imaginary "porch gables" that you invented and said were in
> disrepair during your whole little "gable fable" fiasco where you
> pathetically pretended that you had stopped by my house and "knocked on my
> door" (when there's a doorbell). did you forget about that story?
>
> you ran out of things around my property that you could describe here on
> usenet that google street view could show you and made up some horse shit
> about gables - probably because you confused my house with the neighbors'
> two doors down, whose porch actually does have a gable over it that could
> use some work - but probably not - you're just that stupid, i think.
>
> i couldn't resist sharing a pic of my flat porch roof to not only prove
> you wrong, but to also send you into another months-long frothy
> backpedaling tailspin, which is where we find you today.
>
> http://imgur.com/FTuE0oq
>
> "You should fix the porch gable." - FNVWe the Lying Spinning Fucktard in
> message <7507f92ee1071e24fa5024ee6d7e80d8@dizum.com>
>
> <remainder of your snickerTurds flushed>
Translation:
"BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!"
<snicker>
Wow, I've got the retard chomping that hook so hard he's breaking his
teeth. That's because he's *so* retarded he doesn't know what a gable
is, and he proved it by taking a picture of the *top* of his roof.
LOL!
--
Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757
DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
<snicker>
=================================================
DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================
DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================
This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.
150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 12:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <o2hcbbhfqam14ik0afsa47nh7t96iq20ab@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550944 |
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 19:35:00 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB > LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL > EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE > AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA > TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 14:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.ycffb2pktm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #550947 |
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 14:07:15 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 19:35:00 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB >> LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL >> EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE >> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA >> TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT! yep. it's all he's got left and he's doing it in multiple threads now. live action footage of snickers here: http://i.imgur.com/1P4HKOW.gifv -- i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 07:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <a56f36549e06183d9cbf20e4f756bc5d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550736 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0Ooki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n92saj$1dp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================
I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.
<snicker>
> On 05/02/2016 1:30 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
>>> http://littleshop.physics.colostate.edu/activities/atmos1/ColderOnClearThanCloudy.pdf
>> Bwahahahaaa! A high school
> Colorado State University physics department. Are you illiterate or
> something?
Yeah, it's still a high school level experiment. If what they're
teaching in "college level" physics classes in Colorado is pointing a
temperature gun at a pane of glass and conflating the glass to a
cloud, they must all be high. LOL
>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>> atmospheric window
> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
present. Moron. LOL
So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
skewing the results.
But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
--------------------------
Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
"The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
_decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
=================================================================
"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
"When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
of that total back into space.
{NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
=================================================================
To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
facilities proving it's cooling:
=================================================================
<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
*decrease*.
Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
cooling has set in... since 1998.
<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
"We have been building models and there are now robust
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
physical model says it has to be warming."
===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.
You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
===============================================================
You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
SPNAK!
>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
>> hurricanes. LOL
>>
>> "The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>
>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
>> halfwits believe in. LOL
> *noisy crickets*
Spankard. Backpedal faster, you're losing. LOL
>>> ... 4*pi. For the regular, Platonic solid tetrahedron with
>>> equilaterial-triangle faces, in Euclidean space, it's 6*cos^-1(1/3) -
>>> 4*pi, and will exceed this in positively-curved space and be deficient
>>> of it in negatively-curved space.)
>> Nicely cut-n-pasted from what I'm sure was another of your all-day
>> Google-raping sessions, LunkHead.
And now let's watch the kooktard who's been proven to be *wrong*,
who's had his stupid face rubbed in the reality that the planet is
*cooling*, that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas, that he's a gullible
goof who bought into the lie of AGW because he's a gullible goof who
bought into the lie of liberalism... let's watch that spankard
fucktard spew unrelated froth as means of propping up a weak little
straw man so he can declare some form of 'victolly' before he runs
away with his tail tucked. LOL
<Turns On LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
---------------------------------
> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link
> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did
> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really
> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase
> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than
> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go
> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as
> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without
> any truth to it whatsoever.
>
> Meanwhile, I will use the formula to derive the result for the
> triangular chunk of a sphere surface from ninety-degree segments of
> three great circles:
IOW, you're a lune-loon. LOL
> First, note that such a triangle covers 1/8 of the sphere's surface, as
> one can, using three mutually perpendicular planes intersecting the
> sphere,
So you've created 4 lunes as a part of the spherical surface bounded
by two great circles at their axial antipodal intersections, then
introduced another great circle to create triangles from the lunes.
Nothing very difficult yet, LunkHead. They teach this in introductory
geometry, right? Or did the college you attended teach you such
"advanced theory" as aiming a temperature gun at a pane of glass, and
conflating glass with clouds? LOL
> divide it into eight such curved triangular surfaces.
You're not breaking any new ground here, LunkHead.
> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area
You mean its surface area. Sloppiness begets sloppiness. LOL
> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead. LOL
You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL
You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
LOL
Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.
But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
introductory college course-level geometry goof.
<snicker>
> divided by its surface area.
Wow, LunkHead "knows" that a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature
of 1/r^2. Carl Friedrich Gauss, LunkHead ain't. That's what happens
when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur. LOL
Of course, LunkHead is deliberately sticking with simple geometric
shapes, while conveniently neglecting to mention that a 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold in the presence of an orbiting mass will be more
akin to a complex saddle surface with pseudospherical hyperbolic
surface geometry, and that'd require differential trigonometry of the
eigenvalues of the shape operator to figure out the principal
curvatures, and LunkHead doesn't dare stray into that territory. LOL
He's fine (FSVO "fine", given that he's already fucked up his simple
Gaussian curvature equation above. LOL) as long as he sticks to
describing a simple triangle or sphere wrapped on a non-Euclidean
positive-Gaussian-curvature space, which he can describe via the more
general (and easier) Gauss-Bonnet theorem, but complex shapes which
require surface integrals of the Gaussian curvature to derive the
total curvature and thus the deviation of the sums of a triangle's
angles from 180 degrees would expose him as a Google-raping fraud with
an introductory geometry college class or two under his belt, and as a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy kook merely playing at being an
astrophysicist.
<snicker>
> If the triangle's area is
> x times the sphere's surface area, then the area times the curvature is
> x*A*4*pi/A = 4*pi*x. For x = 1/8 that gives pi/2. Previously established
> was that for a triangle in a curved manifold angle_sum - pi =
> curvature_integral, which for a surface of constant curvature is just
> area * curvature, so angle_sum - pi = pi/2 in our example. So, angle_sum
> = 3*pi/2, or 270 degrees.
>
> What's interesting here is that this angle sum applies to *any*
> triangular chunk of the surface of a sphere whose area is 1/8 of the
> whole sphere. It could be a weird long and narrow triangle with that
> area and the angle sum will still be 270. Just eyeballing a sphere can
> tell you that the special case of three of the vertices of an inscribed
> octahedron (not including any two antipodal ones) will give you a
> triangle with than angle sum, but not that *any* triangle of the same
> area will do likewise.
>
> Now, you go ahead and try to find somewhere I might have plagiarized
> *that* from as well. And fail. But you are obsessed with proving me to
> be some sort of fraud, so you will spend a long time fruitlessly
> spinning your wheels trying before you give up, and that shall be my
> next victory over you. That, and knowing all sorts of math that you
> don't, and never will, because you're too ... lunkheaded.
---------------------------------
<Turns Off LunkHead's Spew Spigot>
Whew! That was quite the butthurt bleating, LunkHead. I've got you
desperately raping Google *and* spewing hard about a completely
unrelated topic, all while my steel-toed boot continues to rapid-fire
kick your stoooopid kook ass on the topic that matters... that of
anthropogenic global warming being proven to be a scam by none other
than NASA, that of your continuing to deny the well-known and
thoroughly-studied existence of the 11-micron infrared atmospheric
window, and that of your continuing to deny that CO2 is a global
*coolant* _because_ of that 11-micron infrared atmospheric window, as
the NASA SABER study and the other referenced peer-reviewed studies
proved.
SPNAK!
> *sn<SMACKAKOOK!>
You're not worthy of the <snicker>, LunkHead. The <snicker> is
reserved for those intelligent enough that they don't have to rape
Google and plagiarize / modify website information to try to "prove"
they're not a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroom-goober.
<snicker>
--
Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 561 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 02:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n945me$1143$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #550836 |
On 06/02/2016 1:38 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14 >>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared >>> atmospheric window > >> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok. > > Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared > atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL! Nope. Reread what I said, kOok. This time for comprehension. > Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. That emission line has nothing to do with *blackbody* radiation, the main radiative mechanism for the transfer of heat, lunkhead. >>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered. >> >> *noisy crickets* *quieter crickets* >> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link >> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did >> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really >> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase >> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than >> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go >> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as >> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without >> any truth to it whatsoever. *crickets* > You mean the Gaussian curve The what? What is a "Gaussian curve", ko0ky? Inventing new kinds of math now to try to get out of having been pwnz0red? > and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r > due to its symmetry Not since ko0ky redefined porch gables and split-phase electrical systems has he spewed something so gOofy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_curvature "For example, a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 everywhere..." SPNAK! on ko0ky. (Expect some sort of anti-Wikipedia screed from him soon.) > Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean > space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, You could probably write science fiction of comparable quality to L. Ron Hubbard's output. Another career option for you is laughter therapist for Stephen Hawking, because what you just wrote is a howler. Curvature varies from place to place, and in this universe is mostly positive (small areas where it's negative can be produced via means like the Casimir effect). No single spot has "both positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature", however. Now go buzz off and attempt to educate yourself. Goodness knows, stupid though you seem to be, maybe the 174th-or-so try will be the charm. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550838 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
<news:n945me$1143$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:
> On 06/02/2016 1:38 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================
I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.
<snicker>
>>>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>>>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>>>> atmospheric window
>>> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
>> Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
>> atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
>>
>> Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
>> range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
>> micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
>> ~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
>> window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
>> constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
>>
>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
>> atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
>> to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
>> present. Moron. LOL
>>
>> So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
>> would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
>> from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
>> window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
>> skewing the results.
>>
>> But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
>> do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
>> NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
>>
>> --------------------------
>>
>> Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
>> 180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
>> causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
>>
>> "The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>
>> To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
>>
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>> =================================================================
>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>> James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>> "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>> molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>>
>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>> of that total back into space.
>>
>> {NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>> wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>> =================================================================
>>
>> To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
>> from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
>> facilities proving it's cooling:
>>
>> =================================================================
>> <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
>> *decrease*.
>>
>> Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
>> *decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>>
>> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>> orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>> cooling has set in... since 1998.
>>
>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>
>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>
>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>> archived it):
>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>
>> "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
>> is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
>>
>> <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>> "We have been building models and there are now robust
>> contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
>> Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
>> physical model says it has to be warming."
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>
>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>> relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
>> scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
>> out of the bag.
>>
>> You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>> ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
>> can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
>> you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
>> window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
>> your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
>> do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
>> your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
>> and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
>>
>> SPNAK!
> Nope. Reread what I said, kOok. This time for comprehension.
That's exactly what you said, you backpedaling moron.
I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
5.5 to 14 microns"
You said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter
snow".
Good gawd, you're pathetic, you can't even acknowledge when you've
obviously fucked up. Spankard. LOL
>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron.
> That emission line has nothing to do with *blackbody* radiation, the
> main radiative mechanism for the transfer of heat, lunkhead.
Wien's displacement law states that the black body radiation curve for
different temperatures peaks at a wavelength inversely proportional to
the temperature.
Wien's Displacement Law:
Displacement_max = b/T
Where:
T = absolute temperature in Kelvin
b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K
Given that:
32 F = freezing point of water
32 F = 273.15 K
2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
And that's a massive SPNAK! on Lunkhead the Backpedaling Moron. LOL!
>>>>> Thus, Question 2 remains unanswered.
>>> *noisy crickets*
>>>> Look at LunkHead dancing furiously in trying to cover up the fact that
>>>> he was *wrong* in his contention that global warming caused stronger
>>>> hurricanes. LOL
>>>>
>>>> "The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
>>>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>>>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>>>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>>>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>>>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>>>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>>>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>>>
>>>> Three peer reviewed studies, combined with the NASA SABER study, prove
>>>> you *wrong* on every single contention you've made, LunkHead... and
>>>> coincidentally, it proves the entire underlying premise of the Klimate
>>>> Katastrophe Kook AGW crowd is a fucking lie that only uneducated
>>>> halfwits believe in. LOL
> *quieter crickets*
You're pathetic, you backpedaling snipping spankard. LOL
You lost. Don't feel bad, stupid always loses.
<snicker>
>>> Then you won't mind backing up that accusation with proof. Say, a link
>>> to where I allegedly plagiarized that from. C'mon -- if I really did
>>> plagiarize it from something I found with a Google search, you really
>>> shouldn't have any trouble finding the original. Just paste a phrase
>>> from what I wrote into google and try to find something (other than
>>> Google Groups's archive of my post, of course) that I copied it from. Go
>>> on, and then post the link here. Your failure to do so will be taken as
>>> your tacit admission that your accusation was a load of bullshit without
>>> any truth to it whatsoever.
> *crickets*
I proved you fucked up that simple geometry, if you can't even do
introductory geometry without fucking it up, you're not an
astrophysicist, LunkHead.
SPNAK!
>>> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area
>>> is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi
>> Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
>> Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
>> backpedal, LunkHead. LOL
>>
>> You mean the Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi),
>> and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r
>> due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's
>> Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? LOL
> The what? What is a "Gaussian curve", ko0ky? Inventing new kinds of math
> now to try to get out of having been pwnz0red?
Wheee! Look at LunkHead backpedal after he got caught fucking up a
simple geometry problem because he raped Wikipedia, which was
incorrect. LOL!
I wrote "curve" instead of "curvature", whereas LunkHead fucked up his
simple geometry, and *continues* to defend his fuckup because he can't
even understand the equations he raped from Wikipedia. LOL!
>> You mean 1 / area^2? Did LunkHead just fuck up his simple geometry?
>> LOL
> Not since ko0ky redefined porch gables and split-phase electrical
> systems has he spewed something so gOofy.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_curvature
>
> "For example, a sphere of radius r has Gaussian curvature 1/r^2
> everywhere..."
And that's why I wrote:
"That's what happens when you try to rape Wikipedia, you poseur." LOL
<http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianCurvature.html>
"For a sphere, the Gaussian curvature is K=1/a^2"
<https://www.math.hmc.edu/~gu/curves_and_surfaces/surfaces/sphere.html>
"Gaussian Curvature: K[u,v] = 1/a^2"
<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
"Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r."
SPNAK! on the Wikipedia-raping moron who's *so* stupid he couldn't
even catch a simple error in a simple geometry problem. LOL!
> SPN<SMACKAKOOK!>
Gaussian curve = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi)
What's r^2 / r^2, Lunkhead? Does that not equal 1?
Therefore what's 1 * 1 * 4 * pi, Lunkhead? Does that not equal 4 * pi?
Therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due
to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian
curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*. LOL
Does LunkHead not know how to cancel on both sides of the equation? If
he did, he'd have caught his stupid "The sphere's Gaussian curvature
is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi" error,
but since you raped Wikipedia for the equations (which Wikipedia has
wrong), and you don't understand the equations, you not only didn't
catch the error, you continue to defend your error. LOL!
SPNAK! on the backpedaling moron who doesn't know how to cancel on
both sides of an equation, and can't even do simple geometry. LOL!
>> Of course, in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the non-Euclidean
>> space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian curvature, and
>> therefore you'd be working with a Gaussian curvature described by -1 /
>> area^2 *and* 1 / area^2, right? After all, doesn't a 4-D Minkowski
>> space-time manifold essentially project and transform the (usually
>> roughly) spherical (elliptical geometry) objects within it to a plane
>> geometry with hyperbolic mass "points" at the intersections of the
>> principal curvatures and tangential plane to produce homeomorphic
>> isometries? Sure it does. Isn't that what Lobachevsky discovered? Sure
>> it is. I mean, isn't that how gravity essentially works, via the
>> metric curvature tensor isometric differential in the tensor field
>> between the curvature of a Riemannian manifold and Euclidean space, as
>> described by the geodesic deviation equation? Sure it is.
>>
>> But don't go there, that way lies you outing yourself as an
>> introductory college course-level geometry goof.
> You could probably write science fiction of comparable quality to L. Ron
> Hubbard's output. Another career option for you is laughter therapist
> for Stephen Hawking, because what you just wrote is a howler.
LunkHead admits he doesn't understand the reality of what I wrote,
which means there's no way in hell he's an astrophysicist. Way to out
yourself, ShroomTard. LOL!
Lunkhead didn't even know that the Riemann curvature tensor concept is
the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity, the
modern theory of gravity, and that the curvature of spacetime is
described by the geodesic deviation equation!
Lunkhead admits he has no clue how space-time is warped by mass!
What a moron! He's no astrophysicist, he's just a poseur, pretending
that he's smarter than he really is. In reality, he's a fucking idiot.
<snicker>
> Curvature varies from place to place, and in this universe is mostly
> positive (small areas where it's negative can be produced via means like
> the Casimir effect). No single spot has "both positive *and* negative
> Gaussian curvature", however.
Did I say that curvature was positive and negative for any "single
spot", LunkHead? Or are you desperately trying to conflate what I
correctly stated above, as even you are forced to admit, to something
I'd not said?
And I quote myself: "in the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, the
non-Euclidean space would have positive *and* negative Gaussian
curvature".
Now LunkHead is trying to state that all of the 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold resides in a "single spot" (Lunkhead's words).
LOL!
What a moron!
SPNAK!
> Now go buzz off and attempt to educate yourself. Goodness knows, stupid
> though you seem to be, maybe the 174th-or-so try will be the charm.
>
> *snicker*
Awwww, the spankard backpedals like mad, snips like crazy, gets caught
in even more erroneous thinking and now he's preparing to tuck tail
and run away because he's facing an opponent with orders of magnitude
more intelligence than his puny little shroom-brain can muster. LOL!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK! SPNAK!
Ah, it's good to be the king.
<snicker>
--
Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 10:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ekccbbhjev1gbbduigg4os4g59senp60rf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #550920 |
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:20:54 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >a fucking idiot Pretty much sums it up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 20:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <cd8a619da336dee5cec7c75f5c1ef6a6@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550920 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
<news:ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in
> <news:n945me$1143$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
> the wood chipper again:
>> On 06/02/2016 1:38 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus wrote:
> Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> ========================================================
>> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
>
> Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
> coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
> apparently.
>
> And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
> on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
>
> Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
> anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
> it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
> between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
> f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
> getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
> mouth!
>
> Oh, here's Kensi:
> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
>
> She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
> I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
>
> Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
> thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
>
> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
>
> You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
> say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
> "sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
> kinky. LOL
>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
>
>> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
>> any good telescopes lately?
>
> Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
> capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
>
> <snicker>
> ========================================================
> ========================================================
>
> I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
> time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
> work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
> which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
> lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
> because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
> assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
> jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
> dude.
>
> <snicker>
>>>>> Most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from 5.5 to 14
>>>>> microns, therefore it's measuring outside the ~11-micron infrared
>>>>> atmospheric window
>>>> So is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter snow, kOok.
>>> Lunkhead is now attempting to state that the ~11-micron infrared
>>> atmospheric window extends from 5.5 to 14 micron. LOL!
>>>
>>> Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared
>>> range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6
>>> micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at
>>> ~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow
>>> window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which
>>> constitutes the infrared atmospheric window.
>>>
>>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron. Right in the center of the
>>> atmospheric infrared window, thus that energy is radiated straight out
>>> to space unimpeded, without heating the atmosphere, even if clouds are
>>> present. Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> So the infrared thermometer used in that high school-level experiment
>>> would have been picking up reflected IR from ~5.5 to ~8 microns and
>>> from ~12.5 to ~14 microns, which is outside the infrared atmospheric
>>> window and thus reflecting the heat of the infrared laser diode, thus
>>> skewing the results.
>>>
>>> But then, high school-level experiments are the best LunkHead can
>>> do... meanwhile, those peer reviewed studies remain unrefuted, the
>>> NASA SABER study remains undisputed, and LunkHead remains *wrong*. LOL
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>>
>>> Kensi The K0ok doesn't want anyone to realize that he was yet again
>>> 180 degrees out from reality. To wit, LunkHead k'lamed global warming
>>> causes stronger hurricanes, but in reality:
>>>
>>> "The total and UV solar radiation - A hurricane's maximum potential
>>> energy is _inversely_ related to the temperature at the top of the
>>> convective clouds in the central core (Emanuel, 1991; Holland, 1997).
>>> An active Sun warms the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere
>>> through ozone absorption of additional UV radiation. A warming
>>> response in the upper troposphere to increased solar UV forcing
>>> _decreases_ the atmosphere convective available potential energy
>>> leading to a _weaker_ cyclone (Elsner and Jagger, 2008)."
>>>
>>> To wit, LunkHead k'lamed that CO2 causes global warming:
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>>> =================================================================
>>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," explains
>>> James Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator.
>>> "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these
>>> molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>>>
>>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>>> of that total back into space.
>>>
>>> {NOTE: They did this by absorbing then re-emitting that energy at the
>>> wavelength of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window.}
>>> =================================================================
>>>
>>> To wit, LunkHead k'lames the planet is warming, in spite of the proof
>>> from NASA, UAH, UK Met, RSS, NSIDC, SIDC SILSO and other research
>>> facilities proving it's cooling:
>>>
>>> =================================================================
>>> <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>>> The UK Met trend shows a -0.014 C per decade (and accelerating)
>>> *decrease*.
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>>> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
>>> *decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>>>
>>> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>>> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>>> orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>>> cooling has set in... since 1998.
>>>
>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>
>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>>> archived it):
>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>>
>>> "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
>>> is not statistically significant." - James Hansen
>>>
>>> <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>>> "We have been building models and there are now robust
>>> contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for
>>> Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The
>>> physical model says it has to be warming."
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>>> relations problem for us." - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
>>> scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
>>> out of the bag.
>>>
>>> You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>>> ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> You can't refute any of the several peer-reviewed studies posted, you
>>> can't refute the NASA SABER study proving CO2 is a global *coolant*,
>>> you can't refute the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric
>>> window which is how CO2 works as a global *coolant*, and in order for
>>> your k'lame of CO2 being a greenhouse gas to work, you have to somehow
>>> do away with the infrared atmospheric window. To fail to do that means
>>> your kook contention of CO2 being a greenhouse gas violates the First
>>> and Second Laws of Thermodynamics.
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>> Nope. Reread what I said, kOok. This time for comprehension.
> That's exactly what you said, you backpedaling moron.
>
> I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
> 5.5 to 14 microns"
>
> You said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of winter
> snow".
>
> Good gawd, you're pathetic, you can't even acknowledge when you've
> obviously fucked up. Spankard. LOL
>>> Water and ice emit at ~11 micron.
>> That emission line has nothing to do with *blackbody* radiation, the
>> main radiative mechanism for the transfer of heat, lunkhead.
> Wien's displacement law states that the black body radiation curve for
> different temperatures peaks at a wavelength inversely proportional to
> the temperature.
>
> Wien's Displacement Law:
> Displacement_max = b/T
> Where:
> T = absolute temperature in Kelvin
> b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K
>
> Given that:
> 32 F = freezing point of water
> 32 F = 273.15 K
>
> 2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
> which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
> atmospheric window.
>
> And that's a massive SPNAK! on Lunkhead the Backpedaling Moron. LOL!
Here's another SPNAK! on Ko0O0oki Kensi the LunkHeaded Libtard:
We can use Wien's Displacement Law to determine the temperature range
which LunkHead k'lames snow is at when it's emitting blackbody
radiation from 5.5 to 14 micron.
I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from
5.5 to 14 microns"
Lunkhead said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of
winter snow".
So let's do the math:
Wien's Displacement Law:
Displacement_max = b/T
Where:
T = absolute temperature in Kelvin
b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K
Given that:
32 F = freezing point of water
32 F = 273.15 K
2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow,
which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
So, plugging in 14 microns, we come up with a temperature of 207.1428
K or -86.8128 F.
Now we plug in 5.5 microns, we come up with a temperature of 527.2727
K or 489.4209 F. Lunkhead says snow can exist at 489 F! Bwahahahaaa!
What a *spankard*! What a *moron*! What a backpedaling bleatfarting
*idiot*!
SPNAK!
<snicker>
--
Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's
growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher
in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991
Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were
conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the
result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a
conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that
takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to
provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them
as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and
k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that
she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her
ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was
a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame
that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority
of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals),
she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience",
"profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's
thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting
(ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear
that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me
everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in
her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level
of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts
grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more
and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 16:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n95q3a$1k43$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #550948 |
On 06/02/2016 2:01 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from > 5.5 to 14 microns, most of which is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window" > > [Kensi] said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of > winter snow". IOW, I said most of it is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window. That you seem to be disputing that (and then using selective quoting, which I corrected above, to "support" your k'lames) means that *you* have now just k'lamed that the blackbody radiation from winter snow comes out in a single narrow emission line at 11 microns, which is such *obvious* bullshit that were sci.physics moderated you'd be banned for life as a health hazard on the grounds that you might someday manage to induce *literally* side-splitting laughter in a significant portion of the audience there, sending them to the emergency room with major bleeding and maybe killing one or two of them. Your confusion about sphere curvature is nearly as hilarious, particularly when my calculation gets the answer for the interior angle sum of a triangular octant of a sphere *right* and yours *doesn't*, which is easy to empirically verify with three pieces of string, a protractor, and a grade school geography class's globe. > So let's do the math: No. No, my own sides hurt too much from laughing uncontrollably already. I've had enough for one day. Go amuse someone else with your howlers for a while. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-07 00:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <e0d0032ba47785435d97ff3c02c04c8a@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #550974 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:n95q3a$1k43$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 06/02/2016 2:01 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from >> 5.5 to 14 microns, most of which is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window" >> >> [Kensi] said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of >> winter snow". Let's watch a spankard backpedal... > IOW, I said most of it "it" being "a patch of winter snow" > is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window. Wrong. As I proved via the Wien Displacement Law: Wien's Displacement Law: Displacement_max = b/T Where: T = absolute temperature in Kelvin b = Wien's displacement constant, 2900 um K Given that: 32 F = freezing point of water 32 F = 273.15 K 2900 um K / 273.15 K = 10.6168 micron blackbody radiation from snow, which is as close as one can get to the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. In order for your k'lame to be true, for that "patch of winter snow" to be emitting outside the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window in the range of 5.5 to 14 micron, you'd have the following temperatures: So, plugging in 14 microns, we come up with a temperature of 207.1428 K or -86.8128 F. Now, you'll be getting right on explaining how this snow, supposedly at -86 F, is giving off heat to a *warmer* surrounding atmosphere, and thereby violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, you backpedaling spankard. SPNAK! Now we plug in 5.5 microns, we come up with a temperature of 527.2727 K or 489.4209 F. Now, you'll be getting right on explaining exactly how snow can exist at 489 F, you backpedaling spankard. SPNAK! > That > you seem to be disputing that (and then using selective quoting, which I > corrected above, to "support" your k'lames) means that *you* have now > just k'lamed that the blackbody radiation from winter snow comes out in > a single narrow emission line at 11 microns, It's a very narrow range, obviously bordered on the shorter wavelengths by the temperature reached, and bordered on the longer wavelengths by the melting point of snow, whereupon that snow would melt away, exposing the land beneath, which emits at longer wavelengths. So at the predominant temperatures of, let's say -50 F to 32 F, we get wavelengths of from 12.7419 micron to 10.6168 micron. Now, if you'll remember, I'd earlier said: ========================================== Lunkhead doesn't know that atmospheric absorption in the infrared range rises rapidly below ~8 micron, reaching ~100% absorption at ~6 micron. On the opposite side, atmospheric absorption rises rapidly at ~12.5 micron, reaching ~100% at ~14.2 micron. So there's a very narrow window at ~10 to ~12.5 micron, and from ~8 to ~9 micron which constitutes the infrared atmospheric window. ========================================== So for all but the most severe cold, snow emits in the wavelength range of the infrared atmospheric window, you backpedaling spankard. SPNAK! > which is such *obvious* bullshit that were sci.physics moderated > you'd be banned for life as a health hazard on the grounds that > you might someday manage to induce *literally* side-splitting > laughter in a significant portion of the audience there, sending > them to the emergency room with major bleeding and maybe killing > one or two of them. And yet, I don't see you refuting that scientific proof, LunkHead. Because you can't, you backpedaling spankard. SPNAK! > Your confusion about sphere curvature is nearly as hilarious, > particularly when my calculation gets the answer for the interior angle > sum of a triangular octant of a sphere *right* and yours *doesn't*, > which is easy to empirically verify with three pieces of string, a > protractor, and a grade school geography class's globe. Awww, you're lying to try to cover up your lie that the Gaussian Curvature of a perfect sphere is dependent upon its radius... of course, anyone who's had any geometry classes knows you're a backpedaling spankard, as does anyone who Googles "Gaussian curvature of a sphere" and avoids the erroneous data on Wikipedia that you obviously used. What's the matter, LunkHead, don't you understand the equations you're using? SPNAK! >> So let's do the math: > No. No, my own sides hurt too much from laughing uncontrollably already. > I've had enough for one day. Go amuse someone else with your howlers for > a while. There's a phrase that applies perfectly here: "Your saying it doesn't make it so." You're delusional, you're snipping out all the info that proves you're delusional, you've been proven *wrong* on every single point you've brought up, and now you're backpedaling with outright lies... and the whole while you've demonstrated you can't even do simple geometry problems without fucking them up, you've admitted you didn't even know that the Riemann curvature tensor concept is the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity, the modern theory of gravity, and that the curvature of spacetime is described by the geodesic deviation equation, and therefore you have no clue how space-time is warped by mass, and therefore there's no way you're an astrophysicist, you backpedaling moron. On top of that, you've further k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time is predominantly positive Gaussian curvature with only minimal negative Gaussian curvature, thereby proving you have no clue of the effects magnetism has upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, which means you have no clue about how space-time can be warped. And given that you're a half-witted moron, I highly doubt you'll ever figure that out, because you've demonstrated your fundamental conceptual errors as pertains not only 4-D Minkowski space-time but of magnetism, as well... and you can't even do basic geometry problems, so your figuring out how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold will be too high a hurdle for you by far. SPNAK! I win. You lose. Because stupid always loses, Stupid. Do you really think you're fooling anyone, Lunkhead? Spankard. <snicker> -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheet is shrinking faster than ever when it's growing (to the tune of 49 gT/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were at least 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 562 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 20:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n9652d$381$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #550989 |
On 06/02/2016 6:39 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Ko0O0oki kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in > <news:n95q3a$1k43$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into > the wood chipper again: > >> On 06/02/2016 2:01 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus wrote: > >>> I said: "most infrared thermometers utilize a band of infrared from >>> 5.5 to 14 microns, most of which is outside the 11 micron atmospheric window" >>> >>> [Kensi] said "so is most of the blackbody radiation from a patch of >>> winter snow". > > Let's watch a spankard backpedal... > >> IOW, I said most of it > > "it" being "a patch of winter snow" *facepalm* If I've told you once I've told you a thousand times: *read* for *comprehension*. >> That >> you seem to be disputing that (and then using selective quoting, which I >> corrected above, to "support" your k'lames) means that *you* have now >> just k'lamed that the blackbody radiation from winter snow comes out in >> a single narrow emission line at 11 microns, > > It's a very narrow range, obviously bordered on the shorter > wavelengths by the temperature reached, and bordered on the longer > wavelengths by the melting point of snow, Proof that you don't understand how blackbody radiation works. No surprise there, of course. > Awww, you're lying to try to cover up your lie that the Gaussian > Curvature of a perfect sphere is dependent upon its radius... > ... the erroneous data on Wikipedia that you obviously used ... Once again, if you're so sure the wikipedia article is wrong, go correct it yourself. I dare you. > On top of that, you've further k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time > is predominantly positive Gaussian curvature with only minimal > negative Gaussian curvature, thereby proving you have no clue of the > effects magnetism has upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, In standard general relativity, it has *no* effects (save to cause a small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field). It does a lot more in the abandoned Kaluza-Klein theory, an attempt to unify gravitation and electromagnetism back in the twenties (before they even knew about either of the two nuclear forces). > you've demonstrated your fundamental conceptual errors Ohhh, the irony. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web