Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516082 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 131 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:29 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:55 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:23 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:51 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:15 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:09 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:08 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:33 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 14:42 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:51 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:05 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:13 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:54 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:22 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:14 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:30 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 11:30 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:39 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 23:16 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 10:00 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:13 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:26 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:22 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 23:52 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 23:53 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 22:06 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 08:49 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:49 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:34 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:05 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:08 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:23 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:35 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:03 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 19:09 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:36 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 07:02 +0200
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:17 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:37 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:07 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:06 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:19 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:57 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:16 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:35 -0700
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:57 -0500
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:32 +0000
Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <bbc4f85e483f68e2e9f87f6a617d92fa@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516528 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >>>> explosion, kook. >>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> >> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. >> >> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera >> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP >> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not >> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned >> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from >> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens >> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and >> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. >> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. >> >> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the >> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found >> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. >> >> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit >> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you >> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're >> making of yourself. >> >> Kook. LOL >>> Rocky >> Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: >> >> ====================================================== >> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below >> the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to >> today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that >> depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's >> *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al >> Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human >> history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep >> Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. >> >> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an >> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a >> nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of >> the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused >> the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would >> have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the >> immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized >> your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for >> dozens of miles radius. >> >> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's >> no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been >> from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of >> radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the >> tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights >> that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a >> nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how >> delusional you are. >> >> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or >> anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). >> They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >> weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear >> weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. >> >> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people >> in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, >> from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 >> MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were >> buried. >> >> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >> source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay >> byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it >> decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any >> sort of nuclear chain reaction. >> >> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* >> *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical >> support column and *NO* EMP: >> ====================== >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount >> of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >> ====================== >> >> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to >> survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be >> approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature >> would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? >> >> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a >> hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding >> rock. >> >> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of >> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were >> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects >> were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. >> >> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent >> down to service those nukes (because now that you know the >> neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a >> periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire >> facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the >> technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with >> "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area >> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to >> admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 >> years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 >> to 1840 degree heat? >> >> 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) >> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all >> 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the >> Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your >> kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" >> (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? >> >> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC >> site on 11 Sep 2001? >> >> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >> underground, Ko0K? >> >> 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have >> tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles >> deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC >> complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to >> detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up >> your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which >> you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference >> was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion >> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The >> Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). >> >> 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes >> (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your >> previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 >> nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming >> under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in >> agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? >> While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps >> (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was >> primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any >> contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in >> place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this >> *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed >> "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where >> your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly >> head again. LOL >> >> 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your >> "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be >> telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by >> 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes >> which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground >> MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet >> and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC >> and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the >> fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn >> out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every >> piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's >> *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL >> >> Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back >> on your meds, you delusional loon. >> ====================================================== >> >> There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of >> physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by >> point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp >> simple physics. >> >> Kook. LOL > i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i > checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any > random electronic device. There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes, you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield against. You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow flies) away from Hawaii. And that was with 1962 electronic devices... no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP. Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously. They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. Kook. LOL > i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed > recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. Kook. LOL > ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global warming > is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or > anything. NukeKook. LOL Climate Change Denier. LOL -- Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home with mommy. Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516703 |
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as > root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did >>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >>>>> explosion, kook. > >>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> > >>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >>> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. >>> >>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera >>> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP >>> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not >>> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned >>> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from >>> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens >>> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and >>> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. >>> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. >>> >>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >>> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the >>> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found >>> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. >>> >>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > >>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit >>> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you >>> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're >>> making of yourself. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > >>>> Rocky > >>> Now, get to addressing the 17 ways your kook conspiracy theory >>> violates the laws of physics: >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >>> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below >>> the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to >>> today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that >>> depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's >>> *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al >>> Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human >>> history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep >>> Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. >>> >>> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an >>> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a >>> nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of >>> the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused >>> the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would >>> have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the >>> immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized >>> your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for >>> dozens of miles radius. >>> >>> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's >>> no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been >>> from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of >>> radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the >>> tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights >>> that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a >>> nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how >>> delusional you are. >>> >>> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or >>> anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). >>> They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >>> weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear >>> weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. >>> >>> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >>> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people >>> in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, >>> from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 >>> MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were >>> buried. >>> >>> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >>> source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay >>> byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it >>> decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >>> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >>> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any >>> sort of nuclear chain reaction. >>> >>> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* >>> *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical >>> support column and *NO* EMP: >>> ====================== >>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >>> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >>> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount >>> of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >>> ====================== >>> >>> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to >>> survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be >>> approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature >>> would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? >>> >>> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a >>> hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding >>> rock. >>> >>> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >>> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of >>> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were >>> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects >>> were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. >>> >>> 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent >>> down to service those nukes (because now that you know the >>> neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a >>> periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire >>> facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the >>> technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with >>> "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area >>> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to >>> admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 >>> years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 >>> to 1840 degree heat? >>> >>> 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) >>> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all >>> 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the >>> Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your >>> kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" >>> (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? >>> >>> 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >>> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC >>> site on 11 Sep 2001? >>> >>> 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >>> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >>> underground, Ko0K? >>> >>> 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have >>> tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles >>> deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC >>> complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to >>> detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up >>> your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which >>> you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference >>> was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion >>> started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The >>> Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). >>> >>> 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes >>> (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your >>> previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 >>> nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming >>> under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in >>> agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? >>> While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps >>> (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was >>> primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any >>> contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in >>> place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this >>> *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed >>> "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where >>> your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly >>> head again. LOL >>> >>> 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your >>> "34 or more nukes" blather... eventually, your broken brain will be >>> telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by >>> 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes >>> which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground >>> MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet >>> and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC >>> and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the >>> fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn >>> out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every >>> piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's >>> *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL >>> >>> Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back >>> on your meds, you delusional loon. >>> ====================================================== >>> >>> There are now 17 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of >>> physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by >>> point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp >>> simple physics. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > >> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i >> checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any >> random electronic device. > > There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes, > you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap > electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP > is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's > ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield > against. > > You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT > Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long > distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the > southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow > flies) away from Hawaii. yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"? > And that was with 1962 electronic devices... > no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in > those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP. > > Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. and your evidence for this EMP is where? > > Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP > was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not > dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can > detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP > because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously. are these things you learned in the merchant marines? > > They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would > survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus > largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and > smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices > would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is out, foamyk0ok. > > Kook. LOL > >> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed >> recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. > > "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips > themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting > right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that > have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. > > Kook. LOL > >> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global >> warming >> is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or >> anything. > > NukeKook. LOL > > Climate Change Denier. LOL > i believe you've got that backwards. you are the one who suspects that 97% of all climate scientists have started a secret pact to lie to the world since you are a k0okyKonservative. -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <3ccfb888e6a5fbf359fed0174d784d56@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516758 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of >> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear >>>>>> explosion, kook. >>>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>> >>>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching >>>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> >>>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >>>> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. >>>> >>>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera >>>> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP >>>> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not >>>> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned >>>> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from >>>> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens >>>> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and >>>> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. >>>> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. >>>> >>>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >>>> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the >>>> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found >>>> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >>>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. >>>> >>>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >>>> >>>> Kook. LOL >>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit >>>> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you >>>> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're >>>> making of yourself. >>>> >>>> Kook. LOL >>> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i >>> checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any >>> random electronic device. >> There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes, >> you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap >> electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP >> is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's >> ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield >> against. >> >> You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT >> Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long >> distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the >> southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow >> flies) away from Hawaii. >> >> And that was with 1962 electronic devices... >> no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in >> those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP. >> >> Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. > yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"? > > and your evidence for this EMP is where? Butthurt and irony mixed together makes a really funky smell... like an egg and cabbage fart in an elevator. LOL Your denial of the 1962 Starfish Prime EMP, along with your continued denial of reality, is noted. LOL >> Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP >> was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not >> dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can >> detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP >> because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously. > are these things you learned in the merchant marines? Is that more of your delusional blather? LOL Go on, CockHopper... get to blathering out your delusional take on who you think I am. You know you want to, and we all need a good laugh. <snicker> >> They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would >> survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus >> largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and >> smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices >> would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. > a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is out, foamyk0ok. So you're admitting that what I state is true, but you're using as your backpedal the fact that the electrical grid would be down anyway... I guess you've never heard of emergency generators (the diesel I've got has *no* engine electronics, it's all mechanical, except for the magneto to produce the spark for the pony engine, but that'll survive an EMP, ya think? As will the generator windings. LOL) I guess you've never heard of solar panels. LOL I guess you've never heard of batteries... which means your 4 foot long 6 inch diameter vibrator is kickstart diesel. LOL Fag. LOL >> Kook. LOL Kook. LOL >>> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed >>> recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. >> "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips >> themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting >> right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that >> have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. >> >> Kook. LOL <crickets> LOL >>> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that >>> global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying >>> to kontrol the world, or anything. >> NukeKook. LOL >> >> Climate Change Denier. LOL > i believe you've got that backwards. you are the one who suspects that > 97% of all climate scientists have started a secret pact to lie to the > world since you are a k0okyKonservative. No, I specifically did the math to prove that 97% of "climate scientists" do *not* believe in global warming, you math and reading comprehension challenged kook. LOL But like you said, intellectually besting you is like shooting fish in a barrel. LOL It's you and your libtard comrades who are still bleating out your "zOMG! Anthropomurphy Glubulur Wormings!" bullshit who are denying reality, given that NASA, UAH, RSS and UK Met data proves the planet has been cooling for the last ~17 years. Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x3xv3axetm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516834 |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:53:16 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as > root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of >>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did >>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>> Wrangler >>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>> >>>>> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did >>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a >>>>>>> nuclear >>>>>>> explosion, kook. > >>>>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>> >>>>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a >>>>>> matching >>>>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated. <G> > >>>>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were >>>>> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit. >>>>> >>>>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera >>>>> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP >>>>> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not >>>>> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned >>>>> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from >>>>> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens >>>>> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and >>>>> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. >>>>> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible. >>>>> >>>>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were >>>>> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the >>>>> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found >>>>> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >>>>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels. >>>>> >>>>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >>>>> >>>>> Kook. LOL > >>>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering >>>>> bullshit >>>>> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you >>>>> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're >>>>> making of yourself. >>>>> >>>>> Kook. LOL > >>>> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i >>>> checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out >>>> any >>>> random electronic device. > >>> There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes, >>> you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap >>> electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP >>> is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's >>> ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield >>> against. >>> >>> You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT >>> Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long >>> distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the >>> southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow >>> flies) away from Hawaii. >>> >>> And that was with 1962 electronic devices... >>> no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in >>> those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP. >>> >>> Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. > >> yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"? >> >> and your evidence for this EMP is where? > > Butthurt and irony mixed together makes a really funky smell... like > an egg and cabbage fart in an elevator. LOL > > Your denial of the 1962 Starfish Prime EMP, along with your continued > denial of reality, is noted. LOL > >>> Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP >>> was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not >>> dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can >>> detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP >>> because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously. > >> are these things you learned in the merchant marines? > > Is that more of your delusional blather? LOL > > Go on, CockHopper... get to blathering out your delusional take on who > you think I am. You know you want to, and we all need a good laugh. > > <snicker> > >>> They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would >>> survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus >>> largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and >>> smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices >>> would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. > >> a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is out, foamyk0ok. > > So you're admitting that what I state is true, but you're using as > your backpedal the fact that the electrical grid would be down > anyway... > > I guess you've never heard of emergency generators (the diesel I've > got has *no* engine electronics, it's all mechanical, except for the > magneto to produce the spark for the pony engine, but that'll survive > an EMP, ya think? As will the generator windings. LOL) > > I guess you've never heard of solar panels. LOL > > I guess you've never heard of batteries... which means your 4 foot > long 6 inch diameter vibrator is kickstart diesel. LOL > > Fag. LOL > >>> Kook. LOL > > Kook. LOL > >>>> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those >>>> designed >>>> recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection. > >>> "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips >>> themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting >>> right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that >>> have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. >>> >>> Kook. LOL > > <crickets> LOL > >>>> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that >>>> global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying >>>> to kontrol the world, or anything. > >>> NukeKook. LOL >>> >>> Climate Change Denier. LOL > >> i believe you've got that backwards. you are the one who suspects that >> 97% of all climate scientists have started a secret pact to lie to the >> world since you are a k0okyKonservative. > > No, I specifically did the math to prove that 97% of "climate > scientists" do *not* believe in global warming, you math and reading > comprehension challenged kook. LOL > > But like you said, intellectually besting you is like shooting fish in > a barrel. LOL > > It's you and your libtard comrades who are still bleating out your > "zOMG! Anthropomurphy Glubulur Wormings!" bullshit who are denying > reality, given that NASA, UAH, RSS and UK Met data proves the planet > has been cooling for the last ~17 years. > > Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL > i'm not the one here calling it "global warming", didya notice? -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <f53e51568e6ec266bb8d000ec5538476@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #516847 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xv3axetm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:53:16 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of >> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of >>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, >>>>>> Summerfield, NC), in >>>>>> <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> >>>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of >>>>>>>> 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule >>>>>>>> compared to a nuclear explosion, kook. >>>>>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground >>>>>>> shaking and a matching EMP when the nuke under >>>>>>> WTC3 was detonated. <G> >>>>>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete >>>>>> and steel were shifting as the central column buckled, >>>>>> you idiotic gullible dumshit. >>>>>> >>>>>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with >>>>>> a camera *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* >>>>>> *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that camera out, >>>>>> blown out its electronics. Not to mention an EMP would >>>>>> have blown out electrical substations, burned out >>>>>> electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to >>>>>> fall from the sky, burned out every single fucking camera >>>>>> in a radius of dozens of miles. That there is video of the >>>>>> event *as* it happened and immediately *after* it happened >>>>>> proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. Your kooky conspiracy >>>>>> theory is impossible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation >>>>>> byproducts were found anywhere in NYC. They found trace >>>>>> amounts of tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law >>>>>> enforcement weapons sights, they found trace amounts of >>>>>> radium from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >>>>>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at >>>>>> background levels. >>>>>> >>>>>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kook. LOL >>>>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional >>>>>> blathering bullshit shouted down, stomped into the dirt >>>>>> and raucously laughed at. If you weren't such a delusional >>>>>> retard, you'd realize what a fool you're making of yourself. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kook. LOL >>>>> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, >>>>> but last i checked, there is no written-on-paper >>>>> guarantee that EMP knocks out any random electronic device. >>>> There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as >>>> regards nukes, you dumbass. Are you another of those >>>> kooks who thinks he can wrap electronic equipment in >>>> aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP is fucking >>>> *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's >>>> ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking >>>> difficult to shield against. >>>> >>>> You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's >>>> 1.44 mT Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion >>>> was a long distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral >>>> distance to the southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... >>>> so 914 miles as the crow flies) away from Hawaii. >>>> >>>> And that was with 1962 electronic devices... >>>> no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment >>>> back in those days, which is naturally much more resistant to >>>> EMP. >>>> >>>> Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. >>> yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"? >>> >>> and your evidence for this EMP is where? >> Butthurt and irony mixed together makes a really funky smell... >> like an egg and cabbage fart in an elevator. LOL >> >> Your denial of the 1962 Starfish Prime EMP, along with your >> continued denial of reality, is noted. LOL <crickets> LOL >>>> Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... >>>> the EMP was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude >>>> of the EMP is not dependent upon the size of the nuke, but >>>> upon how fast the nuke can detonate all its nuclear material... >>>> so smaller nukes have a worse EMP because they can detonate >>>> all their nuclear material instantaneously. >>> are these things you learned in the merchant marines? >> Is that more of your delusional blather? LOL >> >> Go on, CockHopper... get to blathering out your delusional >> take on who you think I am. You know you want to, and we all >> need a good laugh. >> >> <snicker> <crickets> LOL >>>> They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well >>>> they would survive an EMP... only a few survived, those >>>> with the oldest and thus largest transistors. As transistors >>>> continue to get smaller and smaller, there is no way any >>>> modern consumer-grade electronic devices would withstand >>>> the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. >>> a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is >>> out, foamyk0ok. >> So you're admitting that what I state is true, but you're >> using as your backpedal the fact that the electrical grid >> would be down anyway... >> >> I guess you've never heard of emergency generators (the >> diesel I've got has *no* engine electronics, it's all >> mechanical, except for the magneto to produce the spark >> for the pony engine, but that'll survive an EMP, ya think? >> As will the generator windings. LOL) >> >> I guess you've never heard of solar panels. LOL >> >> I guess you've never heard of batteries... which means your >> 4 foot long 6 inch diameter vibrator is kickstart diesel. LOL >> >> Fag. LOL <crickets> LOL >>>>> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially >>>>> those designed recently which happen to luckily have >>>>> active circuit protection. >>>> "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking >>>> IC chips themselves have literally been melted internally. >>>> You'll be getting right on producing a list of >>>> consumer-grade electronic devices that have even basic >>>> lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. >> <crickets> LOL >>>>> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or >>>>> that global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists >>>>> trying to kontrol the world, or anything. >>>> NukeKook. LOL >>>> >>>> Climate Change Denier. LOL >>> i believe you've got that backwards. you are the one who >>> suspects that 97% of all climate scientists have started >>> a secret pact to lie to the world since you are a >>> k0okyKonservative. >> No, I specifically did the math to prove that 97% of >> "climate scientists" do *not* believe in global warming, >> you math and reading comprehension challenged kook. LOL >> >> But like you said, intellectually besting you is like >> shooting fish in a barrel. LOL >> >> It's you and your libtard comrades who are still bleating >> out your "zOMG! Anthropomurphy Glubulur Wormings!" bullshit >> who are denying reality, given that NASA, UAH, RSS and UK >> Met data proves the planet has been cooling for the last >> ~17 years. >> >> Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL > i'm not the one here calling it "global warming", didya notice? "...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the world, or anything." Fucking lying Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 397 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516916 |
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as > root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xv3axetm21m2@benson.localhost> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:53:16 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of >>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> did >>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>> Wrangler >>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>> >>>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) >>>>> of >>>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >>>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did >>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, >>>>>>> Summerfield, NC), in >>>>>>> <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> >>>>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of >>>>>>>>> 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>>>>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule >>>>>>>>> compared to a nuclear explosion, kook. > >>>>>>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground >>>>>>>> shaking and a matching EMP when the nuke under >>>>>>>> WTC3 was detonated. <G> > >>>>>>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete >>>>>>> and steel were shifting as the central column buckled, >>>>>>> you idiotic gullible dumshit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with >>>>>>> a camera *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* >>>>>>> *collapsed*... an EMP would have knocked that camera out, >>>>>>> blown out its electronics. Not to mention an EMP would >>>>>>> have blown out electrical substations, burned out >>>>>>> electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to >>>>>>> fall from the sky, burned out every single fucking camera >>>>>>> in a radius of dozens of miles. That there is video of the >>>>>>> event *as* it happened and immediately *after* it happened >>>>>>> proves there were *no* EMPs. At all. Your kooky conspiracy >>>>>>> theory is impossible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation >>>>>>> byproducts were found anywhere in NYC. They found trace >>>>>>> amounts of tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law >>>>>>> enforcement weapons sights, they found trace amounts of >>>>>>> radium from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear >>>>>>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at >>>>>>> background levels. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kook. LOL > >>>>>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>>>>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional >>>>>>> blathering bullshit shouted down, stomped into the dirt >>>>>>> and raucously laughed at. If you weren't such a delusional >>>>>>> retard, you'd realize what a fool you're making of yourself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kook. LOL > >>>>>> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, >>>>>> but last i checked, there is no written-on-paper >>>>>> guarantee that EMP knocks out any random electronic device. > >>>>> There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as >>>>> regards nukes, you dumbass. Are you another of those >>>>> kooks who thinks he can wrap electronic equipment in >>>>> aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP is fucking >>>>> *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's >>>>> ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking >>>>> difficult to shield against. >>>>> >>>>> You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's >>>>> 1.44 mT Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion >>>>> was a long distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral >>>>> distance to the southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... >>>>> so 914 miles as the crow flies) away from Hawaii. >>>>> >>>>> And that was with 1962 electronic devices... >>>>> no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment >>>>> back in those days, which is naturally much more resistant to >>>>> EMP. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*. > >>>> yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"? >>>> >>>> and your evidence for this EMP is where? > >>> Butthurt and irony mixed together makes a really funky smell... >>> like an egg and cabbage fart in an elevator. LOL >>> >>> Your denial of the 1962 Starfish Prime EMP, along with your >>> continued denial of reality, is noted. LOL > > <crickets> LOL > >>>>> Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... >>>>> the EMP was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude >>>>> of the EMP is not dependent upon the size of the nuke, but >>>>> upon how fast the nuke can detonate all its nuclear material... >>>>> so smaller nukes have a worse EMP because they can detonate >>>>> all their nuclear material instantaneously. > >>>> are these things you learned in the merchant marines? > >>> Is that more of your delusional blather? LOL >>> >>> Go on, CockHopper... get to blathering out your delusional >>> take on who you think I am. You know you want to, and we all >>> need a good laugh. >>> >>> <snicker> > > <crickets> LOL > >>>>> They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well >>>>> they would survive an EMP... only a few survived, those >>>>> with the oldest and thus largest transistors. As transistors >>>>> continue to get smaller and smaller, there is no way any >>>>> modern consumer-grade electronic devices would withstand >>>>> the internal arcing that an EMP would produce. > >>>> a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is >>>> out, foamyk0ok. > >>> So you're admitting that what I state is true, but you're >>> using as your backpedal the fact that the electrical grid >>> would be down anyway... >>> >>> I guess you've never heard of emergency generators (the >>> diesel I've got has *no* engine electronics, it's all >>> mechanical, except for the magneto to produce the spark >>> for the pony engine, but that'll survive an EMP, ya think? >>> As will the generator windings. LOL) >>> >>> I guess you've never heard of solar panels. LOL >>> >>> I guess you've never heard of batteries... which means your >>> 4 foot long 6 inch diameter vibrator is kickstart diesel. LOL >>> >>> Fag. LOL > > <crickets> LOL > >>>>>> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially >>>>>> those designed recently which happen to luckily have >>>>>> active circuit protection. > >>>>> "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking >>>>> IC chips themselves have literally been melted internally. >>>>> You'll be getting right on producing a list of >>>>> consumer-grade electronic devices that have even basic >>>>> lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding. > >>> <crickets> LOL > >>>>>> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or >>>>>> that global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists >>>>>> trying to kontrol the world, or anything. > >>>>> NukeKook. LOL >>>>> >>>>> Climate Change Denier. LOL > >>>> i believe you've got that backwards. you are the one who >>>> suspects that 97% of all climate scientists have started >>>> a secret pact to lie to the world since you are a >>>> k0okyKonservative. > >>> No, I specifically did the math to prove that 97% of >>> "climate scientists" do *not* believe in global warming, >>> you math and reading comprehension challenged kook. LOL >>> >>> But like you said, intellectually besting you is like >>> shooting fish in a barrel. LOL >>> >>> It's you and your libtard comrades who are still bleating >>> out your "zOMG! Anthropomurphy Glubulur Wormings!" bullshit >>> who are denying reality, given that NASA, UAH, RSS and UK >>> Met data proves the planet has been cooling for the last >>> ~17 years. >>> >>> Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL > >> i'm not the one here calling it "global warming", didya notice? > > "...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that global > warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying to kontrol the > world, or anything." > > Fucking lying Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL > are you intentionally this fucking stupid? -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) |
| Message-ID | <bIqdnZ1XQ-gIXUDInZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516987 |
""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > are you intentionally this fucking stupid? Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS in Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the station. And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked up so many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (FNN stupid) |
| Message-ID | <op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #516992 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA > (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA > 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message > news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? > > Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS in > Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the station. > > And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna > and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked > up so > many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. > > Rocky > you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and you're not even pretending to be stupid. you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly believes EVERYTHING they read on the internet. -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <ufOdnc3F4Y-0UkDInZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #516996 |
""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost... > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA >> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA >> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >> news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? >> >> Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS in >> Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the station. >> >> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM antenna >> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked >> up so >> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >> >> Rocky >> > > you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and you're > not even pretending to be stupid. > > you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly believes > EVERYTHING they read on the internet. WHAT THE FCUK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. I was even in the LA area when there was a great big fire that burned for hours in the First Interstate Bank Building. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire I even went down there in the morning while the ground was still wet from all the water and that building remained standing the entire time so why didn't the Twin Towers keep standing? And don't give me bullshit from NIST because they have been proven to be liars. <G> So because I knew we were fed bullshit about Flight 77 and Flight 93 and I've seen high rise buildings survive big fires I knew we were not told the entire story about the Twin Towers and it just so happens one person showed the details that the news left out that only NCDs could do. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <op.x3zdaml1tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #517002 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:36:54 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA > (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA > 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message > news:op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost... >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, >>> PA >>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA >>> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >>> news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>> Wrangler >>>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? >>> >>> Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS >>> in >>> Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the >>> station. >>> >>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >>> antenna >>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked >>> up so >>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>> >>> Rocky >>> >> >> you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and >> you're >> not even pretending to be stupid. >> >> you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly believes >> EVERYTHING they read on the internet. > > WHAT THE FCUK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? > > I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even > heard > Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that > Flight crashing at Pranksville. > > I was even in the LA area when there was a great big fire that burned for > hours in the First Interstate Bank Building. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire > > I even went down there in the morning while the ground was still wet from > all the water and that building remained standing the entire time so why > didn't the Twin Towers keep standing? And don't give me bullshit from > NIST > because they have been proven to be liars. <G> > > So because I knew we were fed bullshit about Flight 77 and Flight 93 and > I've seen high rise buildings survive big fires I knew we were not told > the > entire story about the Twin Towers and it just so happens one person > showed > the details that the news left out that only NCDs could do. > > Rocky > > <yawn> -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <DIWdnSD4o5i3uEPInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517007 |
""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:op.x3zdaml1tm21m2@benson.localhost... > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:36:54 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA >> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA >> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >> news:op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, >>>> PA >>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA >>>> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >>>> news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>>> Wrangler >>>>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? >>>> >>>> Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks WCBS >>>> in >>>> Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the >>>> station. >>>> >>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >>>> antenna >>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they picked >>>> up so >>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>> >>> you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and >>> you're >>> not even pretending to be stupid. >>> >>> you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly believes >>> EVERYTHING they read on the internet. >> >> WHAT THE FCUK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? >> >> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >> heard >> Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that >> Flight crashing at Pranksville. >> >> I was even in the LA area when there was a great big fire that burned for >> hours in the First Interstate Bank Building. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire >> >> I even went down there in the morning while the ground was still wet from >> all the water and that building remained standing the entire time so why >> didn't the Twin Towers keep standing? And don't give me bullshit from >> NIST >> because they have been proven to be liars. <G> >> >> So because I knew we were fed bullshit about Flight 77 and Flight 93 and >> I've seen high rise buildings survive big fires I knew we were not told >> the >> entire story about the Twin Towers and it just so happens one person >> showed >> the details that the news left out that only NCDs could do. >> >> Rocky >> >> > > <yawn> The funniest part about the clowns that worship their Television Set like you is they are so blind to the facts about 9/11 they wouldn't know a nuke if one went off in Nuke York City as proven by the following: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <op.x3ztkym9tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #517103 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:43:49 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA > (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA > 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message > news:op.x3zdaml1tm21m2@benson.localhost... >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:36:54 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, >>> PA >>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA >>> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >>> news:op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, >>>>> PA >>>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, >>>>> PA >>>>> 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >>>>> news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>>>> Wrangler >>>>>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? >>>>> >>>>> Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks >>>>> WCBS >>>>> in >>>>> Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the >>>>> station. >>>>> >>>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >>>>> antenna >>>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they >>>>> picked >>>>> up so >>>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>> >>>> you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and >>>> you're >>>> not even pretending to be stupid. >>>> >>>> you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly >>>> believes >>>> EVERYTHING they read on the internet. >>> >>> WHAT THE FCUK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? >>> >>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >>> heard >>> Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that >>> Flight crashing at Pranksville. >>> >>> I was even in the LA area when there was a great big fire that burned >>> for >>> hours in the First Interstate Bank Building. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire >>> >>> I even went down there in the morning while the ground was still wet >>> from >>> all the water and that building remained standing the entire time so >>> why >>> didn't the Twin Towers keep standing? And don't give me bullshit from >>> NIST >>> because they have been proven to be liars. <G> >>> >>> So because I knew we were fed bullshit about Flight 77 and Flight 93 >>> and >>> I've seen high rise buildings survive big fires I knew we were not told >>> the >>> entire story about the Twin Towers and it just so happens one person >>> showed >>> the details that the news left out that only NCDs could do. >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> <yawn> > > The funniest part about the clowns that worship their Television Set like > you here's a list of shows i watch (on a TV) lately: democracy now quincy rockford files the drew carey show spin city bojack horseman you'll note that only one of those shows is informational programming. > is they are so blind to the facts about 9/11 they wouldn't know a nuke > if one went off in Nuke York City as proven by the following: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg why would you believe something posted on veteranstoday.com to be the de facto truth? rationalwiki.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer James H. "Uncle" Fetzer is a retired philosopher and all-around conspiracy theorist. From the 1970s into the 1990s, he published a number of well regarded works on the philosophy of science, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence. By the late 1990s, however, he had morphed into a full-time conspiracy theorist. He has authored three entire collections of John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory books, co-authored a book that claims Senator Paul Wellstone's plane crash was actually a political assassination, promoted moon landing hoax conspiracy theories, and bolstered his support of holocaust denial with claims that Israel was secretly involved in everything from the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre to 9/11.[1] Naturally, TV shows hosted by intellectual giants such as Jerry Springer, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Jesse Ventura have given Fetzer and his views a comfy guest chair. Fetzer is editor of Veterans Today, a website that promotes itself as a “military veterans and foreign affairs journal." According to the Southern Poverty Law Center:[2] But start reading the posts, and you’ll find something else entirely: myriad claims that there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 (Israel orchestrated it, in cahoots with the American government), that the American government is a puppet (of Israel), that the Holocaust never happened or was greatly exaggerated (Jews made it up to manipulate non-Jews), and, most recently, that Julian Assange, the man behind Wikileaks, is a pawn (of Israel). Notice a theme there? Yet Fetzer dismisses suggestions of an unhealthy obsession with Jews as merely "research" into "controversial subjects" like the Holocaust and "possible Israeli complicity" in events like 9/11.[3] > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y > > Rocky > spare me the youtube "armchair expert" movies uploaded by drunken fratboys, please. -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <8nhvgm.ik4.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517103 |
Rocky wrote: > ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, > PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, > Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message > news:op.x3zdaml1tm21m2@benson.localhost... >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:36:54 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., >>> Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton >>> Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >>> news:op.x3zaa6f8tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:34:29 -0400, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> ""Fakey's" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., >>>>> Pittsburgh, PA >>>>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, >>>>> Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >>>>> news:op.x3y4czg9tm21m2@benson.localhost... >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:33:24 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>>>> Wrangler >>>>>> are you intentionally this fucking stupid? >>>>> >>>>> Talk about the Friendly Neighborhood Nut being stupid. He thinks >>>>> WCBS in >>>>> Nuke York City uses satellite to get from the helicopter to the >>>>> station. >>>>> >>>>> And he never figured out that if the station had a directional AM >>>>> antenna >>>>> and it was aimed at the North Tower that would explain why they >>>>> picked up so >>>>> many EMPs and none of the other major networks did. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>> >>>> you are at least 10 times as stupid as fakeyTurd displays here and >>>> you're >>>> not even pretending to be stupid. >>>> >>>> you are an example of what happens when someone unquestioningly >>>> believes EVERYTHING they read on the internet. >>> >>> WHAT THE FCUK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? >>> >>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I >>> even heard >>> Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about >>> that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >>> >>> I was even in the LA area when there was a great big fire that >>> burned for hours in the First Interstate Bank Building. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire >>> >>> I even went down there in the morning while the ground was still >>> wet from all the water and that building remained standing the >>> entire time so why didn't the Twin Towers keep standing? And don't >>> give me bullshit from NIST >>> because they have been proven to be liars. <G> >>> >>> So because I knew we were fed bullshit about Flight 77 and Flight >>> 93 and I've seen high rise buildings survive big fires I knew we >>> were not told the >>> entire story about the Twin Towers and it just so happens one person >>> showed >>> the details that the news left out that only NCDs could do. >>> >>> Rocky >>> >>> >> >> <yawn> > > The funniest part about the clowns that worship their Television Set > like you is they are so blind to the facts about 9/11 they wouldn't > know a nuke if one went off in Nuke York City as proven by the > following: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Nuclear destruction of the WTC > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y > > Rocky why are you the only one who believes you tube is real
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <iu71bc-7ci.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517002 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even heard > Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story about that > Flight crashing at Pranksville. You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out the windows, kook. <snip remaining insane kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <mrla0f$coc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517034 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >> heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story >> about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. > > You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the > airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out > the windows, kook. > > <snip remaining insane kook babble> Huh? " the passengers looking out the windows " Are you now telling us that you talked to the passengers in the alledged planes ? Uh,...how long has this been happening ? Just stay calm and dial 911, and I'm sure the person who answers will get you the help you need.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <ocn1bc-a5k.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517114 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >>> heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story >>> about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >> >> You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the >> airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out >> the windows, kook. >> >> <snip remaining insane kook babble> > > > > > > > Huh? " the passengers looking out the windows " > Are you now telling us that you talked to the passengers in the alledged > planes ? Learn to read, moron. You could try talking to one of the many EYEWITNESSES that SAW the airline's markings on the aircraft AND the passengers looking out the windows, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <mrlccm$ler$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517116 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >>>> heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story >>>> about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >>> >>> You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the >>> airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out >>> the windows, kook. >>> >>> <snip remaining insane kook babble> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Huh? " the passengers looking out the windows " >> Are you now telling us that you talked to the passengers in the >> alledged planes ? > > Learn to read, moron. > > You could try talking to one of the many EYEWITNESSES that SAW the > airline's markings on the aircraft AND the passengers looking out > the windows, kook. Learn to write. Are you now telling us that people on the ground could see the faces of passengers in a plane that was flying maybe 90+ stories above them at 500 MPH ?? When special closed circuit camera's at the pentagon only were able to catch a blur between frames. (and we are supposed to believe that blur was a whole plane) Oh wait here's some 9/11 eyewitnesses. Includig the news reported filming the story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lc5inmZqGu8 They couldn't even see windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <adq1bc-0ck.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517118 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I even >>>>> heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit story >>>>> about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >>>> >>>> You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the >>>> airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out >>>> the windows, kook. >>>> >>>> <snip remaining insane kook babble> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Huh? " the passengers looking out the windows " >>> Are you now telling us that you talked to the passengers in the >>> alledged planes ? >> >> Learn to read, moron. >> >> You could try talking to one of the many EYEWITNESSES that SAW the >> airline's markings on the aircraft AND the passengers looking out >> the windows, kook. > > > > > > Learn to write. > > Are you now telling us that people on the ground could see the faces of > passengers in a plane that was flying maybe 90+ stories above them at 500 > MPH ?? The subject was the Pentagon, moron. The airplane was not "90+ stories" up at the Pentagon, moron. <snip remaining moronic idiocy> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <mrlhfr$a2g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517123 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I >>>>>> even heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit >>>>>> story about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >>>>> >>>>> You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the >>>>> airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out >>>>> the windows, kook. >>>>> >>>>> <snip remaining insane kook babble> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Huh? " the passengers looking out the windows " >>>> Are you now telling us that you talked to the passengers in the >>>> alledged planes ? >>> >>> Learn to read, moron. >>> >>> You could try talking to one of the many EYEWITNESSES that SAW the >>> airline's markings on the aircraft AND the passengers looking out >>> the windows, kook. >> >> >> >> >> >> Learn to write. >> >> Are you now telling us that people on the ground could see the faces of >> passengers in a plane that was flying maybe 90+ stories above them at >> 500 MPH ?? > > The subject was the Pentagon, moron. > > The airplane was not "90+ stories" up at the Pentagon, moron. > > <snip remaining moronic idiocy> Well dumbass,...if YOU clipped out the part about the pentagon, why are you calling ME a moron. I'll post my FULL reply below.,....so don't go and erase it again. Otherwise people are really going to see what a buffoon you are,....at least the few who have not already decided that. Learn to write. Are you now telling us that people on the ground could see the faces of passengers in a plane that was flying maybe 90+ stories above them at 500 MPH ?? When special closed circuit camera's at the pentagon only were able to catch a blur between frames. (and we are supposed to believe that blur was a whole plane) Oh wait here's some 9/11 eyewitnesses. Including the news reported filming the story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lc5inmZqGu8 They couldn't even see windows. And since you want to deal with the pentagon. How about this little ditty by a newsman on the scene,....who never saw any sign of a plane anywhere https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ Or how about this video,....no plane in sight https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5SeMtoUsXY Yet you are still duped. I'll bet you even put your life savings into the stock market recently. ...Although I'm not sure how they accepted a box of aluminum cans and a half eaten life saver as payment. Or did you invest it all with the nigerian prince email money making opportunity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) |
| Message-ID | <u202bc-r1l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517132 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've never seen any evidence of a 757 ramming the Pentagon and I >>>>>>> even heard Flight 93 landed safely before they started a bullshit >>>>>>> story about that Flight crashing at Pranksville. >>>>>> >>>>>> You could try talking to one of the many eyewitnesses that saw the >>>>>> airline's markings on the aircraft and the passengers looking out >>>>>> the windows, kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip remaining insane kook babble> >>>>> >>>>> Huh? " the passengers looking out the windows " >>>>> Are you now telling us that you talked to the passengers in the >>>>> alledged planes ? >>>> >>>> Learn to read, moron. >>>> >>>> You could try talking to one of the many EYEWITNESSES that SAW the >>>> airline's markings on the aircraft AND the passengers looking out >>>> the windows, kook. >>> >>> >>> Learn to write. >>> >>> Are you now telling us that people on the ground could see the faces of >>> passengers in a plane that was flying maybe 90+ stories above them at >>> 500 MPH ?? >> >> The subject was the Pentagon, moron. >> >> The airplane was not "90+ stories" up at the Pentagon, moron. >> >> <snip remaining moronic idiocy> > > > Well dumbass,...if YOU clipped out the part about the pentagon, why are you > calling ME a moron. "Pentagon" is still right there at the top as it has been all along, moron. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web