Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #516834

Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did
>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com...

>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!>

>>>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a nuclear
>>>>>> explosion, kook.

>>>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>>>>
>>>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a matching
>>>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated.  <G>

>>>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were
>>>> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit.
>>>>
>>>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera
>>>> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP
>>>> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not
>>>> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned
>>>> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from
>>>> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens
>>>> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and
>>>> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all.
>>>> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible.
>>>>
>>>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were
>>>> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the
>>>> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found
>>>> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear
>>>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels.
>>>>
>>>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard.
>>>>
>>>> Kook. LOL

>>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!>

>>>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering bullshit
>>>> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you
>>>> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're
>>>> making of yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Kook. LOL

>>> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i
>>> checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out any
>>> random electronic device.

>> There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes,
>> you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap
>> electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP
>> is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's
>> ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield
>> against.
>>
>> You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT
>> Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long
>> distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the
>> southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow
>> flies) away from Hawaii.
>> 
>> And that was with 1962 electronic devices...
>> no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in
>> those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP.
>>
>> Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*.

> yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"?
> 
> and your evidence for this EMP is where?

Butthurt and irony mixed together makes a really funky smell... like
an egg and cabbage fart in an elevator. LOL

Your denial of the 1962 Starfish Prime EMP, along with your continued
denial of reality, is noted. LOL

>> Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP
>> was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not
>> dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can
>> detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP
>> because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously.

> are these things you learned in the merchant marines?

Is that more of your delusional blather? LOL

Go on, CockHopper... get to blathering out your delusional take on who
you think I am. You know you want to, and we all need a good laugh.

<snicker>

>> They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would
>> survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus
>> largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and
>> smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices
>> would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce.

> a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is out, foamyk0ok.

So you're admitting that what I state is true, but you're using as
your backpedal the fact that the electrical grid would be down
anyway...

I guess you've never heard of emergency generators (the diesel I've
got has *no* engine electronics, it's all mechanical, except for the
magneto to produce the spark for the pony engine, but that'll survive
an EMP, ya think? As will the generator windings. LOL)

I guess you've never heard of solar panels. LOL

I guess you've never heard of batteries... which means your 4 foot
long 6 inch diameter vibrator is kickstart diesel. LOL

Fag. LOL

>> Kook. LOL

Kook. LOL

>>> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those designed
>>> recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection.

>> "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips
>> themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting
>> right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that
>> have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding.
>>
>> Kook. LOL

<crickets> LOL

>>> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that
>>> global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying
>>> to kontrol the world, or anything.

>> NukeKook. LOL
>>
>> Climate Change Denier. LOL

> i believe you've got that backwards.  you are the one who suspects that  
> 97% of all climate scientists have started a secret pact to lie to the  
> world since you are a k0okyKonservative.

No, I specifically did the math to prove that 97% of "climate
scientists" do *not* believe in global warming, you math and reading
comprehension challenged kook. LOL

But like you said, intellectually besting you is like shooting fish in
a barrel. LOL

It's you and your libtard comrades who are still bleating out your
"zOMG! Anthropomurphy Glubulur Wormings!" bullshit who are denying
reality, given that NASA, UAH, RSS and UK Met data proves the planet
has been cooling for the last ~17 years.

Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL

-- 

------------------------------------
Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206

Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at
home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL

Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're
embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate
clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL

Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200
sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his
brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL
------------------------------------

Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:29 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:55 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:23 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:51 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:15 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:09 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:08 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:33 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 14:42 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:51 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:05 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:54 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:22 +0000
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:14 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:30 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:05 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:06 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:04 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 11:30 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:39 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-28 23:16 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:27 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 10:00 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:13 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:12 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 16:26 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:22 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 23:52 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 23:53 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 22:06 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is   worthlesss) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 08:49 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-28 21:05 +0100
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:49 +0200
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:34 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:05 +0200
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:08 +0000
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:23 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:35 -0700
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:03 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 19:09 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 07:02 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:17 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:37 +0000
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:07 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:06 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:19 +0000
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:57 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:16 +0000
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:35 -0700
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:57 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:32 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500

csiph-web