Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #273821

Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence

Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence
References (3 earlier) <0c999aec28e81483a2c0d7daf4d67b78@dizum.com> <op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> <bbc4f85e483f68e2e9f87f6a617d92fa@dizum.com> <op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> <3ccfb888e6a5fbf359fed0174d784d56@dizum.com>
Date 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
From "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID <op.x3xv3axetm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:53:16 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xivkjctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:41:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vusyontm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:42:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky, in <news:YKednVuJFMz_i0fInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did
>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:63cpac-e84.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> BT<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>>>>>>> The energy of a building collapse is miniscule compared to a  
>>>>>>> nuclear
>>>>>>> explosion, kook.
>
>>>>>> A<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I on the other hand have evidence of the ground shaking and a  
>>>>>> matching
>>>>>> EMP when the nuke under WTC3 was detonated.  <G>
>
>>>>> The ground shook because 1.5 million tons of concrete and steel were
>>>>> shifting as the central column buckled, you idiotic gullible dumshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> And there was no "EMP"... there was a firefighter with a camera
>>>>> *inside* one of the WTC towers *as* *it* *collapsed*... an EMP
>>>>> would have knocked that camera out, blown out its electronics. Not
>>>>> to mention an EMP would have blown out electrical substations, burned
>>>>> out electrical generation stations, caused helicopters to fall from
>>>>> the sky, burned out every single fucking camera in a radius of dozens
>>>>> of miles. That there is video of the event *as* it happened and
>>>>> immediately *after* it happened proves there were *no* EMPs. At all.
>>>>> Your kooky conspiracy theory is impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not to mention the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were
>>>>> found anywhere in NYC. They found trace amounts of tritium from the
>>>>> aircraft exit signs and law enforecement weapons sights, they found
>>>>> trace amounts of radon from industrial processes unrelated to nuclear
>>>>> weapons and *every* other form of radiation was at background levels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Get back on your meds, you delusional psychotic retard.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kook. LOL
>
>>>>>> Th<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>>>>> Idiotic mouth-breathers will have their delusional blathering  
>>>>> bullshit
>>>>> shouted down, stomped into the dirt and raucously laughed at. If you
>>>>> weren't such a delusional retard, you'd realize what a fool you're
>>>>> making of yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kook. LOL
>
>>>> i know you're fighting with another K0ok like myself, but last i
>>>> checked, there is no written-on-paper guarantee that EMP knocks out  
>>>> any
>>>> random electronic device.
>
>>> There are no written-on-paper guarantees anywhere as regards nukes,
>>> you dumbass. Are you another of those kooks who thinks he can wrap
>>> electronic equipment in aluminum foil and it'll survive? A nuclear EMP
>>> is fucking *harsh*, it melts integrated electronics internally, it's
>>> ultra-wide-band (DC to daylight), and it's fucking difficult to shield
>>> against.
>>>
>>> You might want to look up what EMP did to Hawaii in 1962's 1.44 mT
>>> Starfish Prime explosion. And that nuclear explosion was a long
>>> distance (250 miles up, about 880 miles lateral distance to the
>>> southwest, launched from Johnston Atoll... so 914 miles as the crow
>>> flies) away from Hawaii.
>>>
>>> And that was with 1962 electronic devices...
>>> no tiny transistors, they were still using tube-type equipment back in
>>> those days, which is naturally much more resistant to EMP.
>>>
>>> Yeah, nuke EMPs are fucking *brutal*.
>
>> yeah, but have you ever started a sentence with the word "And"?
>>
>> and your evidence for this EMP is where?
>
> Butthurt and irony mixed together makes a really funky smell... like
> an egg and cabbage fart in an elevator. LOL
>
> Your denial of the 1962 Starfish Prime EMP, along with your continued
> denial of reality, is noted. LOL
>
>>> Or the 1.7 kT Hardtack-Yucca HEMP and the damage it caused... the EMP
>>> was off the scale. Or did you not know the magnitude of the EMP is not
>>> dependent upon the size of the nuke, but upon how fast the nuke can
>>> detonate all its nuclear material... so smaller nukes have a worse EMP
>>> because they can detonate all their nuclear material instantaneously.
>
>> are these things you learned in the merchant marines?
>
> Is that more of your delusional blather? LOL
>
> Go on, CockHopper... get to blathering out your delusional take on who
> you think I am. You know you want to, and we all need a good laugh.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> They tested transistorized radios in the 70's and how well they would
>>> survive an EMP... only a few survived, those with the oldest and thus
>>> largest transistors. As transistors continue to get smaller and
>>> smaller, there is no way any modern consumer-grade electronic devices
>>> would withstand the internal arcing that an EMP would produce.
>
>> a lot of good those will do you when the power grid is out, foamyk0ok.
>
> So you're admitting that what I state is true, but you're using as
> your backpedal the fact that the electrical grid would be down
> anyway...
>
> I guess you've never heard of emergency generators (the diesel I've
> got has *no* engine electronics, it's all mechanical, except for the
> magneto to produce the spark for the pony engine, but that'll survive
> an EMP, ya think? As will the generator windings. LOL)
>
> I guess you've never heard of solar panels. LOL
>
> I guess you've never heard of batteries... which means your 4 foot
> long 6 inch diameter vibrator is kickstart diesel. LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
>
>>> Kook. LOL
>
> Kook. LOL
>
>>>> i would surmise that some will survive an EMP, especially those  
>>>> designed
>>>> recently which happen to luckily have active circuit protection.
>
>>> "Active circuit protection" won't help when the fucking IC chips
>>> themselves have literally been melted internally. You'll be getting
>>> right on producing a list of consumer-grade electronic devices that
>>> have even basic lightning strike shielding, let alone EMP shielding.
>>>
>>> Kook. LOL
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>>> ...not that i k0okily believe nukes went off in WTC or that
>>>> global warming is 97% of the world's climatologists trying
>>>> to kontrol the world, or anything.
>
>>> NukeKook. LOL
>>>
>>> Climate Change Denier. LOL
>
>> i believe you've got that backwards.  you are the one who suspects that
>> 97% of all climate scientists have started a secret pact to lie to the
>> world since you are a k0okyKonservative.
>
> No, I specifically did the math to prove that 97% of "climate
> scientists" do *not* believe in global warming, you math and reading
> comprehension challenged kook. LOL
>
> But like you said, intellectually besting you is like shooting fish in
> a barrel. LOL
>
> It's you and your libtard comrades who are still bleating out your
> "zOMG! Anthropomurphy Glubulur Wormings!" bullshit who are denying
> reality, given that NASA, UAH, RSS and UK Met data proves the planet
> has been cooling for the last ~17 years.
>
> Climate Change Denying Kook. LOL
>

i'm not the one here calling it "global warming", didya notice?

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:29 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:08 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:33 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 14:42 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:51 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:05 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:54 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:39 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:24 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 22:46 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 14:12 -0500
                Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 21:45 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-26 10:54 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 16:57 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:23 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:09 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:49 +0200
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:34 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:05 +0200
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 14:28 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 20:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:35 -0700
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:03 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 19:09 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 07:02 +0200
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:37 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:57 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:35 -0700
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:57 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500

csiph-web