Groups > sci.physics > #516150 > unrolled thread

WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys

Started by	"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post	2015-08-23 12:40 -0500
Last post	2015-08-23 16:19 -0500
Articles	20 on this page of 101 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

  WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:40 -0500
    Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
    Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 12:47 -0500
      Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:02 -0500
        Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:23 +0000
        Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:50 -0500
        Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 12:06 -0400
    Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0700
      Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:56 -0500
        caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:41 -0500
          Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:44 +0000
          Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:02 -0700
          Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 17:07 -0500
            Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:22 -0500
              Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 18:20 -0500
                caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:00 -0500
                  Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:07 -0700
                    Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:24 -0500
                      Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:36 -0700
                      Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:29 +0000
                      Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:04 -0500
                        Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
                          Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0500
                            Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 10:06 +0100
                  Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:28 +0000
                  Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:02 -0500
                  Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:07 +0200
              Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:48 +0200
                Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:52 -0500
                  Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:30 +0000
                  Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 05:47 +0200
                    Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 04:12 -0500
                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.physics.cunt.scabs> - 2015-08-25 10:45 +0000
                        Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:11 -0500
                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:38 +0000
                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 06:52 -0500
                        Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:00 -0500
                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 11:18 -0500
                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:39 +0000
                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 19:06 +0200
                            Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:54 -0500
                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:19 -0500
                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 17:12 +0200
                        Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:32 -0500
                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
                            Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 13:37 -0500
                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:08 -0400
                                Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +0200
                                  Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 23:53 -0500
                                    Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 08:52 +0200
                                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-25 08:03 +0100
                                        Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 08:58 -0500
                                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 17:25 +0200
                                            Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:52 -0500
                                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:34 -0500
                                                words in chaTRooms noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:25 -0700
                                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:47 +0000
                                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:31 +0200
                                            Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:24 -0500
                                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:06 -0400
                                  Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:00 -0400
                                    Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 18:42 +0200
                                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 13:09 -0400
                                        Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:44 +0200
                                          Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:00 -0400
                                            Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:59 +0200
                                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 15:39 -0400
                                                Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 06:42 +0200
                                                  Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 09:58 -0400
                                                    Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 20:09 +0200
                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:28 +0000
                              Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:29 +0200
                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:35 +0000
                      Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
                  Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:07 -0500
              Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:10 +0000
          Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
            Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:08 -0500
              Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:11 +0000
              Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:11 -0500
                Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0700
                  Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:47 +0200
                    Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:24 -0500
                      Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
                      Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:20 -0500
                    Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 12:10 -0700
                      Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-25 08:25 +0200
    Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:20 +0000
    Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 22:35 +0200
      Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0500
        Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:32 +0200
        Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:12 -0500
          Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:15 -0700
            Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:28 -0500
              Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
                Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 23:17 +0000
              Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:59 -0500
              Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:21 -0500
              w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:29 -0700
    Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 16:19 -0500

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →

#516990 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date	2015-08-26 08:06 -0400
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<op.x3y48pu0tm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to	#516932

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:24:29 -0400, K Wills (Shill #3)  
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:25:02 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>> in <news:NpadnSggKJ696UHInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly
>> jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> Tr!pe the Hypoxic ChickenFucker (aka Steve Hall)
>>> <snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> squawked as he pulled it
>>> to poultry porn in message
>>> news:1m9pacs.1kehnhv1cgspxN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk...
>>
>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus  
>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Me wonders what poor stoooopid MikeyMoron will do now that his
>>>>> real-life identity is tied to his schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
>>>>> rantings on Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>>
>>>> prick
>>
>> You're just mad because I can still access your webcam... when you
>> don't have it completely disabled. Ever get your router secured?
>>
>
>     How stupid is someone that they don't place something over the
> lens to prevent viewing? While I like to think I'm secure, there is
> always the possibility that someone could get through and turn on my
> camera remotely. I have the lens covered so nothing can be seen.
>      They may be able to hear what I'm doing, if they turn on the mic,
> but since I don't do anything embarrassing in the computer room, they
> would get very bored very quickly.

don't be fooled by dumbass's bluster.  he's just acting like he's  
war-driving by people's houses using their guest wireless to check his  
email to "scare" them.  *pffft*

>
>> I can answer that... no. LOL
>>
>> You gotta get *all* new equipment, Tr!pey Old Pwned For Life, that's
>> the only way to get rid of the multitude of back doors.
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>
>      Rocky still uses Windows XP. While it's not a bad OS, it's no
> longer supported by Microsoft. This means any vulnerabilities that
> weren't discovered prior to the cease of support are still there.
>      Sadly, Rocky is not able to understand this.

it also means that there are less people trying to hack XP machines  
because the chances that you'll find any more than someone's minecraft  
scores is very low.

>
> [Snip of items for which I have no comment and the numerous details
> Rocky is unable to explain.]
>


-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516756 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date	2015-08-25 11:00 -0400
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to	#516698

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:40:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka
>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him.
>>
>> he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary
>> bullshit to him.
>
> Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka
> Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to
> prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds.
>
> I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt
> the 'WTC nuke' delusion

try again, idiot.  i said no such thing.  not only do i NOT believe in  
k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing  
with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.

> as you continue your long, slow slide into
> unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that
> would be proof enough of your utter stupidity.
>
> <snicker>
>

get a life, goof.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516797 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date	2015-08-25 18:42 +0200
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<d6469ff731724d362761d8cd31b77e1a@dizum.com>
In reply to	#516756

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:40:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka
>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>> he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him.
>>>
>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary
>>> bullshit to him.

>> Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka
>> Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to
>> prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds.
>>
>> I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt
>> the 'WTC nuke' delusion

> try again, idiot.  i said no such thing.

Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> he can't handle your "truth"

Your implication that what Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) spews is
"truth".

Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> because it's imaginary bullshit to him."

Implying that it's *not* "imaginary bullshit" to you.

Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,

Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
LOL

Climate change denying kook. LOL

> not only do i NOT believe in  
> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing  
> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.

No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL

>> as you continue your long, slow slide into
>> unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that
>> would be proof enough of your utter stupidity.
>>
>> <snicker>

> get a life, goof.

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

-- 

------------------------------------
Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206

Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at
home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL

Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're
embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate
clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL

Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200
sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his
brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL
------------------------------------

Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516810 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date	2015-08-25 13:09 -0400
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to	#516797

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:42:21 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:40:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka
>>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>>> he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him.
>>>>
>>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary
>>>> bullshit to him.
>
>>> Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka
>>> Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to
>>> prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds.
>>>
>>> I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt
>>> the 'WTC nuke' delusion
>
>> try again, idiot.  i said no such thing.
>
> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>>> he can't handle your "truth"
>
> Your implication that what Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) spews is
> "truth".

so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?

how very "smart" of you.

>
> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>>> because it's imaginary bullshit to him."
>
> Implying

i implied nothing.  it seems you inferred something though.

> that it's *not* "imaginary bullshit" to you.

...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me.  ...like k0okyKemtrail  
konspiracies you're a rube for.

>
> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>
> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
> LOL
>
> Climate change denying kook. LOL

you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven to cause  
97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that a lot of it is human-caused,  
which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.

>
>> not only do i NOT believe in
>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing
>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.
>
> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL

i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".

>
>>> as you continue your long, slow slide into
>>> unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that
>>> would be proof enough of your utter stupidity.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> get a life, goof.
>
> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
> =================================================
>>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>
>> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>
> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>
> <snicker>
> =================================================
>


-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516920 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date	2015-08-26 03:44 +0200
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
In reply to	#516810

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:42:21 -0400,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:40:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka
>>>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>>>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>>>>> he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him.
>>>>>
>>>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary
>>>>> bullshit to him.

>>>> Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka
>>>> Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to
>>>> prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds.
>>>>
>>>> I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt
>>>> the 'WTC nuke' delusion

>>> try again, idiot.  i said no such thing.

>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>> >>> he can't handle your "truth"
>>
>> Your implication that what Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) spews is
>> "truth".

> so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?

Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies *again*?

Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
=================================================
"I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"

And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
crying. :(

You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
Dimmy.
=================================================

> how very "smart" of you.

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
stupid, DildoRider.

>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>> >>> because it's imaginary bullshit to him."
>>
>> Implying

> i implied nothing.  it seems you inferred something though.

You implied... now you're backpedaling. Kook. LOL

>> that it's *not* "imaginary bullshit" to you.

> ...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me.  ...like k0okyKemtrail  
> konspiracies you're a rube for.

Awww, still trying that lie for which you got soundly bootfucked?

Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
=================================================
"I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"

And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
crying. :(

You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
Dimmy.
=================================================

If the best you can do is pathetic lies, you'd best just tuck your
tail between your legs and limp away. Again. Kook. LOL

>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>> >>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>>
>> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
>> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
>> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
>> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
>> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
>> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
>> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
>> LOL
>>
>> Climate change denying kook. LOL

> you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven

Lying kook. Even a former lead author for the IPCC says you Klimate
Katastrophe Kooks are full of shit:

Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
forcing

SPNAK! #1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
<http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
<http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
<http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
=================================================
Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.

Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
temperature changes over the 20th Century.

What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
world has warmed over the last century.

"This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.

But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
they otherwise would.

=================================================
{NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
one iota.

<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
<http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
"When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
=================================================
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
LOL

The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
keep trying to sell.

> to cause 97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that
> a lot of it is human-caused, which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.

You're backpedaling and using weasel-words, Ko0k. Mathematical proof
of your delusional climate change denying stupidity:

Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
humans are causing global warming

SPNAK! #4
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
=========================================================
The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
caused!".

Where did this 97% figure come from?

When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
University of Queensland.

What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
(not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
science articles.

But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
uncertain."

That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
position that humans are causing the warming."

11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
(3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
"climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.

But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
that hard math eludes them.
=========================================================

Doh! You're caught in another lie, eh, Dimmy? LOL

>>> not only do i NOT believe in
>>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing
>>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.

>> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
>> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
>> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL

> i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".

<points and laughs at math-challenged climate change denying kook> LOL

>>>> as you continue your long, slow slide into
>>>> unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that
>>>> would be proof enough of your utter stupidity.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>

>>> get a life, goof.

>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>> =================================================
>> >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> >> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>
>> > then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>> > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>
>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>>
>> <snicker>
>> =================================================

Stoooopid libtard climate change denying kook with libtard
chemtrail-touting comrades. LOL

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded
that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied
having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of
course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she
failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy
and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the
DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as
such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a
mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's
"been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this
k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief
that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given
19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new
AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per
year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in
decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually
growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had
the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd
used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out
so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when they're
growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that land ice is
slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat);
she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling
for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the
revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to
give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a
warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature
change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same
web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature
change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then
she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being
forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the
driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been
unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the
Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1
today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented
examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative
(but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a
liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative
political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its
tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of
some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used
a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an
actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist
herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple
math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he
admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every
major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was
conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil
rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed
she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound
psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far
run from five challenges to out me, for 397 days and counting (ie: she
doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she
outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and
her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss
of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she
was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the
length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more
evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring
for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough
attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516989 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date	2015-08-26 08:00 -0400
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to	#516920

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:42:21 -0400,
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3ximfpmtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:40:39 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider)  
>>>>> of
>>>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3vzftgctm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:37:17 -0400, Rocky (aka
>>>>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
>>>>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>> he can't handle your "truth" because it's imaginary bullshit to him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he doesn't believe in climate change either, because it's imaginary
>>>>>> bullshit to him.
>
>>>>> Oh yes, you should *definitely* team up with Michael S. Guthrie (aka
>>>>> Rocky) so you two broken-brained kooks can circle-slurp each other to
>>>>> prop up your kooky little imaginary worlds.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't think of anything more entertaining than watching you adopt
>>>>> the 'WTC nuke' delusion
>
>>>> try again, idiot.  i said no such thing.
>
>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> >>> he can't handle your "truth"
>>>
>>> Your implication that what Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky) spews is
>>> "truth".
>
>> so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?
>
> Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies *again*?
>
> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
> =================================================
> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"

so, strawman argument on your part?

>
> And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
> crying. :(
>
> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
> Dimmy.
> =================================================
>
>> how very "smart" of you.
>
> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
> =================================================
>>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>
>> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>
> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

so what you're saying is that your targets for attack have to be really  
stupid or else you can't manage?

<points and laughs>

>
> <snicker>
> =================================================
>
> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
> stupid, DildoRider.
>
>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> >>> because it's imaginary bullshit to him."
>>>
>>> Implying
>
>> i implied nothing.  it seems you inferred something though.
>
> You implied... now you're backpedaling. Kook. LOL
>
>>> that it's *not* "imaginary bullshit" to you.
>
>> ...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me.  ...like k0okyKemtrail
>> konspiracies you're a rube for.
>
> Awww, still trying that lie for which you got soundly bootfucked?
>
> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
> =================================================
> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"

strawman argument... again.

hey dimbulb... are 97% of the world's climatologists "libtards"?

>
> And that's why you're melting down...

based on your verbosity in response to a few of my words, most would say  
that you were the one melting down, "jeenyus".

> because your own libtard
> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
> crying. :(

more strawman fallacy from snickerTurds.

>
> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
> Dimmy.
> =================================================
>
> If the best you can do is pathetic lies, you'd best just tuck your
> tail between your legs and limp away. Again. Kook. LOL
>
>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>> >>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>>>
>>> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
>>> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
>>> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
>>> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
>>> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
>>> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> Climate change denying kook. LOL
>
>> you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven
>
> Lying kook. Even a former lead author

former?

> for the IPCC says you Klimate
> Katastrophe Kooks are full of shit:
>
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
> forcing

are you claiming that *you* were a lead author for the IPCC?

maybe that's why you're so angry.

>
> SPNAK! #1
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> =================================================
> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>
> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>
> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
> world has warmed over the last century.
>
> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>
> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
> they otherwise would.
>
> =================================================
> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
> one iota.
>
> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
> =================================================
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
> LOL
>
> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
> keep trying to sell.
>
>> to cause 97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that
>> a lot of it is human-caused, which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.
>
> You're backpedaling and using weasel-words, Ko0k. Mathematical proof
> of your delusional climate change denying stupidity:
>
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
> humans are causing global warming
>
> SPNAK! #4
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
> =========================================================
> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
> caused!".
>
> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>
> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
> University of Queensland.
>
> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
> science articles.
>
> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
> uncertain."
>
> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
> position that humans are causing the warming."
>
> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>
> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
> that hard math eludes them.
> =========================================================
>
> Doh! You're caught in another lie, eh, Dimmy? LOL

note that Cook does not subscribe to your conservatard smear tactics,  
snickers:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-determine-the-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming/

"The latest surveys show that 89 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of  
independents and 70 percent of Republicans already believe global warming  
is happening and is at least partly caused by human actions."

...

There's no doubt that Cook regards climate change as a moral issue.

"As a father, I realized that we are handing over a world to our children  
that is worse than the world we were given," he said over the phone from  
Brisbane, Australia. "And as a Christian, I saw climate change as a social  
justice issue."

...

Cook thinks that politicians are not acting because the public is not  
pressuring them enough. If people realize that the majority of scientists  
agree on human-caused climate change, they will absorb that knowledge like  
empty vessels and become more convinced of the threat, he said. They will  
then be more amenable to picking up their phones and calling their  
legislators.

"If the public think that climate scientists agree about what is causing  
global warming, then the public thinks we need to act on it," he said. "If  
the public thinks scientists disagree, then we might as well wait until  
the scientists work it out before we do anything about it."

>
>>>> not only do i NOT believe in
>>>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing
>>>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.
>
>>> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
>>> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
>>> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL
>
>> i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".
>
> <points and laughs at math-challenged climate change denying kook> LOL

and where have i denied climate change?  ever.

>
>>>>> as you continue your long, slow slide into
>>>>> unremitting insanity... your belief in something as retarded as that
>>>>> would be proof enough of your utter stupidity.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>
>>>> get a life, goof.
>
>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>> >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>> >> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> > then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>> > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>
>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>> =================================================
>
> Stoooopid libtard climate change denying kook with libtard
> chemtrail-touting comrades. LOL
>

more strawman fallacy from someone who sure k'laims to be smarter than  
that.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517063 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date	2015-08-26 19:59 +0200
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
In reply to	#516989

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?

>> Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies *again*?
>>
>> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
>> =================================================
>> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
>> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"

> so, strawman argument on your part?

So, backpedal and non sequitur falsified k'lame on your part? LOL

>> And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
>> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
>> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
>> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
>> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
>> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
>> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
>> crying. :(
>>
>> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
>> Dimmy.
>> =================================================

<crickets> LOL

>>> how very "smart" of you.

>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>> =================================================
>>>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>
>>> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>
>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack have to be really  
> stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

>> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
>> stupid, DildoRider.

Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
"really stupid" (your words in your admission). LOL

>>> ...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me.  ...like k0okyKemtrail
>>> konspiracies you're a rube for.

>> Awww, still trying that lie for which you got soundly bootfucked?
>>
>> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
>> =================================================
>> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
>> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"

> strawman argument... again.
> 
> hey dimbulb... are 97% of the world's climatologists "libtards"?

Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
you'd have learned:

Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
========================================================
11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
(3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
"climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.

But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
that hard math eludes them.
========================================================

>> And that's why you're melting down...

> based on your verbosity in response to a few of my words, most would say  
> that you were the one melting down, "jeenyus".

That's called "kicking a retard a thousand times a minute in an
attempt at somehow miraculously knocking a clue into him". LOL

>> because your own libtard
>> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
>> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
>> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
>> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
>> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
>> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
>> crying. :(

> more strawman fallacy from snickerTurds.

More backpedaling non sequitur lies from DildoRider. LOL

>> If the best you can do is pathetic lies, you'd best just tuck your
>> tail between your legs and limp away. Again. Kook. LOL

>>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>>> >>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>>>>
>>>> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
>>>> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
>>>> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
>>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
>>>> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
>>>> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
>>>> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> Climate change denying kook. LOL

>>> you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven

>> Lying kook. Even a former lead author

> former?

Yeah, he figured out the IPCC game of "scream lying alarmist bullshit
to get funding from the libtard politicians trying to set up their
carbon exchange scam" and left. IOW, he's not a dishonest lying piece
of shit like the rest of them at the IPCC. LOL

>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>> forcing

> are you claiming that *you* were a lead author for the IPCC?

Says the guy who's admitted he's "really stupid" (your words). LOL

> maybe that's why you're so angry.

Maybe that's why you're so delusional. LOL

>> SPNAK! #1
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> =================================================
>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
>> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
>> LOL
>>
>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>> keep trying to sell.

<crickets> LOL

Can't face that reality, can you, LibTard? No, you cannot. LOL

>>> to cause 97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that
>>> a lot of it is human-caused, which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.

>> You're backpedaling and using weasel-words, Ko0k. Mathematical proof
>> of your delusional climate change denying stupidity:
>>
>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
>> humans are causing global warming
>>
>> SPNAK! #4
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
>> =========================================================
>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
>> caused!".
>>
>> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>>
>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
>> University of Queensland.
>>
>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
>> science articles.
>>
>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
>> uncertain."
>>
>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
>> position that humans are causing the warming."
>>
>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>
>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>> that hard math eludes them.
>> =========================================================
>>
>> Doh! You're caught in another lie, eh, Dimmy? LOL

> note that Cook does not subscribe to your conservatard smear tactics,  
> snickers:
> 
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-determine-the-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming/
> 
> "The latest surveys show that 89 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of  
> independents and 70 percent of Republicans already believe global warming  
> is happening and is at least partly caused by human actions."

"partly caused" LOL

That's the fallback position the global warming libtard kooks have
been forced into... from "zOMG! The Urf is gunna turn into a giunt
fireball!" to "some people believe that some small percentage of that
non-existent global warming is caused by humans". LOL

Of course, what with the planet cooling for the past ~18 years,
where's this "global warming", K0ok? LOL

> There's no doubt that Cook regards climate change as a moral issue.
> 
> "As a father, I realized that we are handing over a world to our children  
> that is worse than the world we were given," he said over the phone from  
> Brisbane, Australia. "And as a Christian, I saw climate change as a social  
> justice issue."

And as a libtard kook, he didn't take into account all the data,
instead cherry-picking and fitting the data to his agenda. LOL

> Cook thinks that politicians are not acting because the public is not  
> pressuring them enough. If people realize that the majority of scientists  
> agree on human-caused climate change, they will absorb that knowledge like  
> empty vessels and become more convinced of the threat, he said. They will  
> then be more amenable to picking up their phones and calling their  
> legislators.

Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
alarmist propaganda. LOL

===============================================================
<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.

Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>

Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
===============================================================

Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
<http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
<http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
<http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
=================================================
Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.

Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
temperature changes over the 20th Century.

What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
world has warmed over the last century.

"This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.

But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
they otherwise would.

{NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
one iota.

<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
<http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
"When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
=================================================

> "If the public think that climate scientists agree about what is causing  
> global warming, then the public thinks we need to act on it," he said. "If  
> the public thinks scientists disagree, then we might as well wait until  
> the scientists work it out before we do anything about it."

And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.

<snicker>

>>>>> not only do i NOT believe in
>>>>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time arguing
>>>>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.

>>>> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
>>>> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
>>>> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL

>>> i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".

>> <points and laughs at math-challenged climate change denying kook> LOL

> and where have i denied climate change?  ever.

You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".

But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
scientists" have been lying to the public.

===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global 
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public 
relations problem for us."
- Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of 
East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
===============================================================

>>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>>> =================================================
>>>> >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>>> >> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> > then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>>> > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>>
>>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>> =================================================

>> Stoooopid libtard climate change denying kook with libtard
>> chemtrail-touting comrades. LOL

> more strawman fallacy from someone who sure k'laims to be smarter than  
> that.

Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
their lies. LOL

Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
words). LOL

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517078 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date	2015-08-26 15:39 -0400
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to	#517063

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:59:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?
>
>>> Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies *again*?
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
>>> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"
>
>> so, strawman argument on your part?
>
> So, backpedal and non sequitur falsified k'lame on your part? LOL
>
>>> And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
>>> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
>>> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
>>> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
>>> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
>>> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
>>> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
>>> crying. :(
>>>
>>> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
>>> Dimmy.
>>> =================================================
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>>> how very "smart" of you.
>
>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>>>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>>>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>
>>>> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>>> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>
>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>
> DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
> =================================================
>> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack have to be really
>> stupid or else you can't manage?
> =================================================
>
>>> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
>>> stupid, DildoRider.
>
> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
> "really stupid" (your words in your admission). LOL
>
>>>> ...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me.  ...like k0okyKemtrail
>>>> konspiracies you're a rube for.
>
>>> Awww, still trying that lie for which you got soundly bootfucked?
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
>>> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"
>
>> strawman argument... again.
>>
>> hey dimbulb... are 97% of the world's climatologists "libtards"?
>
> Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
> anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
> simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
> you'd have learned:
>
> Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>
> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
> that hard math eludes them.
> ========================================================
>
>>> And that's why you're melting down...
>
>> based on your verbosity in response to a few of my words, most would say
>> that you were the one melting down, "jeenyus".
>
> That's called "kicking a retard a thousand times a minute in an
> attempt at somehow miraculously knocking a clue into him". LOL
>
>>> because your own libtard
>>> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
>>> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
>>> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
>>> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
>>> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
>>> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
>>> crying. :(
>
>> more strawman fallacy from snickerTurds.
>
> More backpedaling non sequitur lies from DildoRider. LOL
>
>>> If the best you can do is pathetic lies, you'd best just tuck your
>>> tail between your legs and limp away. Again. Kook. LOL
>
>>>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>>>> >>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
>>>>> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
>>>>> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
>>>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
>>>>> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
>>>>> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
>>>>> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> Climate change denying kook. LOL
>
>>>> you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven
>
>>> Lying kook. Even a former lead author
>
>> former?
>
> Yeah, he figured out the IPCC game of "scream lying alarmist bullshit
> to get funding from the libtard politicians trying to set up their
> carbon exchange scam" and left. IOW, he's not a dishonest lying piece
> of shit like the rest of them at the IPCC. LOL
>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>>> forcing
>
>> are you claiming that *you* were a lead author for the IPCC?
>
> Says the guy who's admitted he's "really stupid" (your words). LOL
>
>> maybe that's why you're so angry.
>
> Maybe that's why you're so delusional. LOL
>
>>> SPNAK! #1
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> =================================================
>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
>>> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>>> keep trying to sell.
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
> Can't face that reality, can you, LibTard? No, you cannot. LOL
>
>>>> to cause 97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that
>>>> a lot of it is human-caused, which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.
>
>>> You're backpedaling and using weasel-words, Ko0k. Mathematical proof
>>> of your delusional climate change denying stupidity:
>>>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
>>> humans are causing global warming
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #4
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
>>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
>>> =========================================================
>>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
>>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
>>> caused!".
>>>
>>> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>>>
>>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
>>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
>>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
>>> University of Queensland.
>>>
>>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
>>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
>>> science articles.
>>>
>>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
>>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
>>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
>>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
>>> uncertain."
>>>
>>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
>>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
>>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
>>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
>>> position that humans are causing the warming."
>>>
>>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>>
>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>>> that hard math eludes them.
>>> =========================================================
>>>
>>> Doh! You're caught in another lie, eh, Dimmy? LOL
>
>> note that Cook does not subscribe to your conservatard smear tactics,
>> snickers:
>>
>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-determine-the-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming/
>>
>> "The latest surveys show that 89 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of
>> independents and 70 percent of Republicans already believe global  
>> warming
>> is happening and is at least partly caused by human actions."
>
> "partly caused" LOL
>
> That's the fallback position the global warming libtard kooks have
> been forced into... from "zOMG! The Urf is gunna turn into a giunt
> fireball!" to "some people believe that some small percentage of that
> non-existent global warming is caused by humans". LOL
>
> Of course, what with the planet cooling for the past ~18 years,
> where's this "global warming", K0ok? LOL
>
>> There's no doubt that Cook regards climate change as a moral issue.
>>
>> "As a father, I realized that we are handing over a world to our  
>> children
>> that is worse than the world we were given," he said over the phone from
>> Brisbane, Australia. "And as a Christian, I saw climate change as a  
>> social
>> justice issue."
>
> And as a libtard kook, he didn't take into account all the data,
> instead cherry-picking and fitting the data to his agenda. LOL
>
>> Cook thinks that politicians are not acting because the public is not
>> pressuring them enough. If people realize that the majority of  
>> scientists
>> agree on human-caused climate change, they will absorb that knowledge  
>> like
>> empty vessels and become more convinced of the threat, he said. They  
>> will
>> then be more amenable to picking up their phones and calling their
>> legislators.
>
> Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
> of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
> computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
> alarmist propaganda. LOL
>
> ===============================================================
> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>
> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>
> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
> archived it):
> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
> ===============================================================
>
> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> =================================================
> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>
> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>
> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
> world has warmed over the last century.
>
> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>
> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
> they otherwise would.
>
> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
> one iota.
>
> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
> =================================================
>
>> "If the public think that climate scientists agree about what is causing
>> global warming, then the public thinks we need to act on it," he said.  
>> "If
>> the public thinks scientists disagree, then we might as well wait until
>> the scientists work it out before we do anything about it."
>
> And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
> in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
> that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
> earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
> loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
> when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
> agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
> from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>>>> not only do i NOT believe in
>>>>>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time  
>>>>>> arguing
>>>>>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.
>
>>>>> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
>>>>> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
>>>>> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL
>
>>>> i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".
>
>>> <points and laughs at math-challenged climate change denying kook> LOL
>
>> and where have i denied climate change?  ever.
>
> You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
> all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
> standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".
>
> But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
> been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
> not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
> don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
> years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
> scientists" have been lying to the public.
>
> ===============================================================
> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
> relations problem for us."
> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of
> East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
> ===============================================================
>
>>>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>>>> =================================================
>>>>> >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>>>> >> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>>>
>>>>> > then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>>>> > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>> =================================================
>
>>> Stoooopid libtard climate change denying kook with libtard
>>> chemtrail-touting comrades. LOL
>
>> more strawman fallacy from someone who sure k'laims to be smarter than
>> that.
>
> Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
> UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
> doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
> their lies. LOL

says the fucktard who just unapologetically spewed a bunch of fallacy and  
then started backpedaling on his klown unicycle.

>
> Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
> words). LOL
>

you seem to be tacitly admitting that you can only have an argument with  
anyone who is "really stupid".  does that make you just plain stupid?  i'm  
still pointing at you and laughing.  will you be voting for donald trump?

you've been working on that fallacy-ridden response all fucking morning,  
heven't you?

just one thing:  do i (or anybody else, for that matter) give a fuck?  get  
back at me, dawg!

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517152 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date	2015-08-27 06:42 +0200
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<bbdf41289114a2c0b201a1412c5c9392@dizum.com>
In reply to	#517078

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:59:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
>> anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
>> simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
>> you'd have learned:
>>
>> Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
>> ========================================================
>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>
>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>> that hard math eludes them.
>> ========================================================

<crickets> LOL

>> Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
>> of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
>> computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
>> alarmist propaganda. LOL
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>
>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>
>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>> archived it):
>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> =================================================
>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>
>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>
>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>
>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>
>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>> they otherwise would.
>>
>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>> one iota.
>>
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>> =================================================

<crickets> LOL

>> And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
>> in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
>> that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
>> earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
>> loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
>> when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
>> agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
>> from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.

<crickets> LOL

>> You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
>> all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
>> standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".
>>
>> But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
>> been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
>> not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
>> don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
>> years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
>> scientists" have been lying to the public.
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>> relations problem for us."
>> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of
>> East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
>> ===============================================================

<crickets> LOL

>> Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
>> UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
>> doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
>> their lies. LOL

> says the fucktard who just unapologetically spewed a bunch of fallacy and  
> then started backpedaling on his klown unicycle.

Don't be so hard on yourself, FuckTard. You can't help it that you
still believe in the retarded libtard "zOMG! Antrapogienic Glubul
Wooormings! DUUUURRRHH!" lie... you're a retarded libtard. It's what
you do.

<snicker>

>> Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
>> words). LOL

> you seem to be tacitly admitting that you can only have an argument with  
> anyone who is "really stupid".  does that make you just plain stupid?  i'm  
> still pointing at you and laughing.  will you be voting for donald trump?

Pointing and laughing at a libtard no more makes one stupid than
pointing and laughing at circus sideshow freaks makes one a circus
sideshow freak, LibTard Circus Sideshow FrEaK. LOL

> you've been working on that fallacy-ridden response all fucking morning,  
> heven't you?

Projection from the libtard kook who's backpedaling like mad because
he can't refute the reality that he was so stoooopid and gullible that
he believed the libtard "zOMG! Androgenytic Glorbal Wermings! DURRHH!"
lie for 18 long years as the planet was cooling. LOL

> just one thing:  do i (or anybody else, for that matter) give a fuck?  get  
> back at me, dawg!

Awww, the last refuge of a thoroughly bootfucked kook... the attempt
to k'lame that no one cares that the kook is getting its ass kicked.
LOL

-- 

------------------------------------
Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206

Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at
home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL

Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're
embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate
clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL

Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200
sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his
brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL
------------------------------------

Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517192 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Date	2015-08-27 09:58 -0400
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<op.x3043lsjtm21m2@benson.localhost>
In reply to	#517152

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:42:18 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:59:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
>>> anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
>>> simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
>>> you'd have learned:
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
>>> ========================================================
>>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>>
>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>>> that hard math eludes them.
>>> ========================================================
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>> Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
>>> of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
>>> computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
>>> alarmist propaganda. LOL
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>
>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>>> archived it):
>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> =================================================
>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>>
>>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>>
>>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>>
>>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>>
>>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>>> they otherwise would.
>>>
>>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>>> one iota.
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>>> =================================================
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>> And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
>>> in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
>>> that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
>>> earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
>>> loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
>>> when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
>>> agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
>>> from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>> You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
>>> all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
>>> standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".
>>>
>>> But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
>>> been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
>>> not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
>>> don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
>>> years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
>>> scientists" have been lying to the public.
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>>> relations problem for us."
>>> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of
>>> East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
>>> ===============================================================
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>> Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
>>> UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
>>> doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
>>> their lies. LOL
>
>> says the fucktard who just unapologetically spewed a bunch of fallacy  
>> and
>> then started backpedaling on his klown unicycle.
>
> Don't be so hard on yourself, FuckTard. You can't help it that you
> still believe in the retarded libtard "zOMG! Antrapogienic Glubul
> Wooormings! DUUUURRRHH!" lie... you're a retarded libtard. It's what
> you do.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
>>> words). LOL
>
>> you seem to be tacitly admitting that you can only have an argument with
>> anyone who is "really stupid".  does that make you just plain stupid?   
>> i'm
>> still pointing at you and laughing.  will you be voting for donald  
>> trump?
>
> Pointing and laughing at a libtard no more makes one stupid than
> pointing and laughing at circus sideshow freaks makes one a circus
> sideshow freak, LibTard Circus Sideshow FrEaK. LOL
>
>> you've been working on that fallacy-ridden response all fucking morning,
>> heven't you?
>
> Projection from the libtard kook who's backpedaling like mad because
> he can't refute the reality that he was so stoooopid and gullible that
> he believed the libtard "zOMG! Androgenytic Glorbal Wermings! DURRHH!"
> lie for 18 long years as the planet was cooling. LOL
>
>> just one thing:  do i (or anybody else, for that matter) give a fuck?   
>> get
>> back at me, dawg!
>
> Awww, the last refuge of a thoroughly bootfucked kook... the attempt
> to k'lame that no one cares that the kook is getting its ass kicked.
> LOL
>

heavy projection, there, snickers.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517240 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date	2015-08-27 20:09 +0200
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<53055a214db2225f6bbb1f6efb504750@dizum.com>
In reply to	#517192

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3043lsjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did 
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:42:18 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:59:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
>>>> anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
>>>> simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
>>>> you'd have learned:
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
>>>> ========================================================
>>>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>>>
>>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>>>> that hard math eludes them.
>>>> ========================================================

>> <crickets> LOL

>>>> Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
>>>> of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
>>>> computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
>>>> alarmist propaganda. LOL
>>>>
>>>> ===============================================================
>>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>>>
>>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>>>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>>>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>>>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>>>> archived it):
>>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>>>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>>>> ===============================================================
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>>> =================================================
>>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>>>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>>>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>>>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>>>
>>>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>>>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>>>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>>>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>>>
>>>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>>>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>>>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>>>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>>>
>>>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>>>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>>>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>>>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>>>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>>>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>>>> they otherwise would.
>>>>
>>>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>>>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>>>> one iota.
>>>>
>>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>>>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>>>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>>>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>>>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>>>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>>>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>>>> =================================================

>> <crickets> LOL

>>>> And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
>>>> in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
>>>> that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
>>>> earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
>>>> loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
>>>> when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
>>>> agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
>>>> from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.

>> <crickets> LOL

>>>> You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
>>>> all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
>>>> standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".
>>>>
>>>> But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
>>>> been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
>>>> not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
>>>> don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
>>>> years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
>>>> scientists" have been lying to the public.
>>>>
>>>> ===============================================================
>>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>>>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>>>> relations problem for us."
>>>> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of
>>>> East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
>>>> ===============================================================

>> <crickets> LOL

>>>> Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
>>>> UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
>>>> doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
>>>> their lies. LOL

>>> says the fucktard who just unapologetically spewed a bunch of fallacy  
>>> and then started backpedaling on his klown unicycle.

>> Don't be so hard on yourself, FuckTard. You can't help it that you
>> still believe in the retarded libtard "zOMG! Antrapogienic Glubul
>> Wooormings! DUUUURRRHH!" lie... you're a retarded libtard. It's what
>> you do.

And you can't help it that you own dozens of clown-cycles that you 
have to pedal at 1920 RPM to go 10 MPH... it's what ridiculous clowns 
like you do. LOL

>>>> Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
>>>> words). LOL

>>> you seem to be tacitly admitting that you can only have an argument with
>>> anyone who is "really stupid".  does that make you just plain stupid?   
>>> i'm
>>> still pointing at you and laughing.  will you be voting for donald  
>>> trump?

>> Pointing and laughing at a libtard no more makes one stupid than
>> pointing and laughing at circus sideshow freaks makes one a circus
>> sideshow freak, LibTard Circus Sideshow FrEaK. LOL

>>> you've been working on that fallacy-ridden response all fucking morning,
>>> heven't you?

>> Projection from the libtard kook who's backpedaling like mad because
>> he can't refute the reality that he was so stoooopid and gullible that
>> he believed the libtard "zOMG! Androgenytic Glorbal Wermings! DURRHH!"
>> lie for 18 long years as the planet was cooling. LOL

>>> just one thing:  do i (or anybody else, for that matter) give a fuck?   
>>> get back at me, dawg!

>> Awww, the last refuge of a thoroughly bootfucked kook... the attempt
>> to k'lame that no one cares that the kook is getting its ass kicked.
>> LOL

> heavy projection, there, snickers.

Translation:
"I can't refute all his truthiness in the post above, so I'll try the 
reverse psychology projection tactic. Think anyone with an IQ greater 
than mine (so... 3) will see through my transparent backpedaling 
evasion?" LOL

-- 

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis
(aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is 
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're 
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516579 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-08-24 19:28 +0000
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<vr7sac-1kc.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#516556

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> If that were true than why can't you handle the truth in the videos below 
> that prove NIST was full of lies when they charged the US taxpayers millions 
> of dollars to conceal the fact 9/11 was a hoax?

Thus showing once more you are a raving lunatic.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516701 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
Date	2015-08-25 05:29 +0200
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post
Message-ID	<c5ff3b3217db35f7822237ccb975701f@dizum.com>
In reply to	#516556

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC),
in <news:mYmdncOGjpwb-UbInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
> wrote in message news:8156c3845e551cbc95b1464986e5d00b@dizum.com...

>> The truth and reality are not bullshit. Your schizophrenic paranoid
>> delusional use of everyday events and occurrences while k'laming
>> there's some nefarious intent behind them, then *continuing* to use
>> those same events and occurrences even after it's patiently explained
>> and proven to you what reality is, is bullshit. Your making claims
>> that violate the laws of physics and are therefore utterly impossible,
>> is bullshit.
>> 
>> Take your meds, you're having a schizophrenic paranoid delusional
>> break from reality. You think what you see is real, it is not. Your
>> brain is broken.
>> 
>> And why is your brain broken? Because you figured out some truth, and
>> *they* knew you were a threat... so they've done something to your
>> brain to reduce you to this delusion babbling insane mess that you
>> are.
>> 
>> Now incorporate that into your schizophrenic paranoid delusion and
>> start thinking of yourself as some sort of 'martyr'. LOL
>> 
>> Kook. LOL

> If that were true than why can't you handle the truth in the videos below 
> that prove NIST was full of lies when they charged the US taxpayers millions 
> of dollars to conceal the fact 9/11 was a hoax?

Because they didn't. You're just a broken-brained kook in the throes
of a schizophrenic paranoid delusional break from reality. Take your
meds.

Kook. LOL

> And F<SMACKAKOOK!>

You're retarded and insane. Every piece of "evidence" you've provided
has proved you wrong. You should have learned to shut the fuck up by
now, but on top of being insane, you're as dumb as a stump.

Kook. LOL

> Rocky

Now, get to addressing the 18 ways your kook conspiracy theory
violates the laws of physics:

======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
*why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
delusional you are.

4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>).
They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear
weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation.

5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
buried.

6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
sort of nuclear chain reaction.

7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
*was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
rock.

10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
"4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
to 1840 degree heat?

12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?

13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
site on 11 Sep 2001?

14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?

15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).

16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
(MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
(radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
*still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
"EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
head again. LOL

17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your
"34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes
(MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually,
your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the
real city was blown up by
1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes
which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground
MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet
and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC
and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the
fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn
out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every
piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's
*proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL

18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation
byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words
"with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" ().

Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back
on your meds, you delusional loon.
======================================================

There are now 18 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of
physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by
point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp
simple physics.

Kook. LOL

-- 

Michael S. Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206

Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that in your mid-30's, you still live at home
with mommy.

Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional
brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are*
*wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid
the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy
theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516505 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-08-24 16:35 +0000
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list
Message-ID	<sntrac-9ib.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#516392

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - This video is dedicated to Dimitri 
> Khalezov

There was no radiation to clean up, you babbling, bat shit crazy, kook.

> Here, let me put it this way: If there were no nuclear detonations at Ground 
> Zero then why was the NNSA all over Ground Zero?  NNSA?  See:

To make sure that there wasn't any radiation, kook.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516673 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list

From	"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Date	2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list
Message-ID	<aafnta9soepha8hkb709kti66p33a8v738@4ax.com>
In reply to	#516392

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 04:12:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
>wrote in message news:9a360155110142fc53e8f9d521321dc4@dizum.com...
>>
>> After that embarrassment of a video you keep touting, you'd do well to
>> shut the fuck up. There was *no* radiological decontamination going on
>> in any of the photos you showed in that stupid fucking video.
>
>ROTFLMFAO and that has got to be the funniest thing you have ever said.  <G>
>
>I'll bet you didn't even bother to read the second screen in the following 
>video.  <G>
>
>Radiological Cleanup on ground zero - This video is dedicated to Dimitri 
>Khalezov
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9npQPZh2po
>

     I don't see any radiological cleanup in the video.

>Here, let me put it this way: If there were no nuclear detonations at Ground 
>Zero then why was the NNSA all over Ground Zero?  NNSA?  See:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Nuclear_Security_Administration
>

     The NNSA had personnel present within the first few hours after
the collapse. The reason is most probably because there was a chance
the hijackers had so called dirty bombs with them. 
     Better to be safe than sorry.
     Once it was established there was no nuclear radiation, a matter
of a few hours, they left. 

>And the biggest thing you missed was when they mentioned what Dr. Allison 
>Geyh's job was a Ground Zero.  See 4:07 of the above video.
>
>So, it doesn't really matter if there was any Radiological Cleanup in that 
>video because what they were doing was far worse and that was to simply 
>monitor how much radiation people were getting.  

     None, of course.

>And I've seen one video 
>where it even shows an alarm on a Geiger Counter going off.

     Where is the link to this fictional video? If, as you will soon
prove to be the case, you're lying, you'll not offer the link.

>
>And if you want to know more about Allison Geyh and her job with the NNSA 
>just use the following link:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=alison+Geyh+%2B+NNSA
>
>And you will probably see this in the list:
> http://911myths.com/html/dr_alison_geyh.html
>
>And a quote from Alison where she states: "I personally saw open fires, 
>glowing and twisted I-beams. I was told, but do not remember by whom, that 
>the workers were finding molten steel. "
>

     It is possible she was told this. Of course, to the educated
mind, this doesn't mean any of what she was told was true. As will ALL
things, YM will V.

>And that is consistent with someone that knows the molten steel was where 
>the nukes were detonated so she wouldn't want to go there herself.  DUH.
>
>So, now I have
>
>1.  A photo of the hole made by the nuke that was detonated under WTC4 with 
>the walls consistent with the spread pattern of that particular nuke.
>

     No you don't.

>2.  A photo of the remains of Ground Zero where the "Surviving Corners" can 
>only be caused by deep underground nukes.

     And yet the photo PROVES the towers collapsed and were not nuked.

>
>3.  A video clip that shows a mushroom cloud and another smoke pattern that 
>are both consistent with nukes.
>

     The video you linked to previously proves there was no mushroom
cloud.

>4.  A site that proves they covered the hypocenter that was on the north 
>side of WTC3 with special dirt.
>

     No special dirt was used. To the educated mind, diatomaceous
earth is not special.

>5.  A video from WCBS that just happened to record the EMP from the blast 
>that shook the North Tower 12 seconds before it was vaporized.

     There was no EMP. If there had been, the video would have stopped
recording at the point of the EMP. The helicopter would have fallen
from the sky. And the electrical grid for Manhattan would have been
fried.

>
>6.  An inconsistent seismic reading that missed the 12 seconds of no shaking 
>of the North Tower putting the seismic readings in doubt.

     Where is this phantom seismic reading to be found?

>
>7.  And with the first video above proof that the NNSA was all over Nuke 
>York City to help cover-up the fact that nukes were detonated there.  

     No nukes were used.

>BTW 
>the First Responders were told the badges they had to wear were to monitor 
>air quality but they were really dosimeter badges.

     And your evidence for this claim can be found where?

>
>8   And proof that NIST was a sack of shit just like you Friendly 
>Neighborhood Nut with the following:
>
>The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W

     Using k00k vids won't help you. Try something valid. 
     Oh wait, there is nothing valid that will help you. 

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516364 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit

From	gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2015-08-23 23:07 -0500
Subject	Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit
Message-ID	<mre59e$ed3$4@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to	#516345

On 8/23/2015 8:52 PM, Rocky wrote:
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
> wrote in message
>
>> It was diatomaceous earth, used to adsorb toxins and help in
>> the cleanup of those tons of friable asbestos.

you are dumb and stupid, like teenage girl dumb and stupid.

Diatomaceous earth will not absorb toxins and will not clean up asbestos 
at all. Try it, eat a little and then put some up your pooper. Feel 
green and clean now ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516334 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-08-24 00:10 +0000
Subject	Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit
Message-ID	<a04qac-mo6.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#516313

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> It didn't have to fill the Twin Towers because the Hypocenter was under the 
> side of WTC3 closest to WTC1 and not only did that nuke leave a "Surviving 
> Corner" on the far side of WTC1 it also left a "Surviving Corner" on the far 
> side of WTC3 just like an NCD would do.  See:

There was no hypocenter and there were no nukes, you babbling kook.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516309 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

From	Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Date	2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Subject	Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit
Message-ID	<mrdgjf$c5n$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#516297

On 23/08/2015 22:41, Rocky wrote:
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:mrdc2c$u1u$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> On 8/23/2015 12:53 PM, je suis charly wrote:
>>> In article <2uidnVX3hN6imEfInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>    "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And part of the reason for the "nuclear device chimney" could have been
>>>> to
>>>> vent the radiation well above Nuke York City just like a chimney carries
>>>> smoke out of the area.
>>>
>>> Like when Chernobyl vented fission byproducts so successfully they were
>>> completely undetected as far away as northern Europe?
>>>
>>
>> two maps;
>
> ROTFLMAO because the whole world knows that Chernobyl didn't do anything
> about their radiation until way too late.
>
> Where as the mayor of Nuke York City immediately dispatched 120 truckloads
> of treated dirt to Ground Zero to fill in the 3 hypocenters and try to
> conceal the fact that we nuked ourselves on 9/11.  Hear what he said with
> the following:
>   http://drjudywood.com/media/010912_GIulianiDumpTrucks.mp3

Oh good you post a link that purports to prove 120 dumptrucks were sent 
to the WTC with treated earth & it says the dumptrucks were removing 
debris from the site.
Do you ever check the links you post?

>
> And then look at one of the places that treated or special dirt was used
> because it was used right on top of the hypocenter that was under WTC3 and
> that was where the nuke was that vaporized WTC1 and left the Surviving
> Corner of WTC1 furthest from the hypocenter under where WTC3 stood.  <G>
>   http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2009/05/covering-ground-zero-with-dirt.html
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516319 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

From	"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date	2015-08-23 18:08 -0500
Subject	Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit
Message-ID	<KfCdnSeglLdjzEfInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#516309

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mrdgjf$c5n$1@dont-email.me...
> On 23/08/2015 22:41, Rocky wrote:
>> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
>> news:mrdc2c$u1u$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>> On 8/23/2015 12:53 PM, je suis charly wrote:
>>>> In article <2uidnVX3hN6imEfInZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>>    "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And part of the reason for the "nuclear device chimney" could have 
>>>>> been
>>>>> to
>>>>> vent the radiation well above Nuke York City just like a chimney 
>>>>> carries
>>>>> smoke out of the area.
>>>>
>>>> Like when Chernobyl vented fission byproducts so successfully they were
>>>> completely undetected as far away as northern Europe?
>>>>
>>>
>>> two maps;
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because the whole world knows that Chernobyl didn't do anything
>> about their radiation until way too late.
>>
>> Where as the mayor of Nuke York City immediately dispatched 120 
>> truckloads
>> of treated dirt to Ground Zero to fill in the 3 hypocenters and try to
>> conceal the fact that we nuked ourselves on 9/11.  Hear what he said with
>> the following:
>>   http://drjudywood.com/media/010912_GIulianiDumpTrucks.mp3
>
> Oh good you post a link that purports to prove 120 dumptrucks were sent to 
> the WTC with treated earth & it says the dumptrucks were removing debris 
> from the site.
> Do you ever check the links you post?

Too bad the next link shows what they did with part of the 100+ truck loads 
of dirt so all you had to do was continue reading the post you clown.

BTW I've seen it before and before anything was hauled out of GZ truck loads 
of very black dirt or some sort of chemical was hauled in and the photo 
below shows where some of that dirt was placed.  DUH

As a matter of fact dirt was constanly hauled in and out of GZ because they 
were also trying to deal with radiation from the 3 hypocenters at Ground 
Zero. Duh.

>> And then look at one of the places that treated or special dirt was used
>> because it was used right on top of the hypocenter that was under WTC3 
>> and
>> that was where the nuke was that vaporized WTC1 and left the Surviving
>> Corner of WTC1 furthest from the hypocenter under where WTC3 stood.  <G>
>> 
>> http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2009/05/covering-ground-zero-with-dirt.html

Rocky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516335 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date	2015-08-24 00:11 +0000
Subject	Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit
Message-ID	<q24qac-mo6.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to	#516319

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

<snip kook babble>

> As a matter of fact dirt was constanly hauled in and out of GZ because they 
> were also trying to deal with radiation from the 3 hypocenters at Ground 
> Zero. Duh.

No dirt hauled in and no nukes, kook.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic
signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any
seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers
as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected
by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the
Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events.

A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a
fact that is widely known and trivial to verify.

Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it
has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data.

Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available
on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources.

Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any
governmental agency.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →

csiph-web

WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys

Contents

#516990 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516756 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516797 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516810 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516920 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516989 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#517063 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#517078 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#517152 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#517192 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#517240 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516579 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516701 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post

#516505 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list

#516673 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list

#516364 — Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit

#516334 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

#516309 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

#516319 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit

#516335 — Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit