Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517078
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| References | (3 earlier) <d6469ff731724d362761d8cd31b77e1a@dizum.com> <op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com> <op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost> <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2015-08-26 15:39 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:59:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> so in addition to being a kemtrailKook you don't understand sarcasm?
>
>>> Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies *again*?
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
>>> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"
>
>> so, strawman argument on your part?
>
> So, backpedal and non sequitur falsified k'lame on your part? LOL
>
>>> And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard
>>> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
>>> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
>>> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
>>> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
>>> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
>>> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
>>> crying. :(
>>>
>>> You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing,
>>> Dimmy.
>>> =================================================
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
>>>> how very "smart" of you.
>
>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>>>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>>>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>
>>>> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>>> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>
>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>
> DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
> =================================================
>> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack have to be really
>> stupid or else you can't manage?
> =================================================
>
>>> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
>>> stupid, DildoRider.
>
> Bwahahaha! I'ma never let you live down your own admission to being
> "really stupid" (your words in your admission). LOL
>
>>>> ...and yet it is imaginary bullshit to me. ...like k0okyKemtrail
>>>> konspiracies you're a rube for.
>
>>> Awww, still trying that lie for which you got soundly bootfucked?
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com>
>>> =================================================
>>> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard
>>> collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL"
>
>> strawman argument... again.
>>
>> hey dimbulb... are 97% of the world's climatologists "libtards"?
>
> Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
> anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
> simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
> you'd have learned:
>
> Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
> ========================================================
> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>
> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
> that hard math eludes them.
> ========================================================
>
>>> And that's why you're melting down...
>
>> based on your verbosity in response to a few of my words, most would say
>> that you were the one melting down, "jeenyus".
>
> That's called "kicking a retard a thousand times a minute in an
> attempt at somehow miraculously knocking a clue into him". LOL
>
>>> because your own libtard
>>> comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more*
>>> pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent
>>> envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL)
>>> for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming
>>> that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996,
>>> as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started
>>> crying. :(
>
>> more strawman fallacy from snickerTurds.
>
> More backpedaling non sequitur lies from DildoRider. LOL
>
>>> If the best you can do is pathetic lies, you'd best just tuck your
>>> tail between your legs and limp away. Again. Kook. LOL
>
>>>>> Quoting an utter fucking retard:
>>>>> >>> he doesn't believe in climate change either,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure I do... I believe natural cycles of solar and orbital forcing
>>>>> have started the planet on a cooling trend that even NASA, UAH, RSS
>>>>> and UK Met have acknowledged started ~17 years ago. That you libtard
>>>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kooks are still bleating your alarmist "zOMG!
>>>>> Artereosclerotic Globular Wurmings!!" bullshit is testament to the
>>>>> fact that the lot of you can have the wool pulled over your eyes for
>>>>> 17 long years, and not one of you is smart enough to figure it out.
>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> Climate change denying kook. LOL
>
>>>> you are denying climate change being man-made as has been proven
>
>>> Lying kook. Even a former lead author
>
>> former?
>
> Yeah, he figured out the IPCC game of "scream lying alarmist bullshit
> to get funding from the libtard politicians trying to set up their
> carbon exchange scam" and left. IOW, he's not a dishonest lying piece
> of shit like the rest of them at the IPCC. LOL
>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>>> forcing
>
>> are you claiming that *you* were a lead author for the IPCC?
>
> Says the guy who's admitted he's "really stupid" (your words). LOL
>
>> maybe that's why you're so angry.
>
> Maybe that's why you're so delusional. LOL
>
>>> SPNAK! #1
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> =================================================
>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
>>> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>>> keep trying to sell.
>
> <crickets> LOL
>
> Can't face that reality, can you, LibTard? No, you cannot. LOL
>
>>>> to cause 97% of climate scientists to NOT deny that
>>>> a lot of it is human-caused, which makes you the klimateK0ok, kook.
>
>>> You're backpedaling and using weasel-words, Ko0k. Mathematical proof
>>> of your delusional climate change denying stupidity:
>>>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
>>> humans are causing global warming
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #4
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
>>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
>>> =========================================================
>>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
>>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
>>> caused!".
>>>
>>> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>>>
>>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
>>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
>>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
>>> University of Queensland.
>>>
>>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
>>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
>>> science articles.
>>>
>>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
>>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
>>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
>>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
>>> uncertain."
>>>
>>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
>>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
>>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
>>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
>>> position that humans are causing the warming."
>>>
>>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>>
>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>>> that hard math eludes them.
>>> =========================================================
>>>
>>> Doh! You're caught in another lie, eh, Dimmy? LOL
>
>> note that Cook does not subscribe to your conservatard smear tactics,
>> snickers:
>>
>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-determine-the-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming/
>>
>> "The latest surveys show that 89 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of
>> independents and 70 percent of Republicans already believe global
>> warming
>> is happening and is at least partly caused by human actions."
>
> "partly caused" LOL
>
> That's the fallback position the global warming libtard kooks have
> been forced into... from "zOMG! The Urf is gunna turn into a giunt
> fireball!" to "some people believe that some small percentage of that
> non-existent global warming is caused by humans". LOL
>
> Of course, what with the planet cooling for the past ~18 years,
> where's this "global warming", K0ok? LOL
>
>> There's no doubt that Cook regards climate change as a moral issue.
>>
>> "As a father, I realized that we are handing over a world to our
>> children
>> that is worse than the world we were given," he said over the phone from
>> Brisbane, Australia. "And as a Christian, I saw climate change as a
>> social
>> justice issue."
>
> And as a libtard kook, he didn't take into account all the data,
> instead cherry-picking and fitting the data to his agenda. LOL
>
>> Cook thinks that politicians are not acting because the public is not
>> pressuring them enough. If people realize that the majority of
>> scientists
>> agree on human-caused climate change, they will absorb that knowledge
>> like
>> empty vessels and become more convinced of the threat, he said. They
>> will
>> then be more amenable to picking up their phones and calling their
>> legislators.
>
> Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
> of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
> computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
> alarmist propaganda. LOL
>
> ===============================================================
> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>
> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>
> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
> archived it):
> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
> ===============================================================
>
> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> =================================================
> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>
> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>
> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
> world has warmed over the last century.
>
> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>
> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
> they otherwise would.
>
> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
> one iota.
>
> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
> =================================================
>
>> "If the public think that climate scientists agree about what is causing
>> global warming, then the public thinks we need to act on it," he said.
>> "If
>> the public thinks scientists disagree, then we might as well wait until
>> the scientists work it out before we do anything about it."
>
> And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
> in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
> that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
> earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
> loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
> when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
> agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
> from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>>>> not only do i NOT believe in
>>>>>> k0okyNuke 911 konspiracies, i also don't care to waste my time
>>>>>> arguing
>>>>>> with komplete k0oks who believe that sort of nonsense, unlike you.
>
>>>>> No, you just argue with the guy who argues with "komplete k0oks who
>>>>> believe that sort of nonsense"... were you going for the whole "shade
>>>>> of the same color" effect, or are you just stoooopid? LOL
>
>>>> i was going for "pointing at you and laughing".
>
>>> <points and laughs at math-challenged climate change denying kook> LOL
>
>> and where have i denied climate change? ever.
>
> You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
> all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
> standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".
>
> But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
> been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
> not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
> don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
> years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
> scientists" have been lying to the public.
>
> ===============================================================
> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
> relations problem for us."
> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of
> East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
> ===============================================================
>
>>>>> DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
>>>>> MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
>>>>> =================================================
>>>>> >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>>>>> >> damaged your brain, DildoRider.
>>>>>
>>>>> > then it appears that you like shooting fish in
>>>>> > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, you've just admitted that intellectually
>>>>> kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a
>>>>> barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
>>>>> stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>>>>> =================================================
>
>>> Stoooopid libtard climate change denying kook with libtard
>>> chemtrail-touting comrades. LOL
>
>> more strawman fallacy from someone who sure k'laims to be smarter than
>> that.
>
> Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
> UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
> doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
> their lies. LOL
says the fucktard who just unapologetically spewed a bunch of fallacy and
then started backpedaling on his klown unicycle.
>
> Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
> words). LOL
>
you seem to be tacitly admitting that you can only have an argument with
anyone who is "really stupid". does that make you just plain stupid? i'm
still pointing at you and laughing. will you be voting for donald trump?
you've been working on that fallacy-ridden response all fucking morning,
heven't you?
just one thing: do i (or anybody else, for that matter) give a fuck? get
back at me, dawg!
--
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
--
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:41 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 21:44 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:02 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 17:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:22 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 18:20 -0500
caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:00 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:07 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:36 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:29 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:04 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 10:06 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:28 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:02 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:07 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:48 +0200
Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:30 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 05:47 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 04:12 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.physics.cunt.scabs> - 2015-08-25 10:45 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:11 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:38 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 06:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:00 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 11:18 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:39 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 19:06 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:54 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:19 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 17:12 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:32 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:08 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 23:53 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 08:52 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-25 08:03 +0100
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 08:58 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 17:25 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 11:34 -0500
words in chaTRooms noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:25 -0700
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:47 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:31 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:24 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:06 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 18:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 13:09 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:44 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:59 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 15:39 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 06:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 09:58 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 20:09 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:28 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:29 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:35 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:10 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:08 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 00:11 +0000
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:11 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:47 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:20 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 12:10 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-25 08:25 +0200
csiph-web