Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274001
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <op.x3xol6vjtm21m2@benson.localhost> <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com> <op.x3y4ynagtm21m2@benson.localhost> <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> <op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| Subject | Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post |
| Message-ID | <bbdf41289114a2c0b201a1412c5c9392@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-27 06:42 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3zp74ultm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 13:59:43 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> Hey dimbulb... do 97% of the world's climatologists believe in
>> anthropogenic global warming? No, they do not. Had you understood that
>> simple math I presented in proving that libtard lie to *be* a lie,
>> you'd have learned:
>>
>> Message-ID: <555e3bff963632e9ded43203f2949eb3@dizum.com>
>> ========================================================
>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>>
>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
>> that hard math eludes them.
>> ========================================================
<crickets> LOL
>> Politicians are not acting because "global warming" is a steaming pile
>> of libtard bullshit. It doesn't exist anywhere except in the flawed
>> computer models the envirowhackos at the IPCC use to blather out their
>> alarmist propaganda. LOL
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>>
>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>>
>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>> archived it):
>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> =================================================
>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>
>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>
>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>
>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>
>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>> they otherwise would.
>>
>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>> one iota.
>>
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>> =================================================
<crickets> LOL
>> And when the public learns those "climate scientists" have been caught
>> in lie after lie through 129 climate scandals and two email hackings
>> that revealed the truth... that even the "climate scientists" know the
>> earth is cooling, and very well may head into an ice age... the public
>> loses faith in science. As do the politicians. This is what happens
>> when those put into positions of trust lie to further their own kooky
>> agendas. It's a natural weeding-out process to keep the crazies away
>> from the levers of power. And it worked just fine.
<crickets> LOL
>> You still think global warming is in effect, you retard. You're still
>> all for curbs on carbon dioxide emissions and a lowering of everyone's
>> standard of living in order to reduce their "carbon footprint".
>>
>> But you'll note not *one* of you libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks has
>> been able to explain the 18 year 10 month "global warming" hiatus...
>> not you, not your "climate scientists", not one of you... because you
>> don't dare admit the truth, that the earth has been cooling for ~18
>> years and all through that cooling process, your libtard "climate
>> scientists" have been lying to the public.
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
>> relations problem for us."
>> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University of
>> East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
>> ===============================================================
<crickets> LOL
>> Says the kook who denies the irrefutable data from NASA, UAH, RSS and
>> UK Met that the planet has been cooling for ~18 years. Because he
>> doesn't want to admit he was gullible and stoooopid enough to believe
>> their lies. LOL
> says the fucktard who just unapologetically spewed a bunch of fallacy and
> then started backpedaling on his klown unicycle.
Don't be so hard on yourself, FuckTard. You can't help it that you
still believe in the retarded libtard "zOMG! Antrapogienic Glubul
Wooormings! DUUUURRRHH!" lie... you're a retarded libtard. It's what
you do.
<snicker>
>> Odd, given that he's admitted twice now to being "really stupid" (his
>> words). LOL
> you seem to be tacitly admitting that you can only have an argument with
> anyone who is "really stupid". does that make you just plain stupid? i'm
> still pointing at you and laughing. will you be voting for donald trump?
Pointing and laughing at a libtard no more makes one stupid than
pointing and laughing at circus sideshow freaks makes one a circus
sideshow freak, LibTard Circus Sideshow FrEaK. LOL
> you've been working on that fallacy-ridden response all fucking morning,
> heven't you?
Projection from the libtard kook who's backpedaling like mad because
he can't refute the reality that he was so stoooopid and gullible that
he believed the libtard "zOMG! Androgenytic Glorbal Wermings! DURRHH!"
lie for 18 long years as the planet was cooling. LOL
> just one thing: do i (or anybody else, for that matter) give a fuck? get
> back at me, dawg!
Awww, the last refuge of a thoroughly bootfucked kook... the attempt
to k'lame that no one cares that the kook is getting its ass kicked.
LOL
--
------------------------------------
Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky)
336-643-6611
6913 Maynard Road
Summerfield, NC 27358-9206
Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric
help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother
Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at
home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL
Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're
embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate
clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL
Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200
sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his
brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL
------------------------------------
Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.
For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.
B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".
C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).
D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.
E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL
F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL
G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL
H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it
moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes.
Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent
nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot
"crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC
being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL
IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================
Kook. LOL
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:40 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 12:47 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:02 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:50 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 12:06 -0400
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 10:53 -0700
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:56 -0500
caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:41 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit (was: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:02 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 17:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:22 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 18:20 -0500
caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:00 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:07 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 18:36 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:04 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:16 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 10:06 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:02 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in even more bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:07 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:48 +0200
Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 05:47 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 04:12 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@sci.physics.cunt.scabs> - 2015-08-25 10:45 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:11 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 06:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:00 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 19:06 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:54 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit AGAIN + My list Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 17:12 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:32 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:08 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:40 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 23:53 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 08:52 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-25 08:03 +0100
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 08:58 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 17:25 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 10:52 -0500
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:47 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:31 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 18:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 13:09 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:44 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 08:00 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:59 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 15:39 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 06:42 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 09:58 -0400
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 20:09 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:28 +0000
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit + short post Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:29 +0200
Re: Caught Friendly Neighborhood Nut in plenty of bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:07 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:08 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:11 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0700
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:47 +0200
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:24 -0500
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Re: caught gilber34 in bullshit gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:20 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 22:35 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:32 +0200
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 23:12 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:28 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 23:17 +0000
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:21 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 16:17 -0500
Re: w.t.c towers (no asbestos cladding <period "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 09:19 -0500
Re: WTC Constructed to be nuclear device chimneys gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 16:19 -0500
csiph-web