Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #515667 > unrolled thread

The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:22 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-21 18:54 -0400
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:56 +0000
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-21 18:59 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:44 +0200
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 11:48 -0400
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:47 +0200
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:08 -0400
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:46 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:06 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:07 +0200
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:21 +0000
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 03:59 -0400
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:43 +0200
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 12:04 -0500
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 17:23 +0000
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:44 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:23 +0000
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:43 -0500
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 -0400
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:54 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:54 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:53 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:01 -0700
                  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 21:02 -0500
                    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:49 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:26 +0000
                  ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:42 -0500
                    Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 04:07 -0700
                      2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:52 -0500
                        Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:28 -0700
                        Re: 2 je suis charly was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:20 +0000
                    Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
                      Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:23 -0500
                        seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:35 -0500
                          Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:42 -0500
                            Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:05 -0500
                              Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
                                T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0500
                                  Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0000
                                  Re: T-annoy the pain keeps keeps the bullshit going Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                              Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:13 +0000
                              Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:04 -0500
                                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:18 -0500
                                  Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 19:50 +0000
                                    Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:28 -0500
                                      Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:40 +0000
                                      Re: Jim the bullshitter keeps bullshitting je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:20 -0700
                                  Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                                    Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:08 -0500
                                  Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent (was: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
                                Re: Kent the bullshitter keeps bullshitting (was: seismic evidence is inconsistent Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
                          Re: seismic evidence is inconsistent jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:11 +0000
                    Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked (was: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
                    Re: ? 4 Jim about why the Twin Towers look like they were nuked jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:08 +0000
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:24 +0000
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 05:09 -0700
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:40 -0500
                  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:36 -0700
                    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:07 -0500
                      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:03 -0700
                  Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-24 11:59 -0400
                    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:57 -0500
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:35 +0200
          Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 19:41 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 17:55 -0700
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:13 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 18:55 -0700
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 03:44 +0200
              Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:50 -0500
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 05:18 +0200
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:29 +0000
                Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:45 -0500
            Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:28 +0000
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:52 -0700
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:12 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Ming Tiggle" <none@nomail.com> - 2015-08-21 21:53 -0700
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:55 -0500
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:54 -0500
    Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
      Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:21 -0500
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:30 +0000
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:44 -0500
        Re: The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 09:50 -0700

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

#515667 — The wings folded back like a birds wings going into a birdhouse

For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter describes 
the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back like a bird going 
into a birdhouse see:

9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter
( Time indexed to start at 2:01 )
 https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s

That story is so stupid and it is clear Mike wasn't just a bad "Crisis 
Actor" but he was worried he might not get to keep his job if he don't add 
to his big lies.

Fact is a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile crashed in Pranksville, PA and 
two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers where the Twin Towers were finished off 
by deep underground nukes and hence the term "Ground Zero."  DUH.

While people died that number too was a crock pot of you know what.

Too bad there are too many TV Huggers out there.

Rocky

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#515678

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:22:57 -0500
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> For those of you who want to see the video clip where Mike Walter
> describes the wings of the alleged Flight 77 folding it's wings back
> like a bird going into a birdhouse see:
> 
> 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter
> ( Time indexed to start at 2:01 )
>  https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s
> 
> That story is so stupid and it is clear Mike wasn't just a bad
> "Crisis Actor" but he was worried he might not get to keep his job if
> he don't add to his big lies.
> 
> Fact is a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile crashed in Pranksville,
> PA and two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers where the Twin Towers
> were finished off by deep underground nukes and hence the term
> "Ground Zero."  DUH.
> 
> While people died that number too was a crock pot of you know what.
> 
> Too bad there are too many TV Huggers out there.
> 
> Rocky
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515681

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> Fact is a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile crashed in Pranksville, PA and 
> two CGIs rammed into the Twin Towers where the Twin Towers were finished off 
> by deep underground nukes and hence the term "Ground Zero."  DUH.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the two plane crashes were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


> 
> While people died that number too was a crock pot of you know what.
> 
> Too bad there are too many TV Huggers out there.
> 
> Rocky
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515689

On 8/21/2015 5:22 PM, Rocky wrote:
> For those of you who want to see the video


<snip K00k BaBblE crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515718

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> F<SMACKAKOOK!>

<http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>

<http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>

<http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>

<http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>

Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
*inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.

<http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>

And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
rammed it in at full throttle.

Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
<http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
<http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>

You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
the right of the main body punch-through hole.

Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
of the plane, and I found the black box."

Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
together the entire chronology of the event... and that
chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
this 9/11 truther bullshit.

You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
(remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.

I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
Warmings!" lying blather.

Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
nothing more than a laughingstock.

Kook. LOL

> Rocky

Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory
violates the laws of physics:

======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep
below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to
drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact
that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal
*melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636
miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole
*ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why
the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd
been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond
time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP)
would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount
of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That
there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no
nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have
destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that
there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke.
If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have
shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most
likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type
of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or
educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are.

4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex
or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit
signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial
sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for
all other sources of radiation.

5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by
people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you
k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the
order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame
the bombs were buried.

6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts,
the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays,
include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start
any sort of nuclear chain reaction.

7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as*
*it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling
vertical support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No
amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going
to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would
be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the
temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through
a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into
surrounding rock.

10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill
effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or
aircraft.

11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes, as opposed
to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously,
previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken
little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth
and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just
how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining
how the regular rad sweeps at the twin towers (because the space
was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes, and
how 23 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any
attention whatsoever.

12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to
service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source
triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic
basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at
37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology
to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4
blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced
to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched
for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to
survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat?

13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers
(all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked
off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your
admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of
the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe"
(your words)?

14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest
k'lame) you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001?

15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?

16) Explain how these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest
k'lame) could tunnel holes from their underground installation
37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex...
in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating
directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your
timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you
back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit,
you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go
'round again.).
======================================================

There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the
laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each
one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a
retard who can't grasp simple physics.

Kook. LOL

-- 

Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid
admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and
more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly
demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of
illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you
they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a
simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the
nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33
years.

B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video
disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed
to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it
was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your
supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93
*miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and
thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're
talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that
scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill
that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to
yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least
try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a
shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore,
now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked
away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require
periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which
naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay
byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon
poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to
service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means
your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow
hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an
impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years",
to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC,
complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the
explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were
maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of
your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in
which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink
interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP,
they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there
were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely
ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the
city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact
that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or
its vicinity.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were
buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius,
which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to
demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so
your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could
somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just
below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their
cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain
said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock*
in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) Now your broken brain is telling you, for some as-yet
unfathomable reason, that there were 34 nukes, rather than your
previously claimed 19 (or your previously, previously claimed 3),
without explaining exactly how 34 nukes were attained and put
into place without drawing any attention whatsoever (especially
given that the WTC towers had regular rad sweeps because they
were primarily rented by government agencies). Gullible idiots
believe everything they read because their broken brains can't
discern between reality and fantasy. LOL

G) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those
nuclear bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig
their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating
(they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because
it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll
continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time
between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the
time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started.
So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle
that you're insane. LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in
little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing
your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into
a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even
started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515782

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 00:44:07 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>
> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>
> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>
> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>
> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>
> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
> rammed it in at full throttle.
>
> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>
> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>
> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>
> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>
> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>
> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
> Warmings!" lying blather.
>
> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>
> Kook. LOL
>
>> Rocky
>
> Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory
> violates the laws of physics:
>
> ======================================================
> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep
> below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to
> drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact
> that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal
> *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636
> miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole
> *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why
> the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.
>
> 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an
> EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd
> been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond
> time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP)
> would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount
> of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That
> there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no
> nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have
> destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius.
>
> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that
> there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke.
> If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have
> shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most
> likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement
> weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type
> of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or
> educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are.
>
> 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex
> or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit
> signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial
> sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for
> all other sources of radiation.
>
> 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by
> people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you
> k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the
> order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame
> the bombs were buried.
>
> 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
> source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts,
> the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays,
> include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start
> any sort of nuclear chain reaction.
>
> 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as*
> *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling
> vertical support column and *NO* EMP:
> ======================
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No
> amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
> ======================
>
> 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going
> to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would
> be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the
> temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?
>
> 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through
> a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into
> surrounding rock.
>
> 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
> satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
> detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill
> effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or
> aircraft.
>
> 11) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes, as opposed
> to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously,
> previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken
> little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth
> and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just
> how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining
> how the regular rad sweeps at the twin towers (because the space
> was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes, and
> how 23 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any
> attention whatsoever.
>
> 12) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to
> service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source
> triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic
> basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at
> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology
> to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4
> blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
> the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced
> to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched
> for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to
> survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat?
>
> 13) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com)
> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers
> (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked
> off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your
> admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of
> the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe"
> (your words)?
>
> 14) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
> signatures for these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest
> k'lame) you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001?
>
> 15) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
> underground, Ko0K?
>
> 16) Explain how these 19 nukes (now 34 nukes, per your latest
> k'lame) could tunnel holes from their underground installation
> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex...
> in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating
> directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your
> timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you
> back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit,
> you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go
> 'round again.).
> ======================================================
>
> There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the
> laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each
> one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a
> retard who can't grasp simple physics.
>
> Kook. LOL
>

tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't caused by  
man at all, you guys might get along.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515795

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka 
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop 
Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x3r0voqdtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 00:44:07 -0400,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>

>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>>
>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>>
>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>>
>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>>
>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>
>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>>
>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>
>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>>
>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>>
>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>>
>> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
>> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
>> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
>> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>>
>> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
>> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
>> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
>> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
>> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
>> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>>
>> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
>> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
>> Warmings!" lying blather.
>>
>> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
>> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
>> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>>
>> Kook. LOL

> tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't caused by  
> man at all, you guys might get along.

I'd rather tell him about a bootfucked dildoriding trannytard who
hijacks threads to mewl out his pathetic butthurt over having
been proven wrong about his kooktard "zOMG! Globular Warmings!"
Chicken Little alarmist bullshit. LOL

Rocky, meet DildoRider. He's as delusional as you, just in a
different genre. And as is typical for all libtards, he's
clue-repellant. LOL

Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
forcing

SPNAK! #1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
<http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
<http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
<http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
=================================================
Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.

Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
temperature changes over the 20th Century.

What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
world has warmed over the last century.

"This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.

But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
they otherwise would.

=================================================
{NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
one iota.

<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
<http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
"When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
=================================================
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
LOL

The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
keep trying to sell.

===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
public relations problem for us."
 - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
bag.
===============================================================

You poor bootfucked-by-reality Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *still*
can't explain that 18 year 10 month "global warming" pause.
Because you're delusional, dishonest and stupid.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then
demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out
again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after
she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written
things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames
with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't
mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the
psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by
taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes
a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD"
that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no
proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into
admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living
a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay
community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the
CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that
liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated
that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a
nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity
to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to
prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so
badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when
they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that
land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per
Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when
it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA,
and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers
outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year
cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as
the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page
that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd
used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again
her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2
lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree
with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for
global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to
explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the
Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician,
1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed
were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist
or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state
that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of
liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from
socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky
contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and
biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual
scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself);
she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math;
she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he
admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that
every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming
majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the
liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology
experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis
skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me,
for 394 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of
her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's
kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading
comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able
to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was
receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the
length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more
evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not
attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe
husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly,
delusional ass anymore. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515826

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:47:29 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x3r0voqdtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 00:44:07 -0400,
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>>>
>>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>>>
>>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>>>
>>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>>>
>>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>>
>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>>>
>>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>>
>>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>>>
>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>>>
>>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>>>
>>> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
>>> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
>>> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
>>> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>>>
>>> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
>>> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
>>> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
>>> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
>>> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
>>> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>>>
>>> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
>>> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
>>> Warmings!" lying blather.
>>>
>>> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
>>> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
>>> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>>>
>>> Kook. LOL
>
>> tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't caused  
>> by
>> man at all, you guys might get along.
>
> I'd rather tell him about a bootfucked dildoriding trannytard who
> hijacks threads to mewl out his pathetic butthurt over having
> been proven wrong about his kooktard "zOMG! Globular Warmings!"
> Chicken Little alarmist bullshit. LOL
>
> Rocky, meet DildoRider. He's as delusional as you, just in a
> different genre. And as is typical for all libtards, he's
> clue-repellant. LOL
>
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
> forcing
>
> SPNAK! #1
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
> =================================================
> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>
> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>
> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
> world has warmed over the last century.
>
> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>
> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
> they otherwise would.
>
> =================================================
> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
> one iota.
>
> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
> =================================================
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
> LOL
>
> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
> keep trying to sell.
>
> ===============================================================
> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
> public relations problem for us."
>  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
> bag.
> ===============================================================
>
> You poor bootfucked-by-reality Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *still*
> can't explain that 18 year 10 month "global warming" pause.
> Because you're delusional, dishonest and stupid.
>
> <snicker>
>

tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing your  
*true* self.

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515838

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.x3r94hjptm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:47:29 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>

>>>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>>>>
>>>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>>>>
>>>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>>>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>>>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>>>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>>>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>>>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>>>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>>>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>>>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>>>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>>>
>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>>>>
>>>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>>>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>>>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>>>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>>>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>>>
>>>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>>>>
>>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>>>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>>>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>>>>
>>>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>>>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>>>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>>>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>>>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>>>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>>>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>>>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>>>>
>>>> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
>>>> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
>>>> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
>>>> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
>>>> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
>>>> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
>>>> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
>>>> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
>>>> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
>>>> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
>>>> Warmings!" lying blather.
>>>>
>>>> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
>>>> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
>>>> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>>>>
>>>> Kook. LOL

>>> tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't caused  
>>> by man at all, you guys might get along.

>> I'd rather tell him about a bootfucked dildoriding trannytard who
>> hijacks threads to mewl out his pathetic butthurt over having
>> been proven wrong about his kooktard "zOMG! Globular Warmings!"
>> Chicken Little alarmist bullshit. LOL
>>
>> Rocky, meet DildoRider. He's as delusional as you, just in a
>> different genre. And as is typical for all libtards, he's
>> clue-repellant. LOL
>>
>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>> forcing
>>
>> SPNAK! #1
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>> =================================================
>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>
>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>
>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>
>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>
>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>> they otherwise would.
>>
>> =================================================
>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>> one iota.
>>
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>> =================================================
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
>> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
>> LOL
>>
>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>> keep trying to sell.
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
>> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
>> public relations problem for us."
>>  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
>> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
>> bag.
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> You poor bootfucked-by-reality Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *still*
>> can't explain that 18 year 10 month "global warming" pause.
>> Because you're delusional, dishonest and stupid.
>>
>> <snicker>

> tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing your  
> *true* self.

No fucking idea what you're blathering on about... it appears
I've kicked your ass so hard it's damaged your brain, DildoRider.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then
demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out
again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after
she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written
things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames
with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't
mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the
psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by
taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long
before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes
a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD"
that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no
proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into
admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living
a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay
community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the
CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that
liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated
that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a
nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity
to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to
prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so
badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated
the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when
they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that
land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per
Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when
it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA,
and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers
outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year
cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as
the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page
that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd
used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again
her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2
lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree
with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for
global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to
explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the
Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician,
1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she
presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed
were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist
or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state
that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of
liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from
socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky
contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and
biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual
scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself);
she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math;
she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he
admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that
every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals
(when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming
majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the
liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology
experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis
skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me,
for 394 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of
her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's
kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading
comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able
to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was
receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the
length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more
evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a
strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not
attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe
husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly,
delusional ass anymore. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515926

"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
wrote in message news:e7658b880365012a118ab4b389043518@dizum.com...
>
>> tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing your
>> *true* self.
>
> No fucking idea what you're blathering on about... it appears
> I've kicked your ass so hard it's damaged your brain, DildoRider.

Unfcuking real.  While what he says is probably wrong the fact you have no 
idea what he is talking about is worse.

And besides there are other ways to see through all the bullshit the media 
has told us about the Great 9/11 Hoax and one of them is to just look at the 
photos taken of the remains of the Twin Towers and figure out what could 
have vaporized them and yet leave behind so much at the very bottom of them 
too.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Too bad the 9/11 Commission, NIST or you have never even attempted to take 
the photo above and figure out what really finished off the Twin Towers and 
WTC3.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515933

Rocky wrote:
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus"
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message
> news:e7658b880365012a118ab4b389043518@dizum.com... 
>> 
>>> tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing
>>> your *true* self.
>> 
>> No fucking idea what you're blathering on about... it appears
>> I've kicked your ass so hard it's damaged your brain, DildoRider.
> 
> Unfcuking real.  While what he says is probably wrong the fact you
> have no idea what he is talking about is worse.
> 
> And besides there are other ways to see through all the bullshit the
> media has told us about the Great 9/11 Hoax and one of them is to
> just look at the photos taken of the remains of the Twin Towers and
> figure out what could have vaporized them and yet leave behind so
> much at the very bottom of them too.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> Too bad the 9/11 Commission, NIST or you have never even attempted to
> take the photo above and figure out what really finished off the Twin
> Towers and WTC3.
> 
> Rocky

but you're the only one that thinks so

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515942

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Rocky, in <news:7qKdne27ashcgUTInZ2dnUU7-e-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
> wrote in message news:e7658b880365012a118ab4b389043518@dizum.com...

>>> tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing your
>>> *true* self.

>> No fucking idea what you're blathering on about... it appears
>> I've kicked your ass so hard it's damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> Unf<SMACKAKOOK!>

Your doctored photos and retarded blather which violates the laws of
physics is no longer allowed, most especially in reply to posts which
have nothing to do with your retardation. You will provide actual
scientific evidence that can be corroborated or you will admit that
you are a broken-brained, stupid and gullible little kook spewing
complete rubbish.

Kook. LOL

> Rocky

Now, get to addressing the 16 ways your kook conspiracy theory
violates the laws of physics:

======================================================
1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of
collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below
the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to
today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that
depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's
*why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al
Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human
history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep
Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep.

2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an
EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a
nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of
the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused
the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would
have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the
immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized
your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for
dozens of miles radius.

3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's
no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been
from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of
radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the
tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights
that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a
nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how
delusional you are.

4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or
anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and
law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources
unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other
sources of radiation.

5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be
sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people
in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed,
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2
MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were
buried.

6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron
source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay
byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it
decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon
poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger
being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any
sort of nuclear chain reaction.

7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it*
*was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical
support column and *NO* EMP:
======================
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount
of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
======================

8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to
survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be
approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature
would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K?

9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a
hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding
rock.

10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic
taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of
satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were
detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects
were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft.

11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent
down to service those nukes (because now that you know the
neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a
periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire
facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the
technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with
"4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area
the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to
admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33
years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960
to 1840 degree heat?

12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>)
that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all
1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the
Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your
kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized"
(your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)?

13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic
signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC
site on 11 Sep 2001?

14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris
kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep
underground, Ko0K?

15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have
tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles
deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC
complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to
detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up
your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which
you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference
was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion
started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The
Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.).

16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes
(MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your
previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3
nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming
under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in
agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is?
While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps
(radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was
primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any
contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in
place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this
*still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed
"EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where
your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly
head again. LOL
======================================================

There are now 16 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of
physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by
point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp
simple physics.

Kook. LOL

-- 

Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting
*you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate
to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook
conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole
seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515982

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> And besides there are other ways to see through all the bullshit the media 
> has told us about the Great 9/11 Hoax and one of them is to just look at the 
> photos taken of the remains of the Twin Towers and figure out what could 
> have vaporized them and yet leave behind so much at the very bottom of them 
> too.

You really are bat shit crazy, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516007

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:46:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.x3r94hjptm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:47:29 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>>>>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>>>>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>>>>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>>>>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>>>>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>>>>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>>>>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>>>>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>>>>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>>>>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>>>>>
>>>>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>>>>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>>>>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>>>>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>>>>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>>>>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>>>>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>>>>>
>>>>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>>>>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>>>>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>>>>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>>>>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>>>>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>>>>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>>>>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>>>>>
>>>>> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
>>>>> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
>>>>> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
>>>>> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
>>>>> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
>>>>> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
>>>>> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
>>>>> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
>>>>> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
>>>>> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
>>>>> Warmings!" lying blather.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
>>>>> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
>>>>> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kook. LOL
>
>>>> tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't  
>>>> caused
>>>> by man at all, you guys might get along.
>
>>> I'd rather tell him about a bootfucked dildoriding trannytard who
>>> hijacks threads to mewl out his pathetic butthurt over having
>>> been proven wrong about his kooktard "zOMG! Globular Warmings!"
>>> Chicken Little alarmist bullshit. LOL
>>>
>>> Rocky, meet DildoRider. He's as delusional as you, just in a
>>> different genre. And as is typical for all libtards, he's
>>> clue-repellant. LOL
>>>
>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>>> forcing
>>>
>>> SPNAK! #1
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>> =================================================
>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>>
>>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>>
>>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>>
>>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>>
>>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>>> they otherwise would.
>>>
>>> =================================================
>>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>>> one iota.
>>>
>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>>> =================================================
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
>>> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>>> keep trying to sell.
>>>
>>> ===============================================================
>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
>>> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
>>> public relations problem for us."
>>>  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
>>> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
>>> bag.
>>> ===============================================================
>>>
>>> You poor bootfucked-by-reality Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *still*
>>> can't explain that 18 year 10 month "global warming" pause.
>>> Because you're delusional, dishonest and stupid.
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing your
>> *true* self.
>
> No fucking idea what you're blathering on about...

sure you do.  why else would you play your little outerFilther game,  
goofus?

> it appears
> I've kicked your ass so hard it's damaged your brain, DildoRider.

then it appears that you like shooting fish in barrels, intellectually  
lazy fuckhead that you are.

>
> <snicker>
>

<flush>

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516095

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3s9to04tm21m2@benson.localhost> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:46:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop
>> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.x3r94hjptm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head
>> first into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:47:29 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>>>> Rocky, in <news:bMedneXaFfx7OUrInZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>>>>>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>>>>>> F<SMACKAKOOK!>

>>>>>> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
>>>>>> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
>>>>>> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
>>>>>> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
>>>>>> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
>>>>>> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
>>>>>> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
>>>>>> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
>>>>>> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
>>>>>> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
>>>>>> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
>>>>>> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
>>>>>> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
>>>>>> rammed it in at full throttle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
>>>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
>>>>>> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,
>>>>>> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
>>>>>> the right of the main body punch-through hole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
>>>>>> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
>>>>>> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
>>>>>> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
>>>>>> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
>>>>>> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
>>>>>> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
>>>>>> of the plane, and I found the black box."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whoopsie... they found the black box? Why, that'd let them piece
>>>>>> together the entire chronology of the event... and that
>>>>>> chronology proves you're a gullible fuckwit for believing any of
>>>>>> this 9/11 truther bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You've been lied to and manipulated by attention-seeking media
>>>>>> whores who concocted a story to blame the government they hated
>>>>>> (remember, the truther movement started amongst LibTards during a
>>>>>> Republican administration) for the attacks. It's a good thing
>>>>>> only broken-brained kooks like you believe their bullshit,
>>>>>> otherwise their kooky tactic would have actually worked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sure the more astute amongst us will notice the parallels to
>>>>>> the libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kooks and their "zOMG! Globular
>>>>>> Warmings!" lying blather.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now shut the fuck up and crawl back into that welfare single-wide
>>>>>> hole you call a home, you pathetic mindless fuckwit. You're
>>>>>> nothing more than a laughingstock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kook. LOL

>>>>> tell him about how you k0okily believe that climate change isn't  
>>>>> caused by man at all, you guys might get along.

DildoRider denies the mountain of evidence that global warming is a
man-made construct that only exists in the flawed computer models of
the IPCC sham-science organization, and that the earth is actually
cooling. DildoRider is a climate denier kook. LOL

See what I did there, DildoRider? Because you can't face the reality
of the planet having cooled off for the past ~17 years (as RSS, UK
Met, NASA and UAH have proven, *you* *libtards* are now the climate
deniers. LOL

===============================================================
<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.

Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>

Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
===============================================================

Climate denier kook. It's gotta *suck* to be a libtard about now. LOL

>>>> I'd rather tell him about a bootfucked dildoriding trannytard who
>>>> hijacks threads to mewl out his pathetic butthurt over having
>>>> been proven wrong about his kooktard "zOMG! Globular Warmings!"
>>>> Chicken Little alarmist bullshit. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Rocky, meet DildoRider. He's as delusional as you, just in a
>>>> different genre. And as is typical for all libtards, he's
>>>> clue-repellant. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #1: Climate reacts to whatever
>>>> forces it to change at the time; humans are now the dominant
>>>> forcing
>>>>
>>>> SPNAK! #1
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Not according to a former IPCC lead author.
>>>> Message-ID: <71581f83f38e08d06eae2b440227d0ff@dizum.com>
>>>> <http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/22/former-un-lead-author-global-warming-caused-by-natural-variations-in-climate/>
>>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>>> <http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/pdf/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417>
>>>> =================================================
>>>> Global temperature change observed over the last hundred years or
>>>> so is well within the natural variability of the last 8,000
>>>> years, according to a new paper by a former Intergovernmental
>>>> Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) lead author.
>>>>
>>>> Dr. Philip Lloyd, a South Africa-based physicist and climate
>>>> researcher, examined ice core-based temperature data going back
>>>> 8,000 years to gain perspective on the magnitude of global
>>>> temperature changes over the 20th Century.
>>>>
>>>> What Lloyd found was that the standard deviation of the
>>>> temperature over the last 8,000 years was about 0.98 degrees
>>>> Celsius - higher than the 0.85 degrees climate scientists say the
>>>> world has warmed over the last century.
>>>>
>>>> "This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change
>>>> observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse
>>>> gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was
>>>> due to natural variations", Lloyd wrote in his study.
>>>>
>>>> But even surface temperature data showed a hiatus in warming for
>>>> about 15 years or so. Scientists have offered up dozens of
>>>> explanations for why global temperatures have been flat since the
>>>> late 1990s. The most prominent explanation is that oceans have
>>>> been absorbing most of the "heat" from increased greenhouse gas
>>>> emissions, meaning surface temperatures show less warming than
>>>> they otherwise would.
>>>>
>>>> =================================================
>>>> {NOTE: That's entirely untrue. NASA JPL itself did the research
>>>> and determined that ocean temperature at depth had not changed
>>>> one iota.
>>>>
>>>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
>>>> <http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
>>>> "When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
>>>> Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean
>>>> temperature data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean
>>>> abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably",
>>>> the space agency announced in a press release on Monday.
>>>> =================================================
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>>> That's a peer-reviewed paper, from a former IPCC Lead Author,
>>>> calling the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on their alarmist bullshit.
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> The *only* "global warming" is that which resides in those flawed
>>>> computer climate models the libtard environmental whackadoodles
>>>> keep trying to sell.
>>>>
>>>> ===============================================================
>>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both
>>>> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real
>>>> public relations problem for us."
>>>>  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
>>>> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the
>>>> bag.
>>>> ===============================================================
>>>>
>>>> You poor bootfucked-by-reality Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *still*
>>>> can't explain that 18 year 10 month "global warming" pause.
>>>> Because you're delusional, dishonest and stupid.
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>

>>> tell him how you "astrally project" your fear of someone knowing your
>>> *true* self.

Libtard kook believes in "astral projection". Did you have a scary
dream about your Usenet Lord and Master, DildoRider? Is that what's
got you all upset and frothy? LOL

>> No fucking idea what you're blathering on about...

> sure you do.  why else would you play your little outerFilther game,  
> goofus?

Still no idea what you're blathering on about... you might want to
pick up your brain chunks from the floor... I must have booted you
harder than I thought. My bad. Had I known you're such a fragile
delicate little poof, I'd have gone easier on you. Just like I go easy
on all retards.

<snicker>

>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's damaged your brain,
>> DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in barrels, intellectually  
> lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>

>> <snicker>

> <flush>

Translation:
"<run away>"

<snicker>

-- 

Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way
back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK
pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended
up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from
being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with
recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her
dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject
from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck
goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative
Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost
his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up
with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got
growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had
plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety,
given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be
light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling
abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half
his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling.

"Big things are made out of little things."
HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe.

Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com>
"all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e.
everywhere at the same time)"
Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear
transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most
universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very
means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big
bang, and most importantly, reality.

Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing...
he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements:
1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the
negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other."
2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your
consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness."

MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com>
"Who said it's your eyes that see?"
HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity.

"The Turing test is overrated anyway."
HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test.

"The now you experience now simply moves to this now."
HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past.

Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself:
"A fairyboy with an inadequate penis."

Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com>
HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot
he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold
contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when
challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and
contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task
for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling
insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right
alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the
appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to
tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming,
fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his
otherwise-dumbstruck mouth.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515799

"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>
> <http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/nodebris.html>

ROTFLMAO because despite what the website above wants you to believe there 
were no holes from engines of a 757 in the Pentagon because the people that 
were supposed to plant the explosives for that part of the verisimilitude 
didn't want to do too much damage to the Pentagon.  <G>

> <http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/>

Yep, the old straw man argument trick.  They didn't even try to address the 
lack of parts from the wings of the alleged Flight 77 that should have been 
all over the place if they really hit the light poles.  <G>

> <http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/debris.html>

HAHAHAHAHAHA  This site is filled with so much bullshit it is unreal.  They 
talk about the F4 that was rammed into a solid wall and then they never 
showed how much debris from the F4 was left on the ground.  They want you to 
believe that the desinegrated F4 floated away instead of leaving a pile of 
debris on the ground.  < In other words that site was super shit >

> <http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm>

What a crock of shit that site was.  Where is the debris from the alleged 
Flight 77.  They claim it burned up but then there would be evidence of a 
big fire and that was missing too.

> Look at all those photos showing plane debris, both outside and
> *inside* the Pentagon. Hull pieces, the wheel rim of (surprise!
> surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, a chunk of (surprise!
> surprise! surprise! the Boeing 757 nose cone that actually
> punched all the way through to A-E Drive, turbine compressor
> parts from (surprise! surprise! surprise!) a Boeing 757, and a
> shitload of small plane chunks directly in front of the building,
> exactly as one would expect from those once-together chunks
> slamming into and through concrete at 400 MPH. And that's not to
> mention the eyewitnesses *and* video of the crash.
>
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html>

If that site uses Mike Walter then we know it was bullshit because Mike 
Walter, the person in the OP was probably the worst Crisis Actor they hired.


> And wouldn't you know it, the pre-collapse punch-through hole on
> the outer Pentagon matches what one would expect to see from a
> 757 hitting it at near ground level... that pilot was relying on
> ground effect to keep the aircraft just off the ground, and
> rammed it in at full throttle.
>
> Here's what the hole in the Pentagon looked like:
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_precollapse-marked.jpg>
> <http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/pentagon_boeing_large.jpg>

Picture leading you to believe there were two engines that rammed into the 
Pentagon with no excuse for why they only found one.  <G>

> You'll note the starboard wing was clipped by the generator unit,

WTF???  Why couldn't you use the correct term. It was a "Smoke generator 
unit.". Duh.

> shortening the length of the starboard wing punch-through hole to
> the right of the main body punch-through hole.

And yet the starboard wing didn't shed any parts?  Unbelievable.  Well, 
maybe not for you.


> Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural
> engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped
> coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane,
> and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural
> Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing
> on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with
> the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section
> of the plane, and I found the black box."

Too bad it is inconsistent with the lack of debris found outside the 
Pentagon and the fact that not one of the security cameras in the area could 
be used to prove there was a 757 near the Pentagon.  <G>

Love is blind and as long as you are in love with your Television Set you 
will have problems with anything that goes against your Set. .Duh.

Still both Pranksville and the Pentagon were damaged by nukes and the Twin 
Towers were damaged by CGIs that couldn't even keep their wing on.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515801

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> ROTFLMAO because despite what the website above wants you to believe there 
> were no holes from engines of a 757 in the Pentagon because the people that 
> were supposed to plant the explosives for that part of the verisimilitude 
> didn't want to do too much damage to the Pentagon.  <G>

You really are quite insane.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515922

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:6qnmac-55p.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> ROTFLMAO because despite what the website above wants you to believe 
>> there
>> were no holes from engines of a 757 in the Pentagon because the people 
>> that
>> were supposed to plant the explosives for that part of the verisimilitude
>> didn't want to do too much damage to the Pentagon.  <G>
>
> You really are quite insane.

When it is you who has no explanation for why they didn't find two engines 
at the Pentagon or why the two engines didn't make a mark on the Pentagon. 
<G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#515983

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> When it is you who has no explanation for why they didn't find two engines 
> at the Pentagon or why the two engines didn't make a mark on the Pentagon. 

Only you and a few other insane kooks believe that.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516043

On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:44:02 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
>news:6qnmac-55p.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because despite what the website above wants you to believe 
>>> there were no holes from engines of a 757 in the Pentagon because the people 
>>> that were supposed to plant the explosives for that part of the verisimilitude
>>> didn't want to do too much damage to the Pentagon.  <G>
>>
>> You really are quite insane.
>
>When it is you who has no explanation for why they didn't find two engines 
>at the Pentagon or why the two engines didn't make a mark on the Pentagon. 
><G>

     Two were found. But you are free to prove your claim that only
one was found. Unless, of course, you're lying.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web