Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702932 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 261 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Page 2 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 14 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnrvg8$7hs$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703378 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:53 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> Solar? >>>> >>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>> >>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>> >>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>> >>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >> >> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? > > When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel, > which right now looks like never. Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels efficiency to consider. For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs. Citations: https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2- gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. This efficiency is given at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L. Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the tank to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, so what actually gets to the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary target. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8tf87f-n6k.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703426 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:53 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>> >>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>> >>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>> >>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>> >>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >> >> When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel, >> which right now looks like never. > > Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels > efficiency to consider. No shit, Captain Obvious? > For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around > 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs. > > Citations: > > https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2- > gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure > electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, lithium > nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is > lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. This > efficiency is given at: Mining equipment is diesel, not gasoline; your reference talks about gasoline. Charging effiency is not the sole efficieny loss for an electrical vehicle. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types > > The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel > manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L. > > Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the tank > to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, Not shown by your half-assed gasoline example; mining equipment is diesel. > so what actually gets to > the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can > deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but > diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary target. No, battery energy densities are not "improving rapidly" and diesel engines are becoming more efficient with modern computer controls. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <in43qd5h6ut0mtf9u27eqhj62ncantojiv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703437 |
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:55:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:53 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> Solar? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>> >>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>> >>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>> >>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>> >>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>> >>> When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel, >>> which right now looks like never. >> >> Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels >> efficiency to consider. > >No shit, Captain Obvious? > >> For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around >> 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs. >> >> Citations: >> >> https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2- >> gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure >> electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. Does Captain Obvious know there's a bunch of shit on the other end of the "electrical socket?" [chuckle]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pns7n8$jp8$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703437 |
On 9/18/2018 7:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:20:53 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> Solar? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>> >>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>> >>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>> >>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>> >>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>> >>> When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel, >>> which right now looks like never. >> >> Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels >> efficiency to consider. > > No shit, Captain Obvious? > >> For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around >> 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs. >> >> Citations: >> >> https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2- >> gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure >> electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, lithium >> nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is >> lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. This >> efficiency is given at: > > Mining equipment is diesel, not gasoline; your reference talks about > gasoline. > > Charging effiency is not the sole efficieny loss for an electrical > vehicle. > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types >> >> The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel >> manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L. >> >> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the tank >> to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, > > Not shown by your half-assed gasoline example; mining equipment is diesel. > >> so what actually gets to >> the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can >> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but >> diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary target. > > No, battery energy densities are not "improving rapidly" and diesel engines > are becoming more efficient with modern computer controls. > Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards with science and engineering knowledge. It rolls of them like rain off a duck's back. There is a reason women don't do any science or engineering. They only understand emotions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dt83qdp9stefq9lpuut2kk2jq8apsufkje@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703446 |
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:11:07 -0400, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 9/18/2018, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, jimp wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/18/2018, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/17/2018, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>> Solar?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually?
>>>>
>>>> When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel,
>>>> which right now looks like never.
>>>
>>> Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels
>>> efficiency to consider.
>>
>> No shit, Captain Obvious?
>>
>>> For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around
>>> 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs.
>>>
>>> Citations:
>>>
>>> https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2-
>>> gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure
>>> electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, lithium
>>> nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is
>>> lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. This
>>> efficiency is given at:
>>
>> Mining equipment is diesel, not gasoline; your reference talks about
>> gasoline.
>>
>> Charging effiency is not the sole efficieny loss for an electrical
>> vehicle.
>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types
>>>
>>> The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel
>>> manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L.
>>>
>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the tank
>>> to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's,
>>
>> Not shown by your half-assed gasoline example; mining equipment is diesel.
>>
>>> so what actually gets to
>>> the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can
>>> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but
>>> diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary target.
>>
>> No, battery energy densities are not "improving rapidly" and diesel engines
>> are becoming more efficient with modern computer controls.
>>
>Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards with science and
>engineering knowledge. It rolls of them like rain off a duck's back.
>There is a reason women don't do any science or engineering. They only
>understand emotions.
Exactly so. See my new sig.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall
If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition,
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand,
she is offered something which affords a reason for acting in
accordance with her feelings, she will accept it even on the
slightest evidence. The origin of PMS is explained in this way."
-- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnt820$4tt$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703448 |
On 9/18/2018 9:19 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:11:07 -0400, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9/18/2018, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, jimp wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/18/2018, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2018, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>> >>>>> When batteries equal the energy density of a 50 gallon tank of diesel, >>>>> which right now looks like never. >>>> >>>> Energy density is not the be-all and end-all. There's also tank-to-wheels >>>> efficiency to consider. >>> >>> No shit, Captain Obvious? >>> >>>> For fossil fuel vehicles that tends to be around >>>> 20% but exceeds 80% for EVs. >>>> >>>> Citations: >>>> >>>> https://www.energycentral.com/c/ec/comparison-energy-efficiency-and-co2- >>>> gasoline-and-electric-vehicles for the 20% figure, and a 70% figure >>>> electrical socket to wheel efficiency for EVs. The best batteries, lithium >>>> nickel manganese cobalt oxide, have 90% charging efficiency, so 10% is >>>> lost on the way from socket to tank, rather than from tank to wheels. This >>>> efficiency is given at: >>> >>> Mining equipment is diesel, not gasoline; your reference talks about >>> gasoline. >>> >>> Charging effiency is not the sole efficieny loss for an electrical >>> vehicle. >>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_commercial_battery_types >>>> >>>> The latter link also establishes the energy density of a lithium nickel >>>> manganese cobalt oxide at 2.1 MJ/L. >>>> >>>> Your diesel tank meanwhile has an energy density of 32 MJ/L but the tank >>>> to wheels efficiency is a quarter of the EV's, >>> >>> Not shown by your half-assed gasoline example; mining equipment is diesel. >>> >>>> so what actually gets to >>>> the wheels is only 8 MJ/L, which is less than four times what the EV can >>>> deliver ... and shrinking, since EV batteries are improving rapidly but >>>> diesel tanks are diesel tanks are diesel tanks, a fat, stationary target. >>> >>> No, battery energy densities are not "improving rapidly" and diesel engines >>> are becoming more efficient with modern computer controls. >>> >> Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards with science and >> engineering knowledge. It rolls of them like rain off a duck's back. >> There is a reason women don't do any science or engineering. They only >> understand emotions. > > Exactly so. See my new sig. OK, then: > If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, *That* goes against her intuition. > she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is > overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. Gender essentialism noted. You still have a lot to learn about women *and* grammar, "Mr. Wordsmith". > If, on the other hand, she is offered something which affords a > reason *That* affords a reason. > for acting in accordance with her feelings, she will accept > it even on the slightest evidence. You're describing right wing (i.e. your own) response to facts and evidence, which to my knowledge is not inherently gendered, but since men lean right and women lean left on average, does disproportionately impact ... men. > The origin of PMS is explained in this way." You fail endocrinology forever. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <02q4qdlg7euied434rhc341reld3omq2o6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703482 |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
<...>
>>> Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards with science and
>>> engineering knowledge. It rolls of them like rain off a duck's back.
>>> There is a reason women don't do any science or engineering. They only
>>> understand emotions.
>>
>> Exactly so. See my new sig.
>
>OK, then:
>
>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition,
>
>*That* goes against her intuition.
Nothing wrong with using *which*. To wit:
which (h)wiCH
pronoun determiner
determiner which
asking for information specifying one or more people or things from a definite set.
^^^^^
A fact is a thing, silly girl!
>> she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is
>> overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it.
>
>Gender essentialism noted. You still have a lot to learn about women
>*and* grammar, "Mr. Wordsmith".
Women are easily defined as inferior. As for learning about grammar
please read the above definition again.
>> If, on the other hand, she is offered something which affords a
>> reason
>
>*That* affords a reason.
See above and stop flogging a dead horse. LOL!
>> for acting in accordance with her feelings, she will accept
>> it even on the slightest evidence.
>
>You're describing right wing (i.e. your own) response to facts and
>evidence, which to my knowledge is not inherently gendered, but since
>men lean right and women lean left on average, does disproportionately
>impact ... men.
Gibberish!
>> The origin of PMS is explained in this way."
>
>You fail endocrinology forever.
PMS is a descriptor for the erratic functioning of
the female brain which, in turn, is caused by the
hormonal imbalance that causes the onset of estrus.
Men all know that female feelings rule her actions
when her hormones are out of whack. Feminists
tend to deny it because accepting it is to admit
inferiority.
--
Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall
If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition,
she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is
overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand,
she is offered something which affords a reason for acting in
accordance with her feelings, she will accept it even on the
slightest evidence. The origin of PMS is explained in this way."
-- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pntq62$17ga$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703506 |
On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > > <...> > >>>> Don't bother trying to educate these female libtards with science and >>>> engineering knowledge. It rolls of them like rain off a duck's back. >>>> There is a reason women don't do any science or engineering. They only >>>> understand emotions. >>> >>> Exactly so. See my new sig. >> >> OK, then: >> >>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >> >> *That* goes against her intuition. > > Nothing wrong with using *which*. To wit: > > which (h)wiCH > pronoun determiner > determiner which > asking for information specifying one or more people or things from a definite set. > ^^^^^ > A fact is a thing, silly girl! > >>> she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is >>> overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. >> >> Gender essentialism noted. You still have a lot to learn about women >> *and* grammar, "Mr. Wordsmith". > > Women are easily defined as inferior. As for learning about grammar > please read the above definition again. > >>> If, on the other hand, she is offered something which affords a >>> reason >> >> *That* affords a reason. > > See above and stop flogging a dead horse. LOL! > >>> for acting in accordance with her feelings, she will accept >>> it even on the slightest evidence. >> >> You're describing right wing (i.e. your own) response to facts and >> evidence, which to my knowledge is not inherently gendered, but since >> men lean right and women lean left on average, does disproportionately >> impact ... men. > > Gibberish! > >>> The origin of PMS is explained in this way." >> >> You fail endocrinology forever. > > PMS is a descriptor for the erratic functioning of > the female brain which, in turn, is caused by the > hormonal imbalance that causes the onset of estrus. > Men all know that female feelings rule her actions > when her hormones are out of whack. Feminists > tend to deny it because accepting it is to admit > inferiority. Where does CPBS fall in the whacked spectrum? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pntrvn$1b6i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703506 |
On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >> >> *That* goes against her intuition. > > Nothing wrong with using *which*. BZZZT! https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/ [misogynistic rant deleted] -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <om05qdpkqr4favl75f3oqo45n5gfc2i3jb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #703512 |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:03:00 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir >Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >>> >>> *That* goes against her intuition. >> >> Nothing wrong with using *which*. > >BZZZT! > >https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/ A blog? A blog? A freaking BLOG? Sorry, but a dictionary definition *which* I provided takes precedence. You lose! -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance with her feelings, she will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of PMS is explained in this way." -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnua73$5qf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703520 |
On 9/19/2018 1:11 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:03:00 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir >> Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >>>> >>>> *That* goes against her intuition. >>> >>> Nothing wrong with using *which*. >> >> BZZZT! >> >> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/ > > A blog? A blog? A freaking BLOG? > > Sorry, but a dictionary definition *which* I provided > takes precedence. > > You lose! > This is unbelievable. The ONLY thing that lefty libs can do is spelling and grammar and "Kensi" falls flat on Zer face! How embarrassing. Zhe must have been high when posting. Notice that "which" requires a comma while "that" does not and "kensi" didn't even get that right! Fucking PH.D. my sweet ass! Dumbass Lefty Journalist! Shit! No science knowledge, no spelling and grammar knowledge. This is iron-clad proof "kensi" is a bot! (or well, OK, zhe could be a Canadian troll)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnuu4t$e0i$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703520 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:11:13 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:03:00 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi >>> <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >>>> >>>> *That* goes against her intuition. >>> >>> Nothing wrong with using *which*. >> >>BZZZT! >> >>https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/ > > A blog? A blog? A freaking BLOG? > > Sorry, but a dictionary definition *which* I provided <facepalm> If kensi can't educate you, no-one can. Go sit in the corner with this cone on your head, kook. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnv0qj$16r4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703580 |
On 9/19/2018 9:46 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:11:13 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:03:00 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi >>>> <kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >>>>> >>>>> *That* goes against her intuition. >>>> >>>> Nothing wrong with using *which*. >>> >>> BZZZT! >>> >>> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/ >> >> A blog? A blog? A freaking BLOG? >> >> Sorry, but a dictionary definition *which* I provided > > <facepalm> > > If kensi can't educate you, no-one can. Go sit in the corner with this > cone on your head, kook. > Since "kensi" got it all wrong, clearly neither you nor "kensi" can correct anyone. All you can do is repeat you fantasies and scream that your thoughts is what determines reality. Sure, babe, sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <-4WdnX5FSci6jz7GnZ2dnUU7-LHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #703580 |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:46:05 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <pnuu4t$e0i$7@dont-email.me>: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:11:13 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:03:00 -0400, kensi >><kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>On 9/19/2018 11:27 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:22:53 -0400, kensi >>>><kkuntsington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>On 9/18/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>>If a woman is offered a fact which goes against her intuition, >>>>>*That* goes against her intuition. >>>>Nothing wrong with using *which*. >>>BZZZT! https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/ >>A blog? A blog? A freaking BLOG? Sorry, but a dictionary definition >>*which* I provided > ><facepalm> > >If kensi can't educate you, no-one can. Go sit in the corner with this >cone on your head, kook. hee laks to tawk that suhthinn mush-mouf tawk. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f35f58982189a994b5e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703482 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pnt820$4tt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... [...] > since men lean right and women lean left on average... Would you happen to have a cite for that, or is it just your opinion? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po46k8$d3v$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703978 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:08:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pnt820$4tt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > [...] > >> since men lean right and women lean left on average... > > Would you happen to have a cite for that, or is it just your opinion? I don't know whether kensi does, but I do: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/elections_-why-women-vote- more-to-the-left-than-men/44160576 https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144602/gender-gap-democrat-liberal-women https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/06/09/the-lefter-sex -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f98314ed4aaca994b83@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703993 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po46k8$d3v$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:08:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pnt820$4tt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > > > [...] > > > >> since men lean right and women lean left on average... > > > > Would you happen to have a cite for that, or is it just your opinion? > > I don't know whether kensi does, but I do: > > https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/elections_-why-women-vote- > more-to-the-left-than-men/44160576 > > https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144602/gender-gap-democrat-liberal-women > > https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/06/09/the-lefter-sex The Economist conclusion appears to be predicated on assumptions, and is too close to call definitively. We don't live in a black and white world. I didn't bother with the other two. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po58kt$182a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704060 |
On 9/22/2018 4:07 AM, Checkmate wrote: > nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:08:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> since men lean right and women lean left on average... >>> >>> Would you happen to have a cite for that, or is it just your opinion? >> >> I don't know whether kensi does, but I do: >> >> https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/elections_-why-women-vote- >> more-to-the-left-than-men/44160576 >> >> https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144602/gender-gap-democrat-liberal-women >> >> https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/06/09/the-lefter-sex > > The Economist conclusion appears to be predicated on assumptions, and is > too close to call definitively. We don't live in a black and white > world. I didn't bother with the other two. Trying to evade accepting the truth won't work in the long run. Besides, isn't it obvious? Since the right wing is hostile to women's bodily, financial, and social autonomy, there is a strong added reason for women to lean left that does not exist for men, who are advantaged rather than disadvantaged by patriarchy. That the voting gap isn't even wider just shows how much social brainwashing and spousal voter intimidation (or even spousal voter suppression) is going on. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p2gcqd9dag9cilvj0i91ql2b3ruhop8h3v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704072 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 07:22:08 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 9/22/2018 4:07 AM, Checkmate wrote: nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:08:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> since men lean right and women lean left on average... >>>> >>>> Would you happen to have a cite for that, or is it just your opinion? >>> >>> I don't know whether kensi does, but I do: >>> >>> https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/elections_-why-women-vote- >>> more-to-the-left-than-men/44160576 >>> >>> https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144602/gender-gap-democrat-liberal-women >>> >>> https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/06/09/the-lefter-sex >> >> The Economist conclusion appears to be predicated on assumptions, and is >> too close to call definitively. We don't live in a black and white >> world. I didn't bother with the other two. > >Trying to evade accepting the truth won't work in the long run. Besides, >isn't it obvious? Since the right wing is hostile to women's bodily, >financial, and social autonomy, there is a strong added reason for women >to lean left that does not exist for men, who are advantaged rather than >disadvantaged by patriarchy. > >That the voting gap isn't even wider just shows how much social >brainwashing and spousal voter intimidation (or even spousal voter >suppression) is going on. You've just put your misandry on public display, kensi! spous·al 'spouz(?)l adjective adjective spousal relating to marriage or to a husband or wife By definition, spousal can be either husband or wife. SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ®
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvjbl2.hcm83zy5o4fwN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704091 |
Sir Gergory Hall, Esq. <nelly@fake.yacht_maester> gurgled: > Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > >Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume pompously pontificated: > >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:08:43 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >>>> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > >>>> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > >>>>> > >>>>> since men lean right and women lean left on average... > >>>> > >>>> Would you happen to have a cite for that, or is it just your opinion? > >>> > >>> I don't know whether kensi does, but I do: > >>> > >>> https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/directdemocracy/elections_-why-women-vote- > >>> more-to-the-left-than-men/44160576 > >>> > >>> https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144602/gender-gap-democrat-liberal-women > >>> > >>> https://www.economist.com/europe/2016/06/09/the-lefter-sex > >> > >> The Economist conclusion appears to be predicated on assumptions, and is > >> too close to call definitively. We don't live in a black and white > >> world. I didn't bother with the other two. > > > >Trying to evade accepting the truth won't work in the long run. Besides, > >isn't it obvious? Since the right wing is hostile to women's bodily, > >financial, and social autonomy, there is a strong added reason for women > >to lean left that does not exist for men, who are advantaged rather than > >disadvantaged by patriarchy. > > > >That the voting gap isn't even wider just shows how much social > >brainwashing and spousal voter intimidation (or even spousal voter > >suppression) is going on. > > You've just put your misandry on public display, kensi! > > spous·al 'spouz(?)l > adjective > adjective spousal > relating to marriage or to a husband or wife > > By definition, spousal can be either husband or wife. > > SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) > Score one for right-thinking; well done, Gerg. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just nodded his approval.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web