Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #518791 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 53 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400
Re: Rocky's magic bombs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000
Re: Rocky's magic bombs burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400
Re: Rocky's magic bombs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-04 14:54 +0000
Re: Rocky's magic bombs gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 10:12 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500
Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500
Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 13:33 -0700
Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 10:12 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 17:45 -0700
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-05 06:39 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:08 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-05 06:16 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:25 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:59 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 13:30 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:47 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 15:10 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:21 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:13 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <Is Tony Michael?> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:12 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:21 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <K is for Krazy> Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
Re: Rocky can't remember from one day to the next jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:50 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-06 21:22 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <liquid scintillation> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:01 -0500
Re: Rocky falls on his face again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:27 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:31 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 18:21 +0200
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 16:44 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 17:04 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-03 20:51 -0500
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:04 -0700
Re: Rocky still a jobless, batshit crazy stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:02 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 23:10 +0000
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "Edward Higgs" <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 19:09 -0700
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:49 -0400
Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:09 -0500
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 17:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell |
| Message-ID | <hNWdnUzqlcXoVnXInZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in the link below. NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life sized cartoon or an outright lie is with another lie. BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us an underground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is not near as bad as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul in a lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the process so the contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiation elsewhere. NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 18:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <20150903185317.00004bdf@uk.mo> |
| In reply to | #518791 |
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:35:55 -0500 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in > the link below. > > NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life > sized cartoon or an outright lie is with another lie. > > BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us > an underground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small > nukes is not near as bad as people have been led to believe but they > still had to haul in a lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of > contaminated dirt in the process so the contaminated dirt would lose > the majority of it's radiation elsewhere. > > NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc > > Rocky > > How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 23:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's magic bombs |
| Message-ID | <bc0nbc-a48.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518797 |
In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:35:55 -0500 > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in >> the link below. >> >> NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life >> sized cartoon or an outright lie is with another lie. >> >> BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us >> an underground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small >> nukes is not near as bad as people have been led to believe but they >> still had to haul in a lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of >> contaminated dirt in the process so the contaminated dirt would lose >> the majority of it's radiation elsewhere. >> >> NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc >> >> Rocky >> >> > > How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 20:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's magic bombs |
| Message-ID | <20150903200735.00002465@uk.mo> |
| In reply to | #518805 |
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 23:06:19 -0000 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:35:55 -0500 > > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > > >> Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 > >> in the link below. > >> > >> NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life > >> sized cartoon or an outright lie is with another lie. > >> > >> BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us > >> an underground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small > >> nukes is not near as bad as people have been led to believe but > >> they still had to haul in a lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of > >> contaminated dirt in the process so the contaminated dirt would > >> lose the majority of it's radiation elsewhere. > >> > >> NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc > >> > >> Rocky > >> > >> > > > > How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? > > In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose > effects are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work > backwards. > > > LOL, my bad I shoulda known about them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 14:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's magic bombs |
| Message-ID | <mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #518805 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, no seismic signature, no EMP, no fireball, no mushroom cloud, no 5.5 magnitude earthquake and no BANG! Hushaboom technology!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 10:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky's magic bombs |
| Message-ID | <msccdb$2ro$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #518895 |
On 9/4/2015 9:54 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: > >> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? > >> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. > > Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, no seismic signature, no > EMP, no fireball, no mushroom cloud, no 5.5 magnitude earthquake and no > BANG! Hushaboom technology! > an old man's dream, Rockys not hitting on all 3 cylinders, his cheese has slid off his cracker Rocky takes his imagination out for a walk and ends up being dragged around the block by it. Rocky talks to plants on their own level. Rockys a team player... No chance he'll develop a personality on his own. Rocky has a Teflon brain -- nothing sticks. The butter slipped off his noodle. The fan is working but the freon's leaked out. The going got weird, and he turned pro. The heater's plugged in but the rheostat's shot. The perfect personality to write software manuals. The space between his ears powers vacuum pumps. The spit valve's fallen off his trumpet again. The twinkle in his eyes is actually the sun shining between his ears.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 16:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Message-ID | <29mdnVxgU9JzmnfInZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518895 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: > >>In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: > >>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? > >>In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >>are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. > > Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? > no seismic signature But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were not allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene discribed as if it were a 5.5 quake. > no > EMP Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. > no fireball Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as if part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly skips. > no mushroom cloud You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers that are consistant with underground nukes: ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm><> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event that could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded a sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they scrambled to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something coming from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what they left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:=================================Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us anunderground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as bad as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiationelsewhere.NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEscRocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 21:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky still batshit crazy and jobless |
| Message-ID | <okfpbc-pbg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518943 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from > Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? Could that be because there was no radiation, you babbling kook? >> no seismic signature > > But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it > were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were not > allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene discribed > as if it were a 5.5 quake. Absolute nonsense and a lie. Seismic reading are public; all show the roughly 2 that sane people would expect from a collapsing building. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a huge and unique seismic signature that can be detected by a seismograph anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 by any seismograph anywhere in the world but the collapse of the two towers as well as the crashes at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania were detected by nearby seismographs as the slight disturbances (less than 2 on the Richter scale) that rational people would expect from such events. A 1 kiloton explosion registers at about 4 on the Richter scale, a fact that is widely known and trivial to verify. Seismographs are trivial to make and since the invention of the PC it has been trivial to record, store and analyze seismic data. Real time seismic data from around the world is publicly available on the Internet from many government, academic, and private sources. Such data is not controlled by anyone; not the media and not any governmental agency. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/military/how-to-find-a-nuclear-explosion-in-north-korea http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Be sure to follow all the links in the above links. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 16:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> |
| Message-ID | <S8-dnYT77On_jnfInZ2dnUU7-L-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518955 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:okfpbc-pbg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from >> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? > > Could that be because there was no radiation, you babbling kook? There is always radiation everywhere you big Cartoon Physics Freak. <G> But if no radiation was recorded at all then that gives us another smoking bullet. <G> Because the rest of your post has already been addressed here is the OP: Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in the link below. NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life sized cartoon or an outright lie is with another lie. BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us an underground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is not near as bad as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul in a lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the process so the contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiation elsewhere. NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 22:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky still crazy and jobless |
| Message-ID | <nphpbc-3jg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518957 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:okfpbc-pbg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from >>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >> >> Could that be because there was no radiation, you babbling kook? > > There is always radiation everywhere you big Cartoon Physics Freak. <G> Why are all those words capitalized, kook? On 9/11 people were looking for abnormal radiation and none was found, kook. <snip kook babble> > Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in the > link below. The NIST report look sane to me, kook, while you look like a raving, delusional, lunatic, kook. <snip remaining semi-coherant ravings of a jobless kook and stalker> How's the job search going, kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 18:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> |
| Message-ID | <b-idnU1JH9qbuHfInZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518961 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:nphpbc-3jg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:okfpbc-pbg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings >>>> from >>>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >>> >>> Could that be because there was no radiation, you babbling kook? >> >> There is always radiation everywhere you big Cartoon Physics Freak. <G> > > Why are all those words capitalized, kook? > > On 9/11 people were looking for abnormal radiation and none was found, > kook. You are just lie after lie after lie because you can't provide any radiation readings at all from Ground Zero and that too is suspicious especially since there is radiation everywhere and so much evidence that Phantom Flight 175 was bogus. <G> http://911planeshoax.com/ ************** OP BELOW **************** Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in the link below. NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life sized cartoon or an outright lie is with another lie. BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us an underground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is not near as bad as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul in a lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the process so the contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiation elsewhere. NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 00:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky still a batshit crazy, jobless stalker |
| Message-ID | <77opbc-66h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518979 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > You are just lie after lie after lie because you can't provide any radiation > readings at all from Ground Zero and that too is suspicious especially since Nope, you have been provided with quotes from several people who were there to measure radiation that said no unusual radiation was found. I would say that it is you with lie after lie, but it is delusion after delusion, you batshit crazy, lunatic stalker. How's the job search going, you batshit crazy, lunatic stalker? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 11:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> |
| Message-ID | <AfCdndxTwtq2jHbInZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518957 |
<edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:aa2fd53d-e1e2-4e2b-9fae-b833ff5f7db7@googlegroups.com... > On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 5:56:29 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:okfpbc-pbg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> > >> >> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings >> >> from >> >> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >> > >> > Could that be because there was no radiation, you babbling kook? >> >> There is always radiation everywhere you big Cartoon Physics Freak. <G> >> >> But if no radiation was recorded at all then that gives us another >> smoking >> bullet. <G> > > Perhaps people should be more clear that they mean "excessive" radiation > indicative of a nuclear device being set off. Normal background radiation > is considered "no radiation" since it is the same as everywhere else. Actually the background radiation can change from place to place and there is no evidence whatsoever that radiation readings taken at GZ were ever published. And do not forget there is another reason the media didn't even want to mention radiation because they would have opened up a can of worms and people that knew the jets were bogus would have started taking their own Geiger counters to Ground Zero. <G> Once again, only nukes can leave so little on the ground http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg and put so much into the air. http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> |
| Message-ID | <msf98v$bmg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #519097 |
On 05/09/2015 17:00, Rocky wrote: > <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:aa2fd53d-e1e2-4e2b-9fae-b833ff5f7db7@googlegroups.com... >> On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 5:56:29 PM UTC-4, Rocky wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:okfpbc-pbg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings >>>>> from >>>>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >>>> >>>> Could that be because there was no radiation, you babbling kook? >>> >>> There is always radiation everywhere you big Cartoon Physics Freak. <G> >>> >>> But if no radiation was recorded at all then that gives us another >>> smoking >>> bullet. <G> >> >> Perhaps people should be more clear that they mean "excessive" radiation >> indicative of a nuclear device being set off. Normal background radiation >> is considered "no radiation" since it is the same as everywhere else. > > Actually the background radiation can change from place to place and there > is no evidence whatsoever that radiation readings taken at GZ were ever > published. > If that is so, why have you told us that you know about them, you do remember posting that don't you? Have you forgotten the link that was posted about the tritium readings, you did check that link didn't you. > And do not forget there is another reason the media didn't even want to > mention radiation because they would have opened up a can of worms and > people that knew the jets were bogus would have started taking their own > Geiger counters to Ground Zero. <G> > > Once again, only nukes can leave so little on the ground > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > and put so much into the air. > http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 13:33 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled & there is always radiation> |
| Message-ID | <2c1b13a8-f12c-44e3-b397-8022a61c9f3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #519109 |
tritium is cOOl > If that is so, why have you told us that you know about them, you do > remember posting that don't you? > > Have you forgotten the link that was posted about the tritium readings, > you did check that link didn't you. > > > And do not forget there is another reason the media didn't even want to > > mention radiation because they would have opened up a can of worms and > > people that knew the jets were bogus would have started taking their own > > Geiger counters to Ground Zero. <G> > > > > Once again, only nukes can leave so little on the ground > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > and put so much into the air. > > http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 18:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky still delusional and jobless |
| Message-ID | <fkorbc-8mn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #519097 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Actually the background radiation can change from place to place and there > is no evidence whatsoever that radiation readings taken at GZ were ever > published. Actually they were, kook, and several people provide quotes to the effect that nothing unusual was found, so this is either another lie or another delusion on your part. How's the job search going, you delusional, stalker, lunatic? <snip remaining nonsense> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 23:29 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Message-ID | <msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #518943 |
On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >> >>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >> >>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >> >>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. >> >> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, > > And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from > Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf > >> no seismic signature > > But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it > were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were not > allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene discribed > as if it were a 5.5 quake. > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html >> no >> EMP > > Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver > operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. > >> no fireball > > Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact > moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as if > part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly > skips. > >> no mushroom cloud > > You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers > that are consistant with underground nukes: > ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm><> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event that could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded a sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they scrambled to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something coming from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what they left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:========================= ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW the fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us anunderground nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as bad as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiationelsewhere.NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEscRocky > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 18:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Message-ID | <N5adneB0uc5NvnfInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518965 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me... > On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote: >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >>> >>>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >>> >>>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >>> >>>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >>>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. >>> >>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, >> >> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from >> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? > > https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf And just where are the radiation readings? >>> no seismic signature >> >> But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it >> were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were >> not >> allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene >> discribed >> as if it were a 5.5 quake. >> > http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html Those are inconsistant with the fact the North Tower shook like a tuning fork, people started running then and the EMP recorded by an AM receiver by WCBS. >>> no >>> EMP >> >> Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver >> operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. >> >>> no fireball >> >> Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact >> moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as if >> part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly >> skips. >> >>> no mushroom cloud >> >> You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers >> that are consistant with underground nukes: >> >> ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< >> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event that >> could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded a >> sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was >> vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a >> tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where >> only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around >> 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they scrambled >> to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 >> buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 >> and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something coming >> from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what they >> left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 >> Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:========================= > ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 > in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to > explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW the > fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us anunderground > nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as bad > as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of > fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the > contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiationelsewhere.NIST > Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 00:16 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Message-ID | <msd8lk$rtj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #518975 |
On 05/09/2015 00:05, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me... >> On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote: >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >>>> >>>>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose effects >>>>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. >>>> >>>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, >>> >>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings from >>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >> >> https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf > > And just where are the radiation readings? > > The same question I have asked you many times, you have always told us about the radiation. What was the radiation? How was it recorded? Who recorded it? >>>> no seismic signature >>> >>> But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if it >>> were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were >>> not >>> allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene >>> discribed >>> as if it were a 5.5 quake. >>> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic >> >> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html > > Those are inconsistant with the fact the North Tower shook like a tuning > fork, people started running then and the EMP recorded by an AM receiver by > WCBS. > > Yes they are, I wonder why that would be????????? >>>> no >>>> EMP >>> >>> Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver >>> operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. >>> >>>> no fireball >>> >>> Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact >>> moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as if >>> part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that clearly >>> skips. >>> >>>> no mushroom cloud >>> >>> You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin Towers >>> that are consistant with underground nukes: >>> >>> ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< > >>> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event that >>> could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded a >>> sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was >>> vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a >>> tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where >>> only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around >>> 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they scrambled >>> to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 >>> buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 >>> and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something coming >>> from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what they >>> left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 >>> Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:========================= >> ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of WTC7 >> in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to >> explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW the >> fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us anunderground >> nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as bad >> as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of >> fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the >> contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's radiationelsewhere.NIST >> Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 18:25 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Complete bullshit: NIST Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell <OP reinstalled> |
| Message-ID | <EYSdnSiqVr4ftXfInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518982 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:msd8lk$rtj$2@dont-email.me... > On 05/09/2015 00:05, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:msd5tl$g74$3@dont-email.me... >>> On 04/09/2015 22:06, Rocky wrote: >>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mscbao$rc4$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> How did the top soil get contaminated from an underground explosion? >>>>> >>>>>> In Rocky's delusional mind, there are magic nuclear bombs whose >>>>>> effects >>>>>> are first felt hundreds of meters from the bomb then work backwards. >>>>> >>>>> Magic nuclear bombs that produce no radiation, >>>> >>>> And yet nobody has been able to come up with any radiation readings >>>> from >>>> Ground Zero so just where are you getting your bullshit from? >>> >>> https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf >> >> And just where are the radiation readings? >> >> > > The same question I have asked you many times, you have always told us > about the radiation. > > What was the radiation? > How was it recorded? > Who recorded it? You are supposed to tell me you clown. I'm the one that is saying the total lack of any radiation at all at Ground Zero is also a smoking gun because there is radiation everywhere. >>>>> no seismic signature >>>> >>>> But an obvious seismic event big enough to shake the North Tower as if >>>> it >>>> were a tuning fork. And to this date nobody has explained why we were >>>> not >>>> allowed to see any data from that event that people on the scene >>>> discribed >>>> as if it were a 5.5 quake. >>>> >>> http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/Seismic/WTC_LDEO_KIM.htm#seismic >>> >>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/seismic.html >> >> Those are inconsistant with the fact the North Tower shook like a tuning >> fork, people started running then and the EMP recorded by an AM receiver >> by >> WCBS. >> >> > > Yes they are, I wonder why that would be????????? > > >>>>> no >>>>> EMP >>>> >>>> Just EMPs bigger than a lightning storm that srcrewed up an AM receiver >>>> operated by WCBS in Nuke York City. >>>> >>>>> no fireball >>>> >>>> Just a lot of clearly edited videos of WTC7 that are missing the exact >>>> moment a flash would have occured. Some videos show the smoke jump as >>>> if >>>> part of the video was removed and one video even has a timer that >>>> clearly >>>> skips. >>>> >>>>> no mushroom cloud >>>> >>>> You missed the following because it shows two clouds from the Twin >>>> Towers >>>> that are consistant with underground nukes: >>>> >>>> >>>> ><http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm>< >> >>>> no 5.5 magnitude earthquakeJust visible evidence of a seismic event >>>> that >>>> could have rated a 5.5.> and no> BANG!Weird thing is one video recorded >>>> a >>>> sound from an explosion about 12 secondsbefore the North Tower was >>>> vaporized and one didn't but it caught the NorthTower shaking like a >>>> tuning fork.> Hushaboom technology!Just a lot of edited videos where >>>> only CGIs can make their wings disappearand don't have shadows around >>>> 9am. <G>And a shit load of lies and cartoons from NIST as they >>>> scrambled >>>> to useCartoon Physics to try and convince near total idiots that 5 >>>> buildings inNuke York City just decided to commit hari kari where WTC3 >>>> and Fiterman Hallwere not crushed by falling debris but something >>>> coming >>>> from below just likeWTC1 and WTC2 had to be destroyed to leave what >>>> they >>>> left behind. <G>Since this thread was hijacked much like the 9/11 >>>> Commission was the OP hasbeen reinstalled:========================= >>> ========Look how NIST explains the sudden and complete destruction of >>> WTC7 >>> in thelink below.NIST used fcuking cartoons because the only way to >>> explain a life sizedcartoon or an outright lie is with another lie.BTW >>> the >>> fact the building north of WTC7 was also destroyed tells us >>> anunderground >>> nuke was used on WTC7 and the radiation from small nukes is notnear as >>> bad >>> as people have been led to believe but they still had to haul ina lot of >>> fresh dirt and haul out a lot of contaminated dirt in the processso the >>> contaminated dirt would lose the majority of it's >>> radiationelsewhere.NIST >>> Video: Why the Building (WTC7) Fell >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc >> >> Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web