Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #572157 > unrolled thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:10 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 19:19 +0000
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:36 -0500
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 20:34 +0000
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:56 -0500
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:39 -0500

#572157 — Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:negd8s$hu8$4@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:neavl6$bg8$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>>
>>>>YOU FCUKING ASSHOLE BECAUSE THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE.
>>>
>>> Yes it is the issue, kooktard.  It proves once and for all that no nukes
>>> could have been used on 9/11, and all your claims that they were are all
>>> lies.
>
>>AND YOU AVOIDED THE VERY SMALL SEISMIC RECORDS WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 
>>hit
>>the ground why?  ROTFLMAO
>
> And you avoided the issue that there were ZERO signatures of nuclear
> detonations that day.  According to your kooktarded "logic" there were
> three (or more?) nukes that brought down three buildings. So we should
> have seen three instances of nuclear explosions on seismometers.

YOU FCUKHEAD.because the photos prove something brought down the Twin Towers 
besides a "Global Collapse" and all you can do is add more bullshit to all 
the other bullshit.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And don't forget the super small seismic activity of WTC7 meeting the ground 
can be used to prove all the seismic readings were tampered with or can not 
be trusted for some other reason.  ROTFLMAO

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#572175

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:negd8s$hu8$4@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>AND YOU AVOIDED THE VERY SMALL SEISMIC RECORDS WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 
>>>hit
>>>the ground why?  ROTFLMAO
>>
>> And you avoided the issue that there were ZERO signatures of nuclear
>> detonations that day.  According to your kooktarded "logic" there were
>> three (or more?) nukes that brought down three buildings. So we should
>> have seen three instances of nuclear explosions on seismometers.

>YOU FCUKHEAD.because the photos prove something brought down the Twin Towers 
>besides a "Global Collapse" and all you can do is add more bullshit to all 
>the other bullshit.

>And don't forget the super small seismic activity of WTC7 meeting the ground 
>can be used to prove
that there were no nuclear devices exploded that day because the seismic
activity in that area was so quiet that it was impossible for any nuke to
have exploded without its distinctive nuclear explosion signature being
recorded on seismometers throughout the world!!!

> all the seismic readings were tampered with or can not 
>be trusted for some other reason.  ROTFLMAO

All "seismic readings were tampered with"?????? Including seismometers in
places like North Korea, Russia, Iran, Iraq, China and other places
unfriendly to the US, all of whom would have *loved* to point the WTC had
been nuked, if they actually had evidence of that?  And don't forget all
the private and university seismometers worldwide also not under US
government control.

The absurdity of that kookclaim has been pointed out to you many, many 
times before!

> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572178

On 4/21/2016 2:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>
>> all the seismic readings were tampered with or can not
>> be trusted for some other reason.  ROTFLMAO
>
> All "seismic readings were tampered with"?????? Including seismometers in
> places like North Korea, Russia, Iran, Iraq, China and other places
> unfriendly to the US, all of whom would have *loved* to point the WTC had
> been nuked, if they actually had evidence of that?  And don't forget all
> the private and university seismometers worldwide also not under US
> government control.
>-

Michael, you're dealing with a lunatic. Lunatics do not have to make 
sense. This is what makes them lunatics.

A lunatic will happily tell you that they know the truth, but that the 
truth has been obscured by a massive conspiracy that has studiously 
removed all the evidence of the truth, and that the absence of evidence 
of the truth is in fact the proof of the conspiracy.

A lunatic will tell you that Mrs. Opal Showalter upstairs in Apt. 4B is 
secretly in charge of a massive underworld organization with agents in 
the NSA, Interpol, MI6, and the KGB. The fact that Mrs. Opal Showalter 
is a shut-in confined to a wheelchair is a careful cover story designed 
to obscure her real operations. And there is literally nothing you can 
tell the lunatic that will dissuade him from that conviction.

Why are you wasting your time trying to reason with a lunatic?

Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572195

Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael, you're dealing with a lunatic. Lunatics do not have to make 
>sense. This is what makes them lunatics.

...

>Why are you wasting your time trying to reason with a lunatic?

You don't understand my logic.  I enjoy taunting the kooks and lunatics
here.  It's a form of entertainment for me.  I get to look in the asylum
without ever leaving my chair.

I know I will never introduce common sense to the likes of Roger, Sefton
etc.  They are most likely incurable.

One thing that I find interesting is how just about all lunatics have this
one thing they obsess over.  Roger with that picture (not any old picture 
of 9/11 destruction or even the original NOAA 9/17/2001 photo his picture
is based on, but that particular one with all the kookery added), Sefton 
with precessing spinny things, the tornado guy with the nonexistence of 
water vapor, etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572226

On 4/21/2016 3:34 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Michael, you're dealing with a lunatic. Lunatics do not have to make
>> sense. This is what makes them lunatics.
>
> ...
>
>> Why are you wasting your time trying to reason with a lunatic?
>
> You don't understand my logic.  I enjoy taunting the kooks and lunatics
> here.  It's a form of entertainment for me.  I get to look in the asylum
> without ever leaving my chair.

Taunting a lunatic encourages the lunatic.
Because lunatics usually crave attention -- any attention, bad, good, or 
neutral.

>
> I know I will never introduce common sense to the likes of Roger, Sefton
> etc.  They are most likely incurable.
>
> One thing that I find interesting is how just about all lunatics have this
> one thing they obsess over.  Roger with that picture (not any old picture
> of 9/11 destruction or even the original NOAA 9/17/2001 photo his picture
> is based on, but that particular one with all the kookery added), Sefton
> with precessing spinny things, the tornado guy with the nonexistence of
> water vapor, etc.
>

The obsession is a mask for something else.

For Rocky and Sefton and Jacoby, there's an element of defusing the 
feelings of loneliness and disenfranchisement, the feeling that somehow 
they've been cut out of society. Rather than owning that their seclusion 
is due to their own behaviors, they'd rather blame it on imagined 
persecution. To justify the persecution, they foster mistrust. To 
justify their mistrust, they dream up conspiracy. All of this chain is 
to rationalize their sense of alienation.

For Sefton and Seto and McGinn and Wublee, there's a strong element of 
wannabeism. Unwilling to work for recognition, they tell themselves that 
being a genius requires nothing more than self-assurance of genius and 
questioning everything that science has done. Derision only fuels their 
Galileo-persecution complex. They want to feel smart, so they will lie 
to themselves endlessly in any way possible to preserve that feeling, 
because the alternative is a debilitating black plague of inferiority. 
Telling them they are not as smart as they think they are only causes 
them to inflate themselves further.

The article of obsession is irrelevant. The emotional causes are the 
true source. Beating on the article of obsession is like treating blood 
sepsis by spraying the arm with Bactine.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572179

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:nfb94l$92t$4@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:negd8s$hu8$4@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>AND YOU AVOIDED THE VERY SMALL SEISMIC RECORDS WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7
>>>>hit
>>>>the ground why?  ROTFLMAO
>>>
>>> And you avoided the issue that there were ZERO signatures of nuclear
>>> detonations that day.  According to your kooktarded "logic" there were
>>> three (or more?) nukes that brought down three buildings. So we should
>>> have seen three instances of nuclear explosions on seismometers.
>
>>YOU FCUKHEAD.because the photos prove something brought down the Twin 
>>Towers
>>besides a "Global Collapse" and all you can do is add more bullshit to all
>>the other bullshit.
>
>>And don't forget the super small seismic activity of WTC7 meeting the 
>>ground
>>can be used to prove
> that there were no nuclear devices exploded that day because the seismic
> activity in that area was so quiet that it was impossible for any nuke to
> have exploded without its distinctive nuclear explosion signature being
> recorded on seismometers throughout the world!!!
>
>> all the seismic readings were tampered with or can not
>>be trusted for some other reason.  ROTFLMAO
>
> All "seismic readings were tampered with"?????? Including seismometers in
> places like North Korea, Russia, Iran, Iraq, China and other places
> unfriendly to the US, all of whom would have *loved* to point the WTC had
> been nuked, if they actually had evidence of that?  And don't forget all
> the private and university seismometers worldwide also not under US
> government control.
>
> The absurdity of that kookclaim has been pointed out to you many, many
> times before!
>
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg

ROTFLMAO because there was certainly "bathtub damage" but there would have 
been a lot more "bathtub damage" if all 110 floors of both the Twin Towers 
crashed to the ground so the only way they could avoid more damage to the 
"bathtub" was with MRR nukes to vaporize the buildings before they could 
crash to the ground with the full force of 2 110 story buildings  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web