Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #572175

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:negd8s$hu8$4@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>AND YOU AVOIDED THE VERY SMALL SEISMIC RECORDS WHEN WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 
>>>hit
>>>the ground why?  ROTFLMAO
>>
>> And you avoided the issue that there were ZERO signatures of nuclear
>> detonations that day.  According to your kooktarded "logic" there were
>> three (or more?) nukes that brought down three buildings. So we should
>> have seen three instances of nuclear explosions on seismometers.

>YOU FCUKHEAD.because the photos prove something brought down the Twin Towers 
>besides a "Global Collapse" and all you can do is add more bullshit to all 
>the other bullshit.

>And don't forget the super small seismic activity of WTC7 meeting the ground 
>can be used to prove
that there were no nuclear devices exploded that day because the seismic
activity in that area was so quiet that it was impossible for any nuke to
have exploded without its distinctive nuclear explosion signature being
recorded on seismometers throughout the world!!!

> all the seismic readings were tampered with or can not 
>be trusted for some other reason.  ROTFLMAO

All "seismic readings were tampered with"?????? Including seismometers in
places like North Korea, Russia, Iran, Iraq, China and other places
unfriendly to the US, all of whom would have *loved* to point the WTC had
been nuked, if they actually had evidence of that?  And don't forget all
the private and university seismometers worldwide also not under US
government control.

The absurdity of that kookclaim has been pointed out to you many, many 
times before!

> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/2-PATH-bathtub-damage-New-York-Times_IMPROVED.jpg

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:10 -0500
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 19:19 +0000
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:36 -0500
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 20:34 +0000
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:56 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:39 -0500

csiph-web