Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559647 > unrolled thread
| Started by | TrollReportService <envalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-05 14:46 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-03-07 12:34 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 297 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland TrollReportService <envalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-05 14:46 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 13:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 06:50 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 23:15 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 12:04 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 19:50 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 14:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 11:48 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 23:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 15:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 01:35 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 17:00 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 04:53 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:05 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:18 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:04 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:43 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 10:22 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:07 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 21:54 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 08:47 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 03:05 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 00:47 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:37 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 20:00 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 08:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:04 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 18:40 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 11:16 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 21:48 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-09 11:58 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:23 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-14 16:58 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 17:09 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:15 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:08 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-06 20:07 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 03:57 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:18 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-06 23:13 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 18:51 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 10:48 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 13:03 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 07:38 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 02:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 08:14 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 17:34 +0800
RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 09:45 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 18:05 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 10:14 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:34 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:46 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:34 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:55 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:08 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:54 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:07 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:11 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:58 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 19:11 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 11:59 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:05 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:14 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:25 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:27 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:51 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 21:00 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:47 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:52 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 14:35 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 05:41 +0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 14:37 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 19:00 -0500
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:37 -0700
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:15 -0800
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:13 +0000
Re: RMS Primer for Fakey (was: Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:33 -0500
DFTs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 10:24 +0000
Re: DFTs Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 22:30 +0800
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:50 -0500
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:14 +0100
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-09 05:41 -0700
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 11:32 -0500
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:16 +0100
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:36 -0500
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 10:44 -0800
Re: DFTs "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:47 -0500
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:22 -0700
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: DFTs "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-13 20:12 -0400
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 18:25 -0600
Re: DFTs Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: DFTs on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-15 15:51 +0000
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:49 -0800
Re: DFTs snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:17 +0000
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 09:20 -0800
Re: DFTs vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 19:48 +0000
Re: DFTs pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-03-09 11:26 -0600
Re: DFTs snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 11:14 +0000
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:19 -0700
Re: DFTs Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 18:55 -0800
Re: DFTs buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 15:53 -0500
Re: DFTs Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-11 18:15 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:31 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 01:48 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:10 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:12 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 16:42 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 00:55 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 19:32 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 01:14 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:53 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:01 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 21:13 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:39 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 20:50 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:04 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:19 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:16 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 18:37 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 21:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 05:11 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:02 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:44 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 01:30 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 16:11 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:23 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-10 13:33 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:23 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 01:45 -0500
https://soundcloud.com/djdizazter/en3-arrangement-1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 02:18 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:25 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 17:53 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:48 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-13 08:57 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 22:12 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-14 06:31 -0600
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:32 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 18:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:29 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 07:54 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 03:09 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:25 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 15:55 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:06 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:36 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:49 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:00 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 14:08 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:40 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:03 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 10:07 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:45 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 14:58 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 16:17 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 18:52 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 19:00 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:47 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:27 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 22:35 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:29 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 09:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:32 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 11:34 -0500
Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:49 +0000
Re: Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... Earth Calling Planet Fakey, Come In Fakey... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 19:30 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:53 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 03:33 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:05 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:11 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:13 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:17 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:17 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:22 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 22:04 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:03 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:35 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:40 -0800
Re:Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:45 -0500
Re: Re:Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 16:28 -0800
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 19:32 -0500
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 19:41 -0500
Re: Jefferson was James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:08 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:35 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:12 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 18:30 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:32 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:26 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 19:12 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 19:44 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:16 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:44 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:56 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 18:19 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 18:17 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:43 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:03 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 20:20 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-08 17:54 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 12:45 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 09:50 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 06:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 19:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-08 19:01 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 03:26 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:10 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 04:17 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:21 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-08 22:38 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 14:54 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 18:58 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:39 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:14 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 18:54 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-08 17:38 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 19:13 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:04 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 15:11 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:16 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 04:22 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:24 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:20 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:06 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:59 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 01:34 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 23:00 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:41 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 12:52 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:13 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:06 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:50 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:19 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 15:03 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:23 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 21:03 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:36 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 09:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 08:33 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 04:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 01:21 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:29 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 04:42 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:45 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 02:01 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 18:53 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:00 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:09 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 01:14 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 13:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-09 18:37 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:10 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:21 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:38 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:39 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 02:02 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:22 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 19:34 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 13:51 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 12:10 -0700
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:07 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 03:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 15:01 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:18 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:37 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 03:16 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:05 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:21 -0500
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 14:23 +0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:49 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 10:31 +0000
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 17:14 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 12:29 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:54 +0100
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-09 00:03 -0800
Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 13:21 -0500
his sister's dog noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:34 -0800
Page 1 of 15 [1] 2 3 … 15 Next page →
| From | TrollReportService <envalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 14:46 -0600 |
| Subject | James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland |
| Message-ID | <nbfgl8$m9o$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
Who is James B Mcginn - (503) 223-7990 - Portland - OR ... OR, Portland, 2365 NW Marshall St, 97210 https://www.google.com/maps/place /2365+NW+Marshall+St,+Portland,+OR+97210/@45.5306596,-122.6995998,189m /data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x549509f0201cc1d5:0x1ea2ec0bf1d0cb96!6m1!1e1 CEO at Socratic inc Office Technician at State of california File Size: 569 KB; Print Length: 52 pages; Publisher: James B. McGinn IV; 1 edition (June 11, 2014); Sold by: Amazon Digital Services, Inc. Language: English ... [Search domain waatp.com] waatp.com/people/james-b-mcginn/41655274/ zenodo.org James B. McGinn IV, is a graduate of CSU Northridge, BA Geography 1992, and is an independent science theorist whose primary focus is on the physics of the atmosphere. [Search domain zenodo.org] zenodo.org/record/37224/files/HydrogenBondingasTheMe... WHAT GOES UP: Storm Theory: What meteorologists believe but ... James McGinn's out-of-the-box approach opens for debate what everyone has accepted as the unchallenged ... James B. McGinn IV; 1 edition (June 11, 2014 ... [Search domain www.amazon.com] amazon.com/WHAT-GOES-meteorologists-Tornadoes-Atmosp... Wind and Paranoia: What Meteorologist Won't Tell... Claudius Denk. James McGinn. James B. McGinn IV. [Search domain www.kashikari.net] kashikari.net/asin-ForeignBooks-B00KY7EGSG/?lang=tr Picture of his Dog; https://www.rover.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ugly-dog.png Picture of his sister http://weedactivist.com/wp-content/uploads/weird.1.jpg
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 13:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559647 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 12:47:43 PM UTC-8, TrollReportService wrote: Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00 (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of Earth's atmosphere. Or That moist air, all other factors being the same, is or can be lighter than dry air. Here is a link to experimental procedures that would suffice: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/2XZmr9zDCig/mpUXaNxzAAAJ Or That moist air can rise as a result of convection through dry air The person that wrote this "Troll Report," was obviously joking. I want to assure you that this offer of $100,000.00 US Dollars is no joke. Feel free to submit claim here or at my email address below. James McGinn Solving Tornadoes jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 06:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <910a3b6c3baf6ecfefb6505162b5393c@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #559654 |
James McGinn, in <news:28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00 > (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental > evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of > Earth's atmosphere. Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? Or that water in its gaseous phase is miscible in air at all temperatures above ~-60 C? You will typically hear humidity expressed as "relative humidity", which is the ratio of vapor pressure 'e' to saturation vapor pressure 'e_s', and thus when the relative humidity e/e_s < 1, net evaporation occurs, whereas when e/e_s > 1, net condensation occurs. In both cases, however, evaporation is occurring. IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase until its partial pressure has reached the vapor pressure for that temperature. This is best treated by experimental analogy. Get a roulette wheel, spin it slowly and drop in 100 marbles. They'll bounce around, and you might see one or two collide with other marbles, the kinetic energy derived from said collisions giving one of the marbles the necessary energy to escape the roulette wheel (ie: to evaporate to gaseous phase). Now collect all your marbles and spin the roulette wheel faster, and drop the marbles back in. You'll see more of the marbles experiencing collisions which impart to them the energy necessary to fly off the wheel. Thus increased temperature increases evaporation. Now collect all your marbles again, spin the roulette wheel at 5000 RPM and drop the marbles back in. They'll all fling off the wheel... that's boiling. Now, let's address sublimation. Because even when the water molecules are locked in the matrix of ice, the water can evaporate directly from solid to gaseous phase. That would be akin to a roulette wheel spinning very slowly... the collision of marbles necessary to throw one of them off the roulette table wouldn't happen very often, but it'd still happen occasionally. I'm sure you'll blather something akin to "Sublimation produces evaporate (vapor, small clusters of H2O). It does not produce gaseous H2O.", but hey, take a look at this: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation_(phase_transition)> "Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid to the gas phase without passing through the intermediate liquid phase.[1]" That [1] is the Merriam-Webster definition. You're trying to dispute a long-held scientific definition. That's not very smart of you, now is it? Further, just how do you suppose freeze-drying works, if not by sublimation in a reduced-pressure environment? Just how do you suppose dry ice evaporates if not by sublimation? Do you purport that "small clusters of vaporous CO2" are in the atmosphere as a result of sublimation? If so, do try not to breathe, you may suffocate on a "CO2 vapor cluster". I invite you to peruse the works of Bar-Nun et. al., who studied water ice sublimation using mass spectrometry; and Sandford and Allamandola, who studied water ice sublimation using infrared spectroscopy; as well as R.L. Hudson, who studied water ice sublimation via mass spectroscopy. ALL of them found water ice sublimates directly to gaseous phase. Thermodynamics dictates that for a system of liquid, the free energy can be lowered by trading some enthalpy for the increase in entropy. For any given temperature, this balance determines the equilibrium vapor pressure. Thus, there will always be some gaseous phase water in equilibrium (for all temperatures above ~-60 C). At an interface between a liquid and a gas, a water molecule can randomly fly out of the liquid and join the gas, or drop out of the gas and join the liquid. This gas/liquid system is at equilibrium if the change in free energy is the same for a molecule to go in either direction. In this case, the molecules are transferred in both directions at the same rate, and there is no net change. If you have a situation that is not in equilibrium, then molecules will be transferred from the liquid to the gas or the gas to the liquid preferentially, and this will continue until the pressure or temperature have changed to achieve equilibrium, or until one phase is completely gone. In many common examples, equilibrium is never reached. For example, at room temperature, the equilibrium point for water will be at a pressure of about 20 Torr. If the relative humidity is less than 100%, then the partial pressure of water in the air is less than 20 Torr. So, if you put a glass of water in such an atmosphere, the water molecules will tend to leave the liquid and join the gas. Since the atmosphere is much larger than the glass of water, this evaporation will not noticeably change the partial pressure of water in the atmosphere, so the water will continue to evaporate until it is entirely converted into gas. On the other hand, if you put a cap on the glass, the evaporation would only continue until the partial pressure of water under that cap went up to 20 Torr. In point of fact, water is *always* trying to "boil"... except that at room temperature, the 20 Torr pressure created isn't enough to expand the bubbles created by boiling against the atmospheric pressure of ~760 Torr. This can be seen quite easily by putting water in a flask and evacuating the flask to a lower pressure than atmospheric. The water will boil at a lower temperature. In fact, there are such devices that allow one to boil water merely by holding the flask, the heat from one's hand causing the boiling... until gaseous phase water partial pressure in the flask rises sufficiently to prevent bubble formation. <http://docs.engineeringtoolbox.com/documents/689/air-moisture-temperature-saturation-diagram-SI.png> You'll note that at 100 C, the saturation pressure is 100,000 Pa, or atmospheric pressure. You'll further note that at that 100 C / 100,000 Pa point, Density = 1... but at lower temperatures, water in its gaseous phase can still exist at lower partial pressure. At lower atmospheric pressure, the partial pressure:atmospheric pressure ratio increases such that evaporation occurs at a higher rate for a given temperature, finally leading to perpetual boiling for a sufficiently low atmospheric pressure, as in the evacuated flask example above. Did you not think about your contention that all water in the atmosphere is in a liquid state, or that a simple saturation diagram and an evacuated flask would cost you $100,000? I'd like to request my $100,000 in the form of BitCoin, if you please. > Or > > That moist air, all other factors being the same, is or can be > lighter than dry air. Here is a link to experimental procedures > that would suffice: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/2XZmr9zDCig/mpUXaNxzAAAJ Mason jars? Desert environment? Aluminum foil? Cotton balls? You silly little man, there's no need to go to such lengths if you're so very determined to give away $100,000. Density of Dry Air Pa = 0.0035 pa / T Where: Pa = density dry air (kg/m3) pa = partial pressure of air (Pa, N/m2) T = absolute dry bulb temperature (K) Density of Water In Its Gaseous Phase Pw = 0.0022 pw / T Where: pw = partial pressure water in its gaseous phase (Pa, N/m2) Pw = density water in its gaseous phase (kg/m3) T = absolute dry bulb temperature (K) <http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/density-air-d_680.html> Were you not aware that liquid water has an electrostatic surface potential of ~1.815 eV in liquid phase, but ~-1.815 eV in gaseous phase, thus water is *always* trying to evaporate to its gaseous phase to reduce its free energy, but the majority of it is held in check from doing so via the inter-molecular hydrogen bonds? <http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jz900268s> > Or > > That moist air can rise as a result of convection through dry air The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of the atomic masses of its constituent atoms. The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP. Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the same volume of 22.414 liters at STP. The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP. Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh: 18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase 28.57 g for air Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore air with water in its gaseous phase in it is lighter than dry air. Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant. Ergo, your entire basis of argument is invalid, and you'll be forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account immediately. > The person that wrote this "Troll Report," was obviously joking. I want to assure you that this offer of $100,000.00 US Dollars is no joke. Great... so you'll be forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account post-haste. Don't make me sue you for it. You've made a public offer, legally binding. I've met _all_ of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more than thoroughly satisfying the demands of the challenge. I've amply proven using well-known and long-established scientific equations, tables and concepts that you're a kooktard. And kooktards gotta pay. <snicker> > Feel free to submit claim here or at my email address below. > > James McGinn > Solving Tornadoes > jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com The claim has been submitted and you've been proven wrong. Pay up. James McGinn owes FNVWe $100,000. Because stupidity should be costly. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 23:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4ffa904b-e54c-4c4e-aabb-67e19c960709@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559743 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 10:00:51 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > James McGinn, in > <news:28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00 > > (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental > > evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of > > Earth's atmosphere. > > Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? Yes. Perfectly. > Or that water > in its gaseous phase is miscible in air at all temperatures above ~-60 > C? > > You will typically hear humidity expressed as "relative humidity", > which is the ratio of vapor pressure 'e' to saturation vapor pressure > 'e_s', and thus when the relative humidity e/e_s < 1, net evaporation > occurs, whereas when e/e_s > 1, net condensation occurs. In both > cases, however, evaporation is occurring. > > IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase You have to prove it is gaseous. You can't just assume it -- dumbass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 12:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nbhrfu$rvv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #559746 |
On 3/6/2016 1:15 AM, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 10:00:51 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James McGinn, in >> <news:28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> wrote: >> >> >> Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? > > Yes. Perfectly. he agrees he does not understand pp. > > > You have to prove it is gaseous. how does a shirt dry on a clothes line ? magic ? Sorley tormators magicly dry it out for you using their plasmamas, little elven peples w spunges ?? you are an idiot, and a moron, but you already know that. from OP why do have a a restraining order on you ? James B Mcginn IV - (503) 223-7990 - 2365 NW Marshall St, Portland, Or 97210 CEO at Socratic inc Office Technician at State of california
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 19:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <59de46e56833e802ffb541f95bec654e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #559746 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:4ffa904b-e54c-4c4e-aabb-67e19c960709@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 10:00:51 PM UTC-8, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James McGinn, in >> <news:28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>> Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00 >>> (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental >>> evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of >>> Earth's atmosphere. >> Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? Your cowardly snipping is noted, Jim. What are you afraid of? That people will see that I've met every single one of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more than satisfying the conditions of the challenge in the eyes of the law? > Yes. Perfectly. >> Or that water >> in its gaseous phase is miscible in air at all temperatures above ~-60 >> C? >> >> You will typically hear humidity expressed as "relative humidity", >> which is the ratio of vapor pressure 'e' to saturation vapor pressure >> 'e_s', and thus when the relative humidity e/e_s < 1, net evaporation >> occurs, whereas when e/e_s > 1, net condensation occurs. In both >> cases, however, evaporation is occurring. >> >> IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase > You have to prove it is gaseous. > > You can't just assume it -- dumbass. I did prove it, you moron. It's not my fault you can't understand that simple reality as outlined by science long ago. To repeat that which you cowardly snipped out, to give you a second chance to peruse it and realize your error: ================================================================ ================================================================ ================================================================ Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? Or that water in its gaseous phase is miscible in air at all temperatures above ~-60 C? You will typically hear humidity expressed as "relative humidity", which is the ratio of vapor pressure 'e' to saturation vapor pressure 'e_s', and thus when the relative humidity e/e_s < 1, net evaporation occurs, whereas when e/e_s > 1, net condensation occurs. In both cases, however, evaporation is occurring. IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase until its partial pressure has reached the vapor pressure for that temperature. This is best treated by experimental analogy. Get a roulette wheel, spin it slowly and drop in 100 marbles. They'll bounce around, and you might see one or two collide with other marbles, the kinetic energy derived from said collisions giving one of the marbles the necessary energy to escape the roulette wheel (ie: to evaporate to gaseous phase). Now collect all your marbles and spin the roulette wheel faster, and drop the marbles back in. You'll see more of the marbles experiencing collisions which impart to them the energy necessary to fly off the wheel. Thus increased temperature increases evaporation. Now collect all your marbles again, spin the roulette wheel at 5000 RPM and drop the marbles back in. They'll all fling off the wheel... that's boiling. Now, let's address sublimation. Because even when the water molecules are locked in the matrix of ice, the water can evaporate directly from solid to gaseous phase. That would be akin to a roulette wheel spinning very slowly... the collision of marbles necessary to throw one of them off the roulette table wouldn't happen very often, but it'd still happen occasionally. I'm sure you'll blather something akin to "Sublimation produces evaporate (vapor, small clusters of H2O). It does not produce gaseous H2O.", but hey, take a look at this: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation_(phase_transition)> "Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid to the gas phase without passing through the intermediate liquid phase.[1]" That [1] is the Merriam-Webster definition. You're trying to dispute a long-held scientific definition. That's not very smart of you, now is it? Further, just how do you suppose freeze-drying works, if not by sublimation in a reduced-pressure environment? Just how do you suppose dry ice evaporates if not by sublimation? Do you purport that "small clusters of vaporous CO2" are in the atmosphere as a result of sublimation? If so, do try not to breathe, you may suffocate on a "CO2 vapor cluster". I invite you to peruse the works of Bar-Nun et. al., who studied water ice sublimation using mass spectrometry; and Sandford and Allamandola, who studied water ice sublimation using infrared spectroscopy; as well as R.L. Hudson, who studied water ice sublimation via mass spectroscopy. ALL of them found water ice sublimates directly to gaseous phase. Thermodynamics dictates that for a system of liquid, the free energy can be lowered by trading some enthalpy for the increase in entropy. For any given temperature, this balance determines the equilibrium vapor pressure. Thus, there will always be some gaseous phase water in equilibrium (for all temperatures above ~-60 C). At an interface between a liquid and a gas, a water molecule can randomly fly out of the liquid and join the gas, or drop out of the gas and join the liquid. This gas/liquid system is at equilibrium if the change in free energy is the same for a molecule to go in either direction. In this case, the molecules are transferred in both directions at the same rate, and there is no net change. If you have a situation that is not in equilibrium, then molecules will be transferred from the liquid to the gas or the gas to the liquid preferentially, and this will continue until the pressure or temperature have changed to achieve equilibrium, or until one phase is completely gone. In many common examples, equilibrium is never reached. For example, at room temperature, the equilibrium point for water will be at a pressure of about 20 Torr. If the relative humidity is less than 100%, then the partial pressure of water in the air is less than 20 Torr. So, if you put a glass of water in such an atmosphere, the water molecules will tend to leave the liquid and join the gas. Since the atmosphere is much larger than the glass of water, this evaporation will not noticeably change the partial pressure of water in the atmosphere, so the water will continue to evaporate until it is entirely converted into gas. On the other hand, if you put a cap on the glass, the evaporation would only continue until the partial pressure of water under that cap went up to 20 Torr. In point of fact, water is *always* trying to "boil"... except that at room temperature, the 20 Torr pressure created isn't enough to expand the bubbles created by boiling against the atmospheric pressure of ~760 Torr. This can be seen quite easily by putting water in a flask and evacuating the flask to a lower pressure than atmospheric. The water will boil at a lower temperature. In fact, there are such devices that allow one to boil water merely by holding the flask, the heat from one's hand causing the boiling... until gaseous phase water partial pressure in the flask rises sufficiently to prevent bubble formation. <http://docs.engineeringtoolbox.com/documents/689/air-moisture-temperature-saturation-diagram-SI.png> You'll note that at 100 C, the saturation pressure is 100,000 Pa, or atmospheric pressure. You'll further note that at that 100 C / 100,000 Pa point, Density = 1... but at lower temperatures, water in its gaseous phase can still exist at lower partial pressure. At lower atmospheric pressure, the partial pressure:atmospheric pressure ratio increases such that evaporation occurs at a higher rate for a given temperature, finally leading to perpetual boiling for a sufficiently low atmospheric pressure, as in the evacuated flask example above. Did you not think about your contention that all water in the atmosphere is in a liquid state, or that a simple saturation diagram and an evacuated flask would cost you $100,000? I'd like to request my $100,000 in the form of BitCoin, if you please. > Or > > That moist air, all other factors being the same, is or can be > lighter than dry air. Here is a link to experimental procedures > that would suffice: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/2XZmr9zDCig/mpUXaNxzAAAJ Mason jars? Desert environment? Aluminum foil? Cotton balls? You silly little man, there's no need to go to such lengths if you're so very determined to give away $100,000. Density of Dry Air Pa = 0.0035 pa / T Where: Pa = density dry air (kg/m3) pa = partial pressure of air (Pa, N/m2) T = absolute dry bulb temperature (K) Density of Water In Its Gaseous Phase Pw = 0.0022 pw / T Where: pw = partial pressure water in its gaseous phase (Pa, N/m2) Pw = density water in its gaseous phase (kg/m3) T = absolute dry bulb temperature (K) <http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/density-air-d_680.html> Were you not aware that liquid water has an electrostatic surface potential of ~1.815 eV in liquid phase, but ~-1.815 eV in gaseous phase, thus water is *always* trying to evaporate to its gaseous phase to reduce its free energy, but the majority of it is held in check from doing so via the inter-molecular hydrogen bonds? <http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jz900268s> > Or > > That moist air can rise as a result of convection through dry air The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of the atomic masses of its constituent atoms. The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP. Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the same volume of 22.414 liters at STP. The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP. Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh: 18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase 28.57 g for air Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore air with water in its gaseous phase in it is lighter than dry air. Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant. Ergo, your entire basis of argument is invalid, and you'll be forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account immediately. > The person that wrote this "Troll Report," was obviously joking. I want to assure you that this offer of $100,000.00 US Dollars is no joke. Great... so you'll be forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account post-haste. Don't make me sue you for it. You've made a public offer, legally binding. I've met _all_ of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more than thoroughly satisfying the demands of the challenge. I've amply proven using well-known and long-established scientific equations, tables and concepts that you're a kooktard. And kooktards gotta pay. <snicker> > Feel free to submit claim here or at my email address below. > > James McGinn > Solving Tornadoes > jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com The claim has been submitted and you've been proven wrong. Pay up. James McGinn owes FNVWe $100,000. Because stupidity should be costly. <snicker> ================================================================ ================================================================ ================================================================ I'll further add that a gas is a single well-defined thermodynamic phase, whereas a vapor is a mixture of two phases (in the case of water, gas and liquid). A cloud contains water vapor, whereas clear sky contains gaseous water. IOW, all vapor contains gaseous phase, but gas is not vaporous. This applies to all substances which can be liquefied... liquid oxygen will coexist with oxygen vapor right up to the boiling point of oxygen at the pressure it is being stored. Above that Critical Temperature, it is gaseous. So even in water vapor, there is gaseous water... so no matter what, you're wrong, I'm right, and you owe me $100,000. Remember, I'm litigious. I'll gladly spend $25k on an attorney to get $75 net. And I can afford to do so. So you've better pay up. The scientific proof I've provided will stand up in any court of law, you've made a public challenge with a payoff of $100,000 and you've reiterated that offer. It is a legally binding offer. I've met _all_ of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more than thoroughly satisfying the demands of the challenge. I've amply proven using well-known and long-established scientific equations, tables and concepts that I've met your challenge You're the moron who claims that warmer air is *heavier* than colder air... that level of stupidity should be painful. I intend to make it so for you. Pay up. Now. James McGinn owes FNVWe $100,000. Because stupidity should be costly. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 14:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.ydw29umztm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #559809 |
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 13:50:06 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James McGinn, in
> <news:4ffa904b-e54c-4c4e-aabb-67e19c960709@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 10:00:51 PM UTC-8,
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>
>>> James McGinn, in
>>> <news:28189e9d-b2ff-46d5-b481-1d26a1d37491@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00
>>>> (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental
>>>> evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of
>>>> Earth's atmosphere.
>
>>> Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure?
>
> Your cowardly snipping is noted, Jim. What are you afraid of? That
> people will see that I've met every single one of your 'Or'
> conditions, thereby more than satisfying the conditions of the
> challenge in the eyes of the law?
you should graph it for him with gnuplot or desmos.com.
>
>> Yes. Perfectly.
>
>>> Or that water
>>> in its gaseous phase is miscible in air at all temperatures above ~-60
>>> C?
>>>
>>> You will typically hear humidity expressed as "relative humidity",
>>> which is the ratio of vapor pressure 'e' to saturation vapor pressure
>>> 'e_s', and thus when the relative humidity e/e_s < 1, net evaporation
>>> occurs, whereas when e/e_s > 1, net condensation occurs. In both
>>> cases, however, evaporation is occurring.
>>>
>>> IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase
>
>> You have to prove it is gaseous.
>>
>> You can't just assume it -- dumbass.
>
> I did prove it, you moron. It's not my fault you can't understand that
> simple reality as outlined by science long ago.
>
> To repeat that which you cowardly snipped out, to give you a second
> chance to peruse it and realize your error:
> ================================================================
> ================================================================
> ================================================================
> Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? Or that water
> in its gaseous phase is miscible in air at all temperatures above ~-60
> C?
>
> You will typically hear humidity expressed as "relative humidity",
> which is the ratio of vapor pressure 'e' to saturation vapor pressure
> 'e_s', and thus when the relative humidity e/e_s < 1, net evaporation
> occurs, whereas when e/e_s > 1, net condensation occurs. In both
> cases, however, evaporation is occurring.
>
> IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase until its partial pressure
> has reached the vapor pressure for that temperature.
>
> This is best treated by experimental analogy. Get a roulette wheel,
> spin it slowly and drop in 100 marbles. They'll bounce around, and you
> might see one or two collide with other marbles, the kinetic energy
> derived from said collisions giving one of the marbles the necessary
> energy to escape the roulette wheel (ie: to evaporate to gaseous
> phase).
>
> Now collect all your marbles and spin the roulette wheel faster, and
> drop the marbles back in. You'll see more of the marbles experiencing
> collisions which impart to them the energy necessary to fly off the
> wheel. Thus increased temperature increases evaporation.
>
> Now collect all your marbles again, spin the roulette wheel at 5000
> RPM and drop the marbles back in. They'll all fling off the wheel...
> that's boiling.
>
> Now, let's address sublimation. Because even when the water molecules
> are locked in the matrix of ice, the water can evaporate directly from
> solid to gaseous phase. That would be akin to a roulette wheel
> spinning very slowly... the collision of marbles necessary to throw
> one of them off the roulette table wouldn't happen very often, but
> it'd still happen occasionally.
>
> I'm sure you'll blather something akin to "Sublimation produces
> evaporate (vapor, small clusters of H2O). It does not produce gaseous
> H2O.", but hey, take a look at this:
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation_(phase_transition)>
> "Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid
> to the gas phase without passing through the intermediate liquid
> phase.[1]"
>
> That [1] is the Merriam-Webster definition. You're trying to dispute a
> long-held scientific definition. That's not very smart of you, now is
> it?
>
> Further, just how do you suppose freeze-drying works, if not by
> sublimation in a reduced-pressure environment? Just how do you suppose
> dry ice evaporates if not by sublimation? Do you purport that "small
> clusters of vaporous CO2" are in the atmosphere as a result of
> sublimation? If so, do try not to breathe, you may suffocate on a "CO2
> vapor cluster".
>
> I invite you to peruse the works of Bar-Nun et. al., who studied water
> ice sublimation using mass spectrometry; and Sandford and Allamandola,
> who studied water ice sublimation using infrared spectroscopy; as well
> as R.L. Hudson, who studied water ice sublimation via mass
> spectroscopy. ALL of them found water ice sublimates directly to
> gaseous phase.
>
> Thermodynamics dictates that for a system of liquid, the free energy
> can be lowered by trading some enthalpy for the increase in entropy.
> For any given temperature, this balance determines the equilibrium
> vapor pressure. Thus, there will always be some gaseous phase water in
> equilibrium (for all temperatures above ~-60 C).
>
> At an interface between a liquid and a gas, a water molecule can
> randomly fly out of the liquid and join the gas, or drop out of the
> gas and join the liquid. This gas/liquid system is at equilibrium if
> the change in free energy is the same for a molecule to go in either
> direction. In this case, the molecules are transferred in both
> directions at the same rate, and there is no net change. If you have a
> situation that is not in equilibrium, then molecules will be
> transferred from the liquid to the gas or the gas to the liquid
> preferentially, and this will continue until the pressure or
> temperature have changed to achieve equilibrium, or until one phase is
> completely gone. In many common examples, equilibrium is never
> reached. For example, at room temperature, the equilibrium point for
> water will be at a pressure of about 20 Torr. If the relative humidity
> is less than 100%, then the partial pressure of water in the air is
> less than 20 Torr. So, if you put a glass of water in such an
> atmosphere, the water molecules will tend to leave the liquid and join
> the gas. Since the atmosphere is much larger than the glass of water,
> this evaporation will not noticeably change the partial pressure of
> water in the atmosphere, so the water will continue to evaporate until
> it is entirely converted into gas. On the other hand, if you put a cap
> on the glass, the evaporation would only continue until the partial
> pressure of water under that cap went up to 20 Torr.
>
> In point of fact, water is *always* trying to "boil"... except that at
> room temperature, the 20 Torr pressure created isn't enough to expand
> the bubbles created by boiling against the atmospheric pressure of
> ~760 Torr. This can be seen quite easily by putting water in a flask
> and evacuating the flask to a lower pressure than atmospheric. The
> water will boil at a lower temperature. In fact, there are such
> devices that allow one to boil water merely by holding the flask, the
> heat from one's hand causing the boiling... until gaseous phase water
> partial pressure in the flask rises sufficiently to prevent bubble
> formation.
>
> <http://docs.engineeringtoolbox.com/documents/689/air-moisture-temperature-saturation-diagram-SI.png>
> You'll note that at 100 C, the saturation pressure is 100,000 Pa, or
> atmospheric pressure. You'll further note that at that 100 C / 100,000
> Pa point, Density = 1... but at lower temperatures, water in its
> gaseous phase can still exist at lower partial pressure. At lower
> atmospheric pressure, the partial pressure:atmospheric pressure ratio
> increases such that evaporation occurs at a higher rate for a given
> temperature, finally leading to perpetual boiling for a sufficiently
> low atmospheric pressure, as in the evacuated flask example above.
>
> Did you not think about your contention that all water in the
> atmosphere is in a liquid state, or that a simple saturation diagram
> and an evacuated flask would cost you $100,000?
>
> I'd like to request my $100,000 in the form of BitCoin, if you please.
>
>> Or
>>
>> That moist air, all other factors being the same, is or can be
>> lighter than dry air. Here is a link to experimental procedures
>> that would suffice:
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/2XZmr9zDCig/mpUXaNxzAAAJ
>
> Mason jars? Desert environment? Aluminum foil? Cotton balls?
>
> You silly little man, there's no need to go to such lengths if you're
> so very determined to give away $100,000.
>
> Density of Dry Air
> Pa = 0.0035 pa / T
>
> Where:
> Pa = density dry air (kg/m3)
> pa = partial pressure of air (Pa, N/m2)
> T = absolute dry bulb temperature (K)
>
> Density of Water In Its Gaseous Phase
> Pw = 0.0022 pw / T
>
> Where:
> pw = partial pressure water in its gaseous phase (Pa, N/m2)
> Pw = density water in its gaseous phase (kg/m3)
> T = absolute dry bulb temperature (K)
>
> <http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/density-air-d_680.html>
>
> Were you not aware that liquid water has an electrostatic surface
> potential of ~1.815 eV in liquid phase, but ~-1.815 eV in gaseous
> phase, thus water is *always* trying to evaporate to its gaseous phase
> to reduce its free energy, but the majority of it is held in check
> from doing so via the inter-molecular hydrogen bonds?
>
> <http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jz900268s>
>
>> Or
>>
>> That moist air can rise as a result of convection through dry air
>
> The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of
> the atomic masses of its constituent atoms.
>
> The average molar mass of air (approximately 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen,
> 1% other gases) is 28.57 g/mol at STP.
>
> Thus using Avogadro's Law and the Ideal Gas Law, water in its gaseous
> phase and air have a molar volume of 22.414 L/mol at STP. IOW, a molar
> mass of air and a molar mass of water in its gaseous phase occupy the
> same volume of 22.414 liters at STP.
>
> The density of water in its gaseous phase at STP is 0.804 g/L, whereas
> the density of dry air is 1.27 g/L at STP.
>
> Therefore that 22.414 liters molar volume would weigh:
> 18.02 grams for water in its gaseous phase
> 28.57 g for air
>
> Therefore, water in its gaseous phase is lighter than air. Therefore
> air with water in its gaseous phase in it is lighter than dry air.
>
> Therefore, drier air *must* sink through air laden with water in its
> gaseous phase, because it is less buoyant.
>
> Ergo, your entire basis of argument is invalid, and you'll be
> forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account immediately.
>
>> The person that wrote this "Troll Report," was obviously joking. I
>> want to assure you that this offer of $100,000.00 US Dollars is no joke.
>
> Great... so you'll be forwarding the $100,000 to my BitCoin account
> post-haste. Don't make me sue you for it. You've made a public offer,
> legally binding. I've met _all_ of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more
> than thoroughly satisfying the demands of the challenge. I've amply
> proven using well-known and long-established scientific equations,
> tables and concepts that you're a kooktard. And kooktards gotta pay.
>
> <snicker>
>
>> Feel free to submit claim here or at my email address below.
>>
>> James McGinn
>> Solving Tornadoes
>> jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com
>
> The claim has been submitted and you've been proven wrong. Pay up.
>
> James McGinn owes FNVWe $100,000. Because stupidity should be costly.
>
> <snicker>
> ================================================================
> ================================================================
> ================================================================
>
> I'll further add that a gas is a single well-defined thermodynamic
> phase, whereas a vapor is a mixture of two phases (in the case of
> water, gas and liquid). A cloud contains water vapor, whereas clear
> sky contains gaseous water. IOW, all vapor contains gaseous phase, but
> gas is not vaporous.
>
> This applies to all substances which can be liquefied... liquid oxygen
> will coexist with oxygen vapor right up to the boiling point of oxygen
> at the pressure it is being stored. Above that Critical Temperature,
> it is gaseous.
>
> So even in water vapor, there is gaseous water... so no matter what,
> you're wrong, I'm right, and you owe me $100,000.
>
> Remember, I'm litigious. I'll gladly spend $25k on an attorney to get
> $75 net. And I can afford to do so. So you've better pay up.
>
> The scientific proof I've provided will stand up in any court of law,
> you've made a public challenge with a payoff of $100,000 and you've
> reiterated that offer. It is a legally binding offer.
>
> I've met _all_ of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more than thoroughly
> satisfying the demands of the challenge. I've amply proven using
> well-known and long-established scientific equations, tables and
> concepts that I've met your challenge
>
> You're the moron who claims that warmer air is *heavier* than colder
> air... that level of stupidity should be painful. I intend to make it
> so for you.
>
> Pay up. Now.
>
> James McGinn owes FNVWe $100,000. Because stupidity should be costly.
>
> <snicker>
>
--
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 11:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6e0659b2-4349-4656-809d-5da48ace6632@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559809 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 11:00:04 AM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >>> Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00 > >>> (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental > >>> evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of > >>> Earth's atmosphere. > > >> Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? > > Your cowardly snipping is noted, Jim. What are you afraid of? That > people will see that I've met every single one of your 'Or' > conditions, thereby more than satisfying the conditions of the > challenge in the eyes of the law? Have your lawyer email me: jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com > > You have to prove it is gaseous. > > > > You can't just assume it -- dumbass. <snipped psycho-babble> > IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase It remains liquid, suspended in air, dumbass. > until its partial pressure > has reached the vapor pressure for that temperature. > > This is best treated by experimental analogy. Uh, there is no such thing as a experimental analogy, you retard. It's either one or the other. And it is fairly clear its not an experiment. God I had idiots! > I'm sure you'll blather something akin to "Sublimation produces > evaporate (vapor, small clusters of H2O). It does not produce gaseous > H2O.", Correct. but hey, take a look at this: > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation_(phase_transition)> > "Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid > to the gas phase without passing through the intermediate liquid > phase.[1]" Wikepedia was constructed by dumbasses like you. > That [1] is the Merriam-Webster definition. You're trying to dispute a > long-held scientific definition. That's not very smart of you, now is > it? You just lost the argument, dumbass. I suggest you don't waste your money on hiring a lawyer. > Remember, I'm litigious. I'll gladly spend $25k on an attorney to get > $75 net. And I can afford to do so. So you've better pay up. Make my day, dumbass. > The scientific proof I've provided will stand up in any court of law, > you've made a public challenge with a payoff of $100,000 and you've > reiterated that offer. It is a legally binding offer. That's right. Go ahead. It's legally binding. And I have the money. So what are you waiting for? Unfortunately the laws of thermodynamics are also binding. Sorry to burst you little bubble. James McGinn Solving Tornadoes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 23:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <a5e82b3faebefc6443a18618bb478ab7@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #559816 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:6e0659b2-4349-4656-809d-5da48ace6632@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 11:00:04 AM UTC-8, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Also, lest we forget. I am offering a cash reward of $100,000.00 >>>>> (U.S.) for anybody that can come up with reproducible experimental >>>>> evidence that H2O can be a gas at the ambient temperatures of >>>>> Earth's atmosphere. >>>> Do you not understand the concept of partial pressure? >> Your cowardly snipping is noted, Jim. What are you afraid of? That >> people will see that I've met every single one of your 'Or' >> conditions, thereby more than satisfying the conditions of the >> challenge in the eyes of the law? > Have your lawyer email me: > jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com Why do I need my lawyer to contact you, Jim? Are you welshing on your challenge already, after you've been proven irrefutably wrong? You should know I've never lost. And given that you're a moronic kooktard who believes that warmer air is *heavier* than cooler air, you're not going to be the first to beat me. You'll pay up or I'll drive you so insane you'll be begging to pay me just so I leave you alone. I've done it to many others far saner and more intelligent than you. <snicker> >>> You have to prove it is gaseous. >>> >>> You can't just assume it -- dumbass. > <snipped psycho-babble> Translation: "<snipped proof that I owe FNVWe $100,000"> Let it be known that Jim McGinn is a kooktard who doesn't make good on his promises, doesn't pay his debts, and is actually stupid enough to believe that warmer air is heavier than cooler air. Let the game begin, Jim. This doesn't end until you pay. I've met the conditions of your challenge using scientific facts and evidence which would be admissible as evidence in any court of law. Pay up. >> IOW, water will evaporate to gaseous phase > It remains liquid, suspended in air, dumbass. No, it doesn't. I note *you* have provided no proof for your kooky contentions, whereas I've provided plentiful examples, diagrams and equations to prove you *wrong*. Pay up, Jim. You owe me $100,000. >> until its partial pressure >> has reached the vapor pressure for that temperature. >> >> This is best treated by experimental analogy. > Uh, there is no such thing as a experimental analogy, you retard. I just gave you one, so there is. Too stupid to see it? Too stupid to do that simple experiment? Or too cowardly to prove yourself *wrong* because you know you'd be forced to pay me the $100,000 you owe me. > It's either one or the other. > And it is fairly clear its not an experiment. Only because you haven't performed it yet, Jim. Why haven't you performed it yet, Jim? Are you running away from that experimental analogy because you know it'd prove you *wrong*, Jim? Why aren't you paying me the money you owe me, Jim? > God I had idiots! Idiot. LOL >> I'm sure you'll blather something akin to "Sublimation produces >> evaporate (vapor, small clusters of H2O). It does not produce gaseous >> H2O.", > Correct. Wrong. The scientific definition of sublimation proves you wrong. Words have meaning, Jim. You redefining words just because you want to in order to fit your little kook theory doesn't change the reality of those scientific definitions. Ice sublimates directly from solid phase to gaseous phase. You owe me $100,000, Jim. Pay up. >> but hey, take a look at this: >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation_(phase_transition)> >> "Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid >> to the gas phase without passing through the intermediate liquid >> phase.[1]" > Wikepedia was constructed by dumbasses like you. That's the Merriam-Webster definition, a long-held scientific definition of sublimation. <http://chemistry.about.com/od/chemistryglossary/a/sublimationdef.htm> <http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Sublimation> <http://www.windows2universe.org/comets/sublimation.html> <http://van.physics.illinois.edu/QA/listing.php?id=1703> <http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercyclesublimation.htmlwater.usgs.gov/edu/watercyclesublimation.html> It's a well-known and commonly held definition, Jim, across chemistry, biology, astrophysics, physics... even the USGS Water Science School holds to that definition. Every physical science there is. Since approximately the 15th century. And if ice can sublimate directly to gaseous phase, air *must* contain water in its gaseous form. You're wrong, Jim. You owe me $100,000, Jim. Pay up, Jim. >> That [1] is the Merriam-Webster definition. You're trying to dispute a >> long-held scientific definition. That's not very smart of you, now is >> it? > You just lost the argument, dumbass. I just won the argument, Jim. You're the kooktard trying to redefine something that's been known for centuries. You lose, Jim. You owe me $100,000, Jim. Pay up, Jim. > I suggest you don't waste your money on hiring a lawyer. The definitions, equations, tables and examples I've provided would all stand up to scrutiny in a court of law, Jim. You know this, Jim. Whereas you've provided nothing but kook blather with no corroboration whatsoever, Jim. You're wrong, Jim. You owe me $100,000, Jim. Pay up, Jim. >> Remember, I'm litigious. I'll gladly spend $25k on an attorney to get >> $75k net. And I can afford to do so. So you've better pay up. > Make my day, dumbass. Are you now signalling your intent to violate your legally binding offer of $100,000 to the person who proves to you that water in its gaseous phase can and does exist in air, Jim? Why are you backpedaling away from your offer, Jim, rather than presenting proof to the contrary? Is it because you know you're *wrong*, and you owe me $100,000, Jim? Why are you refuted and laughed at everywhere you go, Jim? <http://wottsupwiththat.com/2013/01/06/an-open-letter-challenging-the-epa-on-co2-regulation/> <http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/xaBP8bBV6Co> Your book got bad reviews, all of them calling you a kooktard. "To cite Jim McGinn as an idiot or a moron is to slight idiots and morons." You suffer from Dunning-Kruger Effect, Jim. You need to take your meds: =========================================== 1) Skill-boundary transgression: The individual is seeking to operate as an authority or qualified individual, in a field beyond their personal level of academic and professional qualification. 2) Self-identified authority: The individual identifies themselves as sufficiently competent to comment authoritatively on the subject. 3) Unrecognized competence: The individual's self-assessed competence is not recognized by those who are academically and professional competent. 4) False peers: The individual believes that the favorable commentary of other unskilled and non-professional individuals indicates they themselves are sufficiently qualified. 5) Scrutiny avoidance: The individual fails to submit their work for professional scrutiny (such as in the relevant scholarly literature) for review by those genuinely qualified. 6) Pioneer complex: The individual self-identifies as a pioneer uncovering previously unknown or unrecognized facts. 7) Conspiracy claims: The individual explains opposition by qualified professionals as a coordinated attempt to suppress truth, in order to defend the existing scholarly consensus. 8) Allocentric claims of bias: The individual explains the difference between their views and those of qualified professionals, as the result of inherent bias on the part of the professionals; accusations of bias are directed at anyone other than themselves, and they claim objectivity. =========================================== IOW, you're off your meds again, Jim... and in so being off your meds, you've blathered your way into a corner you now cannot get out of, because you've upped the ante to the point that you've offered $100,000 to anyone able to meet the conditions of your challenge, which I've done in spades. You will pay up or you will be hounded until your burgeoning insanity blossoms into fully-blown psychosis of such an extent that you'll forget your own name. <snicker> >> The scientific proof I've provided will stand up in any court of law, >> you've made a public challenge with a payoff of $100,000 and you've >> reiterated that offer. It is a legally binding offer. > That's right. Go ahead. It's legally binding. And I have the money. > So what are you waiting for? I'm waiting for you to melt down so badly that you beg to pay me the $100,000 in return for me leaving you alone, Jim. I'm going to haunt you from now on, Jim, until you pay what you owe me. > Unfortunately the laws of thermodynamics are also binding. Indeed they are, and as I've already stated in a prior post: =========================================================== Thermodynamics dictates that for a system of liquid, the free energy can be lowered by trading some enthalpy for the increase in entropy. For any given temperature, this balance determines the equilibrium vapor pressure. Thus, there will always be some gaseous phase water in equilibrium (for all temperatures above ~-60 C). =========================================================== That alone proves you *wrong*, Jim. Scientific reality doesn't change just because your broken little tardbrain says it does. Reality is immutable. Take your meds and deal with that reality, Jim. You're conversing with the guy who's made physicists tear their hair out from being proven wrong, Jim, the guy who can type far faster than you can think, and who can think far faster than you can ever imagine. I've proven you wrong in several different ways, all of which would be admissible as evidence in a court of law... ergo you are wrong, Jim, and you owe me $100,000. Pay up, Jim. > Sorry to burst you little bubble. I note you're still cowardly snipping out that which proves you *wrong*, Jim. Let me restate that last little bit for you to peruse again, because it irrefutably proves you *wrong*, leaving you no wiggle room whatsoever: =========================================================== I'll further add that a gas is a single well-defined thermodynamic phase, whereas a vapor is a mixture of two phases (in the case of water, gas and liquid). A cloud contains water vapor, whereas clear sky contains gaseous water. IOW, all vapor contains gaseous phase, but gas is not vaporous. This applies to all substances which can be liquefied... liquid oxygen will coexist with oxygen vapor right up to the boiling point of oxygen at the pressure it is being stored. Above that Critical Temperature, it is gaseous. So even in water vapor, there is gaseous water... so no matter what, you're wrong, I'm right, and you owe me $100,000. Remember, I'm litigious. I'll gladly spend $25k on an attorney to get $75k net. And I can afford to do so. So you've better pay up. The scientific proof I've provided will stand up in any court of law, you've made a public challenge with a payoff of $100,000 and you've reiterated that offer. It is a legally binding offer. I've met _all_ of your 'Or' conditions, thereby more than thoroughly satisfying the demands of the challenge. I've amply proven using well-known and long-established scientific equations, tables and concepts that I've met your challenge You're the moron who claims that warmer air is *heavier* than cooler air... that level of stupidity should be painful. I intend to make it so for you. Pay up. Now. James McGinn owes FNVWe $100,000. Because stupidity should be costly. <snicker> =========================================================== =========================================================== I'll further note that the polarity of water is not variable. It is fixed at 1.09 (http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_properties.html). References: ======================== C-H. Gu, H. Li, R. B. Gandhi and K. Raghavan, Grouping solvents by statistical analysis of solvent property parameters:implication to polymorph screening. Int. J. Pharmaceutics 283 (2004) 117-125. R. S. Varma, Clean chemical synthesis in water, Org. Chem. Highlights (2007), February. ======================== If water's polarity were variable, its solvent properties would be variable, as well. It is not, therefore its polarity is not variable, Jim. Why do you deny reality, Jim? =========================================================== =========================================================== Another method of debunking your retarded drivel is via the speed of sound in dry air and air laden with water in its gaseous phase. The Ideal Gas Model predicts that the speed of sound in a pure gas will be: v_sound = SQRT((y * P)/p) Where: y = specific heat ratio or adiabatic exponent P = absolute pressure of gas p = density of gas Using the Ideal Gas Law, PV = nRT (with 'n' constant, ie: the number of gas molecules is constant), the equation above can be rewritten as: v_sound = SQRT((y * k_b * T)/M) Where: T = temperature (K) M = mass of one gass molecule k_b = Boltzmann's constant (converts absolute temperature units to energy units) Thus, for typical air at room conditions, the average molecule is moving at about 500 m/s. Since the Law of Conservation of Energy states that no energy is lost due to these molecular collisions, the collisions do not slow down the speed of sound, they simply randomize the motion resultant from that sound pressure wave... hence sound waves propagate spherically from their source until they hit an obstruction. For air, which is a mixture of molecules, one must use average values for the adiabatic constant and molecular mass. Air is mostly N2 and O2, which are both simple diatomic molecules with almost the same masses. The adiabatic constant will be very close to 1.4 for both molecules for a wide range of temperatures near room temperature. Hence the adiabatic constant will also be close to 1.4 for bulk air. The average molecular mass will depend on the air composition which changes slightly, for example due to day to day variations in relative humidity. For 100% relative humidity under normal room conditions, about 2% of the molecules of air are water molecules. Since the mass of a water molecule is almost half that of an oxygen or nitrogen molecule, the larger the humidity the lower the density of the air for the same pressure and temperature. At or near room temperature the fraction of air which is water is small, and so the effect will not be large. The temperature dependence and the change in density due to changes in composition, the latter almost entirely due to changes in humidity, are by far the two largest causes for variations in the speed of sound in air. Note, however, that humidity is normally expressed as a percentage of the maximum concentration for the air. That maximum may change with conditions. What matters for the speed of sound is the fraction of the air molecules which are water (i.e. the "molar fraction"). The molar fraction corresponding to 100% humidity will depend on temperature and pressure. Hence there may be an apparent dependence on pressure when the water content is expressed as a percent relative humidity rather than a molar fraction. For example, if you take 20 C air at 1 atm and 100% humidity and remove half of the molecules, you end up with air at 0.5 atm and about 50% relative humidity, not 100% humidity. Hence to look at the changes due only to changes in pressure, and not molecular composition, you would need to compare air at 1 atm and 100% humidity with air at 0.5 atm and 50% humidity. <http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/SoundSpeedTemp.gif> As one can easily see, the speed of sound increases with increasing humidity of air... hence the *only* way that can happen is if air laden with water in its gaseous phase is less dense than dry air, given the same temperature and pressure for each. =========================================================== Why do you continue to deny reality, Mr. McGinn? And given that you've been proven *wrong* via several different avenues, all of which would be admissible in a court of law as evidence, why do you continue to refuse to pay the $100,000 you promised to the person who proved you *wrong*, namely, your Usenet Lord and Master... me. Pay me what you owe me, Mr. McGinn. =========================================================== Stop to think *why* water expands upon increased temperature, despite the fact that the covalent O-H bond length shrinks with rising temperature, Jim... might that give a clue as to why gaseous phase water can exist in our atmosphere? =========================================================== Pay me what you owe me, Jim. Because there is a toll for stupidity. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 15:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b07f359f-30be-4328-ba8f-a0d86aea3f56@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559833 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 2:19:13 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Have your lawyer email me: > > jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com > > Why do I need my lawyer to contact you, Well, I suggest you don't. But if you do the lawyer will probably suggest that you hire a meteorologists. The meteorologists will tell you and the lawyer that you are right, but that won't do you any good. So, I suggest you don't. But you know what they say about a fool and their money. Or, you might just hire a chemistry student or even a real chemist to do the experiment for you. That way you can minimize your losses. > Jim? Are you welshing on your > challenge already, after you've been proven irrefutably wrong? If you think your imagination will stand up in court then what are you waiting for. Go ahead. > You should know I've never lost. You can't lose if you don't play. > And given that you're a moronic > kooktard who believes that warmer air is *heavier* than cooler air, > you're not going to be the first to beat me. You'll pay up or I'll > drive you so insane you'll be begging to pay me just so I leave you > alone. I've done it to many others far saner and more intelligent than > you. Ho hum. > No, it doesn't. I note *you* have provided no proof This is a perfect opportunity for you then, isn't it. You could get a lawyer to do it on spec. You know you are right. Right? You can enlists meteorologists too. Right? So what's the problem. Go for it. Don't waste time whining here. > Wrong. The scientific definition of sublimation proves you wrong. Spoken like a true science groupy. Definitions don't define reality, idiot. > The definitions, equations, tables and examples I've provided would > all stand up to scrutiny in a court of law, Jim. Well then there's your answer. You could even start contacting meteorologists. LOL.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 01:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f14b3ddf043a85ecc8327769a777e451@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #559846 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:b07f359f-30be-4328-ba8f-a0d86aea3f56@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 2:19:13 PM UTC-8, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Have your lawyer email me: >>> jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com >> Why do I need my lawyer to contact you, > Well, I suggest you don't. Because you don't have the $100,000 you owe me, or because you couldn't stand to have your kooky theory demolished in a court of law, which would shatter your fragile little ego? > But if you do the lawyer will probably suggest that you hire > a meteorologists. I don't need to hire a meteorologist. I'm right, science proves me right. A meteorologist wouldn't be any more adept at presenting the science involved than I would be. > The meteorologists will tell you and the lawyer that you are right, Ah, so you admit your kooky theory has been decimated, then, and that I am right. Good. Pay me the $100,000 you owe me. You've just made an admission in a public forum that a court of law will consider to be your admission that you know you owe me $100,000, per the terms of the challenge that you publicly made. You *will* pay, Mr. McGinn... one way or another. > but that won't do you any good. Because you don't have the money, or because you don't want the world to realize what a kooktard you are for believing such an off-the-wall theory that is diametrically opposed to reality? > So, I suggest you don't. But you know what they say about a fool > and their money. Yeah, that fool pays me $100,000 or I so utterly destroy his kooky theory that he's driven insane and begs to pay me the money he owes me just so he can limp away and attempt to salvage what little sanity I let him keep intact. > Or, you might just hire a chemistry student or even a real > chemist to do the experiment for you. That way you can > minimize your losses. What losses, Jim? You've admitted above that I'm right. Pay what you owe. I've demonstrated via several different avenues that your kooky theory is wrong, I've met every single one of your 'Or' conditions, not just one... I've exceeded the requirements of your public challenge by a great deal and I've done so using long-known and well-established science which you cannot refute. Pay what you owe, Jim. Because one way or another, I *will* exact a toll. >> Jim? Are you welshing on your >> challenge already, after you've been proven irrefutably wrong? > If you think your imagination will stand up in court then what are > you waiting for. Go ahead. The scientific fact I've presented is not "imagination", Jim. What *is* "imagination" is your kooky theory, which is so full of holes it's like Swiss cheese. Your theory runs counter to reality, Mr. McGinn. It's been proven wrong. I fully intend to collect what you owe me per the terms of your own publicly offered challenge. Your failure to pay means you agree to *my* terms... and my terms are that I drive you to the brink of insanity *until* you pay me what you owe me. >> You should know I've never lost. > You can't lose if you don't play. Non sequitur, Jim. Don't do that. That makes you look even more foolish than I've already made you look. >> And given that you're a moronic >> kooktard who believes that warmer air is *heavier* than cooler air, >> you're not going to be the first to beat me. You'll pay up or I'll >> drive you so insane you'll be begging to pay me just so I leave you >> alone. I've done it to many others far saner and more intelligent than >> you. > Ho hum. If these pathetic non sequiturs are the best you can come up with, Jim, you stand no chance in court, and even less chance with the alternative. >> No, it doesn't. I note *you* have provided no proof > This is a perfect opportunity for you then, isn't it. You could > get a lawyer to do it on spec. You know you are right. Right? > You can enlists meteorologists too. Right? So what's the > problem. Go for it. Don't waste time whining here. Oh, but that's not the way I operate, Jim. You see, I always get my kooks to do my bidding. It's my way of letting them know that I'm the dominant species, and they're the retarded shit-flinging monkeys. So I do believe I'll just continue to destroy your kooky little theory until either your brain implodes or you beg to pay me what you owe me just to be rid of me in order to spare what scraps of sanity I allow you to keep. Does that work for you, Jim? >> Wrong. The scientific definition of sublimation proves you wrong. > Spoken like a true science groupy. Definitions don't define reality, idiot. Reality defines the definitions, Jim. And reality *and* those definitions are immutable. Your kooky attempts at skirting reality by redefining definitions known for centuries isn't working. >> The definitions, equations, tables and examples I've provided would >> all stand up to scrutiny in a court of law, Jim. > Well then there's your answer. > > You could even start contacting meteorologists. LOL. No, I think we'll go with Plan B instead, it's more fun that way. It's worked so well in the past, it's a sure winner. Inside of 5 years, you'll either pay me just to be rid of me to spare your sanity any more drubbings, or you'll be driven so insane you won't even remember your own name. It could go either way... it has in the past. But one way or another, I *will* exact a toll, Jim. Stupidity should be painful. And for you, that pain starts now. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 17:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <66f4be5d-55f3-429a-95a8-6e79f7813440@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559864 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 4:45:06 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Because you don't have the $100,000 you owe me, or because you > couldn't stand to have your kooky theory demolished in a court of law, > which would shatter your fragile little ego? There are thousands of physicists in the world. Why don't you see if you can get one to help you. > A meteorologist wouldn't be any more adept at presenting the > science involved than I would be. You have a point there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 04:53 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9f938a8128279124eb54c8c7295e9c0f@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #559868 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:66f4be5d-55f3-429a-95a8-6e79f7813440@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 4:45:06 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > >> Because you don't have the $100,000 you owe me, or because you >> couldn't stand to have your kooky theory demolished in a court of law, >> which would shatter your fragile little ego? > There are thousands of physicists in the world. And you've demonstrated that you are not one of them. You're a kooktard with a weird theory that is at odds with reality. You get laughed at and refuted everywhere you go. People point and laugh at the broken-brained freak who thinks warmer air is heavier than cooler air because you can't grasp basic thermodynamics and physics. You likely never even graduated from high school, let alone college, let alone got an advanced degree. You have no actual proof of your theory, just twisted logic from your equally twisted mind. You do not and cannot grasp the fundamentals, which has led you off into the brambles of your odd little theory, and just as most Dunning-Kruger sufferers do, you're compelled to put your incompetence on public display. > Why don't you see if you can get one to help you. I don't need to. Scientific fact proves you wrong. You can backpedal and deny all you like, but in your heart, you know you're wrong. You're just hoping you're right... but you're not. You're wrong. Laughably wrong. Deal with that reality as you will, Jim. >> A meteorologist wouldn't be any more adept at presenting the >> science involved than I would be. > You have a point there. Exactly right. And given that I've met every single 'Or' condition of your kooky challenge and utterly demolished your weird little theory in a mere day, forcing you to acknowledge that I am right, you are further forced to admit you owe me $100,000. That payment can be either cash or your sanity, Jim. Your choice. But before you choose, I'd suggest you do some research into just how *many* I've driven insane in the past... the number might surprise you. <snicker> -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 21:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e592a4cf-f85a-4ea4-87eb-e5333ce68256@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559904 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 8:03:35 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Why don't you see if you can get one to help you. > > I don't need to. Scientific fact proves you wrong. Why be so emotional. If you are sure you are right then you should be willing to make some effort to provide the proof. I'm a reasonable person. I can afford it. I will pay you gladly if you provide the proof. Read my proposal again. I provided you three different approaches. I even suggested a particular experiment. You could collaborate with other scientists, let some kids to the experimental work. I outlined the methods for you. If you are so sure you are right you should be excited, happy, grateful. Unless you really aren't as confident as you claim . . . . . . could that be it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 17:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f593297b90dc04fb5f0fb1c87b155409@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #559910 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:e592a4cf-f85a-4ea4-87eb-e5333ce68256@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 8:03:35 PM UTC-8, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Why don't you see if you can get one to help you. >> I don't need to. Scientific fact proves you wrong. You can backpedal >> and deny all you like, but in your heart, you know you're wrong. >> You're just hoping you're right... but you're not. You're wrong. >> Laughably wrong. Deal with that reality as you will, Jim. > Why be so emotional. You don't want me to laugh at your stupidity quite so much, Jim? > If you are sure you are right then you should be willing to make > some effort to provide the proof. But I've already provided the scientific proof that your kooky theory is broken, Jim. You'll backpedal away from it as you have all the other proof. > I'm a reasonable person. I can afford it. No, you're not, and no, you can't. You're a kooktard Dunning-Kruger sufferer who, to bolster your inadequate ego, has taken the ridiculous step of offering a cash reward for disproving his kooky theory... then you run from every bit of proof provided. I've utterly decimated your kooky theory, Jim. There is no "shifting the details a bit" to try to compensate, I've proven your main premise is flawed, therefore your entire theory is built upon a flawed premise. > I will pay you gladly if you provide the proof. Read my proposal > again. I've already provided you the scientific data to prove you're wrong, no experiment required. We use mathematics because it's a highly accurate model of our environment... where is the mathematics to support your kooky theory, Jim? Because that's another giant glaring "Dunning-Kruger" flashing signpost when the kooktard has developed no advanced mathematics to model his kooky world. > I provided you three different approaches. I even suggested a > particular experiment. A flawed experiment that isn't needed? You silly little kooktard, no experiment is needed. The scientific proof of the flaws within your kooky theory lie within the scientific data already provided. That which you ran away from. > You could collaborate with other scientists, let some kids to the > experimental work. I outlined the methods for you. But I've utterly destroyed every tenet of your kooky theory, to include the central pillar... that removing one inter-molecular H bond strengthens the other... it doesn't, it causes the much stronger and shorter covalent bonds to shorten preferentially, as I proved. Thus, your central tenet is flawed, thus your entire premise is flawed, thus your kooky theory is flawed, thus your brain is flawed. You have no mathematics to model any of your kookblather, you can't get through the peer-review process, and you're refuted and laughed at everywhere you go because your kooky theory is flawed, although you're so emotionally invested in it by now that you'll ignore all proof to the contrary. You can't escape scientific logic, Jim. I've destroyed your theory, proven via many avenues that it is flawed and thus does not reflect reality. > If you are so sure you are right you should be excited, happy, grateful. Oh, I am. You're going to pay me $100,000 for disproving your theory. Maybe not right now, but you will... eventually. > Unless you really aren't as confident as you claim . . . > > . . . could that be it? Your non sequitur is noted. Whereas no emotion was conveyed, you read into it what you needed, to try to spin away from the fact that I've already met and exceeded the terms of your challenge, and you refuse to pay. Because one overarching feature of all Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards is that they are, to a person, cowards when confronted with proof of their mental disease. You're not the first D-K sufferer to suffer this fate, Jim... you're so prototypical you didn't even realize other D-K sufferers are often compelled to up the ante to ridiculous heights, often offering a "cash reward" to disprove their kooky theories... and all of them, when their kooky theories are disproved, ran away and went into hiding rather than pay. Don't worry, though... I'm also very good at tracking people down. There's no escape for you now, Jim. <snicker> -- Wherein I shred Burnore's version of events (read: Burnore's lies) with the truth... liars lie, it's what Convicted Child Molester Gary Lee 'DiddleTard' Burnore does: Message-ID: <c099dd0d93396c49dfbb49025e69e876@dizum.com> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/Ejc0ZFJyF00/SpW4kc6UoUcJ> Message-ID: <a070be7fcd535c2137753847509b6a0c@dizum.com> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/Ejc0ZFJyF00/SpW4kc6UoUcJ> Message-ID: <kiunju$dgm$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/uCvjWySm7X8/0Ki8Nq3SsswJ> Gary Lee Burnore 137 Meadowbrook Lane Davidson, NC 28036 SSN: 316-70-3613 DOB: 10-13-1957 BORN: Southbend, IN Operator of the Databasix.com NNTP server, and the following domains: netbasix.net usfast.net ncfast.net Databasix.com was recently shut down and has purportedly been bought and set up again by another person of similar ilk as Gary Lee Burnore. Some believe it is Mr. Burnore, under a false name. Gary Lee Burnore was convicted of sexually molesting a minor in 1997 in California. <https://www.wklaw.com/annoying-or-molesting-a-child-pc-647.6/> ============================================================== In order to convict you of annoying or molesting a child, the prosecution must prove the following: 1) You engaged in conduct directed at a minor AND 2) A normal person, without hesitation, would have been disturbed, irritated, offended, or injured by your conduct AND 3) Your conduct was motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in the minor AND 4) The minor was under the age of 18 years at the time of the conduct ============================================================== Police Narrative Pages 1-7 http://s12.postimg.org/fwvzv9fx9/Police_Narrative_1.jpg http://s12.postimg.org/vjn98mtp9/Police_Narrative_2.jpg http://s12.postimg.org/j2gllgyjh/Police_Narrative_3.jpg http://s12.postimg.org/4bqvko0rh/Police_Narrative_4.jpg http://s12.postimg.org/scxrm4fkt/Police_Narrative_5.jpg http://s12.postimg.org/tghvy307x/Police_Narrative_6.jpg http://s12.postimg.org/hm533bvml/Police_Narrative_7.jpg Gary Lee Burnore's police confession: http://s2.postimg.org/g2nbvhmux/Burnore_Police_Confession.jpg His conviction brought with it the requirement that he register for life as a sexual offender in any state he resided in: Gary Lee Burnore's signed Sexual Offender Registration form: http://s24.postimg.org/7waeeak1h/Burnore_Sex_Offender_Registration_3.jpg The above, zoomed in: http://s24.postimg.org/k9n8l79px/Burnore_Sex_Offender_Registration_1.jpg Rather than face what he'd done, Gary Lee Burnore violated his probation to avoid the consequences of his sexual offender conviction and its lifetime registration requirement. He secretly absconded from CA to NC; attempted to evade his probation officer; failed to register as a convicted sexual offender; failed to attend court-ordered psychological counseling; and tried to evade paying victim restitution. For his efforts, CA hauled him back into court and petitioned to revoke his probation: Petition To Revoke Probation Pages 1-3 http://s14.postimg.org/kcq6po31d/Petition_to_Revoke_Probation_1.jpg http://s14.postimg.org/ppf13sqxt/Petition_to_Revoke_Probation_2.jpg http://s14.postimg.org/t6h36rq01/Petition_to_Revoke_Probation_3.jpg Because of an inconsistency in the legalese between the California Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (CA ICAOS) board and the NC ICAOS board, Gary Lee Burnore was able to get his conviction pleaded down to "Assault On Female" in North Carolina (except for that, he'd be listed on the NC Department of Public Safety website as a Convicted Sexual Offender, registered for life as a sexual predator): North Carolina Department Of Public Safety (NC DPS): http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483 Short URL: http://goo.gl/FSN0W You'll notice on the website directly above that Gary Lee Burnore is listed as a "California Interstate Compact Offender". There are only three ways to get listed on the CA ICAOS list: Narcotics Offender Arson Offender Sexual Offender Gary Lee Burnore, despite his denials, is a convicted sexual offender, and we know this from the scanned documents above, and because he REMAINS on the NC Department of Public Safety website as a California Interstate Compact Offender. If he were either of the other two types of offender (Narcotics, Arson), he'd have aged off the CA ICAOS list by now, but convicted sexual offenders are listed for life. Gary Lee Burnore has already admitted that the record on that NC DPS page is his: Message-ID: <jjtrbk$liq$1@reader1.panix.com> Gary Lee Burnore describes why he got the reckless driving conviction reflected in his NC DPS record: "I did a reverse 180 and then a rolling burnout on a bet. Naturally, cop saw me. Google Reverse 180. THEN google 66 Newport. You'll see why it was spectacular. Well worth three days picking up leaves. ;)" Note that this proves (and that Gary Lee Burnore admits) that the NC DPS record in question is his, 'Assault on Female' conviction, Interstate Compact Offender listing, and all. Note that 'Assault' and 'Assault On Female' are not the same thing. 'Assault On Female' encompasses domestic abuse, sexual battery, etc., as North Carolina recognizes two forms of assault... the regular "show of violence" type, and a "serious mental injury" type. Burnore falls into the second type, merely because NC didn't have an identical statute that the NC ICAOS could charge him with to reflect his CA conviction for molesting a minor, and he had a good lawyer who worked hard to reclassify Burnore's conviction in CA to as innocuous a conviction as was possible in NC. Note also that 'Assault On Female' in NC is a Class A1 misdemeanor, which is the most serious misdemeanor class. Note also that in North Carolina, an 'Assault On Female' arrest entails an automatic 48 hour mandatory jail hold where the arrestee cannot bond out for that 48 hours, handily disproving Burnore's claim that he never went to jail for his actions. That's why his NC DPS web page entry for his "Assault On Female" conviction also has a "Sentence Type 3: DEPT OF CORR DIV OF PRISONS" entry. But we already knew Burnore is a liar, right? Gary Lee Burnore's PGP-signed confessional post: http://www.shmoo.com/mail/cypherpunks/jun99/msg00146.html Gary Lee Burnore now disavows having made that confessional PGP-signed post, and has for years asserted that the child he was convicted of molesting either seduced him into doing what he did, or sexually assaulted him as he slept (he's made both claims), as well as claiming that _none_ of it happened, that it was all a plot by someone he'd harassed online, that he'd never spent any time in prison... except he forgets his NC DPS record, and the CA ICAOS listing reflected therein. If you don't believe any of the above, you could always call 408-261-5400 (Santa Clara Police Department Detective Division) and ask to speak to a Brian Lane (badge: Lane 7281), the police officer who signed Burnore's arrest warrant and prepared Burnore's Police Narrative/Supplemental Report. Or, you could call Paul Bick Nguyen (Nguyen Bich) at 408-288-9224. He was Burnore's attorney. More reading material: Message-ID: <0b1dd3d600712dce6b4a912cef1e9677@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/b7ab18a19c1d0bdc Message-ID: <4c0fdcbb534c818fa5f8687d9bea8480@dizum.com> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/7911259ccad1dc09 Message-ID: <8ab6af816a7e504f5da17a32f4e8d32a@dizum.com> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/0830c4bd6ec481c7 Message-ID: <2c38499401819919bb778c5adbca3fad@remailer.privacy.at> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/50f591d0a4251e01 Message-ID: <k74fb5$s0e$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org> https://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/bcc9cb11d8682c1f Message-ID: <kipe34$nov$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136424653700 Message-ID: <kiunju$dgm$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org> https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ccb2d2ad36bca8d0 Message-ID: <ko6jdg$7gt$1@news.mixmin.net> http://alt.usenet.kooks.narkive.com/vVlTBJjE/usenet-priority-0ne-1-news-reader-software-changes-potential-abuse-complaint-information-inside.3#post55
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 09:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <de26619c-08d8-441f-9b2b-59909b5477f6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559990 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:28:43 AM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Why be so emotional. > > You don't want me to laugh at your stupidity quite so much, Jim? > > > If you are sure you are right then you should be willing to make > > some effort to provide the proof. > > But I've already provided the scientific proof Maybe you could hire a tutor to help you get a better understanding of science. One of the things they should teach you is the meaning of boiling point. And they could teach you methods on how to make decisions when the evidence is unclear. I hope that helps, James McGinn Solving tornadoes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 18:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <dfe6fb5ba7845ecab8c7f514f3b584af@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560003 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:de26619c-08d8-441f-9b2b-59909b5477f6@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:28:43 AM UTC-8, Friendly > Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Why be so emotional. >> You don't want me to laugh at your stupidity quite so much, Jim? >>> If you are sure you are right then you should be willing to make >>> some effort to provide the proof. >> But I've already provided the scientific proof that your >> kooky theory is broken, Jim. You'll backpedal away from >> it as you have all the other proof. > Maybe you could hire a tutor to help you get a better understanding > of science. Translation: "I can't refute FNVWe, nor the scientific proof he's provided which proves my kooky theory is the mad ravings of a moron, so I'll do the only thing I can do... snip, backpedal, non sequitur, lie and divert." > One of the things they should teach you is the meaning > of boiling point. Says the moron who doesn't know the meaning of "boiling point", nor much of anything else. Remember, you're the moron who couldn't describe the process by which evaporation happens at the molecular level. I did, thereby yet again proving your kooky theory wrong. And you *still* don't understand it. > And they could teach you methods on how to make decisions > when the evidence is unclear. The "evidence" is only "unclear" on your end, Jim... IOW, you've provided *no* evidence to back up your kooky theory. Everywhere you go, people refute and belittle you. You can't even get through the peer-review process. People having bought and read your "book" call you a moron. It's not a conspiracy, Jim... you're a fucking moron and you're wrong. The whole world telling you that you're a fucking moron and that you're wrong doesn't constitute a conspiracy, it constitutes you being a fucking moron and you being wrong. > I hope that helps, I note you cannot refute the scientific proof I've provided that utterly decimates your kooky theory, Jim. I further note you're snipping all that scientific proof out. That's telling, Jim. Even *you* know you're defeated, but you're far too emotionally invested in being wrong to ever admit that you're wrong. IOW, your kooky theory has driven you to reject reality. You're insane, Jim. Seek psychiatric help immediately. <snicker> -- Marguerite Kathleenann Petersen (aka Pandora, aka Granny Inane) in a nutshell... which considering her limited intellect, gives her plenty of room: Message-ID: <59819a918e3a4dbf74aff9b198c6fd16@dizum.com> Message-ID: <db1a278983d3e1aae453ca2037d63cb7@dizum.com> Message-ID: <932033cd588c739f4a380e8a328a8bde@dizum.com> Her story gets more and more unbelievable with each passing day, eh? He had a checkup just a month prior and it was completely normal, he weighed 245 pounds with end-stage pancreatic cancer, and it killed him in 3 weeks. Except she was posting on Usenet about his glaucoma and seizures... amongst other problems he'd been having prior to his death. What'd your doctor do, Granny Inane? Shake a dead chicken at your husband, slit it open, read the entrails, and declare your dying husband completely healthy? For fuck sake, he fucking *died*, supposedly of pancreatic cancer... and end stage pancreatic cancer ravages the body in 100% of cases. Unless you're lying, which is looking more and more to be the case... which would explain your return to your usual stupidity and inanity in a mere 5 days after your husband's supposed death, supposedly from terminal pancreatic cancer... and it'd explain why you were drooling over the fact that you could go out and get eye-humped by other men a mere 9 days after his supposed death. So... which is it, Marg? Are you lying about the circumstances of Bent's death? Or are you so fucking clueless that you believe cancer can replicate quickly enough to kill a 245 pound man in three weeks with no symptoms? Ah, well, at least his students won't be sad to see him go: http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=338031 Overall Quality: 1.6 / 5 Helpfulness: 1.7 / 5 Clarity: 1.5 / 5 Easiness: 1.9 / 5 I especially like this quote from one of his students: "Not only is the book a better teacher, it has a better personality" Not a very highly-rated professor, was he? Most of the students said something on the order of "Thank God for the TA", the TA being Kyle Champley. Remember, Granny Inane, it was *you* who dragged your personal life into Usenet like an attention whore... if you don't like what others are saying about it, keep it to yourself. And no one is keeping you here, there's the door if you don't like it. Those are the rules you and your stauker pals made for Emmett, right? Those are the rules you and your stauker pals used to justify your continued harassment of Emmett, right? They're your rules. Live with 'em. <snicker> Marguerite Kathleenann McCrindle-Petersen P.O. Box 608 993 Driftwood Lane Yachats, OR 97498 pandora@peak.org (541) 547-3497 And here's the insane wrinkled old bag herself: https://goo.gl/qiEJQ1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 10:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e87bb530-1798-4247-834d-f91a1aab6db7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #560022 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:53:03 AM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Maybe you could hire a tutor to help you get a better understanding > > of science. > > Translation: > "I can't refute Nobody can refute gibberish. > > One of the things they should teach you is the meaning > > of boiling point. > > Says the moron who doesn't know the meaning of "boiling point", Maybe you can explain it to all of us. Hmm. I wonder why it's called a "point" and not a boiling distribution. Hmm. That's curious. Hmm.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 06:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <af052b6ad0769198f25c57bc3f806f78@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #560037 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:e87bb530-1798-4247-834d-f91a1aab6db7@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:53:03 AM UTC-8, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Maybe you could hire a tutor to help you get a better understanding >>> of science. >> Translation: >> "I can't refute FNVWe, nor the scientific proof he's provided which >> proves my kooky theory is the mad ravings of a moron, so I'll do the >> only thing I can do... snip, backpedal, non sequitur, lie and divert." > Nobody can refute gibberish. Then it's a good thing I'm using peer-reviewed studies instead of gibberish to prove your kooky theory *wrong*, Jim. Now why can't you refute those peer-reviewed studies, Jim? >>> One of the things they should teach you is the meaning >>> of boiling point. >> Says the moron who doesn't know the meaning of "boiling point", nor >> much of anything else. Remember, you're the moron who couldn't >> describe the process by which evaporation happens at the molecular >> level. I did, thereby yet again proving your kooky theory wrong. And >> you *still* don't understand it. > Maybe you can explain it to all of us. Hmm. I wonder why it's > called a "point" and not a boiling distribution. Hmm. That might be because it's the *point* where the evaporation processes gaseous pressure is sufficient to overcome atmospheric pressure, thus allowing boiling (bubble formation) to occur in the bulk of the liquid, you moronic kooktard. I'll let you do this experiment, Jim. Carry a beaker of water to sea level, heat it to 100 C. You'll note the water gaseous pressure is sufficient to overcome the 760 mm Hg atmospheric pressure. Now allow the water to cool to 70 C, you'll note the vapor pressure is insufficient to overcome the 750 mm Hg atmospheric pressure, so boiling does not occur, yet evaporation does occur. Now, while maintaining that water at 70 C, carry it to the top of Mt. Everest. You'll note that as you rise in altitude, the water will again begin boiling, despite the temperature of the water only being 70 C. Hence, boiling and evaporation are the same process, but evaporation has the condition where gaseous phase pressure is insufficient to overcome atmospheric pressure, and thus bulk boiling cannot occur, and hence bubbles will not form in the bulk of the liquid. You'll note the only condition that changed to transition from evaporation to boiling was atmospheric pressure, Jim... hence evaporation and boiling are the same process under different conditions. And that destroys yet another of your kooky tenets of your kooky theory, Jim. Now you'll be forced to backpedal away from reality again. > That's curious. Hmm. Awww, poor kooktard James McGinn doesn't know that evaporation and boiling are the same process under different conditions, as I've proven. LOL > What is the temperature of atmosphere? If you have to ask questions, rather than offer refutation, Jim, you don't know... making you a low-information moronic kooktard suffering the crippling effects of delusion and Dunning-Kruger effect. But one of the manifestations of D-K is that its sufferers, while holding themselves out as 'experts', display their utter nincompoopish incompetence, as you do, Jim. > Where is your evidence that moist air contains gaseous H2O? See below, Jim. Those peer-reviewed studies presented utterly destroy your kooky theory. Why can't you get your kooky theory through the peer-review process, Jim? Could it be because it's *wrong*, Jim? > Your imagination is not evidence. Peer-reviewed evidence is evidence, Jim. Why do you continue cowardly snipping out and running away from that evidence that proves you're a moron who in actuality knows next to nothing about that which you're stupidly blathering about, Jim? <http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/interfacial_water.html> "About a quarter of the water molecules each have a 'dangling' O-H group [415, 1613] pointing at a slight angle out of the water [594, 1261] whilst slightly more have 'dangling' acceptor electron positions [2334] similar to water-hydrophobe surfaces, creating a slight negative charge on the surface." What's that say, you moron? Just how do you think evaporation occurs in the first place? The surface potential of water is negative. The electric potential of air is positive. This, combined with random thermal vibrations in the bulk water, causes individual water molecules to be electrically attached to the air. Reference Feynman Lectures on Physics, Electricity In The Atmosphere, 1964. <http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_09.html> <http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/img/FLP_II/f09-01/f09-01_tc_iPad_big_a.svgz> You're wrong, Jim. Your entire kooky theory is wrong, Jim. I've destroyed the central premise of your kooky theory, thereby proving that both you *and* your kooky theory are wrong, Jim. That'd be because you're an uneducated moron suffering from delusions, combined with Dunning-Kruger causing you to believe you can never be wrong. Take your meds, Jim. Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research <http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation> ================================================= A water molecule is typically tied to three or four other molecules in the liquid through strong hydrogen bonds. At the surface, this number is reduced, and in order to evaporate the molecule must break at least one hydrogen bond. However, this requires substantial energy, and the obvious question is: "How do evaporating water molecules gain sufficient energy to break the strong hydrogen bond?" To answer this, the researchers watched molecules evaporate in their molecular movies, and inspected the evaporating molecules' trajectories. They found that an ejected molecule always gains its kinetic energy through a precise interaction with two other molecules. It always had a violent collision with a fast-moving molecule just prior to leaving the liquid. This fast-moving molecule, further study showed, was interacting strongly with a third molecule, femtoseconds prior to the evaporation process, in a way that was crucial to the evaporation process. As such, the evaporation process can be viewed as a Newton's cradle, where momentum is transferred to the surface from below, in a well-timed manner, to kick off one water molecule. ================================================= "one water molecule", Jim. Evaporation is a molecule-by-molecule process, meaning that water in its gaseous phase is entering the atmosphere, meaning water in its gaseous phase is in the atmosphere, meaning your kooky challenge has been met and the proof has been provided, meaning the underlying premise of your kooky theory has been utterly destroyed, meaning you owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay, Jim. <snicker> Whooopsie... *another* peer-reviewed study proving monomer gaseous water exists in the atmosphere: <http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/> ========================================================= Superimposed on the water monomer absorption, a water continuum absorption has long been recognized, but its true nature still remains controversial. ========================================================= That not only meets the terms of your kooky challenge (again), Jim, thereby triggering your paying me that offered $100,000 which you promised in a publicly announced and therefore legally binding challenge, but it utterly destroys your kooky theory *and* proves you're a moronic kooktard, Jim. <snicker> You'll be paying me the $100,000 prize for meeting (indeed, *exceeding*) not just one of your 'Or' conditions in your challenge, but *all* of the conditions... in the process, utterly destroying your kooky theory and proving you, James McGinn, are a moronic delusional Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktard. <snicker> -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 21:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cd5839ef-24ec-4978-950a-e042a152f8cb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #560244 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:17:03 PM UTC-8, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > Maybe you can explain it to all of us. Hmm. I wonder why it's > > called a "point" and not a boiling distribution. Hmm. > > That might be because it's the *point* where the evaporation processes > gaseous pressure is sufficient to overcome atmospheric pressure, thus > allowing boiling (bubble formation) to occur in the bulk of the > liquid, Reference?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 15 [1] 2 3 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web