Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #642043

Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in
<news:b07f359f-30be-4328-ba8f-a0d86aea3f56@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 2:19:13 PM UTC-8,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>>> Have your lawyer email me:
>>> jimmcginn9 at gmail dot com

>> Why do I need my lawyer to contact you, 

> Well, I suggest you don't.

Because you don't have the $100,000 you owe me, or because you
couldn't stand to have your kooky theory demolished in a court of law,
which would shatter your fragile little ego?

> But if you do the lawyer will probably suggest that you hire
> a meteorologists.

I don't need to hire a meteorologist. I'm right, science proves me
right. A meteorologist wouldn't be any more adept at presenting the
science involved than I would be.

> The meteorologists will tell you and the lawyer that you are right,

Ah, so you admit your kooky theory has been decimated, then, and that
I am right. Good. Pay me the $100,000 you owe me. You've just made an
admission in a public forum that a court of law will consider to be
your admission that you know you owe me $100,000, per the terms of the
challenge that you publicly made. You *will* pay, Mr. McGinn... one
way or another.

> but that won't do you any good.

Because you don't have the money, or because you don't want the world
to realize what a kooktard you are for believing such an off-the-wall
theory that is diametrically opposed to reality?

> So, I suggest you don't.  But you know what they say about a fool
> and their money.

Yeah, that fool pays me $100,000 or I so utterly destroy his kooky
theory that he's driven insane and begs to pay me the money he owes me
just so he can limp away and attempt to salvage what little sanity I
let him keep intact.

> Or, you might just hire a chemistry student or even a real
> chemist to do the experiment for you.  That way you can
> minimize your losses.  

What losses, Jim? You've admitted above that I'm right. Pay what you
owe. I've demonstrated via several different avenues that your kooky
theory is wrong, I've met every single one of your 'Or' conditions,
not just one... I've exceeded the requirements of your public
challenge by a great deal and I've done so using long-known and
well-established science which you cannot refute. Pay what you owe,
Jim. Because one way or another, I *will* exact a toll.

>> Jim? Are you welshing on your
>> challenge already, after you've been proven irrefutably wrong?

> If you think your imagination will stand up in court then what are
> you waiting for.  Go ahead.  

The scientific fact I've presented is not "imagination", Jim. What
*is* "imagination" is your kooky theory, which is so full of holes
it's like Swiss cheese. Your theory runs counter to reality, Mr.
McGinn. It's been proven wrong. I fully intend to collect what you owe
me per the terms of your own publicly offered challenge. Your failure
to pay means you agree to *my* terms... and my terms are that I drive
you to the brink of insanity *until* you pay me what you owe me.

>> You should know I've never lost.

> You can't lose if you don't play.

Non sequitur, Jim. Don't do that. That makes you look even more
foolish than I've already made you look.

>> And given that you're a moronic
>> kooktard who believes that warmer air is *heavier* than cooler air,
>> you're not going to be the first to beat me. You'll pay up or I'll
>> drive you so insane you'll be begging to pay me just so I leave you
>> alone. I've done it to many others far saner and more intelligent than
>> you.

> Ho hum.

If these pathetic non sequiturs are the best you can come up with,
Jim, you stand no chance in court, and even less chance with the
alternative.

>> No, it doesn't. I note *you* have provided no proof

> This is a perfect opportunity for you then, isn't it.  You could
> get a lawyer to do it on spec.  You know you are right.  Right?
> You can enlists meteorologists too.  Right?  So what's the
> problem.  Go for it.  Don't waste time whining here.

Oh, but that's not the way I operate, Jim. You see, I always get my
kooks to do my bidding. It's my way of letting them know that I'm the
dominant species, and they're the retarded shit-flinging monkeys. So I
do believe I'll just continue to destroy your kooky little theory
until either your brain implodes or you beg to pay me what you owe me
just to be rid of me in order to spare what scraps of sanity I allow
you to keep. Does that work for you, Jim?

>> Wrong. The scientific definition of sublimation proves you wrong.

> Spoken like a true science groupy.  Definitions don't define reality, idiot.

Reality defines the definitions, Jim. And reality *and* those
definitions are immutable. Your kooky attempts at skirting reality by
redefining definitions known for centuries isn't working.

>> The definitions, equations, tables and examples I've provided would
>> all stand up to scrutiny in a court of law, Jim. 

> Well then there's your answer.
> 
> You could even start contacting meteorologists.  LOL.

No, I think we'll go with Plan B instead, it's more fun that way. It's
worked so well in the past, it's a sure winner. Inside of 5 years,
you'll either pay me just to be rid of me to spare your sanity any
more drubbings, or you'll be driven so insane you won't even remember
your own name. It could go either way... it has in the past.

But one way or another, I *will* exact a toll, Jim. Stupidity should
be painful. And for you, that pain starts now.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 06:50 +0100
  Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-06 23:13 +0800
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 18:51 +0100
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 13:21 -0500
  Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 19:50 +0100
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 14:04 -0500
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 01:09 +0100
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-07 01:11 +0000
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 01:35 +0100
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-06 20:07 -0500
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 03:57 +0100
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:18 -0800
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 04:53 +0100
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:15 -0800
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:08 +0100
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:18 +0100
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:43 +0100

csiph-web