Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #648570

Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in
<news:e592a4cf-f85a-4ea4-87eb-e5333ce68256@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 8:03:35 PM UTC-8,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>>> Why don't you see if you can get one to help you.  

>> I don't need to. Scientific fact proves you wrong. You can backpedal
>> and deny all you like, but in your heart, you know you're wrong.
>> You're just hoping you're right... but you're not. You're wrong.
>> Laughably wrong. Deal with that reality as you will, Jim.

> Why be so emotional.

You don't want me to laugh at your stupidity quite so much, Jim?

> If you are sure you are right then you should be willing to make
> some effort to provide the proof.

But I've already provided the scientific proof that your kooky theory
is broken, Jim. You'll backpedal away from it as you have all the
other proof.

> I'm a reasonable person.  I can afford it.

No, you're not, and no, you can't. You're a kooktard Dunning-Kruger
sufferer who, to bolster your inadequate ego, has taken the ridiculous
step of offering a cash reward for disproving his kooky theory... then
you run from every bit of proof provided. I've utterly decimated your
kooky theory, Jim. There is no "shifting the details a bit" to try to
compensate, I've proven your main premise is flawed, therefore your
entire theory is built upon a flawed premise.

> I will pay you gladly if you provide the proof.  Read my proposal
> again.

I've already provided you the scientific data to prove you're wrong,
no experiment required. We use mathematics because it's a highly
accurate model of our environment... where is the mathematics to
support your kooky theory, Jim? Because that's another giant glaring
"Dunning-Kruger" flashing signpost when the kooktard has developed no
advanced mathematics to model his kooky world.

> I provided you three different approaches.  I even suggested a
> particular experiment.  

A flawed experiment that isn't needed? You silly little kooktard, no
experiment is needed. The scientific proof of the flaws within your
kooky theory lie within the scientific data already provided. That
which you ran away from.

> You could collaborate with other scientists, let some kids to the
> experimental work.  I outlined the methods for you.  

But I've utterly destroyed every tenet of your kooky theory, to
include the central pillar... that removing one inter-molecular H bond
strengthens the other... it doesn't, it causes the much stronger and
shorter covalent bonds to shorten preferentially, as I proved. Thus,
your central tenet is flawed, thus your entire premise is flawed, thus
your kooky theory is flawed, thus your brain is flawed.

You have no mathematics to model any of your kookblather, you can't
get through the peer-review process, and you're refuted and laughed at
everywhere you go because your kooky theory is flawed, although you're
so emotionally invested in it by now that you'll ignore all proof to
the contrary.

You can't escape scientific logic, Jim. I've destroyed your theory,
proven via many avenues that it is flawed and thus does not reflect
reality.

> If you are so sure you are right you should be excited, happy, grateful.

Oh, I am. You're going to pay me $100,000 for disproving your theory.
Maybe not right now, but you will... eventually.

> Unless you really aren't as confident as you claim . . . 
> 
> . . . could that be it?

Your non sequitur is noted. Whereas no emotion was conveyed, you read
into it what you needed, to try to spin away from the fact that I've
already met and exceeded the terms of your challenge, and you refuse
to pay. Because one overarching feature of all Dunning-Kruger
afflicted kooktards is that they are, to a person, cowards when
confronted with proof of their mental disease.

You're not the first D-K sufferer to suffer this fate, Jim... you're
so prototypical you didn't even realize other D-K sufferers are often
compelled to up the ante to ridiculous heights, often offering a "cash
reward" to disprove their kooky theories... and all of them, when
their kooky theories are disproved, ran away and went into hiding
rather than pay.

Don't worry, though... I'm also very good at tracking people down.
There's no escape for you now, Jim.

<snicker>

-- 

Wherein I shred Burnore's version of events (read: Burnore's lies)
with the truth... liars lie, it's what Convicted Child Molester Gary
Lee 'DiddleTard' Burnore does:
Message-ID: <c099dd0d93396c49dfbb49025e69e876@dizum.com>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/Ejc0ZFJyF00/SpW4kc6UoUcJ>

Message-ID: <a070be7fcd535c2137753847509b6a0c@dizum.com>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/Ejc0ZFJyF00/SpW4kc6UoUcJ>

Message-ID: <kiunju$dgm$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/uCvjWySm7X8/0Ki8Nq3SsswJ>

Gary Lee Burnore
137 Meadowbrook Lane
Davidson, NC 28036

SSN:  316-70-3613
DOB:  10-13-1957
BORN: Southbend, IN

Operator of the Databasix.com NNTP server, and the following domains:
netbasix.net
usfast.net
ncfast.net

Databasix.com was recently shut down and has purportedly been bought
and set up again by another person of similar ilk as Gary Lee Burnore.
Some believe it is Mr. Burnore, under a false name.

Gary Lee Burnore was convicted of sexually molesting a minor in 1997
in California.

<https://www.wklaw.com/annoying-or-molesting-a-child-pc-647.6/>
==============================================================
In order to convict you of annoying or molesting a child, the
prosecution must prove the following:

1) You engaged in conduct directed at a minor AND

2) A normal person, without hesitation, would have been disturbed,
irritated, offended, or injured by your conduct AND

3) Your conduct was motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual
interest in the minor AND

4) The minor was under the age of 18 years at the time of the conduct
==============================================================

Police Narrative Pages 1-7
http://s12.postimg.org/fwvzv9fx9/Police_Narrative_1.jpg
http://s12.postimg.org/vjn98mtp9/Police_Narrative_2.jpg
http://s12.postimg.org/j2gllgyjh/Police_Narrative_3.jpg
http://s12.postimg.org/4bqvko0rh/Police_Narrative_4.jpg
http://s12.postimg.org/scxrm4fkt/Police_Narrative_5.jpg
http://s12.postimg.org/tghvy307x/Police_Narrative_6.jpg
http://s12.postimg.org/hm533bvml/Police_Narrative_7.jpg

Gary Lee Burnore's police confession:
http://s2.postimg.org/g2nbvhmux/Burnore_Police_Confession.jpg

His conviction brought with it the requirement that he register for
life as a sexual offender in any state he resided in:

Gary Lee Burnore's signed Sexual Offender Registration form:
http://s24.postimg.org/7waeeak1h/Burnore_Sex_Offender_Registration_3.jpg

The above, zoomed in:
http://s24.postimg.org/k9n8l79px/Burnore_Sex_Offender_Registration_1.jpg

Rather than face what he'd done, Gary Lee Burnore violated his
probation to avoid the consequences of his sexual offender conviction
and its lifetime registration requirement. He secretly absconded from
CA to NC; attempted to evade his probation officer; failed to register
as a convicted sexual offender; failed to attend court-ordered
psychological counseling; and tried to evade paying victim
restitution. For his efforts, CA hauled him back into court and
petitioned to revoke his probation:

Petition To Revoke Probation Pages 1-3
http://s14.postimg.org/kcq6po31d/Petition_to_Revoke_Probation_1.jpg
http://s14.postimg.org/ppf13sqxt/Petition_to_Revoke_Probation_2.jpg
http://s14.postimg.org/t6h36rq01/Petition_to_Revoke_Probation_3.jpg

Because of an inconsistency in the legalese between the California
Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision (CA ICAOS) board and
the NC ICAOS board, Gary Lee Burnore was able to get his conviction
pleaded down to "Assault On Female" in North Carolina (except for
that, he'd be listed on the NC Department of Public Safety website as
a Convicted Sexual Offender, registered for life as a sexual
predator):

North Carolina Department Of Public Safety (NC DPS):
http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=0594483

Short URL:
http://goo.gl/FSN0W

You'll notice on the website directly above that Gary Lee Burnore is
listed as a "California Interstate Compact Offender".

There are only three ways to get listed on the CA ICAOS list:
Narcotics Offender
Arson Offender
Sexual Offender

Gary Lee Burnore, despite his denials, is a convicted sexual offender,
and we know this from the scanned documents above, and because he
REMAINS on the NC Department of Public Safety website as a California
Interstate Compact Offender. If he were either of the other two types
of offender (Narcotics, Arson), he'd have aged off the CA ICAOS list
by now, but convicted sexual offenders are listed for life.

Gary Lee Burnore has already admitted that the record on that NC DPS
page is his:

Message-ID: <jjtrbk$liq$1@reader1.panix.com>
Gary Lee Burnore describes why he got the reckless driving conviction
reflected in his NC DPS record:
"I did a reverse 180 and then a rolling burnout on a bet. Naturally,
cop saw me. Google Reverse 180. THEN google 66 Newport. You'll see why
it was spectacular. Well worth three days picking up leaves. ;)"

Note that this proves (and that Gary Lee Burnore admits) that the NC
DPS record in question is his, 'Assault on Female' conviction,
Interstate Compact Offender listing, and all.

Note that 'Assault' and 'Assault On Female' are not the same thing.
'Assault On Female' encompasses domestic abuse, sexual battery, etc.,
as North Carolina recognizes two forms of assault... the regular "show
of violence" type, and a "serious mental injury" type. Burnore falls
into the second type, merely because NC didn't have an identical
statute that the NC ICAOS could charge him with to reflect his CA
conviction for molesting a minor, and he had a good lawyer who worked
hard to reclassify Burnore's conviction in CA to as innocuous a
conviction as was possible in NC.

Note also that 'Assault On Female' in NC is a Class A1 misdemeanor,
which is the most serious misdemeanor class.

Note also that in North Carolina, an 'Assault On Female' arrest
entails an automatic 48 hour mandatory jail hold where the arrestee
cannot bond out for that 48 hours, handily disproving Burnore's claim
that he never went to jail for his actions.

That's why his NC DPS web page entry for his "Assault On Female"
conviction also has a "Sentence Type 3: DEPT OF CORR DIV OF PRISONS"
entry.

But we already knew Burnore is a liar, right?

Gary Lee Burnore's PGP-signed confessional post:
http://www.shmoo.com/mail/cypherpunks/jun99/msg00146.html

Gary Lee Burnore now disavows having made that confessional PGP-signed
post, and has for years asserted that the child he was convicted of
molesting either seduced him into doing what he did, or sexually
assaulted him as he slept (he's made both claims), as well as claiming
that _none_ of it happened, that it was all a plot by someone he'd
harassed online, that he'd never spent any time in prison... except he
forgets his NC DPS record, and the CA ICAOS listing reflected therein.

If you don't believe any of the above, you could always call
408-261-5400 (Santa Clara Police Department Detective Division) and
ask to speak to a Brian Lane (badge: Lane 7281), the police officer
who signed Burnore's arrest warrant and prepared Burnore's Police
Narrative/Supplemental Report.

Or, you could call Paul Bick Nguyen (Nguyen Bich) at 408-288-9224. He
was Burnore's attorney.

More reading material:
Message-ID:
<0b1dd3d600712dce6b4a912cef1e9677@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/b7ab18a19c1d0bdc

Message-ID: <4c0fdcbb534c818fa5f8687d9bea8480@dizum.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/7911259ccad1dc09

Message-ID: <8ab6af816a7e504f5da17a32f4e8d32a@dizum.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/0830c4bd6ec481c7

Message-ID: <2c38499401819919bb778c5adbca3fad@remailer.privacy.at>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/50f591d0a4251e01

Message-ID: <k74fb5$s0e$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
https://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/bcc9cb11d8682c1f

Message-ID: <kipe34$nov$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136424653700

Message-ID: <kiunju$dgm$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ccb2d2ad36bca8d0

Message-ID: <ko6jdg$7gt$1@news.mixmin.net>
http://alt.usenet.kooks.narkive.com/vVlTBJjE/usenet-priority-0ne-1-news-reader-software-changes-potential-abuse-complaint-information-inside.3#post55

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 06:50 +0100
  Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-06 23:13 +0800
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 18:51 +0100
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 13:21 -0500
  Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-06 19:50 +0100
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-06 14:04 -0500
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 01:09 +0100
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-07 01:11 +0000
    Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 01:35 +0100
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-06 20:07 -0500
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 03:57 +0100
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:18 -0800
      Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 04:53 +0100
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:15 -0800
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:08 +0100
        Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:18 +0100
          Re: James McGinn pictures of his dog and sister w Claudius Denk in Portland Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:43 +0100

csiph-web