Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #278369
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai |
| Date | 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n0ctn4$5cr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <MPG.3091ff07d414690498c366@news.giganews.com> <n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me> <RKadncshkoEC0bTLnZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.3093719b6bb223b798c370@news.giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
BDK wrote: > In article <n0bkin$iaq$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:n0aqm2$7aa$1@dont-email.me... >>>> >>>> >>>> BDK wrote: >>>>> In article <n4cf2b94nvptfskmqucojfg0hj84m7hrsp@4ax.com>, >>>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:41:55 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" >>>>>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" >>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast" >>>>>>>>> <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror >>>>>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash >>>>>>>>>>>> dynamics of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning >>>>>>>>>>>> they were just CGI and the fact the following is not >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent with a Kerosene Collapse but it is consistent >>>>>>>>>>>> with Nuclear Demolitions where people had to stay out of the >>>>>>>>>>>> site for 2 days when the radiation was the highest. >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of >>>>>>>>>>> professional help. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to >>>>>>>>>> steal tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control >>>>>>>>>> of the economies of the countries they do not yet control. >>>>>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd, >>>>>>>>>> that can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all >>>>>>>>>> the no central bank countries >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane >>>>>>>>>> into another building like 9/11 ?????? >>>>>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all >>>>>>>>>> the years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been >>>>>>>>>> found. BOO !!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone >>>>>>>>> who is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nevermind the insults. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action >>>>>>> to change the truth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not >>>>>>> befall me to prove them incorrect. >>>>>> >>>>>> The illogical minds of Bast and the crazy Troofers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TPP? >>>>>> >>>>>> To Bast the self-proclaimed dyke, TPP stands for Tea Party >>>>>> Patriots. She/he has no a wide view of the world so everything for >>>>>> him/her must be simple, simple, simple. >>>>> >>>>> She seems to think everyone who is an unbeliever in Troofery is a >>>>> wingnut. Once again, as always, she's wrong. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, >>>>>>>> and see if you get anything out of it. >>>>> >>>>> I guess she actually believes that we unbelievers are being paid to >>>>> post. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Nope not at all. >>>> Even the government wouldn't waste that money on you. >>>> >>>> But it will be funny to see you being the first into the furnaces, >>>> when they decide you no longer serve any purpose >>>> >>>> Just be real nice when they assign you to a nice warm room at the >>>> FEMA camp, and don't be concerned at all that the lock is only on the >>>> OUTSIDE of your room. >>> >>> It is so simple. Jets don't just disappear into buildings or dirt as >>> in Pranksville, >> >> >> >> >> Of course not. >> Even hitting water at any speed would simply leave a mass of twisted >> and torn metal on the surface. >> >> Ask anyone who's done a bellyflop off a diving board how "soft" water >> is. >> >> Every action produces and equal and opposite reaction. >> So if you hit something at "XXX" miles per hour,....it hits back at >> "XXX" miles per hour. >> Anyone haunting an astronomy group should know basic Neutonian physics. >> >> >> I dare say >> >> >> >> >> >> >> PS and buildings don't just fall at free fall speed on >>> their own or fall at near free fall speed with fires only. >>> >>> And even NIST can not explain why the Twin Towers really came down or >>> left a pile of rubble with one wall standing much much higher than the >>> other walls when it was supposed to be a straight down "collapse." >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What was more interesting was the TOWER of central columns that >> remained. Fell straight down through itself,....when logic would have >> expected it to tilt over and fall to the side. >> >> 9/11 WTC pulverized (with CERN antimatter weapon?) in 10 sec. Bethlehem >> steel column turns into dust >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdrL19oqhmg >> >> >> I dare any of these DWEEBunkers to explain THAT > > I dare say you're as dumb as Lookey is. Antimatter weapon? WTF is wrong > with you? Well,.....the title as a QUESTION MARK. Then why don't you tell us, what caused steel beams to turn to dust like that ?? Steel might bend, might lean and fall over,....but not collapse directly though itself like that. AND you can go through all the videos, right from the originals the TV networks aired on 9/11,.....and that "smoking gun" is in PLAIN sight.
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 15:57 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 01:01 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 20:24 -0700
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 20:22 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 00:58 +0000
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:56 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 09:30 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 09:18 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 10:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 23:49 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 19:35 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 10:42 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-24 17:26 +0100
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 21:23 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 06:35 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:54 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:47 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:52 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 15:50 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 15:43 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:19 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:47 -0400
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:39 -0400
csiph-web