Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #529848 > unrolled thread

9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 21:38 -0600
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 07:16 -0800
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 08:02 -0800
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 08:31 -0800
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-02 15:32 -0500
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-02 21:13 +0000
        Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-03 02:43 -0500
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 16:46 +0000
            Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:55 -0600
              Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:18 +0000
                Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:55 -0600
                  Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:28 +0000
                Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 03:26 -0600
              Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 06:08 +0000
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:46 +1100
        Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 18:08 -0600
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 11:32 +1100
            Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-03 02:52 -0500
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-03 02:49 -0500
            Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 04:10 -0600
            Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:11 +1100

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#529848 — 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ

Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down but 
to screw up cheap video recorders too.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky
 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#529915

In article <14OdnQW8I4Y5R6vLnZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
> 
> Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down but 
> to screw up cheap video recorders too.
>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> 
> Rocky
>  

and this.
In article <4boc3bpcv3sh785gmt2sadv2s2gdq2kicq@4ax.com>,
 William Gigantus <bigwilly@shtc.net> wrote:

> We are not safe in our own homes and it is not the terrorists we must
> fear, it is our own government.
>  - Big Willy
> 
> Not counting the crisis actors pretending to die in the Boston 
> Smoke Bomb psyOp, NO AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY ISIS ON THE
> CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, ALASKA OR HAWAII.
> 
> The U.S. War Casualties the Pentagon Doesn’t Want You to See
> http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/27/the-u-s-war-casualties-the-pe
> ntagon-doesn-t-want-you-to-see.html
> 
> A few Americans were killed buy ISIS in Syria and Iraq but the
> government won't give any specifics.  Are you afraid of ISIS?
> Then DON'T GO TO IRAQ OR SYRIA.  Then all you have to worry about is
> federal, state and local law enforcement killing your ass.
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Americans should be more concerned about rogue cops than terrorists
> http://thefifthcolumnnews.com/2015/04/americans-should-be-more-concern-about-r
> ogue-cops-than-terrorists/
> 
> Washington, D.C. (TFC) – There’s a threat in America, lurking on the
> streets, ready to strike. The threat has the system on their side,
> allowing them to act with impunity. It’s not ISIS who rules the
> streets of America, killing and maiming at will. It is the American
> police that have turned peaceful streets into roads of terror, and
> unlike ISIS, that story isn’t being publicized. While the mainstream
> media fear mongers the public regarding ISIS, the threat police pose
> to Americans has been ignored.
> 
> Since 9/11 Americans have been told the threat exists in jihadists in
> the Middle East who chant Death to America while trying to recruit
> westerners to join the fight. As ISIS continues to behead, and execute
> prisoners in places like Syria and Iraq, Washington continues to fear
> monger. They say a terror attack in imminent; they argue scores of
> Americans will die any day thanks to an attack by jihadists who
> devalue life. Those fears are not matched with numbers.
> 
> There has been no terror attack since The Boston Bombings of 2013, if
> the number of dead is added to the attacks since 2002, a grand total
> of nineteen people have been murdered. More Americans have died from
> poisonings, intentional drowning, and fire in that time. Although
> dozens of threats have been uncovered, the majority of them don’t get
> past the discussion phase. Quite frankly, America should not be hiding
> in the bushes fearful of the next attack. Acts of terror take months,
> even years to plan, and have to sneak through America’s massive spy
> state before they can be carried out.
> 
> What America should be fearful of is a system that allows poorly
> trained officers who are infested with warrior mentalities to
> literally get away with murder.
> 
> Since 9/11 more Americans have been killed at the hands of police
> officers than terrorists. In March alone, police officers killed more
> Americans than the British police killed during the entire 20th
> century. When people are employed to protect the peace, they should
> protect lives, not end them; but as the body count increases, the
> American government ignores these crimes, and the mainstream media
> refuses to report on the stories, leaving alternative news outlets to
> pick up the slack. While Americans are taught to fear terrorists
> killing and raping people thousands of miles away, murderers and
> rapists with badges are being allowed to break the law with impunity
> and bias on their side.
> 
> According to data compiled by Fatal Encounters, a non-profit that
> tracks police killings, around 5,600 Americans have been killed by law
> enforcement since 2000. Those high numbers are sadly just the tip of
> the iceberg. The head of Fatal Encounters estimated his group captured
> numbers of only 35% of all police killings; giving Americans only a
> glimpse of the problem.
> 
> In 2010, Officer Coleman “Duke” Brackney was in pursuit of a suspected
> speeder on the roads of rural Arkansas. When the Miata stopped in a
> ditch, Brackney flooded the car with bullets, killing James Ahern with
> several rounds in the back. Five years later, after pleading down from
> manslaughter, and being fired from the force he worked for at the time
> of the shooting, Brackney is without a record, and serves as a police
> chief in a town just a few miles from the scene.
> 
> In his defense, Brackney claimed Ahern was about to back the car up in
> his direction, however, according to The Washington Post, video of the
> incident disputes Brackney’s claim, who was allowed to walk free and
> get another job with a different police force after firing gunshots
> into a car that was stuck in a ditch.
> 
> The story is one of hundreds reported, or not reported where police
> are given the benefit of the doubt from the public who see police as
> holy prophets sent down from God who can do no wrong.
> 
> In a case where prosecutor J.R. Joyner called the forensic evidence,
> “the strongest of any case in my career,” Darlington County Sheriff’s
> Deputy Tim Robertson approached William Sheffield, a suspect in a
> robbery of a gas grill and three trailers. As Robertson handcuffed
> Sheffield on the hood of the suspect’s truck, the man according to
> Robertson reached for his gun, the officer fired two shots, and
> Sheffield ran into the woods, where the unarmed man was killed thanks
> to bullets fired into his back.
> 
> Joyner told the Washington Post, “There was no threat because there
> was no one around who could get hurt. There was a trail of shell
> casings that showed the deputy chased him and shot at him as he ran
> away.” Although the evidence pointed to an unjustified killing, the
> jury acquitted Robertson who still works for the same department.
> 
> Two officers, in two different states killed unarmed men, and received
> no punishment, because the public has a bias towards all police
> officers. According to law professor David Harris, “To get (juries) to
> buy into a story where the officer is the bad guy goes fundamentally
> against everything they believe.” The expert on police force argued a
> bias exists within juries that paint all police officers as saints,
> and that is part of the massive problem. Prosecutors need to find
> egregious examples of police brutality to even press charges.  These
> are people who depend on cops to help them prosecute murderers and
> thieves without badges; the relationship between cops and prosecutors
> is one of dependence; and that makes police brutality defensible.
> 
> In the same Washington Post story that cited the two above examples of
> cops getting away with murder, the newspaper studied cases of police
> murder with Bowling Green University and found, despite thousands of
> cases, only 54 police officers faced charges after fatal shootings,
> with most of the officers being cleared of charges, or acquitted.
> 
> Terror attacks are scary. Thousands can die in a manner of seconds; it
> only took minutes for thousands to die at The World Trade Center, but
> when innocent, or unarmed people are being killed daily by people who
> are tasked with saving lives and preventing crime, the reality is even
> harder to swallow. Only the truly crazy side with terrorists; no jury
> in America would sympathize with a man or a woman who built a bomb to
> end dozens or hundreds of lives, but they are believing murderous cops
> when evidence points to cold blooded murder. They still believe,
> despite hundreds of cases, the beating of peaceful protesters in
> Ferguson, and the militarized police killing and maiming young
> children in the search of a plant; juries still believe every single
> cop resides in Mayberry.
> 
> The American justice system does not protect terrorists; it protects
> lawless police officers who maim and kill Americans by using the tired
> excuse of, “I feared for my life.” The system allowed for a police
> officer to force a woman to perform oral sex on him, and give him the
> satisfaction to not having to register as a sex offender.
> 
> Police who have killed innocent people have been granted freedom; in
> some cases they got their jobs back. Even with surveillance video
> showing a vicious beating of a mentally ill homeless man, two police
> officers were acquitted, showing bad cops have been allowed to roam
> American streets to exert their power with violence.

Thanks for this good post, I'll share it.
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529929

In article <georgewk10-D9BDDD.07160902112015@news.toast.net>,
 Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article <14OdnQW8I4Y5R6vLnZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
> > 
> > Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down 
> > but 
> > to screw up cheap video recorders too.
> >  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> > 
> > Rocky
> >  
> 
> and this.
> In article <4boc3bpcv3sh785gmt2sadv2s2gdq2kicq@4ax.com>,
>  William Gigantus <bigwilly@shtc.net> wrote:
> 
> > We are not safe in our own homes and it is not the terrorists we must
> > fear, it is our own government.
> >  - Big Willy
> > 
> > Not counting the crisis actors pretending to die in the Boston 
> > Smoke Bomb psyOp, NO AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY ISIS ON THE
> > CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, ALASKA OR HAWAII.
> > 
> > The U.S. War Casualties the Pentagon Doesn’t Want You to See
> > http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/27/the-u-s-war-casualties-the-
> > pe
> > ntagon-doesn-t-want-you-to-see.html
> > 
> > A few Americans were killed buy ISIS in Syria and Iraq but the
> > government won't give any specifics.  Are you afraid of ISIS?
> > Then DON'T GO TO IRAQ OR SYRIA.  Then all you have to worry about is
> > federal, state and local law enforcement killing your ass.
> > 
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > Americans should be more concerned about rogue cops than terrorists
> > http://thefifthcolumnnews.com/2015/04/americans-should-be-more-concern-about
> > -r
> > ogue-cops-than-terrorists/
> > 
> > Washington, D.C. (TFC) – There’s a threat in America, lurking on the
> > streets, ready to strike. The threat has the system on their side,
> > allowing them to act with impunity. It’s not ISIS who rules the
> > streets of America, killing and maiming at will. It is the American
> > police that have turned peaceful streets into roads of terror, and
> > unlike ISIS, that story isn’t being publicized. While the mainstream
> > media fear mongers the public regarding ISIS, the threat police pose
> > to Americans has been ignored.
> > 
> > Since 9/11 Americans have been told the threat exists in jihadists in
> > the Middle East who chant Death to America while trying to recruit
> > westerners to join the fight. As ISIS continues to behead, and execute
> > prisoners in places like Syria and Iraq, Washington continues to fear
> > monger. They say a terror attack in imminent; they argue scores of
> > Americans will die any day thanks to an attack by jihadists who
> > devalue life. Those fears are not matched with numbers.
> > 
> > There has been no terror attack since The Boston Bombings of 2013, if
> > the number of dead is added to the attacks since 2002, a grand total
> > of nineteen people have been murdered. More Americans have died from
> > poisonings, intentional drowning, and fire in that time. Although
> > dozens of threats have been uncovered, the majority of them don’t get
> > past the discussion phase. Quite frankly, America should not be hiding
> > in the bushes fearful of the next attack. Acts of terror take months,
> > even years to plan, and have to sneak through America’s massive spy
> > state before they can be carried out.
> > 
> > What America should be fearful of is a system that allows poorly
> > trained officers who are infested with warrior mentalities to
> > literally get away with murder.
> > 
> > Since 9/11 more Americans have been killed at the hands of police
> > officers than terrorists. In March alone, police officers killed more
> > Americans than the British police killed during the entire 20th
> > century. When people are employed to protect the peace, they should
> > protect lives, not end them; but as the body count increases, the
> > American government ignores these crimes, and the mainstream media
> > refuses to report on the stories, leaving alternative news outlets to
> > pick up the slack. While Americans are taught to fear terrorists
> > killing and raping people thousands of miles away, murderers and
> > rapists with badges are being allowed to break the law with impunity
> > and bias on their side.
> > 
> > According to data compiled by Fatal Encounters, a non-profit that
> > tracks police killings, around 5,600 Americans have been killed by law
> > enforcement since 2000. Those high numbers are sadly just the tip of
> > the iceberg. The head of Fatal Encounters estimated his group captured
> > numbers of only 35% of all police killings; giving Americans only a
> > glimpse of the problem.
> > 
> > In 2010, Officer Coleman “Duke” Brackney was in pursuit of a suspected
> > speeder on the roads of rural Arkansas. When the Miata stopped in a
> > ditch, Brackney flooded the car with bullets, killing James Ahern with
> > several rounds in the back. Five years later, after pleading down from
> > manslaughter, and being fired from the force he worked for at the time
> > of the shooting, Brackney is without a record, and serves as a police
> > chief in a town just a few miles from the scene.
> > 
> > In his defense, Brackney claimed Ahern was about to back the car up in
> > his direction, however, according to The Washington Post, video of the
> > incident disputes Brackney’s claim, who was allowed to walk free and
> > get another job with a different police force after firing gunshots
> > into a car that was stuck in a ditch.
> > 
> > The story is one of hundreds reported, or not reported where police
> > are given the benefit of the doubt from the public who see police as
> > holy prophets sent down from God who can do no wrong.
> > 
> > In a case where prosecutor J.R. Joyner called the forensic evidence,
> > “the strongest of any case in my career,” Darlington County Sheriff’s
> > Deputy Tim Robertson approached William Sheffield, a suspect in a
> > robbery of a gas grill and three trailers. As Robertson handcuffed
> > Sheffield on the hood of the suspect’s truck, the man according to
> > Robertson reached for his gun, the officer fired two shots, and
> > Sheffield ran into the woods, where the unarmed man was killed thanks
> > to bullets fired into his back.
> > 
> > Joyner told the Washington Post, “There was no threat because there
> > was no one around who could get hurt. There was a trail of shell
> > casings that showed the deputy chased him and shot at him as he ran
> > away.” Although the evidence pointed to an unjustified killing, the
> > jury acquitted Robertson who still works for the same department.
> > 
> > Two officers, in two different states killed unarmed men, and received
> > no punishment, because the public has a bias towards all police
> > officers. According to law professor David Harris, “To get (juries) to
> > buy into a story where the officer is the bad guy goes fundamentally
> > against everything they believe.” The expert on police force argued a
> > bias exists within juries that paint all police officers as saints,
> > and that is part of the massive problem. Prosecutors need to find
> > egregious examples of police brutality to even press charges.  These
> > are people who depend on cops to help them prosecute murderers and
> > thieves without badges; the relationship between cops and prosecutors
> > is one of dependence; and that makes police brutality defensible.
> > 
> > In the same Washington Post story that cited the two above examples of
> > cops getting away with murder, the newspaper studied cases of police
> > murder with Bowling Green University and found, despite thousands of
> > cases, only 54 police officers faced charges after fatal shootings,
> > with most of the officers being cleared of charges, or acquitted.
> > 
> > Terror attacks are scary. Thousands can die in a manner of seconds; it
> > only took minutes for thousands to die at The World Trade Center, but
> > when innocent, or unarmed people are being killed daily by people who
> > are tasked with saving lives and preventing crime, the reality is even
> > harder to swallow. Only the truly crazy side with terrorists; no jury
> > in America would sympathize with a man or a woman who built a bomb to
> > end dozens or hundreds of lives, but they are believing murderous cops
> > when evidence points to cold blooded murder. They still believe,
> > despite hundreds of cases, the beating of peaceful protesters in
> > Ferguson, and the militarized police killing and maiming young
> > children in the search of a plant; juries still believe every single
> > cop resides in Mayberry.
> > 
> > The American justice system does not protect terrorists; it protects
> > lawless police officers who maim and kill Americans by using the tired
> > excuse of, “I feared for my life.” The system allowed for a police
> > officer to force a woman to perform oral sex on him, and give him the
> > satisfaction to not having to register as a sex offender.
> > 
> > Police who have killed innocent people have been granted freedom; in
> > some cases they got their jobs back. Even with surveillance video
> > showing a vicious beating of a mentally ill homeless man, two police
> > officers were acquitted, showing bad cops have been allowed to roam
> > American streets to exert their power with violence.
> 
> Thanks for this good post, I'll share it.

and let's visit another Truth site.
https://www.reddit.com/r/911truth
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#529935

In article <georgewk10-D9BDDD.07160902112015@news.toast.net>,
 Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

> In article <14OdnQW8I4Y5R6vLnZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
> > 
> > Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down 
> > but 
> > to screw up cheap video recorders too.
> >  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
> > 
> > Rocky
> >  
> 
> and this.
> In article <4boc3bpcv3sh785gmt2sadv2s2gdq2kicq@4ax.com>,
>  William Gigantus <bigwilly@shtc.net> wrote:
> 
> > We are not safe in our own homes and it is not the terrorists we must
> > fear, it is our own government.
> >  - Big Willy
> > 
> > Not counting the crisis actors pretending to die in the Boston 
> > Smoke Bomb psyOp, NO AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY ISIS ON THE
> > CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, ALASKA OR HAWAII.
> > 
> > The U.S. War Casualties the Pentagon Doesn’t Want You to See
> > http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/27/the-u-s-war-casualties-the-
> > pe
> > ntagon-doesn-t-want-you-to-see.html
> > 
> > A few Americans were killed buy ISIS in Syria and Iraq but the
> > government won't give any specifics.  Are you afraid of ISIS?
> > Then DON'T GO TO IRAQ OR SYRIA.  Then all you have to worry about is
> > federal, state and local law enforcement killing your ass.
> > 
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > Americans should be more concerned about rogue cops than terrorists
> > http://thefifthcolumnnews.com/2015/04/americans-should-be-more-concern-about
> > -r
> > ogue-cops-than-terrorists/
> > 
> > Washington, D.C. (TFC) – There’s a threat in America, lurking on the
> > streets, ready to strike. The threat has the system on their side,
> > allowing them to act with impunity. It’s not ISIS who rules the
> > streets of America, killing and maiming at will. It is the American
> > police that have turned peaceful streets into roads of terror, and
> > unlike ISIS, that story isn’t being publicized. While the mainstream
> > media fear mongers the public regarding ISIS, the threat police pose
> > to Americans has been ignored.
> > 
> > Since 9/11 Americans have been told the threat exists in jihadists in
> > the Middle East who chant Death to America while trying to recruit
> > westerners to join the fight. As ISIS continues to behead, and execute
> > prisoners in places like Syria and Iraq, Washington continues to fear
> > monger. They say a terror attack in imminent; they argue scores of
> > Americans will die any day thanks to an attack by jihadists who
> > devalue life. Those fears are not matched with numbers.
> > 
> > There has been no terror attack since The Boston Bombings of 2013, if
> > the number of dead is added to the attacks since 2002, a grand total
> > of nineteen people have been murdered. More Americans have died from
> > poisonings, intentional drowning, and fire in that time. Although
> > dozens of threats have been uncovered, the majority of them don’t get
> > past the discussion phase. Quite frankly, America should not be hiding
> > in the bushes fearful of the next attack. Acts of terror take months,
> > even years to plan, and have to sneak through America’s massive spy
> > state before they can be carried out.
> > 
> > What America should be fearful of is a system that allows poorly
> > trained officers who are infested with warrior mentalities to
> > literally get away with murder.
> > 
> > Since 9/11 more Americans have been killed at the hands of police
> > officers than terrorists. In March alone, police officers killed more
> > Americans than the British police killed during the entire 20th
> > century. When people are employed to protect the peace, they should
> > protect lives, not end them; but as the body count increases, the
> > American government ignores these crimes, and the mainstream media
> > refuses to report on the stories, leaving alternative news outlets to
> > pick up the slack. While Americans are taught to fear terrorists
> > killing and raping people thousands of miles away, murderers and
> > rapists with badges are being allowed to break the law with impunity
> > and bias on their side.
> > 
> > According to data compiled by Fatal Encounters, a non-profit that
> > tracks police killings, around 5,600 Americans have been killed by law
> > enforcement since 2000. Those high numbers are sadly just the tip of
> > the iceberg. The head of Fatal Encounters estimated his group captured
> > numbers of only 35% of all police killings; giving Americans only a
> > glimpse of the problem.
> > 
> > In 2010, Officer Coleman “Duke” Brackney was in pursuit of a suspected
> > speeder on the roads of rural Arkansas. When the Miata stopped in a
> > ditch, Brackney flooded the car with bullets, killing James Ahern with
> > several rounds in the back. Five years later, after pleading down from
> > manslaughter, and being fired from the force he worked for at the time
> > of the shooting, Brackney is without a record, and serves as a police
> > chief in a town just a few miles from the scene.
> > 
> > In his defense, Brackney claimed Ahern was about to back the car up in
> > his direction, however, according to The Washington Post, video of the
> > incident disputes Brackney’s claim, who was allowed to walk free and
> > get another job with a different police force after firing gunshots
> > into a car that was stuck in a ditch.
> > 
> > The story is one of hundreds reported, or not reported where police
> > are given the benefit of the doubt from the public who see police as
> > holy prophets sent down from God who can do no wrong.
> > 
> > In a case where prosecutor J.R. Joyner called the forensic evidence,
> > “the strongest of any case in my career,” Darlington County Sheriff’s
> > Deputy Tim Robertson approached William Sheffield, a suspect in a
> > robbery of a gas grill and three trailers. As Robertson handcuffed
> > Sheffield on the hood of the suspect’s truck, the man according to
> > Robertson reached for his gun, the officer fired two shots, and
> > Sheffield ran into the woods, where the unarmed man was killed thanks
> > to bullets fired into his back.
> > 
> > Joyner told the Washington Post, “There was no threat because there
> > was no one around who could get hurt. There was a trail of shell
> > casings that showed the deputy chased him and shot at him as he ran
> > away.” Although the evidence pointed to an unjustified killing, the
> > jury acquitted Robertson who still works for the same department.
> > 
> > Two officers, in two different states killed unarmed men, and received
> > no punishment, because the public has a bias towards all police
> > officers. According to law professor David Harris, “To get (juries) to
> > buy into a story where the officer is the bad guy goes fundamentally
> > against everything they believe.” The expert on police force argued a
> > bias exists within juries that paint all police officers as saints,
> > and that is part of the massive problem. Prosecutors need to find
> > egregious examples of police brutality to even press charges.  These
> > are people who depend on cops to help them prosecute murderers and
> > thieves without badges; the relationship between cops and prosecutors
> > is one of dependence; and that makes police brutality defensible.
> > 
> > In the same Washington Post story that cited the two above examples of
> > cops getting away with murder, the newspaper studied cases of police
> > murder with Bowling Green University and found, despite thousands of
> > cases, only 54 police officers faced charges after fatal shootings,
> > with most of the officers being cleared of charges, or acquitted.
> > 
> > Terror attacks are scary. Thousands can die in a manner of seconds; it
> > only took minutes for thousands to die at The World Trade Center, but
> > when innocent, or unarmed people are being killed daily by people who
> > are tasked with saving lives and preventing crime, the reality is even
> > harder to swallow. Only the truly crazy side with terrorists; no jury
> > in America would sympathize with a man or a woman who built a bomb to
> > end dozens or hundreds of lives, but they are believing murderous cops
> > when evidence points to cold blooded murder. They still believe,
> > despite hundreds of cases, the beating of peaceful protesters in
> > Ferguson, and the militarized police killing and maiming young
> > children in the search of a plant; juries still believe every single
> > cop resides in Mayberry.
> > 
> > The American justice system does not protect terrorists; it protects
> > lawless police officers who maim and kill Americans by using the tired
> > excuse of, “I feared for my life.” The system allowed for a police
> > officer to force a woman to perform oral sex on him, and give him the
> > satisfaction to not having to register as a sex offender.
> > 
> > Police who have killed innocent people have been granted freedom; in
> > some cases they got their jobs back. Even with surveillance video
> > showing a vicious beating of a mentally ill homeless man, two police
> > officers were acquitted, showing bad cops have been allowed to roam
> > American streets to exert their power with violence.
> 
> Thanks for this good post, I'll share it.

and'
 David Ray Griffin (Retired theology professor; past nominee for the 
Nobel Peace Prize for his 9/11 work; founder, Consensus 9/11 Panel; 
author of 10 books on 9/11)
In the fall of 2002, one of my students at the Claremont School of 
Theology told me that a visiting professor said that 9/11 was an inside 
job and asked if I wanted to meet him. I said yes, and after talking 
with him, I told him that his theory certainly seemed plausible, given 
all the things the U.S. government had done (I was working on a book 
manuscript on U.S. imperialism), but that I would need to see evidence. 
I studied the evidence he emailed but concluded that it was not 
persuasive, so I went back to my work on U.S. imperialism
for more;
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/when-did-they-know-truth
-leaders-on-how-they-awakened-to-the-911-lie/
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530003

On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ

Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
nuclear detonation in NYC? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530018

In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
> 
> Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
> nuclear detonation in NYC? 

Because seismographs don't record EMP's, but they do record the energy
release of a nuclear detonation; but they didn't record any of those
either.

If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
would have been fried.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530095

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>> 
>> Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>> nuclear detonation in NYC? 
>
>Because seismographs don't record EMP's, but they do record the energy
>release of a nuclear detonation; but they didn't record any of those
>either.

Haha.  I was trying to get RogerRocky to again bite on that little
nugget.  Maybe I shouldn't poke the trooferfool.   :)

>If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>would have been fried.

Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
like scalded dogs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530139

Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:

>On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>>If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>would have been fried.

>Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>like scalded dogs.

That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no nukes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531435

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>
>>On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>>>If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>would have been fried.
>
>>Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>like scalded dogs.
>
> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no nukes.

BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep underground 
nukes make tremendous EMPs.

And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would 
know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.  But we don't 
know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were not 
told what those test were in.

Fact is, you lie about how much interference there should be from deep 
underground nukes but some of them can screw up AM receivers as proven by 
multiple places in the great 9/11 HOAX.

Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple 
floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about why 
jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing 
parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon or 
PentaCON.  Oh yeah, and then you gave us a bullshit story about Pranksville, 
PA that could not include any photos since those photos would have proven 
their own story to be total bullshit.  <G>

Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the original meaning of Ground Zero 
but to assholes like you they just redlined Ground Zero after 9/11 so you 
wouldn't even consider the truth.  DUH

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Or

 WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
( Skipped over the first 30 seconds to get right to the meat of the video )
 https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s

=============  OP below ==============

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ

Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down but
to screw up cheap video recorders too.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531510

On 09/11/2015 16:55, Rocky wrote:
> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
> news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>> If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>> would have been fried.
>>
>>> Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>> thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>> happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>> like scalded dogs.
>>
>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no nukes.
>
> BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep underground
> nukes make tremendous EMPs.
>
> And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would
> know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.  But we don't
> know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were not
> told what those test were in.
>
> Fact is, you lie about how much interference there should be from deep
> underground nukes but some of them can screw up AM receivers as proven by
> multiple places in the great 9/11 HOAX.

What am recievers would thos e be?

>
> Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple
> floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about why
> jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing
> parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon or
> PentaCON.  Oh yeah, and then you gave us a bullshit story about Pranksville,
> PA that could not include any photos since those photos would have proven
> their own story to be total bullshit.  <G>
>
> Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the original meaning of Ground Zero
> but to assholes like you they just redlined Ground Zero after 9/11 so you
> wouldn't even consider the truth.  DUH
>
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Or
>
>   WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
> ( Skipped over the first 30 seconds to get right to the meat of the video )
>   https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>
> =============  OP below ==============
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>
> Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down but
> to screw up cheap video recorders too.
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531527

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n1quuk$b0b$7@dont-email.me...
> On 09/11/2015 16:55, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>>> would have been fried.
>>>
>>>> Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>>> thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>>> happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>>> like scalded dogs.
>>>
>>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no 
>>> nukes.
>>
>> BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep 
>> underground
>> nukes make tremendous EMPs.
>>
>> And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would
>> know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.  But we 
>> don't
>> know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were 
>> not
>> told what those test were in.
>>
>> Fact is, you lie about how much interference there should be from deep
>> underground nukes but some of them can screw up AM receivers as proven by
>> multiple places in the great 9/11 HOAX.
>
> What am recievers would thos e be?

Prove to me you are not a shill and let me see the questions you had for 
NIST or the 9/11 Commision regarding why the jets in Nuke York City 
resembled CGIs and why the top 100 floors of the Twin Towers didn't crush 
what was at the very bottom of the Twin Towers?
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


>> Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple
>> floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about 
>> why
>> jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing
>> parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon 
>> or
>> PentaCON.  Oh yeah, and then you gave us a bullshit story about 
>> Pranksville,
>> PA that could not include any photos since those photos would have proven
>> their own story to be total bullshit.  <G>
>>
>> Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the original meaning of Ground 
>> Zero
>> but to assholes like you they just redlined Ground Zero after 9/11 so you
>> wouldn't even consider the truth.  DUH
>>
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Or
>>
>>   WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
>> ( Skipped over the first 30 seconds to get right to the meat of the 
>> video )
>>   https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>>
>> =============  OP below ==============
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>
>> Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down 
>> but
>> to screw up cheap video recorders too.
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531558

On 09/11/2015 20:55, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:n1quuk$b0b$7@dont-email.me...
>> On 09/11/2015 16:55, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>>>> would have been fried.
>>>>
>>>>> Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>>>> thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>>>> happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>>>> like scalded dogs.
>>>>
>>>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>>>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no
>>>> nukes.
>>>
>>> BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep
>>> underground
>>> nukes make tremendous EMPs.
>>>
>>> And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would
>>> know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.  But we
>>> don't
>>> know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were
>>> not
>>> told what those test were in.
>>>
>>> Fact is, you lie about how much interference there should be from deep
>>> underground nukes but some of them can screw up AM receivers as proven by
>>> multiple places in the great 9/11 HOAX.
>>
>> What am recievers would thos e be?
>
> Prove to me you are not a shill and let me see the questions you had for
> NIST or the 9/11 Commision regarding why the jets in Nuke York City
> resembled CGIs and why the top 100 floors of the Twin Towers didn't crush
> what was at the very bottom of the Twin Towers?
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>
>>> Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple
>>> floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about
>>> why
>>> jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing
>>> parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon
>>> or
>>> PentaCON.  Oh yeah, and then you gave us a bullshit story about
>>> Pranksville,
>>> PA that could not include any photos since those photos would have proven
>>> their own story to be total bullshit.  <G>
>>>
>>> Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the original meaning of Ground
>>> Zero
>>> but to assholes like you they just redlined Ground Zero after 9/11 so you
>>> wouldn't even consider the truth.  DUH
>>>
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> Or
>>>
>>>    WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
>>> ( Skipped over the first 30 seconds to get right to the meat of the
>>> video )
>>>    https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>>>
>>> =============  OP below ==============
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>>
>>> Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down
>>> but
>>> to screw up cheap video recorders too.
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
>
>

So no answer then, glad that's cleared up.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531738

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:18:36 +0000, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

>On 09/11/2015 16:55, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>>> would have been fried.
>>>
>>>> Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>>> thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>>> happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>>> like scalded dogs.
>>>
>>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no nukes.
>>
>> BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep underground
>> nukes make tremendous EMPs.
>>
>> And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would
>> know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.  But we don't
>> know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were not
>> told what those test were in.
>>
>> Fact is, you lie about how much interference there should be from deep
>> underground nukes but some of them can screw up AM receivers as proven by
>> multiple places in the great 9/11 HOAX.
>
>What am recievers would thos e be?

     The ones not in use.
     FNVW posted a very detailed explanation about the use of
applicable  radio frequencies. Since the post proved all of Rocky's
claims about an EMP wrong, he ran away from it.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#531727

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>
>>>On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>>If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>>would have been fried.
>>
>>>Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>>thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>>happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>>like scalded dogs.
>>
>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no nukes.

>BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep underground 
>nukes make tremendous EMPs.

>And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would 
>know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.

Nope.  All nukes produce an EMP.

>But we don't 
>know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were not 
>told what those test were in.

Yes we do.  I posted a description.  They often produce mounds of crushed
rock above them ("retarcs") instead of collapse craters.  Of course no
such thing was observed at Ground Zero.  Add that to your Duck Test!

>Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple 
>floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about why 
>jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing 
>parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon or 
>PentaCON.

Nope.  I gave an explanation of the walls, the planes did slow down 
(measure the speed of UA 175 before impact, and time the time from when
the nose hits to the time the first debris exits the north wall, get the
speed from the fact the towers were 206' wide), and they found 95% of
Flight 77 inside (not outside) the Pentagon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530045

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:32:13 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>
>Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>nuclear detonation in NYC? 

Seismographs don't measure electromagnetic pulses. They measure vibrations in
the ground.

That doesn't mean that an EMP wouldn't be picked up all around the world.

Shill #2
--
http://i462.photobucket.com/albums/qq341/govshill/Rockhead.jpg

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530059

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:46:30 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:32:13 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>
>>Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>>nuclear detonation in NYC? 
>
>Seismographs don't measure electromagnetic pulses. They measure vibrations in
>the ground.
>
>That doesn't mean that an EMP wouldn't be picked up all around the world.
>

     Any electronics in the area would have been fried if there had
been an EMP.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530063

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:08:56 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:46:30 +1100, Government Shill #2
><gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:32:13 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>>
>>>Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>>>nuclear detonation in NYC? 
>>
>>Seismographs don't measure electromagnetic pulses. They measure vibrations in
>>the ground.
>>
>>That doesn't mean that an EMP wouldn't be picked up all around the world.
>>
>
>     Any electronics in the area would have been fried if there had
>been an EMP.

A fact which Rockhead continues to ignore.

Shill #2
--
"... the truthfulness of the following statement is not important but it could
be true..."
  Roger Wittekind (Rocky) alt.conspiracy 16 Oct 13

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530097

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:32:28 +1100, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:08:56 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:46:30 +1100, Government Shill #2
>><gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:32:13 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>>>
>>>>Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>>>>nuclear detonation in NYC? 
>>>
>>>Seismographs don't measure electromagnetic pulses. They measure vibrations in
>>>the ground.
>>>
>>>That doesn't mean that an EMP wouldn't be picked up all around the world.
>>>
>>
>>     Any electronics in the area would have been fried if there had
>>been an EMP.
>
>A fact which Rockhead continues to ignore.

Funny that..  I think it was BDK who said truth is kryptonite to the
Troofers.  

>Shill #2

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530096

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:08:56 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:46:30 +1100, Government Shill #2
><gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:32:13 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>>
>>>Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>>>nuclear detonation in NYC? 
>>
>>Seismographs don't measure electromagnetic pulses. They measure vibrations in
>>the ground.
>>
>>That doesn't mean that an EMP wouldn't be picked up all around the world.
>>
>
>     Any electronics in the area would have been fried if there had
>been an EMP.

Hey, LOL  I was trying to get RogerRocky to make up some new Troofer
nonsense.  This stuff gets boring after about a month.   How do you
guys stick with it?    :)    I'd like to hear Roger tell us again
about his little imaginary nukes tunneling their way up to the surface
using their tiny little shovels.   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#530101

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:49:45 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:08:56 -0600, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:46:30 +1100, Government Shill #2
>><gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:32:13 -0500, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:38:32 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>>>
>>>>Why did no seismograph in the world record an EMP on 9/11 from a
>>>>nuclear detonation in NYC? 
>>>
>>>Seismographs don't measure electromagnetic pulses. They measure vibrations in
>>>the ground.
>>>
>>>That doesn't mean that an EMP wouldn't be picked up all around the world.
>>>
>>
>>     Any electronics in the area would have been fried if there had
>>been an EMP.
>
>Hey, LOL  I was trying to get RogerRocky to make up some new Troofer
>nonsense.  This stuff gets boring after about a month.   How do you
>guys stick with it?    :)    

     Most of us don't. After a while, we accept that Roger's intellect
is so low, he is honestly unable to accept the truth. We then cease
replying to his constantly proving his own claims wrong while
insisting he's done the opposite.

>I'd like to hear Roger tell us again
>about his little imaginary nukes tunneling their way up to the surface
>using their tiny little shovels.   

     Tiny shovels make as much sense as any other Troofer claim.


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."

Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web