Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #278912

Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction

From "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
References (2 earlier) <i90lgc-of2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <12pg3blk55ovgv9hm9a9id7gns1rhra5oa@4ax.com> <n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com> <1M6dnWKcl4v3Td3LnZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n1quuk$b0b$7@dont-email.me>
Subject Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction
Date 2015-11-09 14:55 -0600
Message-ID <bsCdnUEPD8TlldzLnZ2dnUU7-IGdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:n1quuk$b0b$7@dont-email.me...
> On 09/11/2015 16:55, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>>> would have been fried.
>>>
>>>> Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>>> thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>>> happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>>> like scalded dogs.
>>>
>>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no 
>>> nukes.
>>
>> BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep 
>> underground
>> nukes make tremendous EMPs.
>>
>> And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would
>> know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.  But we 
>> don't
>> know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were 
>> not
>> told what those test were in.
>>
>> Fact is, you lie about how much interference there should be from deep
>> underground nukes but some of them can screw up AM receivers as proven by
>> multiple places in the great 9/11 HOAX.
>
> What am recievers would thos e be?

Prove to me you are not a shill and let me see the questions you had for 
NIST or the 9/11 Commision regarding why the jets in Nuke York City 
resembled CGIs and why the top 100 floors of the Twin Towers didn't crush 
what was at the very bottom of the Twin Towers?
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


>> Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple
>> floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about 
>> why
>> jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing
>> parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon 
>> or
>> PentaCON.  Oh yeah, and then you gave us a bullshit story about 
>> Pranksville,
>> PA that could not include any photos since those photos would have proven
>> their own story to be total bullshit.  <G>
>>
>> Ground Zero was called Ground Zero for the original meaning of Ground 
>> Zero
>> but to assholes like you they just redlined Ground Zero after 9/11 so you
>> wouldn't even consider the truth.  DUH
>>
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Or
>>
>>   WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS presents DOUG MICHAEL - 9/11 DIATRIBE
>> ( Skipped over the first 30 seconds to get right to the meat of the 
>> video )
>>   https://youtu.be/HDkDYzOWYG8?t=30s
>>
>> =============  OP below ==============
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guerNn5T1WQ
>>
>> Seems the 9/11 Hoaxsters used nukes not just to bring the buildings down 
>> but
>> to screw up cheap video recorders too.
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 21:38 -0600
  Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 07:16 -0800
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 08:02 -0800
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 08:31 -0800
  Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:55 -0600
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:18 +0000
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:55 -0600
        Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:28 +0000

csiph-web