Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #270888

Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n1aocn$g6a$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> writes:
>>
>>>On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:13:54 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>>>If there had been an EMP, all the consumer electronics in the area
>>>>would have been fried.
>>
>>>Yesiree.   Proof positive of no EMP is we have hundreds if not
>>>thousands of videos from people who witnessed the events as they
>>>happened.  A fact both RogerRocky and his dopey sidekick Bast run from
>>>like scalded dogs.
>>
>> That's correct.  It's one part of Rocky's awesome "Duck Test" proof that
>> no nukes were used.  Nuclear explosions produce EMPs, so no EMP=no nukes.

>BOY ARE YOU AN ASSHOLE because you have never proven that deep underground 
>nukes make tremendous EMPs.

>And if you had watched the video by dmaster from alt.conspiracy you would 
>know that deep underground nukes don't make an EMP or a flash.

Nope.  All nukes produce an EMP.

>But we don't 
>know what deep underground nukes would do in solid rock because we were not 
>told what those test were in.

Yes we do.  I posted a description.  They often produce mounds of crushed
rock above them ("retarcs") instead of collapse craters.  Of course no
such thing was observed at Ground Zero.  Add that to your Duck Test!

>Michael you are a flat out LIAR.  You lied about why there were multiple 
>floor surviving corners to both the Twin Towers and you have lied about why 
>jets should be able to fly into buildings without slowing down or loosing 
>parts and you have lied about the airplane debris found at the Pentagon or 
>PentaCON.

Nope.  I gave an explanation of the walls, the planes did slow down 
(measure the speed of UA 175 before impact, and time the time from when
the nose hits to the time the first debris exits the north wall, get the
speed from the fact the towers were 206' wide), and they found 95% of
Flight 77 inside (not outside) the Pentagon.

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-01 21:38 -0600
  Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 07:16 -0800
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 08:02 -0800
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-02 08:31 -0800
  Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-02 15:32 -0500
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-02 21:13 +0000
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-03 02:43 -0500
        Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-03 16:46 +0000
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 10:55 -0600
            Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 20:18 +0000
              Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-09 14:55 -0600
                Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-09 22:28 +0000
              Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 03:26 -0600
            Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-10 06:08 +0000
    Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 09:46 +1100
      Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 18:08 -0600
        Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 11:32 +1100
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-03 02:52 -0500
        Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-11-03 02:49 -0500
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 04:10 -0600
          Re: 9/11 Static on TV from an Electromagnetic pulse from the nuclear reaction Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:11 +1100

csiph-web