Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #558971 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-04 06:14 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 53 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 20:08 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:15 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 17:35 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:42 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:57 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:10 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 21:08 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:55 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:22 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:00 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:09 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:24 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:40 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:10 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:41 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 23:03 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:18 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:30 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 02:32 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:53 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:11 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 07:27 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:45 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:58 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 04:12 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 02:44 +0000
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-03 21:59 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 16:52 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:39 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 18:55 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:10 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:19 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:30 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:32 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:37 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 13:36 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:41 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:43 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 12:16 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 15:55 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:39 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:42 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 14:54 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 20:00 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 18:11 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 22:02 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 14:29 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 05:35 -0800
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-04 08:03 -0600
Re: Meteorology Needs a New Theory HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:14 -0800
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 11:40 -0800 |
| Subject | Meteorology Needs a New Theory |
| Message-ID | <eb2945b9-3a67-42ca-bec7-94581042e1ab@googlegroups.com> |
We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. Most of us have at least enough education to realize the boiling point of water is much higher than that of our ambient environment. And most of us realize that boiling has to do with a phase change from a liquid state of matter to a gaseous state of matter. Most of us reconcile this dichotomy by just not thinking about it. Some of us come up with rationalization to explain it away. But if you are going to do science you can't fall back on these excuses. You have to see things for what they actually are. There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere. Moist air is heavier than dry air. Moist air convection is impossible. Meteorology needs another way to explain the power of storms, why storms are wet, and how heavier moist air gets so high in earth's atmosphere. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwSyalcoRAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexlOvP7mPw James McGinn Solving Tornadoes
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 20:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <07imqc-4e3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #558971 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and doing simple experiments. Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more complex. By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely proven. Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 16:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <972e7ecc-b30d-4b80-9222-476fda2def3b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558980 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. > > Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and > doing simple experiments. > > Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more > complex. > > By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely > proven. > > Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9f2nqc-e25.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559063 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. >> >> Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and >> doing simple experiments. >> >> Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more >> complex. >> >> By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely >> proven. >> >> Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. > > So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional when their delusions are challenged. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 17:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <234812d6-913e-4af4-8a88-cdc9b6f3d364@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559073 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. > >> > >> Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and > >> doing simple experiments. > >> > >> Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more > >> complex. > >> > >> By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely > >> proven. > >> > >> Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. > > > > So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? > > The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional > when their delusions are challenged. What's your challenge?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 02:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r89nqc-hq5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559084 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. >> >> >> >> Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and >> >> doing simple experiments. >> >> >> >> Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more >> >> complex. >> >> >> >> By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely >> >> proven. >> >> >> >> Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. >> > >> > So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? >> >> The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional >> when their delusions are challenged. > > What's your challenge? Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 18:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <eb887c09-f7f5-42e7-9baf-77f7834a3c1a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559107 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:46:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. > >> >> > >> >> Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and > >> >> doing simple experiments. > >> >> > >> >> Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more > >> >> complex. > >> >> > >> >> By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely > >> >> proven. > >> >> > >> >> Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. > >> > > >> > So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? > >> > >> The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional > >> when their delusions are challenged. > > > > What's your challenge? > > Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable > and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. And yet you can't find one?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 04:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hfenqc-9a6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559116 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:46:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 4:46:17 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 12:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > We all grow up believing that the moisture in clear air is gaseous. >> >> >> >> >> >> Nope, we learn that in grade school science class from text books and >> >> >> doing simple experiments. >> >> >> >> >> >> Later on in high school both the texts and the experiments become more >> >> >> complex. >> >> >> >> >> >> By the time we get to the college level stuff it has been completely >> >> >> proven. >> >> >> >> >> >> Your theories, on the other hand, seem to come from a drug dream. >> >> > >> >> > So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? >> >> >> >> The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional >> >> when their delusions are challenged. >> > >> > What's your challenge? >> >> Reality; hundreds of years of research, thousand of text books, repeatable >> and reproducible experiments, i.e. facts. > > And yet you can't find one? I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well as numerous references on the Internet. Apparently you don't own any books and are too dense to figure out how to find things on the Internet. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 21:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9589c49e-e389-4ad0-a814-d74499c7e586@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559142 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well > as numerous references on the Internet. It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference. > Apparently you don't own any books and are too dense to figure out how > to find things on the Internet. It must be frustrating for you that the internet does not allow you to drop links to your imagination.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 06:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hfcqqc-uuf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559501 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well >> as numerous references on the Internet. > > It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference. I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference book. Finding Internet references is so simple children do it all the time. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 06:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <219241c5-8d21-49ad-9d3e-3b4df7dfebd1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559542 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 6:05:12 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well > >> as numerous references on the Internet. > > > > It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference. > > I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference > book. It's regrettable you cannot provide a direct reference?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 19:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <40nrqc-7gk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559554 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 6:05:12 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > >> >> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well >> >> as numerous references on the Internet. >> > >> > It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference. >> >> I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference >> book. > > It's regrettable you cannot provide a direct reference? How is the title of a reference text NOT a direct reference? If you are looking for page numbers, that is what the index of the text provides. Do you understand how books work? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 11:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e4ed05de-e6a5-43a4-a421-d6290f004866@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559610 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:01:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 6:05:12 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well > >> >> as numerous references on the Internet. > >> > > >> > It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference. > >> > >> I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference > >> book. > > > > It's regrettable you cannot provide a direct reference? > > How is the title of a reference text NOT a direct reference? > > If you are looking for page numbers, that is what the index of the text > provides. > > Do you understand how books work? > > -- > Jim Pennino Can you drop a link to one of the "numerous" internet reference instead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 19:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mborqc-7gk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559612 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:01:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 6:05:12 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 8:31:10 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I can find lots in all the physics and chemistry books I have as well >> >> >> as numerous references on the Internet. >> >> > >> >> > It's regrettable you can't provide a direct reference. >> >> >> >> I already provided you with the title and author of one physics reference >> >> book. >> > >> > It's regrettable you cannot provide a direct reference? >> >> How is the title of a reference text NOT a direct reference? >> >> If you are looking for page numbers, that is what the index of the text >> provides. >> >> Do you understand how books work? >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Can you drop a link to one of the "numerous" internet reference instead. Children know how to do an Internet search, why don't you know how? Has anyone ever taken out a restraining order on you? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 11:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8f365ebd-5656-4f55-9c15-5d124437ef55@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559626 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Children know how to do an Internet search, Why don't you see if you can get a child to help you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 22:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o32sqc-gml.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559633 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Children know how to do an Internet search, > > Why don't you see if you can get a child to help you. I am not the one having a problem finding references. Perhaps you can find a child to help you, that is if there isn't a restraining order keeping you from kids. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 14:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <308c2ed5-36e8-42f5-9f3a-d854a0e94ea1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559663 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> Children know how to do an Internet search, > > > > Why don't you see if you can get a child to help you. > > I am not the one having a problem finding references. > > Perhaps you can find a child to help you, that is if there isn't a restraining > order keeping you from kids. Why the desperation?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 23:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i75sqc-l1m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559675 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:09 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > >> >> Children know how to do an Internet search, >> > >> > Why don't you see if you can get a child to help you. >> >> I am not the one having a problem finding references. >> >> Perhaps you can find a child to help you, that is if there isn't a restraining >> order keeping you from kids. > > Why the desperation? You are projecting again. Has anyone ever taken out a restraining order on you? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 02:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbar9d$vqs$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #559073 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: >James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? >The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional >when their delusions are challenged. What you're seeing, jimp, is "projection" where the delusional attributes to others his own reactions/emotions/etc. Very common.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 18:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0049de30-b33e-4711-93c9-52dc0fdc0143@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559091 |
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:18:44 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com writes: > > >James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> So, What do you think it indicates that you get so emotional about this? > > >The only one getting emotional is you as is typical of the delusional > >when their delusions are challenged. > > What you're seeing, jimp, is "projection" where the delusional attributes > to others his own reactions/emotions/etc. Very common. Do you think you'd be less frustrated if you actually had a genuine dispute?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web