Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Last post2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
            Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                        Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                            "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
                                        BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                                                        Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                                                " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                                                  Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                                                    Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                                                      Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                                                        Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                                                          Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                                                        Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                                                      "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                                                        Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
                                                          "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
                                                            Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
                                                              You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
                                                                    India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
                                                                  The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
                                                                        Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
                                                                            Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
                                                                              Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
                                                                                  Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                      Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
                                                                                            Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
                                                                      Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
                                                              Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
                                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700

Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13  Next page →


#687591 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<peifa7$ooj$23@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687571
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:08:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pefmo9$ooj$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
>> You really are a piece of shit, aren't you?
> 
> OBJECTION!  Leading question...

It's Gergzlz. Ergo, "hostile witness" rules are in effect.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687342 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<8TAOC.124745$R51.83202@fx03.iad>
In reply to#687308
On 5/27/2018 3:44 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Nadegda:
>>>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>>>
>>>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>>
>>>> Who are you calling "kook", kook ?
>>>
>>> Shut up kook.
>>
>> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook ?
> 
> You (Nadegda) changed the topic from a big ass
> " child support, custody, visitation " battle between Michael Rotondo
> and his (anonymous) baby mama to: " Who's the bigger kook ? ";
> well done, you must be proud.
> 
Hey Rolf, remember HVAC? Now HE was a pro. But Nads is just a rank 
amateur like Wormley was, paid by the post to troll and cut and paste 
journalist propaganda and disrupt the group as much as possible to 
prevent real discussions of real issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687348 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<9uudnQcAxcxfQJfGnZ2dnUU7-TfNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#687342
On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:18:00 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "benj
<benj@nobody.net>" determined that the following was of great
importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<8TAOC.124745$R51.83202@fx03.iad>:
 
>On 5/27/2018 3:44 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>Nadegda:
>>>>>>>Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- 
>>>>>>>affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>>>>Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>>>Who are you calling "kook", kook ?
>>>>Shut up kook.
>>>Why don't you come over here and make me, kook ?
>>You (Nadegda) changed the topic from a big ass " child support, custody,
>>visitation " battle between Michael Rotondo and his (anonymous) baby
>>mama to: " Who's the bigger kook ? "; well done, you must be proud. 
>Hey Rolf, remember HVAC? Now HE was a pro. But Nads is just a rank
>amateur like Wormley was, paid by the post to troll and cut and paste
>journalist propaganda and disrupt the group as much as possible to
>prevent real discussions of real issues.

i remember HVAC/harlow victor allen campbell and i recall that he sucked a lot of dicks, on average.  i believe he eventually had to killfile me in order to spare his snowflake sensibilities from complete breakdown.

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687429 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<pefmqf$ooj$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687342
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:18:00 -0400, benj wrote:

> Nads is ... paid by the post to troll and cut and paste
> journalist propaganda and disrupt the group as much as possible to
> prevent real discussions of real issues.

Proof, kook?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687436 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687429
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 27 May 2018 19:53:35 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:

> On Mon, 28 May 2018 01:42:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:18:00 -0400, benj wrote:
>>
>>> Nads is ... paid by the post to troll and cut and paste journalist
>>> propaganda and disrupt the group as much as possible to prevent real
>>> discussions of real issues.
>>
>>Proof, kook?
>
> In the pudding.

So, no proof then. Gotcha.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687471 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<HLSOC.162622$T14.10372@fx44.iad>
In reply to#687436
On 5/27/2018 9:57 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 19:53:35 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 01:42:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:18:00 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nads is ... paid by the post to troll and cut and paste journalist
>>>> propaganda and disrupt the group as much as possible to prevent real
>>>> discussions of real issues.
>>>
>>> Proof, kook?
>>
>> In the pudding.
> 
> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> 
You "got" nothing but drug-soaked ego and fantasy.
The guilty always deny their guilt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687484 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<peh3pq$1558$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687471
On 5/28/2018 8:38 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/27/2018 9:57 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 19:53:35 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:18:00 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>> Nads is ... paid by the post to troll and cut and paste journalist
>>>>> propaganda and disrupt the group as much as possible to prevent real
>>>>> discussions of real issues.
>>>>
>>>> Proof, kook?
>>>
>>> In the pudding.
>>
>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>
> You "got" nothing but drug-soaked ego and fantasy.
> The guilty always deny their guilt.

Projection.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687573 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<MPG.35763abf3e34d73b993b89@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687436
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> >>Proof, kook?
> >
> > In the pudding.
> 
> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> 

Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687576 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>
In reply to#687573
On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>@gmail.invalid says...
>
>
>> >>Proof, kook?
>> >
>> > In the pudding.
>> 
>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>> 
>
>Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.

So you like white pudding then?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687582 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<MPG.35764f0d45156e44993b8c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687576
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> >@gmail.invalid says...
> >
> >
> >> >>Proof, kook?
> >> >
> >> > In the pudding.
> >> 
> >> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> >> 
> >
> >Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
> 
> So you like white pudding then?

No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687585 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<mddpgd59kaqog29gqnm098dr9haq4k1o76@4ax.com>
In reply to#687582
On Mon, 28 May 2018 18:38:57 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>, 
>bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>> >Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> >@gmail.invalid says...
>> >
>> >
>> >> >>Proof, kook?
>> >> >
>> >> > In the pudding.
>> >> 
>> >> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>> >> 
>> >
>> >Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
>> 
>> So you like white pudding then?
>
>No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?

I like chocolate and tapioca as well.  Are you trying to read homo
into everything I say?   For shame for shame!  Didn't someone just
"out" you again by your own admission?  What are you ashamed of fella?
Don't get mad at it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687612 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<MPG.3576b59191519736993b8e@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687585
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <mddpgd59kaqog29gqnm098dr9haq4k1o76@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Mon, 28 May 2018 18:38:57 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>, 
> >bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >> >Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> >> >@gmail.invalid says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >>Proof, kook?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In the pudding.
> >> >> 
> >> >> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
> >> >> 
> >> >
> >> >Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
> >> 
> >> So you like white pudding then?
> >
> >No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?
> 
> I like chocolate and tapioca as well.  Are you trying to read homo
> into everything I say?   For shame for shame!  Didn't someone just
> "out" you again by your own admission?  What are you ashamed of fella?
> Don't get mad at it.

You can't talk all faggy like you just did, and then pretend you're just 
"misunderstood".  Darlene has determined that AC is full of old gay men, 
so I guess you'd be included.  That means by your own insinuations, that 
would make you gay by virtue of the fact you post here too.  See how that 
shit works?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687586 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<peidd2$1crh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687582
On 5/28/2018 9:38 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>,
> bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>
>>>>>> Proof, kook?
>>>>>
>>>>> In the pudding.
>>>>
>>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>>>
>>> Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
>>
>> So you like white pudding then?
> 
> No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?

You know what's funny?  Sending a kid to school with a bag lunch with 
tapioca pudding made with the really big pearls so when the teacher 
comes around to check that the kids are eating the correct food that 
won't make them hyper or fat (like when you eat a p&j or a bologny 
sandwich), the kid can tell her that it's fish eyes in sour cream sauce.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687587 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<ndepgd5oav2a5duhq64e63uun4u48nmvdd@4ax.com>
In reply to#687586
On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:20:03 -0400, mixed nuts
<melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:

>On 5/28/2018 9:38 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>,
>> bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>> Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>>>>> Proof, kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the pudding.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>>>>
>>>> Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
>>>
>>> So you like white pudding then?
>> 
>> No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?
>
>You know what's funny?  Sending a kid to school with a bag lunch with 
>tapioca pudding made with the really big pearls so when the teacher 
>comes around to check that the kids are eating the correct food that 
>won't make them hyper or fat (like when you eat a p&j or a bologny 
>sandwich), the kid can tell her that it's fish eyes in sour cream sauce.


FISH EYES FISH EYES
ROLY POLY FISH EYES

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687588 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<baf3ev.k3o.19.8@news.alt.net>
In reply to#687586
On 2018-05-29 4:20 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 5/28/2018 9:38 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>,
>> bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>> Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>>>>> Proof, kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the pudding.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>>>>
>>>> Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
>>>
>>> So you like white pudding then?
>>
>> No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?
> 
> You know what's funny?  Sending a kid to school with a bag lunch with 
> tapioca pudding made with the really big pearls so when the teacher 
> comes around to check that the kids are eating the correct food that 
> won't make them hyper or fat (like when you eat a p&j or a bologny 
> sandwich), the kid can tell her that it's fish eyes in sour cream sauce.
> 
glue its in glue

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687595 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<peih88$1hgf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687588
On 5/28/2018 1:29 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-29 4:20 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 5/28/2018 9:38 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <8b8pgdtm1btsvsm8gf60e5bbr055p31v12@4ax.com>,
>>> bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:12:16 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading 
>>>>> posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <pefnmh$ooj$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Proof, kook?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the pudding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, no proof then. Gotcha.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Damn!  Now I have a hankering for pudding.
>>>>
>>>> So you like white pudding then?
>>>
>>> No, I like chocolate or tapioca.  Are you acting queer again?
>>
>> You know what's funny?  Sending a kid to school with a bag lunch with 
>> tapioca pudding made with the really big pearls so when the teacher 
>> comes around to check that the kids are eating the correct food that 
>> won't make them hyper or fat (like when you eat a p&j or a bologny 
>> sandwich), the kid can tell her that it's fish eyes in sour cream sauce.
>>
> glue its in glue

What are you doing in the middle east?  Chopping heads?

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689300 — Re: Nadegda must be proud.

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
SubjectRe: Nadegda must be proud.
Message-ID<XnsA8FA47A47D9CBgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#687308
Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote in news:Jeff-Relf.Me@May.27--0.44am.Seattle.2018:

> Nadegda:
>> > > > > Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a
>> > > > > massive housing- affordability crisis going on throughout
>> > > > > most of the western world? 
>> > > > 
>> > > > Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>> > > 
>> > > Who are you calling "kook", kook ?
>> > 
>> > Shut up kook.
>> 
>> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook ?
> 
> You (Nadegda) changed the topic from a big ass
> " child support, custody, visitation " battle between Michael Rotondo
> and his (anonymous) baby mama to: " Who's the bigger kook ? ";
> well done, you must be proud.

She's not proud, she's stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687320 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<MPG.35742de429ff8516993b5c@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687303
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pedevu$v0b$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:49 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >>>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >>>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >>>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> >>>> > 
> >>>> > The Washington Post says:
> >>>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >>>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >>>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >>>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents
> >>>> >   than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in
> >>>> >   130 years.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive
> >>>> housing-
> >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >>> 
> >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >>
> >>Who are you calling "kook", kook?
> > 
> > Shut up kook.
> 
> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook?

I'd pay to see that.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687324 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<1npgkfz.5l1sswxfgyqlN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#687320
Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <pedevu$v0b$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...

> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:49 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nerdegda
> > > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> > > 
> > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> > >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Nerdegda replied ( to me ):
> > >>>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > >>>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > >>>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> > >>>> > 
> > >>>> > The Washington Post says:
> > >>>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> > >>>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> > >>>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> > >>>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents
> > >>>> >   than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in
> > >>>> >   130 years.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive
> > >>>> housing-
> > >>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> > >>
> > >>Who are you calling "kook", kook?
> > > 
> > > Shut up kook.
> > 
> > Why don't you come over here and make me, kook?
> 
> I'd pay to see that.

Ices!  Popcorn!

-- 
^Ï^.           Sn!pe           <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon just is.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687338 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<5PAOC.318506$PE5.53518@fx37.iad>
In reply to#687303
On 5/27/2018 1:16 AM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:49 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents
>>>>>>    than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in
>>>>>>    130 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive
>>>>> housing-
>>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>>
>>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>
>>> Who are you calling "kook", kook?
>>
>> Shut up kook.
> 
> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook?
> 
Nads, many of us here have been trying to "make you" for a long time, 
but you won't give your real name and address. Your loss!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 9 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web