Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Last post2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
            Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                        Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                            "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
                                        BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                                                        Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                                                " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                                                  Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                                                    Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                                                      Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                                                        Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                                                          Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                                                        Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                                                      "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                                                        Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
                                                          "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
                                                            Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
                                                              You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
                                                                    India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
                                                                  The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
                                                                        Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
                                                                            Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
                                                                              Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
                                                                                  Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                      Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
                                                                                            Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
                                                                      Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
                                                              Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
                                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700

Page 12 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13  Next page →


#688466

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Message-ID<pf0vo9$17jk$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#688342
On 6/2/2018 5:05 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:37:09 -0400, benj wrote:
>> Do you then agree that a man who murders a pregnant woman should be
>> charged with only one murder and not two no matter how far along the
>> pregnancy is?
> 
> I don't know whether kensi does, but I do. My guess would be that so does
> kensi, though, because only you rightwingers tend to be hypocritical to
> that degree.

Yep.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689057

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA8F8DC2501548greyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#688227
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
news:pet62g$bad$8@dont-email.me: 

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:
> 
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:pecmq6$v0b$13@dont-email.me:
>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less
>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study
>>>>>>> suggests: 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>> having-
>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>> starving! Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>
>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>>>> the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>> 
>>> It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort
>>> to such horrific means as mass murder.
>> 
>> Really? What do you consider abortion?
> 
> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at
> that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human
> being. 

I have become a huge fan of post birth abortion. Especially for loons 
like you.

> 
>>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be
>>> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world
>>> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded
>>> congested cities...
>>
>> Name calling Chicken little.
> 
> There goes that HDMonitor alarm again.
> 
> Aaand there goes the magic smoke. Shit!
> 
> Irony meters lost to AUK-adjacent groups since 2007:
> 
> 卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌å
> ŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒ 
> 卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌å
> ŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒåŒ 
> 卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌卌| ... and
> counting 
> 
> <sigh>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689111

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Message-ID<pf7lji$d4b$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#689057
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 06 Jun 2018 01:38:27 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:

> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
> news:pet62g$bad$8@dont-email.me:
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> 
>>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:pecmq6$v0b$13@dont-email.me:
>>> 
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rice – the staple food of billions – will become less
>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study
>>>>>>>> suggests:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>>>> having-
>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>> starving! Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>>>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>>>>> the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>> 
>>>> It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to
>>>> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results
>>>> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the
>>>> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort to
>>>> such horrific means as mass murder.
>>> 
>>> Really? What do you consider abortion?
>> 
>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at
>> that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being.
> 
> I have become a huge fan of post birth abortion. Especially for loons
> like you.

Hey kensi, I just got another kooky death threat. Nyaah nyaah.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689139

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Message-ID<pf8du1$1mhs$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#689111
On 6/5/2018 11:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2018 01:38:27 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:pet62g$bad$8@dont-email.me:
>>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at
>>> that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being.
>>
>> I have become a huge fan of post birth abortion. Especially for loons
>> like you.
> 
> Hey kensi, I just got another kooky death threat. Nyaah nyaah.
> 
> <snicker>

Call me when you've notched up 500 of them.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689207

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Message-ID<mkXRC.95684$7H4.48144@fx12.iad>
In reply to#689139
On 6/6/2018 6:44 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 6/5/2018 11:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2018 01:38:27 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:pet62g$bad$8@dont-email.me:
>>>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at
>>>> that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being.
>>>
>>> I have become a huge fan of post birth abortion. Especially for loons
>>> like you.
>>
>> Hey kensi, I just got another kooky death threat. Nyaah nyaah.
>>
>> <snicker>
> 
> Call me when you've notched up 500 of them.
> 
> *snicker*
> 
I've long been a fan of the scientific theory that live begins at 30 
years old! Do you and "kensi" still qualify for abortions? Obviously you 
both act like you are in grade school.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689298

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA8FA462EE801Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#689139
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:pf8du1$1mhs$2@gioia.aioe.org: 

> On 6/5/2018 11:49 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2018 01:38:27 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote:
>>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:pet62g$bad$8@dont-email.me:
>>>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not,
>>>> at that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human
>>>> being. 
>>>
>>> I have become a huge fan of post birth abortion. Especially for
>>> loons like you.
>> 
>> Hey kensi, I just got another kooky death threat. Nyaah nyaah.
>> 
>> <snicker>
> 
> Call me when you've notched up 500 of them.
> 
> *snicker*
> 

I've had death threats from the Klan, sparky.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#689301

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Message-ID<pfb6l2$b2l$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#689298
On 6/7/2018 6:53 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in
> news:pf8du1$1mhs$2@gioia.aioe.org:
> 
>> Call me when you've notched up 500 of them.
>>
>> *snicker*
> 
> I've had death threats from the Klan, sparky.

Sectarian disputes are the most vicious, aren't they?

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687233

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35736c01b7b141b2993b49@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687213
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <peceb7$v0b$6@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
> > On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as
> >> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
> >> 
> >> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-
> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
> >
> > Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
> > Oh wait. That's not worse...
> 
> Fuck off, racist scum.

Racism notwithstanding, why do so many of Kensi's posts contain the 
phrase "a new study SUGGESTS"?  That ain't science.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687402

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Message-ID<1m0mgddvd5h3qcbutinh4bq30s95jgt1p8@4ax.com>
In reply to#687233
On Sat, 26 May 2018 14:05:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:


>Racism notwithstanding, why do so many of Kensi's posts contain the 
>phrase "a new study SUGGESTS"?  That ain't science.

Exactly! Have you read Benj's essay on the subject.
It's quite good so far. I'm about halfway through
it. I liked the part about Tesla and Veliskoski(SP?)
and how they illustrate the fact that if one isn't
in the scientific *club* one is rejected outright no
matter how brilliant or insightful.

Kensi's science is basically a liberal cult. It's even
more elitist than in Tesla's day. And, she can't see
it because she's part of it.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687482

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Message-ID<peh374$149d$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687402
On 5/27/2018 6:25 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 14:05:47 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Racism notwithstanding, why do so many of Kensi's posts contain the
>> phrase "a new study SUGGESTS"?  That ain't science.
>
> Exactly! Have you read Benj's essay on the subject.
> It's quite good so far. I'm about halfway through
> it. I liked the part about Tesla and Veliskoski(SP?)

Well of course you did, since Velikovsky is a complete and utter quack 
and a lunatic.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

"Controversy reigned when the book's publisher (Macmillan) was forced to 
tear up Velikovsky's contract and pulp the book when it was top of the 
best-seller list, due to the ire of the scientific community who 
threatened to boycott Macmillan's textbooks if it did not stop peddling 
the egregious bullshit."

Needless to say, that wackjob is infamous among astrophysicists, when 
we're not using his /Worlds in Collision/ as a quick recipe for belly 
laughs. It's packed from stem to stern with howlers.

... "In short, comparative mythology was not a valid way to perform 
research into astrophysics, as it neglected such small matters as the 
conservation of angular momentum."

I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687486

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Message-ID<peh4b4$1558$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687482
On 5/28/2018 10:37 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:20:22 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> [Velikovsky]
>>
>> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n.
> 
> He's still smarter and more popular than you are.

Another Velikovsky fanb0i heard from. You fail astrophysics forever.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687508

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Message-ID<peheqv$1qdc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687486
On 5/28/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> On 5/28/2018 10:37 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:20:22 -0400, kensi
>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> [Velikovsky]
>>>>
>>>> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n.
>>>
>>> He's still smarter and more popular than you are.
>>
>> Another Velikovsky fanb0i heard from. You fail astrophysics forever.
> 
> Most likely since I don't do astrophysics.

That much is obvious -- if you did, you'd think Velikovsky was full of shit.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687520

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Message-ID<Y7YOC.107597$Jm2.52577@fx24.iad>
In reply to#687508
On 5/28/2018 1:38 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/28/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 5/28/2018 10:37 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:20:22 -0400, kensi
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> [Velikovsky]
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n.
>>>>
>>>> He's still smarter and more popular than you are.
>>>
>>> Another Velikovsky fanb0i heard from. You fail astrophysics forever.
>>
>> Most likely since I don't do astrophysics.
> 
> That much is obvious -- if you did, you'd think Velikovsky was full of 
> shit.
> 
Standard ignorant lies and liberal science propaganda. Oddly enough 
Velikovsky actually HAD the medical credentials to make a diagnosis of 
insanity for "kensi" even though "kensi" who has no such credentials 
seems to regularly make such a diagnosis for anyone who points out her 
lies.

Kensi obviously still believes with the "real" scientists of the day in 
golden-haired Venusians tripping about the greenhouse gasses of Venus!
Diagnosis anyone?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687528

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Message-ID<UAYOC.253096$DS3.13208@fx42.iad>
In reply to#687508
On 5/28/2018 1:38 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/28/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 5/28/2018 10:37 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:20:22 -0400, kensi
>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> [Velikovsky]
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n.
>>>>
>>>> He's still smarter and more popular than you are.
>>>
>>> Another Velikovsky fanb0i heard from. You fail astrophysics forever.
>>
>> Most likely since I don't do astrophysics.
> 
> That much is obvious -- if you did, you'd think Velikovsky was full of 
> shit.
> 
This is what scientists believed when Velikovsky's first book came out:

“Of all the planets, Venus is the most like earth. It is the
one which comes nearest to us, excepting our moon and some of the little 
bodies called 'asteroids' or minor planets. Eight-tenths as massive, 
more highly reflecting and two-thirds as far from the sun as the
earth, Venus seems more fit on many accounts than any other of the 
planets to support life similar to ours.”

"Kensi" obviously still believes this bullshit including golden-haired 
Venusians traipsing around under a beautiful cloud-filled sky. Oddly, 
most of what Velikovsky predicted was confirmed by later space probes 
and all the "experts" were shown to be morons just like "kensi" is today.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687626

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Message-ID<pejgll$15ub$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687528
On 5/28/2018 3:16 PM, benj wrote:
> "Kensi" obviously still believes this bullshit including golden-haired 
> Venusians traipsing around under a beautiful cloud-filled sky. Oddly, 
> most of what Velikovsky predicted was confirmed by later space probes 
> and all the "experts" were shown to be morons just like "kensi" is today.

Don't be ridiculous, k0Ok.

Velikovsky fanb0is so far:

- puddles
- Skeeter
- benj
- Tr!pe

So many of them! Makes me wonder if we have an actual bona fide flat 
Earther or two lurking somewhere around here. :P

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687668

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Message-ID<GDfPC.259547$DS3.257741@fx42.iad>
In reply to#687626
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that 
Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant.


On 5/29/2018 8:22 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/28/2018 3:16 PM, benj wrote:
>> "Kensi" obviously still believes this bullshit including golden-haired 
>> Venusians traipsing around under a beautiful cloud-filled sky. Oddly, 
>> most of what Velikovsky predicted was confirmed by later space probes 
>> and all the "experts" were shown to be morons just like "kensi" is today.
> 
> Don't be ridiculous, k0Ok.

Oh look muffy an anonymous crank on the internet says truth is 
"ridiculous'"!

Still looking for those venusians to visit you in their "beamships"?
That is "science" to you right? How about those "beautiful white clouds 
on Venus?" I'm sure that is what you call science.

> Velikovsky fanb0is so far:
> 
> - puddles
> - Skeeter
> - benj
> - Tr!pe
> 
> So many of them! Makes me wonder if we have an actual bona fide flat 
> Earther or two lurking somewhere around here. :P

So basically your are too ignorant and lazy to have even read what 
Velikovsky predicted and what was eventually found. If it's so "wrong" 
why not just list his predictions that establishment science thought was 
so kooky and compare them to science fact?

Obviously you can't because you are lib who is too ignorant to ever 
learn any real science. So all you can do is call anyone a "kook" who 
points out your incompetence. Why would ANYONE waste time reading your 
drooling screed?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687710

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Message-ID<pekcqr$ooj$38@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687668
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:56:57 -0400, benj wrote:

> Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that
> Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant.
> 
> 
> On 5/29/2018 8:22 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/28/2018 3:16 PM, benj wrote:
>>> "Kensi" obviously still believes this bullshit including golden-haired
>>> Venusians traipsing around under a beautiful cloud-filled sky. Oddly,
>>> most of what Velikovsky predicted was confirmed by later space probes
>>> and all the "experts" were shown to be morons just like "kensi" is
>>> today.
>> 
>> Don't be ridiculous, k0Ok.
> 
> Oh look muffy an anonymous crank on the internet says truth is
> "ridiculous'"!
> 
> Still looking for those venusians to visit you in their "beamships"?
> That is "science" to you right? How about those "beautiful white clouds
> on Venus?" I'm sure that is what you call science.
> 
>> Velikovsky fanb0is so far:
>> 
>> - puddles - Skeeter - benj - Tr!pe
>> 
>> So many of them! Makes me wonder if we have an actual bona fide flat
>> Earther or two lurking somewhere around here. :P
> 
> So basically your are too ignorant and lazy to have even read what
> Velikovsky predicted and what was eventually found. If it's so "wrong"
> why not just list his predictions that establishment science thought was
> so kooky and compare them to science fact?
> 
> Obviously you can't because you are lib who is too ignorant to ever
> learn any real science. So all you can do is call anyone a "kook" who
> points out your incompetence. Why would ANYONE waste time reading your
> drooling screed?

According to

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky

Velikovsky was quite the kook. As are all of his supporters. That means 
you.

SPNAK!

Scientific method? The page details numerous egregious scientific errors, 
including very basic errors in physics and chemistry, on Velikovsky's part.

SPNAK!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687821

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Message-ID<pemnav$u13$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687710
On 5/29/2018 4:37 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky
>>
>> Velikovsky was quite the kook. As are all of his supporters. That means
>> you.
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> Scientific method? The page details numerous egregious scientific errors,
>> including very basic errors in physics and chemistry, on Velikovsky's part.
>>
>> SPNAK!
> 
> rationalwiki?

What's wrong with rationalwiki?

Oh, that's right. Ko0ks are allergic to it ... and you are one.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687932

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Message-ID<peogld$1nht$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#687821
On 5/30/2018 1:50 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> On 5/29/2018 4:37 PM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> rationalwiki?
>>
>> What's wrong with rationalwiki?
>>
>> Oh, that's right. Ko0ks are allergic to it ... and you are one.
>>
>> *snicker*
> 
> It's a wiki,

So?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687593

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Message-ID<peifiv$ooj$25@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687508
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 28 May 2018 11:51:51 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:

> On Mon, 28 May 2018 13:38:41 -0400, kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>On 5/28/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 5/28/2018 10:37 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:20:22 -0400, kensi
>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> [Velikovsky]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's still smarter and more popular than you are.
>>>>
>>>> Another Velikovsky fanb0i heard from. You fail astrophysics forever.
>>> 
>>> Most likely since I don't do astrophysics.
>>
>>That much is obvious -- if you did, you'd think Velikovsky was full of
>>shit.
> 
> He's still smarter and more popular than you are.

Meanwhile, while you've been engaging in climate change denial and other 
pseudoscientific woo, a named tropical storm has been killing people in 
Florida AND IT ISN'T EVEN JUNE YET...

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 12 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web