Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Page 11 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <pfknrp$fcj$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689869 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 12:00:28 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: > Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in > news:pfd4ot$d4b$11@dont-email.me: > >>>>> Shut up kook. >>>> >>>> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook? >>> >>> Ok. Where are you? >> >> You started this. You divulge *your* location so I can come and kick >> your ass. > > I am actually not worried that some fat, lesbian snowflake is going to > harm me. I'm not fat, I'm not lesbian, and I know aikido. So go ahead, underestimate me. Your overconfidence will lead to a lengthy hospital stay, followed by jail time. And then a Bobo Award. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. |
| Message-ID | <bbhdj6.eoe.17.15@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #689958 |
On 2018-06-10 7:47 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 12:00:28 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: > >> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in >> news:pfd4ot$d4b$11@dont-email.me: >> >>>>>> Shut up kook. >>>>> >>>>> Why don't you come over here and make me, kook? >>>> >>>> Ok. Where are you? >>> >>> You started this. You divulge *your* location so I can come and kick >>> your ass. >> >> I am actually not worried that some fat, lesbian snowflake is going to >> harm me. > > I'm not fat, I'm not lesbian, and I know aikido. So go ahead, > underestimate me. Your overconfidence will lead to a lengthy hospital > stay, followed by jail time. And then a Bobo Award. > > <snicker> > do you know 38 to the head it tends to beat most martial arts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3573cc2785ce0ba0993b52@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #687275 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ped25j$v0b$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > Nadegda replied: > >> > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! > >> > > >> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of > >> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by > >> > the billions of people overload on the planet ? > >> > >> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including > >> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about > >> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready > >> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction > >> in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the > >> needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as > >> mass murder. > >> > >> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able > >> to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going > >> to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested > >> cities... > > > > Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, > > while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. > > > > In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", > > she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. > > > > Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his > > parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction came > > immediately after he lost visitation rights. > > > > CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, > > if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. > > > > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, > > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; > > oddly, she's off the radar. > > > > The Washington Post says: > > > > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > > > > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > > > > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly > > doubling since 1960. > > > > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than > > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least > > 130 years. > > Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- > affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? I guess it's making the natives restless. I don't know who I should worry about when the SHTF... the natives, or the Government. Probably both. I could totally live in an abandoned missile silo... I don't get out much anyway. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <t1dkgdtdrt4kr52scqnj9gcq0fp34ea2v3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687295 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:55:53 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >Checkmate! In article <ped25j$v0b$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >@gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> > Nadegda replied: >> >> > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >> >> > >> >> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of >> >> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by >> >> > the billions of people overload on the planet ? >> >> >> >> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including >> >> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about >> >> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready >> >> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction >> >> in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the >> >> needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as >> >> mass murder. >> >> >> >> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able >> >> to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going >> >> to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested >> >> cities... >> > >> > Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, >> > while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. >> > >> > In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", >> > she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. >> > >> > Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his >> > parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction came >> > immediately after he lost visitation rights. >> > >> > CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, >> > if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. >> > >> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, >> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >> > oddly, she's off the radar. >> > >> > The Washington Post says: >> > >> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >> > >> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >> > >> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly >> > doubling since 1960. >> > >> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >> > with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least >> > 130 years. >> >> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > >I guess it's making the natives restless. I don't know who I should >worry about when the SHTF... the natives, or the Government. Probably >both. I could totally live in an abandoned missile silo... I don't get >out much anyway. That's because I have the key to your cage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <pedf2l$v0b$29@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687300 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:30:51 -0500, Bricked wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:55:53 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>Checkmate! In article <ped25j$v0b$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>@gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>> > Nadegda replied: >>> >> > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >>> >> > >>> >> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of >>> >> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled >>> >> > by the billions of people overload on the planet ? >>> >> >>> >> It's been well established that affording women full rights, >>> >> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to >>> >> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive >>> >> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results >>> >> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the >>> >> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort >>> >> to such horrific means as mass murder. >>> >> >>> >> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be >>> >> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world >>> >> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded >>> >> congested cities... >>> > >>> > Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, >>> > while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. >>> > >>> > In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", >>> > she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. >>> > >>> > Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his >>> > parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction >>> > came immediately after he lost visitation rights. >>> > >>> > CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, >>> > if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. >>> > >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>> > oddly, she's off the radar. >>> > >>> > The Washington Post says: >>> > >>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>> > >>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>> > >>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, >>> > roughly doubling since 1960. >>> > >>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents >>> > than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in >>> > at least 130 years. >>> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive >>> housing- affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western >>> world? >> >>I guess it's making the natives restless. I don't know who I should >>worry about when the SHTF... the natives, or the Government. Probably >>both. I could totally live in an abandoned missile silo... I don't get >>out much anyway. > > That's because I have the key to your cage. ... he says, while dancing merrily to our tune for our amusement. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35742b3adc8a0b10993b57@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #687304 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pedf2l$v0b$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:30:51 -0500, Bricked wrote: > > > On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:55:53 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > >>Checkmate! In article <ped25j$v0b$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >>@gmail.invalid says... > >> > >> > >> > >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>> melt! > >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>> > >>> > Nadegda replied: > >>> >> > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of > >>> >> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled > >>> >> > by the billions of people overload on the planet ? > >>> >> > >>> >> It's been well established that affording women full rights, > >>> >> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to > >>> >> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive > >>> >> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results > >>> >> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the > >>> >> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort > >>> >> to such horrific means as mass murder. > >>> >> > >>> >> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be > >>> >> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world > >>> >> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded > >>> >> congested cities... > >>> > > >>> > Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, > >>> > while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. > >>> > > >>> > In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", > >>> > she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. > >>> > > >>> > Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his > >>> > parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction > >>> > came immediately after he lost visitation rights. > >>> > > >>> > CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, > >>> > if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. > >>> > > >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, > >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old; > >>> > oddly, she's off the radar. > >>> > > >>> > The Washington Post says: > >>> > > >>> > one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. > >>> > > >>> > 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. > >>> > > >>> > Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, > >>> > roughly doubling since 1960. > >>> > > >>> > more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents > >>> > than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in > >>> > at least 130 years. > >>> > >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive > >>> housing- affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western > >>> world? > >> > >>I guess it's making the natives restless. I don't know who I should > >>worry about when the SHTF... the natives, or the Government. Probably > >>both. I could totally live in an abandoned missile silo... I don't get > >>out much anyway. > > > > That's because I have the key to your cage. > > ... he says, while dancing merrily to our tune for our amusement. > > <snicker> Don't let him (?) think he's being tag-teamed. <swats Bricked back in your court> -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <gbulgd9l5m83e2jqmv5aire1n7qoh0iqf5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687275 |
On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: <...> >Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? Perhaps YOU haven't noticed that young men have little desire to get out into the real world and be exposed to liberal termagants such as yourself... -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <EsSOC.157265$o43.19695@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #687397 |
On 5/27/2018 6:25 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > > <...> > >> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > > Perhaps YOU haven't noticed that young men have > little desire to get out into the real world and be > exposed to liberal termagants such as yourself... > Now you've done it Sir Greg. Nads is actually going to have to ask "Kanzi" what "termagants" means. (We already know she is much too lazy to google it online and especially too lazy to actually pull a dictionary off the shelf.) She knows that "Ignorance is Strength".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <peh3td$1558$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687468 |
On 5/28/2018 8:18 AM, benj wrote: > Now you've done it Sir Greg. Nads is actually going to have to ask > "Kanzi" what "[misogynist slur deleted]" means. (We already know she > is much too lazy to google it online and especially too lazy to > actually pull a dictionary off the shelf.) > > She knows that "Ignorance is Strength". /Au contraire/. But I do know that conservatism is doubleplus ungood. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <peifee$ooj$24@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687485 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:32:15 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 5/28/2018 8:18 AM, benj wrote: >> Now you've done it Sir Greg. Nads is actually going to have to ask >> "Kanzi" what "[misogynist slur deleted]" means. (We already know she is >> much too lazy to google it online and especially too lazy to actually >> pull a dictionary off the shelf.) >> >> She knows that "Ignorance is Strength". > > /Au contraire/. But I do know that conservatism is doubleplus ungood. There's been a spanking. I'd also say benj has been schooled, but benj has proven time and again that benj is uneducable. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <pefmsv$ooj$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687275 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 27 May 2018 07:09:03 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:55 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >>> Nadegda replied: >>>> > > > it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >>>> > >>>> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of >>>> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by >>>> > the billions of people overload on the planet ? >>>> >>>> It's been well established that affording women full rights, >>>> including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to >>>> move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive >>>> autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care; results >>>> in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the women of the >>>> world will achieve the needed population reductions without resort to >>>> such horrific means as mass murder. >>>> >>>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be >>>> able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world >>>> is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded >>>> congested cities... >>> >>> Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front, >>> while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal. >>> >>> In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ", >>> she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden. >>> >>> Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his >>> parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction came >>> immediately after he lost visitation rights. >>> >>> CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, >>> if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course. >>> >>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here, >>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old; >>> oddly, she's off the radar. >>> >>> The Washington Post says: >>> >>> one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home. >>> >>> 12.5 percent of women that age live at home. >>> >>> Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly >>> doubling since 1960. >>> >>> more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than >>> with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least >>> 130 years. >> >>Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- >>affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > > > You can thank the left for that. Ronnie Reagan is "the left" now?! -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35763a3fea2839cf993b88@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #687430 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pefmsv$ooj$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > >>Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing- > >>affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world? > > > > > > You can thank the left for that. > > Ronnie Reagan is "the left" now?! Ronnie did that? That BASTARD! -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vb0mgdtqkvptq2rs05rcsitrvunb2ueddl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687243 |
On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: <...> >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder. How about you women just stop fucking so much? You don't need liberation; you need to keep your knees together. You act as if your brain just can't conceive of the simple fact that you won't conceive if you don't allow all and sundry to insert their penises into your body which with you claim to have the right to do anything you wish? So, how's about you stop your over production of progeny? It's your sole responsibility. But NOOOOO! You'd rather blame it on everything else but your own lack of personal responsibility. Typical bankrupt liberal attitude, yours! Feminism is the ultimate hypocrisy unless and until you women take full responsibility for your progeny. >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities... While you misandrists blame the blameless. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA8F39E81F4A04greyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223> |
| In reply to | #687243 |
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in news:pecmq6$v0b$13@dont-email.me: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less >>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study >>>>> suggests: >>>>> >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is- > having- >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice >>>> >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians >>>> starving! Oh wait. That's not worse... >>> >>> Fuck off, racist scum. >> >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by >> the billions of people overload on the planet? > > It's been well established that affording women full rights, including > economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about > unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready > access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction > in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the > needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as > mass murder. Really? What do you consider abortion? > But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be > able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is > going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded > congested cities... > Name calling Chicken little. You are obsolete.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pet62g$bad$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687995 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: > Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in > news:pecmq6$v0b$13@dont-email.me: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less nutritious as >>>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is- >> having- >>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice >>>>> >>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse... >>>> >>>> Fuck off, racist scum. >>> >>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of >>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the >>> billions of people overload on the planet? >> >> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including >> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about >> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready >> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction >> in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the >> needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as >> mass murder. > > Really? What do you consider abortion? A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being. >> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able >> to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going >> to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested >> cities... > > Name calling Chicken little. There goes that HDMonitor alarm again. Aaand there goes the magic smoke. Shit! Irony meters lost to AUK-adjacent groups since 2007: ååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååå ååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååå ååååååååååååååååååå| ... and counting <sigh> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <b3zQC.143094$R51.58880@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #688227 |
On 6/2/2018 12:22 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: > >> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in >> news:pecmq6$v0b$13@dont-email.me: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less nutritious as >>>>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is- >>> having- >>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse... >>>>> >>>>> Fuck off, racist scum. >>>> >>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of >>>> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the >>>> billions of people overload on the planet? >>> >>> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including >>> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about >>> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready >>> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction >>> in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the >>> needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as >>> mass murder. >> >> Really? What do you consider abortion? > > A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at that > time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being. So at what point in time do YOU consider life "begins". I want to know when a medical operation turns into murder. This is especially important to those interested in killing women. (Oh my! A "death threat" Call Eric Holder or maybe "Honest" Big Jim Comey! >>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able >>> to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going >>> to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested >>> cities... >> >> Name calling Chicken little. > > There goes that HDMonitor alarm again. As Germans say, why don't you just HDM? > Aaand there goes the magic smoke. Shit! > > Irony meters lost to AUK-adjacent groups since 2007: > > ååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååå > ååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååååå > ååååååååååååååååååå| > ... and counting > > <sigh> No such scientific thing as an "Irony meter". Show the insanity that Nads and "kensi" try to pass off as science education!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <peullh$1s6p$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688284 |
On 6/2/2018 11:52 AM, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 12:22 AM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: >>> Really? What do you consider abortion? >> >> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at that >> time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being. > > So at what point in time do YOU consider life "begins". "At birth" would seem to be the standard response. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8eDQC.195098$6C5.192027@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #688304 |
On 6/2/2018 1:54 PM, kensi wrote: > On 6/2/2018 11:52 AM, benj wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 12:22 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: >>>> Really? What do you consider abortion? >>> >>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at >>> that >>> time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human being. >> >> So at what point in time do YOU consider life "begins". > > "At birth" would seem to be the standard response. > But I asked what YOU believed not what was "standard". Aren't you capable of speaking for yourself? Do you then agree that a man who murders a pregnant woman should be charged with only one murder and not two no matter how far along the pregnancy is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pev0q1$bad$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688330 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:37:09 -0400, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 1:54 PM, kensi wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 11:52 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 12:22 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: >>>>> Really? What do you consider abortion? >>>> >>>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at >>>> that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human >>>> being. >>> >>> So at what point in time do YOU consider life "begins". >> >> "At birth" would seem to be the standard response. > > But I asked what YOU believed not what was "standard". No, you didn't, you asked what *I* believed. Obviously kensi didn't want to put words in my mouth. She needn't have worried: I agree with her. > Do you then agree that a man who murders a pregnant woman should be > charged with only one murder and not two no matter how far along the > pregnancy is? I don't know whether kensi does, but I do. My guess would be that so does kensi, though, because only you rightwingers tend to be hypocritical to that degree. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hkGQC.303975$br4.72352@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #688342 |
On 6/2/2018 5:05 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:37:09 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 6/2/2018 1:54 PM, kensi wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 11:52 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 12:22 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:34:54 +0000, Avenging Angel wrote: >>>>>> Really? What do you consider abortion? >>>>> >>>>> A medical procedure to remove a small ball of cells which is not, at >>>>> that time, a human being or even remotely close to being a human >>>>> being. >>>> >>>> So at what point in time do YOU consider life "begins". >>> >>> "At birth" would seem to be the standard response. >> >> But I asked what YOU believed not what was "standard". > > No, you didn't, you asked what *I* believed. Obviously kensi didn't want > to put words in my mouth. She needn't have worried: I agree with her. Quit pretending you are not "putting words in "kensi's" mouth. OF course you agree with "her" when you choose to. But since "kensi" has not yet answered my direct question, it is not certain what "she" believes. >> Do you then agree that a man who murders a pregnant woman should be >> charged with only one murder and not two no matter how far along the >> pregnancy is? > > I don't know whether kensi does, but I do. My guess would be that so does > kensi, though, because only you rightwingers tend to be hypocritical to > that degree. > You mean like all those rightwingers in the administrations that have been controlling the White House and Congress for how long now? Nads you need a bit more experience with REAL government if you ever intend to rise above the level of "useful idiot". Think of how EMOTIONAL the death of a woman and her unborn is! Don't you think that such suffering deserves extra punishment for the (obviously rightwing) killer? I"m pretty sure that the media agrees with this and so will most people after the media is through with them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web