Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #685243 > unrolled thread

What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:54 -0500
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:18 -0700
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:51 -0700
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 12:24 -0700
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-14 20:09 -0700
    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 06:09 +1000
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 15:27 -0500
        Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 19:03 -0400
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:32 +1000
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 18:24 -0400
        Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 08:49 +1000
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 20:09 -0400
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 19:26 -0500
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 10:44 +1000
      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:30 -0700
        Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 09:41 +1000
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 19:00 -0500
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 10:12 +1000
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:53 -0400
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 09:19 -0500
                Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:52 +1000
                  Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-17 12:22 -0500
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 20:13 -0400
          Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 20:11 -0400
            Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 10:46 +1000
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 22:09 -0400
                Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-15 16:00 +1000
                  Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 01:37 -0700
                    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 05:17 -0700
                      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 05:25 -0700
                      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:27 +0000
                    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 09:56 -0400
                      Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 15:42 -0700
              Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 21:20 -0500
                Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-16 09:32 +1000
                  Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-16 12:00 -0500
                    Re: What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-17 07:53 +1000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#685243 — What's the Bigger Menace, an Asteroid Impact or Climate Change?

obviously Asteroids!!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/


Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
into perspective."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#685335

On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:54:48 AM UTC+10, Sergio wrote:
> obviously Asteroids!!
> 
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
> 
> 
> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
> into perspective."

If they had been less racist+bigoted hypocritical pseudo-scientists, promoting their respective tribalisms accordingly, then they would have taken my new and original ground-breaking experiments in physics seriously; and then taken effective measures to overcome the incredibly dangerous and ever-present asteroid menace. As things are, they are the most despicable unspeakables strangling physics and thus pre-empting new technologies - such liars, and confidence tricksters. They ignore me, simply because I am a brown Hindu - and for centuries these racists have considered Hinduism an inferior religion, thoroughly other-worldly and unscientific, while secretly absorbing as much as they could from the ancient lore of India.

The following video films have been around for more than one year, and have been ignored thanks to their corrupt and perverted mentalities, shared by all the leading institutions. I don't think they will take notice even when say New York is wiped out by an asteroid. Such is the power of obtuseness based upon tribalistic self-interest.

Nevertheless, the chances that succeeding generations will be better than this bad lot, area not non-zero, especially among the upcoming thirdworlders whose elites need not such bootlicking reverse-racists - the situation now. To help them in preserving life on the planet and beyond (by breaking up large asteroids or diverting them before they reach Earth with rail guns mounted on IFE powered spaceships) I present once again the links to the vidoe films I put on youtube last year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685343

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 1:54:48 PM UTC-4, Sergio wrote:
> obviously Asteroids!!
> 
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
> 
> 
> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
> into perspective."


Thanks Sergio.
"even though the climate change threat is more
than a thousand times greater"

Now we have some relative probabilities.

And of course it is easier to sell the danger of a fast death
(within a congressman's lifetime) versus a slow death (in that
congressman's great grand child's lifetime).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685426

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 10:54:48 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> obviously Asteroids!!
> 
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
> 
> 
> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
> into perspective."

Climate getting to warm is realty as of now.Asteroid or comet hitting soon have great odds against it.Tiny singing birds have died already.The big sperm whale needs cold water,and its now known ocean ice is melting as I type. We must go this reality.Only low wit Mafia GOPers will tell you that global warming is a democrate conspiracy.O ya  Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685508

SwineBert "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
you write about "mafia, mafia, mafia"  in every post of 
yours of mafiosi from "NYC ,Chicago, FL and N.J.

>So don't be surprised, TurdBert, when and sooner or 
later a "made man" from the Jewish-, Irish- or Italian-Mafia 
does come looking for you, put concrete-shoes on you, 
and then dumps you off the Huntington Beach Pier to test
your "Heavy Air" theory, while he watches & waits  until 
bubbles-of-your-heavy-air stop coming up. 
>
hmmm...<snicker>...<chortle>...ahahahAHAHA...ROTFLMAO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685433

On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
> obviously Asteroids!!
> 
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
> 
> 
> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
> into perspective."
> 

**Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other 
agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet. 
We must also deal with the reality of global warming.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685442

On 5/14/2018 3:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>
>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>
>>
>>
>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>> into perspective."
>>
> 
> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
> 

yep, they are two different problems.

The asteroid one,
	detection decreases as size decreases or as distance increases.
	probably cannot do anything if below a certain size, the atmosphere
will burn out most below about 4 inches in diameter

	what to do if the thing is 100 foot across or greater ?

	NASA cannot predict where something will land on Earth due to
atmosphere unless it is Really big, like a few miles big

so, I have not seen anything real that could prevent or change course of
an asteroid in any size range.

with Laser, they cannot focus energy on target long enough.

so What will NASA do, they dont really talk about destroying asteroid,
but they will talk about detection of them, map them.

so if detected, now, there is nothing we can do, and it most likely
cannot predict where it will hit on earth with any accuracy.

problem is getting enough mass up there in time near asteroid to do
something.


Physics problem;

take a 1,000 foot diameter, iron, coming in at 20,000 mph detected at
10,000,000 mi out.  How much time does earth have to get something there
in time to effect a path change ?  How much mass is required to launch ?

(make assumptions where needed, and bound problem where you can)
	
	
	

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685462

On 5/14/2018 4:27 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 3:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>
>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>> into perspective."
>>>
>>
>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>
> 
> yep, they are two different problems.
> 
> The asteroid one,
> 	detection decreases as size decreases or as distance increases.
> 	probably cannot do anything if below a certain size, the atmosphere
> will burn out most below about 4 inches in diameter
> 
> 	what to do if the thing is 100 foot across or greater ?
> 
> 	NASA cannot predict where something will land on Earth due to
> atmosphere unless it is Really big, like a few miles big
> 
> so, I have not seen anything real that could prevent or change course of
> an asteroid in any size range.
> 
> with Laser, they cannot focus energy on target long enough.
> 
> so What will NASA do, they dont really talk about destroying asteroid,
> but they will talk about detection of them, map them.
> 
> so if detected, now, there is nothing we can do, and it most likely
> cannot predict where it will hit on earth with any accuracy.
> 
> problem is getting enough mass up there in time near asteroid to do
> something.
> 
> 
> Physics problem;
> 
> take a 1,000 foot diameter, iron, coming in at 20,000 mph detected at
> 10,000,000 mi out.  How much time does earth have to get something there
> in time to effect a path change ?  How much mass is required to launch ?
> 
> (make assumptions where needed, and bound problem where you can)

Foolish question, Sergio. Libs can't do science. (even though Trevor 
pretends to know science, watch he won't answer this because he can't 
Google it and pretend he did it himself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685467

On 15/05/2018 9:03 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 4:27 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 3:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>
>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>> into perspective."
>>>>
>>>
>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>
>>
>> yep, they are two different problems.
>>
>> The asteroid one,
>>     detection decreases as size decreases or as distance increases.
>>     probably cannot do anything if below a certain size, the atmosphere
>> will burn out most below about 4 inches in diameter
>>
>>     what to do if the thing is 100 foot across or greater ?
>>
>>     NASA cannot predict where something will land on Earth due to
>> atmosphere unless it is Really big, like a few miles big
>>
>> so, I have not seen anything real that could prevent or change course of
>> an asteroid in any size range.
>>
>> with Laser, they cannot focus energy on target long enough.
>>
>> so What will NASA do, they dont really talk about destroying asteroid,
>> but they will talk about detection of them, map them.
>>
>> so if detected, now, there is nothing we can do, and it most likely
>> cannot predict where it will hit on earth with any accuracy.
>>
>> problem is getting enough mass up there in time near asteroid to do
>> something.
>>
>>
>> Physics problem;
>>
>> take a 1,000 foot diameter, iron, coming in at 20,000 mph detected at
>> 10,000,000 mi out.  How much time does earth have to get something there
>> in time to effect a path change ?  How much mass is required to launch ?
>>
>> (make assumptions where needed, and bound problem where you can)
> 
> Foolish question, Sergio. Libs can't do science. (even though Trevor 
> pretends to know science, watch he won't answer this because he can't 
> Google it and pretend he did it himself.
> 

**No, you dumb lap-dog. Trevor won't answer it for several reasons:

* I don't deal in Imperial measurements. No one on this planet does 
(except for a pitiful 5% of the planet's population). The Metric system 
is the only language scientists deal with.
* The Question is irrelevant to the discussion.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685455

On 5/14/2018 4:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>
>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>
>>
>>
>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>> into perspective."
>>
> 
> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other 
> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet. 
> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
> 
Actually we must deal with the reality of the fantasies of the likes of 
you. Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average went up a 
couple of degrees? Somehow reasonable people think you are lying.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685458

On 15/05/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 4:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>
>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>> into perspective."
>>>
>>
>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other 
>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
>> planet. We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>
> Actually we must deal with the reality of the fantasies of the likes of 
> you. Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average went up a 
> couple of degrees? Somehow reasonable people think you are lying.

**Ah, the yappy lap-dog arrives.

I NEVER claimed that the average temperatures had risen "a couple of 
degrees".

Feel free to cite where you imagine I claimed such a thing.

I'll wait while you bark and run around in circles.

Stupid lap-dog.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685476

On 5/14/2018 6:49 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 4:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>
>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>> into perspective."
>>>>
>>>
>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other 
>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
>>> planet. We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>
>> Actually we must deal with the reality of the fantasies of the likes 
>> of you. Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average went 
>> up a couple of degrees? Somehow reasonable people think you are lying.
> 
> **Ah, the yappy lap-dog arrives.
> 
> I NEVER claimed that the average temperatures had risen "a couple of 
> degrees".
> 
> Feel free to cite where you imagine I claimed such a thing.
> 
> I'll wait while you bark and run around in circles.
> 
> Stupid lap-dog.
> 
Time for your meds. Nobody said you claimed anything. You can't read and 
your attention span is zero. So how much has average temperature anomaly 
  risen since 1920? Please stay out of your stash until you answer. 
(Sergio can help you out if you are stuck)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685482

On 5/14/2018 7:09 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 6:49 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 4:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing
>>>>> the
>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>> threats
>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>> planet. We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>
>>> Actually we must deal with the reality of the fantasies of the likes
>>> of you. Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average
>>> went up a couple of degrees? Somehow reasonable people think you are
>>> lying.
>>
>> **Ah, the yappy lap-dog arrives.
>>
>> I NEVER claimed that the average temperatures had risen "a couple of
>> degrees".
>>
>> Feel free to cite where you imagine I claimed such a thing.
>>
>> I'll wait while you bark and run around in circles.
>>
>> Stupid lap-dog.
>>
> Time for your meds. Nobody said you claimed anything. You can't read and
> your attention span is zero. So how much has average temperature anomaly
>  risen since 1920? Please stay out of your stash until you answer.
> (Sergio can help you out if you are stuck)

no problem-o,

I do accept kickstarter funding, just send $4.99 to
makemerich@paypal.com and I can research your side with Math!, and
forward the info to you via email, then you could post it here as yours,
after all you did pay for the research so it does belong to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685483

On 15/05/2018 10:09 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 6:49 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2018 4:09 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/ 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing 
>>>>> the
>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both 
>>>>> threats
>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other 
>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the 
>>>> planet. We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>
>>> Actually we must deal with the reality of the fantasies of the likes 
>>> of you. Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average 
>>> went up a couple of degrees? Somehow reasonable people think you are 
>>> lying.
>>
>> **Ah, the yappy lap-dog arrives.
>>
>> I NEVER claimed that the average temperatures had risen "a couple of 
>> degrees".
>>
>> Feel free to cite where you imagine I claimed such a thing.
>>
>> I'll wait while you bark and run around in circles.
>>
>> Stupid lap-dog.
>>
> Time for your meds. Nobody said you claimed anything.


**YOU responded to my post with this:

"Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average went up a 
couple of degrees?"

So, how am I expected to respond, you dumb, yappy lap-dog?

I'll wait while you bark and run around in circles.


  You can't read and
> your attention span is zero.

**I read just fine. Here is what you said:

"Are you SURE you can tell that the temperature on average went up a 
couple of degrees?"

You have the attention span of (yes, you guessed it) a yappy lap-dog.


  So how much has average temperature anomaly
>   risen since 1920?

**Approximately 1.3 degrees C.


  Please stay out of your stash until you answer.
> (Sergio can help you out if you are stuck)

**You keep appealing to your master, you dumb, yappy lap-dog. You 
wouldn't want to do your own research, would you?


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685466

On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
> > obviously Asteroids!!
> > 
> > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
> > 
> > 
> > Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
> > more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
> > dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
> > the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
> > than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
> > climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
> > into perspective."
> > 
> 
> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other 
> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet. 
> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
> 
> -- 
> Trevor Wilson
> www.rageaudio.com.au

What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo, Kolkata, etc.?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685469

On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>
>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>> into perspective."
>>>
>>
>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>
>> -- 
>> Trevor Wilson
>> www.rageaudio.com.au
> 
> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo, Kolkata, etc.?
> 

**With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter 
the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With 
less warning, nothing.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685474

On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>
>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>> into perspective."
>>>>
>>>
>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Trevor Wilson
>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>
>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>
> 
> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter
> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
> less warning, nothing.
> 


Physics Question;

so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth)

part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the path of
the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
ball)

part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?

(math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
cannot save the planet))

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685479

On 15/05/2018 10:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>
>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>
>>
>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter
>> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
>> less warning, nothing.
>>
> 
> 
> Physics Question;
> 
> so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
> detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
> ? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth >
> part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the path of
> the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
> ball)
> 
> part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
> to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?
> 
> (math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
> deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
> cannot save the planet))
> 

**No doubt about it. Fortunately, the chances of being hit are 
incredibly remote. Unlike global warming, which is measurable and 
something we may be able to deal with.

BTW: If you want any calculations done, use the accepted scientific 
units. No one uses Imperial measurements any more.

Cue: Benj, the yappy lap-dog.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685506

On Tue, 15 May 2018 10:12:45 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:

>On 15/05/2018 10:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been much
>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in characterizing the
>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is more
>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative comparison of
>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both threats
>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the planet.
>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>
>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>
>>>
>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter
>>> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
>>> less warning, nothing.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Physics Question;
>> 
>> so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
>> detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
>> ? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth >
>> part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the path of
>> the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
>> ball)
>> 
>> part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
>> to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?
>> 
>> (math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
>> deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
>> cannot save the planet))
>> 
>
>**No doubt about it. Fortunately, the chances of being hit are 
>incredibly remote. Unlike global warming, which is measurable and 
>something we may be able to deal with.

Woo hoo! Let's give an asteroid a place to land that is not too hot,
not too cold, but just right. ... then we can kiss our asses goodbye
with the self-satisfaction that we "saved the planet" from getting a
bit warmer before the big one hit because we wasted all our time and
money "fighting" climate change.



>BTW: If you want any calculations done, use the accepted scientific 
>units. No one uses Imperial measurements any more.
>
>Cue: Benj, the yappy lap-dog.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685578

On 5/14/2018 7:12 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/05/2018 10:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 6:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2018 9:30 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:09:36 AM UTC+10, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 14/05/2018 3:54 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> obviously Asteroids!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/asteroid-impact-climate-change/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless, they wrote, "The asteroid-threat community has been
>>>>>> much
>>>>>> more successful than the climate change community in
>>>>>> characterizing the
>>>>>> dominant worst-case scenarios and communicating them to policymakers,
>>>>>> the media and the public—even though the climate change threat is
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> than a thousand times greater…, [therefore] quantitative
>>>>>> comparison of
>>>>>> climate change to asteroid impact is a valuable way to put both
>>>>>> threats
>>>>>> into perspective."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **Walk, chew gum. Humans can do both. Certainly NASA and the other
>>>>> agencies must continue to identify objects that may endanger the
>>>>> planet.
>>>>> We must also deal with the reality of global warming.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Trevor Wilson
>>>>> www.rageaudio.com.au
>>>>
>>>> What the f can anyone do when they learn at the last moment that an
>>>> asteroid is coming to wipe out New York? Or Mosocow, Beijing, Tokyo,
>>>> Kolkata, etc.?
>>>>
>>>
>>> **With sufficient warning (20 ~ 30 years), then we may be able to alter
>>> the orbit of the object, sufficiently, so that it misses Earth. With
>>> less warning, nothing.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Physics Question;
>>
>> so, at 20,000 mph, and 20 years away, how large is the asteroid to be
>> detectable by radar at that distance ?  OR how about by reflected light
>> ? (assume rock is coming straight towards earth >
>> part 2.   How much mass to we need to put up there to effect the path of
>> the rock ?  (assume by gravity, by explosion, or by hitting it like a q
>> ball)
>>
>> part 3. how much time and energy does it take to put the mass up there
>> to the asteroid from Earth to affect something ?
>>
>> (math is not hard, but I think you will see how the Earth is in very
>> deep yogurt when it comes to asteroids, of most any size, (Bruce Willis
>> cannot save the planet))
>>
> 
> **No doubt about it. Fortunately, the chances of being hit are
> incredibly remote. Unlike global warming, which is measurable and
> something we may be able to deal with.
> 
> BTW: If you want any calculations done, use the accepted scientific
> units. No one uses Imperial measurements any more.

Fosters beer comes in p & q's dude.

answer the physics question.


> 
> Cue: Benj, the yappy lap-dog.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web