Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #548424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500 |
| Articles | 15 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 00:02 +0000
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:48 -0800
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 06:19 +0000
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:23 -0500
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:18 -0500
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:36 -0600
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-28 23:12 +0000
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:23 -0600
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 01:31 +0000
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 19:54 -0600
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-28 14:35 -0800
Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600 |
| Subject | Neutral result charges up antimatter research |
| Message-ID | <Ovudne2Lj4NuZTrLnZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Neutral result charges up antimatter research > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again > pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest > breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today > in the prestigious journal Nature, the collaboration's result > improved the measurement of the charge of antihydrogen, essentially > zero, by a factor of 20. Their work is the latest contribution in the > quest to chase down the answer to the basic antimatter question, "If > matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big > Bang, where did all the antimatter go?" -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 00:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g1elnc-t37.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #548424 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Neutral result charges up antimatter research >> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > "For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs, Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior written or oral permission is required." http://phys.org/help/contactus/ What is Fair Use? "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work." http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/ Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-26 21:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <45e5d231-d8fe-4cd4-825f-766f979e3f73@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #548437 |
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > > Neutral result charges up antimatter research > >> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > > "For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs, > Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set > forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up > to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back > to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior > written or oral permission is required." > > http://phys.org/help/contactus/ > > What is Fair Use? > > "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted > material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to > comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work." > > http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/ > > Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head? Same place it's always been and always will be; beyond his competence. He has said that he learned from his teaching (assisting) experience to refrains from commenting lest he contaminate other's thinking with his own. On the one hand, he's abstaining from being an Authority to which to Appeal. On the other hand, he's abstaining from participating in the best part of science, *fertilizing* others' minds with one's own thoughts. On the gripping hand, I think he's afraid to back something that later turns out to be wrong. Mark L. Fergerson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 06:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <844mnc-p49.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #548488 |
nuny@bid.nes <Alien8752@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Neutral result charges up antimatter research >> >> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html >> >> "For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs, >> Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set >> forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up >> to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back >> to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior >> written or oral permission is required." >> >> http://phys.org/help/contactus/ >> >> What is Fair Use? >> >> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted >> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to >> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work." >> >> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/ >> >> Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head? > > Same place it's always been and always will be; beyond his competence. > > He has said that he learned from his teaching (assisting) experience to refrains from commenting lest he contaminate other's thinking with his own. > > On the one hand, he's abstaining from being an Authority to which to Appeal. > > On the other hand, he's abstaining from participating in the best part of science, *fertilizing* others' minds with one's own thoughts. > > On the gripping hand, I think he's afraid to back something that later turns out to be wrong. > > > Mark L. Fergerson Mostly I think he has delusions of competence but subconsciously knows if he opens his mouth he will expose his incompetence as is shown by his refusal to ever actually debate anything. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 02:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2g_py.212917$qz7.148573@fx01.iad> |
| In reply to | #548497 |
On 01/27/2016 01:19 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> nuny@bid.nes <Alien8752@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Neutral result charges up antimatter research
>>>>> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html
>>>
>>> "For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs,
>>> Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set
>>> forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up
>>> to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back
>>> to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior
>>> written or oral permission is required."
>>>
>>> http://phys.org/help/contactus/
>>>
>>> What is Fair Use?
>>>
>>> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
>>> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
>>> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."
>>>
>>> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/
>>>
>>> Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head?
>>
>> Same place it's always been and always will be; beyond his competence.
>>
>> He has said that he learned from his teaching (assisting) experience to refrains from commenting lest he contaminate other's thinking with his own.
>>
>> On the one hand, he's abstaining from being an Authority to which to Appeal.
>>
>> On the other hand, he's abstaining from participating in the best part of science, *fertilizing* others' minds with one's own thoughts.
>>
>> On the gripping hand, I think he's afraid to back something that later turns out to be wrong.
>>
>>
>> Mark L. Fergerson
>
> Mostly I think he has delusions of competence but subconsciously knows
> if he opens his mouth he will expose his incompetence as is shown by
> his refusal to ever actually debate anything.
Which is made doubly funny by his constant posting of the Sci.physics
charter saying the newsgroup is for discussion of physics topics!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-27 02:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wb_py.212915$qz7.173844@fx01.iad> |
| In reply to | #548488 |
On 01/27/2016 12:48 AM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Neutral result charges up antimatter research
>>>> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html
>>
>> "For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs,
>> Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set
>> forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up
>> to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back
>> to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior
>> written or oral permission is required."
>>
>> http://phys.org/help/contactus/
>>
>> What is Fair Use?
>>
>> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
>> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
>> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."
>>
>> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/
>>
>> Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head?
>
> Same place it's always been and always will be; beyond his competence.
>
> He has said that he learned from his teaching (assisting) experience to refrains from commenting lest he contaminate other's thinking with his own.
>
> On the one hand, he's abstaining from being an Authority to which to Appeal.
>
> On the other hand, he's abstaining from participating in the best part of science, *fertilizing* others' minds with one's own thoughts.
>
> On the gripping hand, I think he's afraid to back something that later turns out to be wrong.
>
>
> Mark L. Fergerson
Mark has hit the nail on the head with regard to Warmley's lack of any
discussion. However, under the terms of the phys.org permission no
discussion is needed. While they "rely" of the terms of "fair use" they
make no requirement of it. In fact they give anyone permission to copy
up to 200 words of any of their so-called "material" regardless of
purpose provided a hyperlink back to the original content. While I
haven't counted Wormley's words I don't think they exceed 200.
Note that this is not a restriction to 200 words or even providing a
hyperlink IF the copying falls under fair use. For example you could
copy the entire piece with NO link back to the original legally for the
purpose of parody which courts have uniformly upheld as "fair use" (and
the articles at phys.org REALLY need to turned into more parody than
they already are!) Other "fair use" is far more restrictive by courts.
So while jimp whines about Sam violating copyrights, in the case of
phys.org trash he clearly has their permission to distribute 200 words
and a link which they appear to feel is advertising for their screed.
Sam's other copies though are not so off the hook as they have for the
most part NOT provided permission like phys.org and thus Sam MUST comply
with terms of fair use which in general are quite restrictive these days.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 16:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <wM-dnbn0j6qUBTfLnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #548437 |
On 1/26/16 6:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head? Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Neutral result charges up antimatter research > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again > pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest > breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today > in the prestigious journal Nature, the collaboration's result > improved the measurement of the charge of antihydrogen, essentially > zero, by a factor of 20. Their work is the latest contribution in the > quest to chase down the answer to the basic antimatter question, "If > matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big > Bang, where did all the antimatter go?" -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 23:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <esjqnc-amn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #548886 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/26/16 6:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head? > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Where is your copyright required commentary on the material you copied, shit head? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 17:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <wM-dnbf0j6p3PzfLnZ2dnUU7-cudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #548902 |
On 1/28/16 5:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Where is your copyright required commentary on the material you copied, > shit head? > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Neutral result charges up antimatter research > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again > pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest > breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today > in the prestigious journal Nature, the collaboration's result > improved the measurement of the charge of antihydrogen, essentially > zero, by a factor of 20. Their work is the latest contribution in the > quest to chase down the answer to the basic antimatter question, "If > matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big > Bang, where did all the antimatter go?" -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 01:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e1sqnc-veo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #548909 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/28/16 5:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Where is your copyright required commentary on the material you copied, >> shit head? >> > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Follow the charters of USENET groups and the law; quit being a copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 19:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ueKdnXbuu7jLWzfLnZ2dnUU7-bmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #548942 |
On 1/28/16 7:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Follow the charters of USENET groups and the law; quit being a copyright > violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Neutral result charges up antimatter research > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again > pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest > breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today > in the prestigious journal Nature, the collaboration's result > improved the measurement of the charge of antihydrogen, essentially > zero, by a factor of 20. Their work is the latest contribution in the > quest to chase down the answer to the basic antimatter question, "If > matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big > Bang, where did all the antimatter go?" -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bluqnc-voo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #548954 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/28/16 7:31 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Follow the charters of USENET groups and the law; quit being a copyright >> violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Your copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming is out of control. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5kuqnc-voo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #548942 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 1/28/16 5:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> Where is your copyright required commentary on the material you copied, >>> shit head? >>> >> >> >> Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Your copyright violating, cut and paste spamming is out of control. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-28 14:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <89a0ac03-d941-4d59-a0ac-4d6a3cd3ebf9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #548424 |
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 2:53:43 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > Neutral result charges up antimatter research > > http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > > > > Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again > > pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest > > breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today > > in the prestigious journal Nature, the collaboration's result > > improved the measurement of the charge of antihydrogen, essentially > > zero, by a factor of 20. Their work is the latest contribution in the > > quest to chase down the answer to the basic antimatter question, "If > > matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big > > Bang, where did all the antimatter go?" More important is what the gravitational relationship is between matter and antimatter. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bJidnV9zo597YTfLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #548424 |
On 26/01/2016 5:53 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Neutral result charges up antimatter research >> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html > > >> Scientists of the international ALPHA Collaboration have once again >> pushed the boundaries of antimatter research with their latest >> breakthrough studying the properties of antihydrogen. Published today >> in the prestigious journal Nature, the collaboration's result >> improved the measurement of the charge of antihydrogen, essentially >> zero, by a factor of 20. Their work is the latest contribution in the >> quest to chase down the answer to the basic antimatter question, "If >> matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts during the Big >> Bang, where did all the antimatter go?" So after all of that experimentation, they found that the overall charge of an anti-hydrogen atom is zero? Awesome result, bravo! Really the reason for the lack of antimatter in *this* universe is because it's all in our twin antimatter universe, which has it's own mysterious "lack of matter" problem. Yousuf Khan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web