Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research
Date	2016-01-27 00:02 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<g1elnc-t37.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<Ovudne2Lj4NuZTrLnZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Neutral result charges up antimatter research
>> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html
> 

"For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs,
Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set
forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up
to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back
to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior
written or oral permission is required."

http://phys.org/help/contactus/

What is Fair Use?

"In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."

http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/

Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head?

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 00:02 +0000
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:48 -0800
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 06:19 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:23 -0500
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:18 -0500
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:36 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-28 23:12 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:23 -0600
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 01:31 +0000
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 19:54 -0600
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-28 14:35 -0800
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500

csiph-web