Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #548497

Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research

Show all headers | View raw

nuny@bid.nes <Alien8752@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Neutral result charges up antimatter research
>> >> http://phys.org/news/2016-01-neutral-result-antimatter.html
>>  
>> "For all other non-commercial uses of Phys.org content, such as blogs,
>> Web sites and the like, we rely on the parameters of "Fair Use" as set
>> forth in the Copyright Act. Users may copy, transfer or reproduce up
>> to 200 words of an article or story and then insert a hyperlink back
>> to the original Phys.org content. By following these steps, no prior
>> written or oral permission is required."
>> 
>> http://phys.org/help/contactus/
>> 
>> What is Fair Use?
>> 
>> "In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted
>> material done for a limited and 'transformative' purpose, such as to
>> comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."
>> 
>> http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/
>> 
>> Where is your required commentary on the material you copied, shit head?
> 
>   Same place it's always been and always will be; beyond his competence.
> 
>   He has said that he learned from his teaching (assisting) experience to refrains from commenting lest he contaminate other's thinking with his own.
> 
>   On the one hand, he's abstaining from being an Authority to which to Appeal.
> 
>   On the other hand, he's abstaining from participating in the best part of science, *fertilizing* others' minds with one's own thoughts.
> 
>   On the gripping hand, I think he's afraid to back something that later turns out to be wrong.
> 
> 
>   Mark L. Fergerson

Mostly I think he has delusions of competence but subconsciously knows
if he opens his mouth he will expose his incompetence as is shown by
his refusal to ever actually debate anything.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 00:02 +0000
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:48 -0800
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 06:19 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:23 -0500
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:18 -0500
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:36 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-28 23:12 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:23 -0600
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 01:31 +0000
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 19:54 -0600
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-28 14:35 -0800
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500

csiph-web