Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #563111 > unrolled thread

Re: does anybody remember

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 17:16 +0100
    Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:32 -0400
      Re: does anybody remember Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 18:08 +0000
      Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:19 +0100
        Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 01:32 -0400
          Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:24 +0100
    Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-18 04:43 +0800
      Re: does anybody remember "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 00:35 -0400
      Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 05:39 +0100
        Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 01:13 +0800
          Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:36 +0100
            Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 17:31 +0800
              Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 17:59 +0100
                Re: does anybody remember Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 00:33 -0600
                Re: does anybody remember Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 02:50 +0800
                  Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 11:59 -0700
                    Re: does anybody remember snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 20:29 +0000
                      Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-20 13:45 -0700
                        Re: does anybody remember vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-21 17:43 +0000
                  Re: does anybody remember Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 21:35 +0100
              Re: does anybody remember Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-19 11:33 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#563111 — Re: does anybody remember

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yeghuppntm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again on Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:33:51 -0400:

Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL

> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Vector summation of AC is *still* kicking your retarded ass,
>>>> DildoRider? 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> You still haven't figured out how to calculate the combined slope of
>>>> two lines of different slope, huh. Here, give this a try... a line of
>>>> 60 degrees, and a line of -60 degrees.
>>>>
>>>> Now, according to your kooky subtraction equation, you'll get:
>>>> 60 - (-60) = 120 degrees
>>>> (-60) - 60 = -120 degrees = 240 degrees
>>>>
>>>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
>>>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
>>>>
>>>> Now, I'm sure you'll try to weasel, so let's do it again:
>>>> 60 - (-60) = 60 - 300 = -240 = 120 degrees
>>>> (-60) - 60 = 300 - 60 = 240 degrees
>>>>
>>>> According to DildoRider, the *direction* and *slope* of a vector can
>>>> change merely by changing its position in his kooky equation.
>>>>
>>>> And _both_ of the results from your kooky equation are *wrong*. LOL
>>>>
>>>> In actuality, the correct answer is:
>>>> 60 + (-60) = 0 degrees
>>>> (-60) + 60 = 0 degrees
>>>> 
>>>> From this simple demonstration, one can see that
>>>> DildoRider is a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> SPNAK!

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> Yes, for DC. For 3-phase AC with a phase difference between two legs,
>>>> one cannot use subtraction of the two waveforms,

>>> you might want to, as it will give you the correct answer.

>> Here's what DildoRider considers "correct answers":
>>
>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>> voltage was derived from.
>>
>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a result of all three phases
>> of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>
>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
>> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>>
>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>
>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>
>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>
>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> as DildoRider showed it leads to 0 volts,

> MID?

See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL

>>>> rather than a waveform that is the same amplitude as the
>>>> tributaries but phase-shifted 60 degrees,

>>> wrong, cluetard.

>> Awww, look at DildoRider backpedal away from his fuckup. LOL
>>
>> Message-ID: <6ee0e01f28cc48d89d70260de47457b4@dizum.com>
>> ====================================================
>> >> As a result of your being too stupid to figure out vector summation,
>> >> you k'lamed that adding two phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts.
>> >> LOL!
>>
>> > adding it sure does equal a big fat zero, just like adding the functions
>> > representing opposite polarity legs of 120/240 service.
>>
>> Bwahahahaaa! Mathematical Moron strikes again.
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Remember, DildoRider? Even LunkHead explained it to you, whereupon you
>> embarked upon the fastest backpedal ever recorded in Usenet history...
>> you're still backpedaling now. LOL
>>
>> So whereas you're not getting correct results whether you use plus
>> signs or minus signs in your kooky equation, I've plotted 170 volt
>> peak L-N voltage, derived 120 volt RMS

> no you didn't.  you posted the wrong fucking thing and proved you don't  
> understand what RMS is.

Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
do that, DildoRider. LOL

>> L-N from that, then derived 208
>> volt RMS L-L from that, all with the correct phase shift. That's
>> something you find yourself utterly unable to do, because you're a
>> mathematical moron.

> with what equation?

Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
you're the moron who has claimed:

1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
voltage was derived from.

2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.

3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
3-phase AC.

4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.

5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.

6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
between voltage and apparent power.

And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

SPNAK!

>> Then you bleated that you couldn't understand why you were getting a
>> resultant of the same amplitude, but phase-shifted 60 degrees in
>> between each tributary and 180 degrees from the third phase:
>>
>> DildoRider blathered:
>> Message-ID: <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com>
>> ====================================================
>> > so why how come phase A minus phase B produces a graph
>> > of the proper 208V 60Hz sine wave and summation produces
>> > a nonsensical sum that is the inverse of phase C
>>
>> Because you're a mathematical moron using the wrong equation,
>> DildoRider.
>> ====================================================
>>
>> DildoRider blathered again:
>> Message-ID: <87ebab570e8ead5f3b1bd9fcd93c2a77@dizum.com>
>> ====================================================
>> how come when i add two 120 degree phase-separated 60Hz 120V sine
>> waves i just get another 60Hz 120V sine wave:
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/nO3iCEd.png

> yep.  wrong.

No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL

>> ....but if I subtract them i get an expected correct 208V 60Hz sine
>> wave, fakey?
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png
>> ====================================================

> now it's correct.
> 
> clearly if it were incorrect you'd have said so here.

You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
how retarded are you?

The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.

>> Then you launched into your bleating about your disbelief that the
>> resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC resulted in 0 volts,

> i wasn't in disbelief.

Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL

>> making a k'lame that it instead *doubled* the voltage... because you
>> are, after all, Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL

> how can something double to zero?  LOL

Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL

>> And now you're backpedaling even faster, denying that you were ever so
>> stoooopid as to have fucked up that badly. For the rest of us, we
>> expected it... you are, after all, Robert Michael Wolfe the
>> Mathematical Moron. LOL

>>> http://i.imgur.com/ILFlzNw.png

>> Translation:
>> "Damn it! FNVWe is right, I'm a mathematical moron. <backpedal>
>> <backpedal> <backpedal> <backpedal>"

>>>> equally offset between the two tributaries and 180 degrees
>>>> phase from the remaining third phase.

>>> which is what i plotted.

>> Sane person:
>> When you find yourself stuck in a hole, stop digging.

> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png

Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL

>> DildoRider:
>> When trapped in a lie hole, don't stop digging... lie *harder*.

> why does phase A minus phase B of a 3-phase installation produce the  
> correct resultant waveform?
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/OPEeEJJ.png

Bwahahaaaaaa! Moron.

The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.

> (FREE KLOO: saying: "it doesn't" doesn't prove anything)
> 
> all you have to do is show me a single instance of someone graphing the  
> resultant sine waves using euler summation, you don't even have to do it  
> (since we know you can't).

Translation:
"Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."

> why is that so hard for you to figure out, k0oky?

I have figured it out, DildoRider. You, quite obviously, have not.

>> LOL

> nervous laughter noted.

Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL

>>> note that the voltage "magically" produces the correct summation to 208
>>> volts.

>> Bwahahahaaaaa! And even after he's had clue forcefully imparted to his
>> lumpy skull, DildoRider doesn't get it.

> why do my calculations automatically take care of the fact that the two  
> 120 degree phase shifted 120V@60Hz waves can only produce 208V peak?   
> what's going on there, k0oky?

It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
LOL

The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.

Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL

> why did my calculations work correctly for not only split-phase and  
> 3-phase but ALSO your mishmosh of 6 random sinewaves that you  
> embarrassingly proclaimed would eventually sum to 2550.25?  (of course you  
> were wrong.  you used YOUR broken method of summing sine waves which you  
> are screaming at us "IT'S CORRECT!!! IT'S CORRECT!!!! 2550.25!!!!" for 3  
> months now)

Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
moron. LOL

>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>> degrees from the remaining third leg.

> so why don't you graph that and actually prove your k'lame instead of  
> k0okily proclaiming it and showing no ability to understand what you've  
> just written?

I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
*must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
parcel of your retardation. LOL

> PS: you're wrong.  even the phasor math that your (once thought to be)  
> idiot-proof "vector sums" are derived from prove you wrong about your "180  
> degrees from the third leg" stab in the dark.
> 
> try again.

Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
represented in sinusoid.

Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
jump-start your brain. LOL

>> If you're getting any other
>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.

> and yet, somehow, the results i'm getting are correct.

No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL

> and they agree with the known phasor math.

No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL

> and they make you look like a complete idiot.

No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL

> 1) voltages between conductors are measured using subtraction.

For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
must be used.

> 2) graphing the phase-shifted sine waves and the resultant voltage  
> differences over time using mathematics produce correctly phased resultant  
> sine waves or else mathematics is broken.

Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
DildoRider. LOL

> 3) mathematics isn't broken.

Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL

> 4) you have been unable in 3 months to prove me incorrect, whereas you are  
> proven incorrect by multiple people every time you utter some nonsense  
> about things you have no experience with outside of google-diving and  
> maybe a high-school textbook years ago.

Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
the Mathematical Moron. LOL

>>> fakey, why does my subtraction equation give the correct answer?

>> It doesn't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL

> it does.
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png

Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL

> and you're saying it isn't correct for 3 months because you're just a  
> mathematical moron.

Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
moron. LOL

>>> here's the sum:
>>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
>>>
>>> it appears exactly wrong as your graph would have looked if you weren't
>>> using the same subtraction equations to calculate your "euler summation"
>>> sham.

>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider take his kooky sinewave subtraction equation,
>> changes the minus signs to plus signs, stupidly believes he's now
>> using the proper Euler sinewave summation equation, and blathers out
>> more mathematical moronity.

> plot your equation.

<http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>

Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)

You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
result of 0.

You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.

Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
equation, DildoRider? Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
vector summation, DildoRider?

You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.

SPNAK!

>> You'll never grasp vector summation of sinusoids, DildoRider. You're
>> simply too stupid to do so.

> ...except i learned phasors very early on in my engineering coursework.

You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL

>>>> According to you, Tr!pey old bird buggerer, the "Potential Difference"
>>>> between two 120 volt RMS phases would be 240 volts.

>>> only if the plots of their representative sine waves are 180 degrees out
>>> of phase, but you said 120 degrees, so when you subtract the sine waves
>>> there is not a point where they both peak at 120v simultaneously.

>> And yet, even knowing that, you've blathered that the voltage
>> difference between two phases of a 3-phase system is 0 volts.

> no it isn't.  it's clearly 208v.

Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the
first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary,
DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron.

> see:
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png

Mathematical Moron. LOL

>> Because
>> you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron.

> i wonder how many times you'll get away with saying that before someone  
> hammers it through your thick neanderthal skull that i've been posting  
> correct math this whole time.

Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by
scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one
thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL

> you only posted a graph which you're afraid to show us the equations that  
> you plotted.

You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to
Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite
having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL

> what was the link to that, again?

<https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Euler+sinewave+summation+equation>

LOL!

>>>> Do get right on
>>>> providing that kooky math to prove your contention, or admit you are
>>>> wrong.

>>> you should get right on sharing the equations that you graphed that you
>>> klame are correct while howling about the same exact equations being  
>>> wrong when anybody but you graphs them.

>> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
>> and engineers since 1748, DildoRider? Are you admitting you're too
>> stupid to Google for it, or too stupid to understand how to use it?

> you're too stupid to demonstrate it.

Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt
RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly
graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't
demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
Moron. LOL

>> Both? 150 IQ? LOL

Both. 50 IQ? LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#563137

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL
>
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
>
> <crickets> LOL!
>
> See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL
>
> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
> which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
> proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
> do that, DildoRider. LOL
>
> Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
> you're the moron who has claimed:
>
> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
> voltage was derived from.
>
> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>
> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
> 3-phase AC.
>
> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>
> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>
> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
> between voltage and apparent power.
>
> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
> No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
> time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL
>
> You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
> how retarded are you?
>
> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>
> Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL
>
> Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
> DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL
>
> Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
> your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL
>
> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>
> Translation:
> "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
> every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
> too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
> use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."
>
> Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL
>
> It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
> LOL
>
> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>
> Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
> volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
> oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL
>
> Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
> again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
> moron. LOL
>
> I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
> *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
> parcel of your retardation. LOL
>
> Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
> 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
> represented in sinusoid.
>
> Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
> jump-start your brain. LOL
>
> No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>
> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>
> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>
> For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
> must be used.
>
> Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
> DildoRider. LOL
>
> Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
> Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
> Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
> stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
> Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
> the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
> Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
> describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
> shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL
>
> Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
> moron. LOL
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>

BWAHAHAHAA!

k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will produce  
170 volts!!

>
> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>
> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
> the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
> result of 0.

dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts.  if  
it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service.  i  
hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.

the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.

i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all.

ho-hum.

>
> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
> degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
> moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.
>
> Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
> equation, DildoRider?

because i don't need it.  the correct math produces correct results, much  
like correct phasor math does.

http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png

notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for  
subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty.

> Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
> vector summation, DildoRider?

that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics  
and engineering courses.

>
> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.

what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting?

:)

>
> SPNAK!
>
> You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL

your daydream fantasies are noted.

>
> Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the
> first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary,
> DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron.
>
> Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
> Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by
> scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one
> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL
>
> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
> and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to
> Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite
> having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL
>
> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Euler+sinewave+summation+equation>

is that how *you* found out about it?  LOL

>
> LOL!
>
> Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt
> RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly
> graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't
> demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
> Moron. LOL
>
> Both. 50 IQ? LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563153

\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
(aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA
15206-2117 wrote:

> dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts. 
> if it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service. 
> i hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.
> 
> the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.

V_line = sqrt(3) * V_phase = 1.7 * 220

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563287

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka 
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), 
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yehcb1cotm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL

>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler

>> <crickets> LOL!
>> <crickets> LOL!
>>
>> See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL
>>
>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
>> which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
>> proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
>> do that, DildoRider. LOL
>>
>> Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
>> you're the moron who has claimed:
>>
>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>> voltage was derived from.
>>
>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>
>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
>> 3-phase AC.
>>
>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>
>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>
>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>
>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
>> time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL
>>
>> You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
>> how retarded are you?
>>
>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>
>> Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL
>>
>> Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
>> DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL
>>
>> Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
>> your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL
>>
>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>
>> Translation:
>> "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
>> every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
>> too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
>> use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."
>>
>> Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL
>>
>> It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
>> LOL
>>
>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>
>> Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
>> volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
>> oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL
>>
>> Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
>> again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
>> moron. LOL
>>
>> I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
>> *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
>> parcel of your retardation. LOL
>>
>> Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
>> 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
>> represented in sinusoid.
>>
>> Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
>> jump-start your brain. LOL
>>
>> No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>
>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>
>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>
>> For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
>> must be used.
>>
>> Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
>> DildoRider. LOL
>>
>> Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
>> Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>
>> Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
>> stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
>> Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
>> the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>
>> Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
>> describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
>> shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL
>>
>> Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
>> moron. LOL

And that's a big ol' whomping <crickets> SPNAK! on Robert Michael
Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL

>> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>

> BWAHAHAHAA!
> 
> k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will produce  
> 170 volts!!

Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates that he *still* can't figure out
vector summation. He k'lames the resultant of 3-phases of 3-phase AC
*doubles* the voltage! He derives a higher RMS voltage than the peak
voltage it's derived from! He k'lames "kVA" denotes voltage! What a
moron! LOL

>> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
>> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
>> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
>> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>
>> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
>> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
>> the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
>> result of 0.

> dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts.  if  
> it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service.  i  
> hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.

Still having trouble grasping vector summation, are you, DildoRider?
Why are you such a fucking moron?

What is the resultant of all 3 phases of 3-phase AC, DildoRider. Go
on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. Again. LOL

> the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.
> 
> i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all.
> 
> ho-hum.

Except they're not. The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in
use by scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky
sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for 3 months by only one
thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL

>> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
>> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
>> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
>> degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
>> moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.
>>
>> Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
>> equation, DildoRider?

> because i don't need it.  the correct math produces correct results, much  
> like correct phasor math does.
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
> 
> notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for  
> subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty.

Awwww, look at the kooktard project. You haven't gotten one single
thing right *except* when you summed two sinewaves, you fecking nong.
It's been three long months that you've been demonstrating that you're
Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron, and you don't seem to be
gaining clue... you're stupidity appears to be perpetual. LOL

>> Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
>> vector summation, DildoRider?

> that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics  
> and engineering courses.

And yet you can't figure out vector summation to save your life. 150
IQ? LOL

>> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.

> what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting?

The result is Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron,
backpedaling from his fuckups such as:

1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS 
voltage was derived from.

2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three 
phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.

3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference 
between any two phases of 3-phase AC.

4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* 
gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from 
each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 
degrees phase from the remaining third phase.

5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of 
3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.

6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a 
*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, 
then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you 
even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you 
were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and 
k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 
kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference 
between voltage and apparent power.

And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

> :)

Moronic tard-grin noted, DildoRider. LOL

>> SPNAK!
>>
>> You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL

> your daydream fantasies are noted.

Your reality is noted. LOL

>> Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the
>> first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary,
>> DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron.
>>
>> Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>
>> Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by
>> scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one
>> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL
>>
>> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
>> and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to
>> Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite
>> having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL
>>
>> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Euler+sinewave+summation+equation>

> is that how *you* found out about it?  LOL

Translation:
"I still can't find it. I'm Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
Moron. You'll have to give me more clues than that to find that
well-known and widely-used equation that's been around 260+ years.
Remember, I'm retarded. Not 150 IQ." LOL

>> LOL!
>>
>> Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt
>> RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly
>> graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't
>> demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
>> Moron. LOL
>>
>> Both. 50 IQ? LOL

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563291

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:19:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yehcb1cotm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL
>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>> Wrangler
>
>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>>
>>> See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL
>>>
>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
>>> which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
>>> proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
>>> do that, DildoRider. LOL
>>>
>>> Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
>>> you're the moron who has claimed:
>>>
>>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>>> voltage was derived from.
>>>
>>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>>
>>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
>>> 3-phase AC.
>>>
>>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>>
>>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>>
>>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>>
>>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
>>> time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
>>> how retarded are you?
>>>
>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL
>>>
>>> Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
>>> DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
>>> your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL
>>>
>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> Translation:
>>> "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
>>> every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
>>> too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
>>> use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."
>>>
>>> Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>
>>> It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
>>> LOL
>>>
>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>
>>> Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
>>> volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
>>> oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL
>>>
>>> Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
>>> again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
>>> moron. LOL
>>>
>>> I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
>>> *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
>>> parcel of your retardation. LOL
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
>>> 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
>>> represented in sinusoid.
>>>
>>> Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
>>> jump-start your brain. LOL
>>>
>>> No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>
>>> For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
>>> must be used.
>>>
>>> Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
>>> DildoRider. LOL
>>>
>>> Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
>>> Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
>>> stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
>>> Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
>>> the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
>>> describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
>>> shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
>>> moron. LOL
>
> And that's a big ol' whomping <crickets> SPNAK! on Robert Michael
> Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>
>
>> BWAHAHAHAA!
>>
>> k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will  
>> produce
>> 170 volts!!
>
> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates that he *still* can't figure out
> vector summation. He k'lames the resultant of 3-phases of 3-phase AC
> *doubles* the voltage! He derives a higher RMS voltage than the peak
> voltage it's derived from! He k'lames "kVA" denotes voltage! What a
> moron! LOL

http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

>
>>> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
>>> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
>>> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
>>> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>>
>>> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
>>> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
>>> the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
>>> result of 0.
>
>> dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts.   
>> if
>> it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service.  i
>> hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.
>
> Still having trouble grasping vector summation, are you, DildoRider?
> Why are you such a fucking moron?

i understand that you keep getting the wrong answers and pretending that  
you aren't.

http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

>
> What is the resultant of all 3 phases of 3-phase AC, DildoRider. Go
> on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. Again. LOL
>
>> the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.
>>
>> i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all.
>>
>> ho-hum.
>
> Except they're not. The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in
> use by scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky
> sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for 3 months by only one
> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL
>
>>> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
>>> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
>>> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
>>> degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
>>> moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.
>>>
>>> Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
>>> equation, DildoRider?
>
>> because i don't need it.  the correct math produces correct results,  
>> much
>> like correct phasor math does.
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
>>
>> notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for
>> subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty.
>
> Awwww, look at the kooktard project. You haven't gotten one single
> thing right *except* when you summed two sinewaves, you fecking nong.
> It's been three long months that you've been demonstrating that you're
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron, and you don't seem to be
> gaining clue... you're stupidity appears to be perpetual. LOL
>
>>> Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
>>> vector summation, DildoRider?
>
>> that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics
>> and engineering courses.
>
> And yet you can't figure out vector summation to save your life. 150
> IQ? LOL
>
>>> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.
>
>> what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting?
>
> The result is Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron,
> backpedaling from his fuckups such as:
>
> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
> voltage was derived from.
>
> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>
> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>
> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>
> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>
> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
> between voltage and apparent power.
>
> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>
>> :)
>
> Moronic tard-grin noted, DildoRider. LOL
>
>>> SPNAK!
>>>
>>> You spent that time sucking dicks in a back alley, apparently. LOL
>
>> your daydream fantasies are noted.
>
> Your reality is noted. LOL
>
>>> Bwahahahaaa! Now calculate the resultant of that resultant as the
>>> first tributary and the remaining third phase as the second tributary,
>>> DildoRider. Go on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron.
>>>
>>> Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Wrong. The correct Euler sinewave summation equation has been used by
>>> scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky sinewave
>>> subtraction equation has only been in use for three months by only one
>>> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL
>>>
>>> You mean the Euler sinewave summation equation, in use by scientists
>>> and engineers since 1748? You yet again admit you're too stupid to
>>> Google for it, and far too stupid to ever properly use it, despite
>>> having been *given* the equation. Twice. LOL
>>>
>>> <https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Euler+sinewave+summation+equation>
>
>> is that how *you* found out about it?  LOL
>
> Translation:
> "I still can't find it. I'm Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
> Moron. You'll have to give me more clues than that to find that
> well-known and widely-used equation that's been around 260+ years.
> Remember, I'm retarded. Not 150 IQ." LOL
>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Already demonstrated, DildoRider. The 170 volt peak L-N, the 120 volt
>>> RMS L-N which acted as tributary for the 208 volt RMS L-L, properly
>>> graphed with the correct phase shift and amplitude. You can't
>>> demonstrate that, because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
>>> Moron. LOL
>>>
>>> Both. 50 IQ? LOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>


-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563403

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
<news:op.yeh9obbftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:

> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:19:41 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.yehcb1cotm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:16:22 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>>>> Time to Wee hours bleating again, Spankard? LOL

>>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:29:35 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote  
>>>>> Wrangler

>>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>>> <crickets> LOL!
>>>>
>>>> See 9 lines below, ClueTard. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
>>>> which I derived the completely correct 208 volt RMS L-L sinusoid, with
>>>> proper phase shift. You're just mad because you're too stupid to ever
>>>> do that, DildoRider. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Certainly not with your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. Remember,
>>>> you're the moron who has claimed:
>>>>
>>>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>>>> voltage was derived from.
>>>>
>>>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>>>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>>>
>>>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts as a resultant of two phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC.
>>>>
>>>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>>>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>>>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>>>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>>>
>>>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>>>
>>>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>>>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>>>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>>>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>>>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>>>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>>>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>>>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>>>
>>>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> SPNAK!
>>>>
>>>> No, you got the *correct* result in that graph, DildoRider. The first
>>>> time you've ever been right about anything. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> You moron, do you *still* not understand vector summation? Holy fuck,
>>>> how retarded are you?
>>>>
>>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> Backpedal harder, Lying Spankard. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Piling reading comprehension problems on top of backpedaling,
>>>> DildoRider? Why are you such a moron? LOL
>>>>
>>>> Bwahahaaa! You moron. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation has
>>>> your brain so twisted in knots you're making a fool of yourself. LOL
>>>>
>>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> Translation:
>>>> "Please, oh please, oh please, FNVWe, let me in on that secret that
>>>> every scientist and engineer since 1748 has known and used. I'm far
>>>> too stoooopid to Google for it, and far too stoooopid to ever properly
>>>> use it, so please baby-step me through it using monosyllabic words."
>>>>
>>>> Moronism noted. 150 IQ? LOL
>>>>
>>>> It might have to do with the fact that you're a mathematical moron.
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> The resultant of two phases of 3-phase AC must only be a sinewave of
>>>> same frequency and amplitude as the two tributaries, phase-shifted to
>>>> be 60 degrees off from and in between the two tributaries and 180
>>>> degrees from the remaining third leg. If you're getting any other
>>>> result, your kooky equation is *wrong*, DildoRider.
>>>>
>>>> Thus the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC must only be 0
>>>> volts, as you can easily ascertain with a simple Google search...
>>>> oh... wait... you're too stoooopid to use Google. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Your kooky equation *didn't* "work correctly", DildoRider. Try it
>>>> again, and this time, try not to make yourself look like a fucking
>>>> moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> I did graph it, you moron. That you don't even know why that result
>>>> *must* be, otherwise your kooky equation is *wrong*, is part and
>>>> parcel of your retardation. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Bwahahaaa! DildoRider denies that the resultant of the three phases of
>>>> 3-phase AC is always 0, hence 3-phase AC represents a full circle
>>>> represented in sinusoid.
>>>>
>>>> Holy shit, DildoRider... if you get any dumber they're gonna have to
>>>> jump-start your brain. LOL
>>>>
>>>> No, they're not. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> No, they don't. You're just a mathematical moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> For DC, Moron. For AC, superposition dictates that vector *summation*
>>>> must be used.
>>>>
>>>> Except your bad sinewaves are as fucked up as your kooky sinewave
>>>> subtraction equation, which is fucked up as your broken brain,
>>>> DildoRider. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Your math is horribly broken, DildoRider. That's *why* you're Robert
>>>> Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Except a simple Google search will prove you wrong. You're simply too
>>>> stupid to do that Google search, so instead you spew Man-Goo,
>>>> Spaghetti Code and Bad Sinewaves. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe
>>>> the Mathematical Moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Bwahahaaaa! So wrong that the word "wrong" is the wrong word to
>>>> describe how wrong it is, DildoRider. You can't even get the phase
>>>> shift *or* the resultant voltage correct. You moron. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Says the backpedaling bleatfarting bad sinewave-spamming mathematical
>>>> moron. LOL

>> And that's a big ol' whomping <crickets> SPNAK! on Robert Michael
>> Wolfe the Mathematical Moron. LOL

>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/t0sO6xh.png>

>>> BWAHAHAHAA!
>>>
>>> k0oky k'lames that a voltmeter between phase legs of 3-phase will  
>>> produce
>>> 170 volts!!

What's a "phase leg", DildoRider? Another of your kooky inventions
like your sinewave subtraction equation, the gables on *top* of your
roof or your clowncycles you have to pedal at 10,000 RPM to go 10 MPH?
LOL

>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider demonstrates that he *still* can't figure out
>> vector summation. He k'lames the resultant of 3-phases of 3-phase AC
>> *doubles* the voltage! He derives a higher RMS voltage than the peak
>> voltage it's derived from! He k'lames "kVA" denotes voltage! What a
>> moron! LOL

> http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

Bwahahahaaaa! DildoRider finally stumbles upon the correct result for
the second time, and he's *such* a fucking moron that not only does he
not understand *why* it's the correct result, he denies it's the
correct result! LOL!

Oh, you're *never* going to live this down, DildoRider. LOL!

Oh yeah, that's getting archived so you can't backpedal from your
stupidity, DildoRider. You are and you shall remain Robert Michael
Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron for all time. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20160318055836/http://imgur.com/xTldIjM>

>>>> Blue - Phase 1 (170 volts, 0 degrees), Tributary 1
>>>> Orange - Phase 2 (170 volts, 120 degrees), Tributary 2
>>>> Purple - Phase 3 (170 volts, 240 degrees)
>>>> Green - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>>> Red - Resultant (170 volts, 60 degrees)
>>>>
>>>> You'll note the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave are 180
>>>> degrees out of phase, exactly as they should be. Thus the resultant of
>>>> the red/green sinewave and the purple sinewave will give a correct
>>>> result of 0.

>>> dude.  a voltmeter across 2 phases of 3-phase doesn't read 170 volts.   
>>> if it does, then it's probably because you installed your own service.  i
>>> hope you didn't charge yourself a lot for that.

>> Still having trouble grasping vector summation, are you, DildoRider?
>> Why are you such a fucking moron?

> i understand that you keep getting the wrong answers and pretending that  
> you aren't.

No, you're getting the wrong results with your kooky sinewave
subtraction equation and you're too fucking retarded to realize why.
150 IQ? LOL!

> http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png

Your fuckup is noted and archived for all time, DildoRider. There's no
escaping your being a fucking moron now.

DildoRider copies his Usenet Lord and Master, gets the correct result,
but is so stoooopid he denies it's the correct result... expect more
bad sinewaves from the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL

<https://web.archive.org/web/20160318060618/http://i.imgur.com/xTldIjM.png>

<snicker>

>> What is the resultant of all 3 phases of 3-phase AC, DildoRider. Go
>> on, *prove* yourself a mathematical moron. Again. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

What's the matter, Mathematical Mega-Moron? You not quite ready to
prove you're the biggest fucking moron on the planet? LOL

Go on, use your kooky sinewave subtraction equation on that red/green
line and the purple line... it'll give you either -340 volts or 340
volts (dependent upon which position in your kooky equation you put
each tributary). Both results *wrong*.

The correct result is 0 volts, thus proving that your blather about
the resultant of the three phases of 3-phase AC being *double* the
amplitude of the tributaries is the mad blathering of Robert Michael
Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL

SPNAK!

>>> the number you are looking for is sqrt(3)*170, g0ober.
>>>
>>> i guess your euler equations are horribly broken after all.
>>>
>>> ho-hum.

>> Except they're not. The Euler sinewave summation equation has been in
>> use by scientists and engineers since 1748, whereas your kooky
>> sinewave subtraction equation has been in use for 3 months by only one
>> thoroughly confused kooktard. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> You'll further note that both the red and green sinewaves are at the
>>>> same phase angle despite having the two phases interchanged in the
>>>> equation (green - 0 degrees first, 120 degrees second; red - 120
>>>> degrees first, 0 degrees second). Whereas in your kooky equation
>>>> moving the tributaries in your equation gives different results.
>>>>
>>>> Why are you too stoooopid to find that Euler sinewave summation
>>>> equation, DildoRider?

>>> because i don't need it.  the correct math produces correct results,  
>>> much like correct phasor math does.
>>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/4itzDIY.png
>>>
>>> notice how you're the one backpedaling, swapping summation for
>>> subtraction, and hiding equations, bleaty.

>> Awwww, look at the kooktard project. You haven't gotten one single
>> thing right *except* when you summed two sinewaves, you fecking nong.
>> It's been three long months that you've been demonstrating that you're
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron, and you don't seem to be
>> gaining clue... you're stupidity appears to be perpetual. LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> Why are you far too stoooopid to figure out
>>>> vector summation, DildoRider?

>>> that's not what it says on my transcript right beside all of my physics
>>> and engineering courses.

>> And yet you can't figure out vector summation to save your life. 150
>> IQ? LOL

<crickets> LOL!

>>>> You're a mathematical moron improperly using a kooky sinewave
>>>> subtraction equation which gives you an improper result.

>>> what if the result was to make you bleat for 3 months and counting?

>> The result is Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Moron,
>> backpedaling from his fuckups such as:
>>
>> 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS
>> voltage was derived from.
>>
>> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three
>> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together.
>>
>> 3) You k'lamed a result of 0 volts when deriving the difference
>> between any two phases of 3-phase AC.
>>
>> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed*
>> gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from
>> each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180
>> degrees phase from the remaining third phase.
>>
>> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of
>> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts.
>>
>> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a
>> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side,
>> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you
>> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you
>> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and
>> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12
>> kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference
>> between voltage and apparent power.
>>
>> And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL

<crickets>

No more backpedaling away from your stupidity, DildoRider. You will
have your face rubbed in your moronism for the remainder of your
Usenet existence... and given that you look like you've got full-blown
AIDS, that shouldn't be long.

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Obsessed Retard. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL

-- 

Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey)
5907 Stanton Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA
(412) 853-6395
(412) 799-0532
(412) 665-8289
(412) 404-8757

DildoRider admits he's stoooopid:
MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com>
=================================================
>> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's
>> damaged your brain, DildoRider.

> then it appears that you like shooting fish in
> barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are.

Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is
akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're
stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell.

<snicker>
=================================================

DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL
MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com>
=================================================
> so what you're saying is that your targets for attack
> have to be really stupid or else you can't manage?
=================================================

DildoRider admits much more about himself:
MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com>
=================================================
"absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly,
toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless"
=================================================

This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake.

150 IQ? LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563197

Fakey wrote:

> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from

Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
and 120v RMS are not the very same?

Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
He's what you call an "everything moron".

-- 
"The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts,
moron. LOL"
  --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563273

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:43:54 -0400, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass  
<bender@the.future> wrote:

> Fakey wrote:
>
>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
>
> Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
> and 120v RMS are not the very same?

yep.  although i saw him mention them as if they were the same in a post  
earlier.

it might just take him a few weeks to "get" things.

> Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
> He's what you call an "everything moron".

and here, he calls himself a multi-millionaire...

more proof that capitalism has failed us.

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563276

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:pe5mebphn3aocbm8p94q3arv6c8p3fshos@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from

> Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
> and 120v RMS are not the very same?
> 
> Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
> He's what you call an "everything moron".

Awwww, look at the spankard bleating because he's proved he's an
"everything moron"... moronic on every fucking thing he's blathered
about, as evidence in my .sig.

RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, and
can thus be graphed.

<http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
<http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

SPNAK!

Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563417

Fakey wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
> 
> > Fakey wrote:
> 
> >> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
> >> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
> 
> > Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
> > and 120v RMS are not the very same?
> > 
> > Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
> > He's what you call an "everything moron".
> 
> Awwww, look at the spankard bleating because he's proved he's an
> "everything moron"... moronic on every fucking thing he's blathered
> about, as evidence in my .sig.
> 
> RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
> same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, and
> can thus be graphed.
> 
> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

So, fakey, let me get this straight.  In the first pic, the
dashed purple line with peaks at +/-240v... you are claiming
that is the equivalent, power-wise, of 240v dc?

Do you not see quite clearly that its amplitude is always
less than 240v except at 2 fleeting points?  How can it
possibly source the same power as the constant 240v dc?

Explain, please.

> SPNAK!
> 
> Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
> 
> <snicker>

Stupid, indeed!

-- 
"But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
  --Fakey lectures on trig identities

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563574

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:94boebp3s0dlp1992qsa0tceq7719nfko8@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in

>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from

>>> Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
>>> and 120v RMS are not the very same?
>>> 
>>> Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
>>> He's what you call an "everything moron".

>> Awwww, look at the spankard bleating because he's proved he's an
>> "everything moron"... moronic on every fucking thing he's blathered
>> about, as evidence in my .sig.
>> 
>> RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
>> same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, and
>> can thus be graphed.
>> 
>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
>> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

> So, fakey, let me get this straight.  In the first pic, the
> dashed purple line with peaks at +/-240v... you are claiming
> that is the equivalent, power-wise, of 240v dc?
> 
> Do you not see quite clearly that its amplitude is always
> less than 240v except at 2 fleeting points?  How can it
> possibly source the same power as the constant 240v dc?
> 
> Explain, please.

The explanation is that you're a moron. LOL

>> SPNAK!
>> 
>> Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?
>> 
>> <snicker>

> Stupid, indeed!

Why are you so stupid and inane, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

> -- 
> "But that squared sinewave function is still a sinewave."
>   --Fakey lectures on trig identities

<http://i.imgur.com/SU4YXB0.png>

Gee, that *sinusoid* sure looks like a *sinusoid*. LOL

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563604

Fakey wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
> 
> > Fakey wrote:
> 
> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
> 
> >>> Fakey wrote:
> 
> >>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
> >>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from
> 
> >>> Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
> >>> and 120v RMS are not the very same?
> >>> 
> >>> Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
> >>> He's what you call an "everything moron".
> 
> >> Awwww, look at the spankard bleating because he's proved he's an
> >> "everything moron"... moronic on every fucking thing he's blathered
> >> about, as evidence in my .sig.
> >> 
> >> RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
> >> same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, and
> >> can thus be graphed.
> >> 
> >> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
> >> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
> 
> > So, fakey, let me get this straight.  In the first pic, the
> > dashed purple line with peaks at +/-240v... you are claiming
> > that is the equivalent, power-wise, of 240v dc?
> > 
> > Do you not see quite clearly that its amplitude is always
> > less than 240v except at 2 fleeting points?  How can it
> > possibly source the same power as the constant 240v dc?
> > 
> > Explain, please.
> 
> The explanation is that you're a moron. LOL

LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...

Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
your ass?

-- 
"What is the plasma temperature of H2O, Jim? 12000 K."
  --Fakey claims water can exist as a plasma

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563652

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
<news:hr6qeb10hhltsl00sv0b4sts3hqjcb6co4@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

>>>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>>>> Wrong. I posted a completely correct 170 volt peak L-N sinusoid, from
>>>>>> which I derived the completely correct 120 volt RMS L-N sinusoid, from

>>>>> Christ on a moped, is fakey still claiming that 170v peak
>>>>> and 120v RMS are not the very same?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hot diggity, that boy just doesn't learn very quick.
>>>>> He's what you call an "everything moron".

>>>> Awwww, look at the spankard bleating because he's proved he's an
>>>> "everything moron"... moronic on every fucking thing he's blathered
>>>> about, as evidence in my .sig.
>>>> 
>>>> RMS represents the *equivalent* DC voltage which would dissipate the
>>>> same amount of power as that *AC* voltage. Hence, RMS is still AC, and
>>>> can thus be graphed.
>>>> 
>>>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
>>>> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

>>> So, fakey, let me get this straight.  In the first pic, the
>>> dashed purple line with peaks at +/-240v... you are claiming
>>> that is the equivalent, power-wise, of 240v dc?
>>> 
>>> Do you not see quite clearly that its amplitude is always
>>> less than 240v except at 2 fleeting points?  How can it
>>> possibly source the same power as the constant 240v dc?
>>> 
>>> Explain, please.

>> The explanation is that you're a moron. LOL

> LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
> with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...

Your k'laming me to have admitted something is not indicative of my
having admitted anything, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. Remember, you're the
lying backpedaling bleatfarting blither-blathering spankard Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard, Usenet's Mathematical Moron.

Meanwhile, that giant whomping SPNAK! awaits your further
backpedaling. See below.

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

> Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission

Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL

You may begin your moronic backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>

> from your ass?

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at 
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping 
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like 
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he 
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because 
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line 
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical 
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal 
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to 
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called 
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the 
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity 
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and 
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and 
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for 
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on 
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition 
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits 
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's 
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum 
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two 
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third 
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always 
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show 
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple 
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave 
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the 
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the 
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line 
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87 
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result 
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh... 
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at 
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave 
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably 
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge 
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been 
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your 
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
formulas used:

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
\frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

\left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
\left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
}{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)

And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...

SPNAK!

You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!

<snicker>
===============================================================

You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you 
bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

> -- 
> "What is the plasma temperature of H2O, Jim? 12000 K."
>   --Fakey claims water can exist as a plasma

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Lying Backpedaling Bleatfarting
Blither-Blathering Spankard Moron dribbled:
> Water has no plasma phase.

<https://www.quora.com/Can-liquids-be-turned-into-plasma>
=========================================================
Owen Jones, Physics graduate, postdoctoral researcher in magnetic 
confinement fusion.

In order to jump straight from a liquid to a plasma, you need to 
supply sufficient energy to remove the electrons from the atoms over a 
large enough volume that the material can be classified as a plasma 
(see my answer to this question for more details on what constitutes a 
plasma). The easiest way of doing this is with an extremely powerful, 
intense laser pulse. Some of the world's most powerful short-pulse 
lasers are capable of producing power densities of a billion trillion  
(10^21) watts per square centimetre. The electric fields generated by 
these lasers are strong enough to rip electrons from the atoms in any 
material, be it solid, liquid or gas, in much less than a trillionth 
of a second. The material doesn't even get a chance to go through the 
normal solid-liquid-gas phase transitions; it's completely vaporized 
and ionized almost as soon as the laser pulse hits it.

So in answer to your question about converting a liquid straight to a 
plasma, it's possible as long as you have a big enough laser!
=========================================================

<https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_it_possible_to_create_a_plasma_from_water_vapour_in_a_laboratory>
=========================================================
Is it possible to create a plasma from water vapour in a laboratory?

Christophe O Laux · Ecole Centrale Paris
We did exactly that, create a plasma in pure water vapor. We published 
a first paper on the topic: Sainct, F.P., Lacoste, D.A., Kirkpatrick, 
M.J., Odic, E., and Laux, C.O., Experimental study of nanosecond 
repetitively pulsed discharges in water vapor, International Journal 
of Plasma Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, Sep. 
2012. More publications should follow soon.
=========================================================

SPNAK! on the backpedaling bleating lying blither-blathering moron. 
LOL

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563819

On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:59:06 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
>Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL


Translation:  Duh..I dunno.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563888

Fakey wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> 
> > Fakey wrote:
> 
> >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> 
> >>> Fakey wrote:

> >>>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
> >>>> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>
> 
> >>> So, fakey, let me get this straight.  In the first pic, the
> >>> dashed purple line with peaks at +/-240v... you are claiming
> >>> that is the equivalent, power-wise, of 240v dc?
> >>> 
> >>> Do you not see quite clearly that its amplitude is always
> >>> less than 240v except at 2 fleeting points?  How can it
> >>> possibly source the same power as the constant 240v dc?
> >>> 
> >>> Explain, please.
> 
> >> The explanation is that you're a moron. LOL
> 
> > LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
> > with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...
> > 
> > Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
> > your ass?
> 
> Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
> Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL

Whoooosh!

I'm going to call it about 700 nm.  It sure looks like 700
nm to me, so it must be.

What temperature does 700 nm correspond to, ersatzia?

-- 
"3-phase AC power constitutes a closed loop!"
  --Fakey demonstrates his mastery of Kirchoff's Law

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563893

In article <vlntebh9fsr8f1orvja9blffu6topn8a4q@4ax.com>, 
bender@the.future says...


> > > LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
> > > with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...
> > > 
> > > Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
> > > your ass?
> > 
> > Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
> > Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL
> 
> Whoooosh!
> 

When all else fails, pretend that you don't get the joke.

-- 
Mustaffa Sheboygan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563922

Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

> In article <vlntebh9fsr8f1orvja9blffu6topn8a4q@4ax.com>, 
> bender@the.future says...
> 
> 
> > > > LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
> > > > with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...
> > > > 
> > > > Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
> > > > your ass?
> > > 
> > > Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
> > > Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL
> > 
> > Whoooosh!
> > 
> 
> When all else fails, pretend that you don't get the joke.
>

Shall we ask him how a differential back-axle works? 
After all, it is an integral part of a vroom-vroom 
Lotus codpiece.  I wonder if he could calculate a 
final-drive ratio?  It'd probably give him gallstones.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe       <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

My pet rock Gordon wants home rule for England.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563936

In article <1mkff6f.p7jtyhi3twxvN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
@gmail.com says...


> 
> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
> 
> > In article <vlntebh9fsr8f1orvja9blffu6topn8a4q@4ax.com>, 
> > bender@the.future says...
> > 
> > 
> > > > > LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
> > > > > with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
> > > > > your ass?
> > > > 
> > > > Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
> > > > Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL
> > > 
> > > Whoooosh!
> > > 
> > 
> > When all else fails, pretend that you don't get the joke.
> >
> 
> Shall we ask him how a differential back-axle works? 
> After all, it is an integral part of a vroom-vroom 
> Lotus codpiece.  I wonder if he could calculate a 
> final-drive ratio?  It'd probably give him gallstones.

Maybe just ask him to explain how the spider gears work.

-- 
Mustaffa Sheboygan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564199

On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:45:33 -0700, Mustaffa Sheboygan wrote:

> In article <1mkff6f.p7jtyhi3twxvN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2
> @gmail.com says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> 
>> > In article <vlntebh9fsr8f1orvja9blffu6topn8a4q@4ax.com>,
>> > bender@the.future says...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > > > LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away with
>> > > > > a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
>> > > > > your ass?
>> > > > 
>> > > > Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
>> > > > Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL
>> > > 
>> > > Whoooosh!
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > When all else fails, pretend that you don't get the joke.
>> >
>> >
>> Shall we ask him how a differential back-axle works? After all, it is
>> an integral part of a vroom-vroom Lotus codpiece.  I wonder if he could
>> calculate a final-drive ratio?  It'd probably give him gallstones.
> 
> Maybe just ask him to explain how the spider gears work.

JAM HANDY CAN HELP!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYAw79386WI

-- 
 -v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#563938

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, in
<news:vlntebh9fsr8f1orvja9blffu6topn8a4q@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in

>>>>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>>>>>> <http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/articles/rms1.gif>
>>>>>> <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/isotek3/graph.png>

>>>>> So, fakey, let me get this straight.  In the first pic, the
>>>>> dashed purple line with peaks at +/-240v... you are claiming
>>>>> that is the equivalent, power-wise, of 240v dc?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you not see quite clearly that its amplitude is always
>>>>> less than 240v except at 2 fleeting points?  How can it
>>>>> possibly source the same power as the constant 240v dc?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Explain, please.

>>>> The explanation is that you're a moron. LOL

>>> LOL.  Fakey admits that he's wrong.  Again.  And runs away
>>> with a cherry red, glow-in-the-dark ass.  Again.  Ho hum...
>>> 
>>> Fakey,... how many nanometers is the red-body emission from
>>> your ass?

>> Bwahahahaaa! What the fuck is "red-body emission", Shiny Tinfoil
>> Spankard? Are you a moron, or what? LOL

> Whoooosh!

Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at 
refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping 
drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like 
a coward and ran away from.

If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he 
smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because 
you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.

<snicker>

===============================================================
Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line 
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical 
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal 
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to 
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called 
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the 
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity 
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and 
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and 
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for 
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on 
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition 
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits 
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's 
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum 
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two 
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third 
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always 
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show 
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple 
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave 
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the 
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the 
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line 
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87 
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result 
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh... 
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at 
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave 
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably 
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge 
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been 
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your 
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

> I'm going to call it about 700 nm.  It sure looks like 700
> nm to me, so it must be.

Bwahahahaaaa! What the fuck is a "red-body", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?
Are you a moron, or what? LOL

> What temperature does 700 nm correspond to, ersatzia?

Does that imply a "red-body", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, or are you
making up shit because you're a moron? LOL

> -- 
> "3-phase AC power constitutes a closed loop!"
>   --Fakey demonstrates his mastery of Kirchoff's Law

What's 120 degrees + 120 degrees + 120 degrees, Mathematical Moron?
LOL

<https://youtu.be/pgzc4aU_HeY?t=110>
"The reason that we have these degree designators is because these 
represent fractions of a full circle, and in fact the sine waves are a 
manifestation of circular motion, that's why the sine function is 
sometimes called a circular function."

<http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/91155/traditional-kirchoff-voltage-law-in-ac-circuit>
"Where does this equation come from? It comes from writing the KVL
equation around the loop in terms of the series current ii. Now, it is
true that if the assumptions of ideal circuit theory do not hold, KVL
does not hold. However, understand that AC circuit analysis is under
the umbrella of ideal circuit theory thus, in that context, KCL holds
for AC circuit analysis."

SPNAK!

Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls:
=====================================
"All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths
done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web