Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #501674 > unrolled thread

Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 11:00 -0700
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 11:03 -0700
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 16:20 -0700
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:26 -0500
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:30 -0500
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-23 09:25 -0700
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 14:39 -0400
        Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-06-23 18:50 +0000
          Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 05:35 -0400
            Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 12:24 -0400
              Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 04:04 -0500
        Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 22:23 -0400
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 05:12 -0400

#501674 — Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking

On Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 2:42:32 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 6/20/15 3:45 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > Never to old to change.Sam is on the money on my posts.I now Bert
> > only post what is known(in the books) and sign out with Bert. Should
> > Treb throw in his advanced science(285 years ) He will sign out
> > Treb.Sam can throw the book at Treb,but best he keep in mind Treb is
> > not flesh and bone.Bert
> >
> 
>    Treb not being flesh and bone? What is he? A screwdriver?
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
> of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
> social issues.

Sam Treb is a quantum computer and is in our twin anti-galaxy.He is 285 years ahead of Earth's time.Our twin universe goes with positrons . Sam I thought you knew this.I posted it many times in 20 years.Treb just jumped in "Hi Sam"  Treb

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#501676

On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 11:00:09 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 2:42:32 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 6/20/15 3:45 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > > Never to old to change.Sam is on the money on my posts.I now Bert
> > > only post what is known(in the books) and sign out with Bert. Should
> > > Treb throw in his advanced science(285 years ) He will sign out
> > > Treb.Sam can throw the book at Treb,but best he keep in mind Treb is
> > > not flesh and bone.Bert
> > >
> > 
> >    Treb not being flesh and bone? What is he? A screwdriver?
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
> > of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
> > social issues.
> 
> Sam Treb is a quantum computer and is in our twin anti-galaxy.He is 285 years ahead of Earth's time.Our twin universe goes with positrons . Sam I thought you knew this.I posted it many times in 20 years.Treb just jumped in "Hi Sam"  Treb

That's Treb's universe goes with positrons.In reality if we shook hands we would explode into pure energy.(photons)   Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#501925

On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 11:57:42 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 6/21/15 1:00 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > Sam Treb is a quantum computer and is in our twin anti-galaxy.He is 285 years ahead of Earth's time.Our twin universe goes with positrons . Sam I thought you knew this.I posted it many times in 20 years.Treb just jumped in "Hi Sam"  Treb
> 
>    Time to throw Treb under the train Bert.
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
> of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
> social issues.

Sam Treb has done me some good,and I know he likes me.He knows my future as well as all humankind. He only gives me small bits of the future,and that goes with good reasoning.I know what you are thinking Sam.No I'm not crazy.I know its crazy for others,and it takes in an act of faith.Still now that Treb got through there have not been any figure 8 knots in my vacuum 25 foot cord. Still Treb will sign out if the thinking is not in the books,and I will sign Bert when I read the books on science,and that way Sam you being on ly a book worm will not get upset. Deal  Treb    Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#501927

On 6/22/15 6:20 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Sam Treb has done me some good,and I know he likes me.He knows my future as well as all humankind.

   Then you know that humans will be extinct within a hundred years
   or two. Sad.

   Sixth mass extinction is here, researcher declares
 > http://phys.org/news/2015-06-sixth-mass-extinction-declares.html

 > There is no longer any doubt: We are entering a mass extinction that
 > threatens humanity's existence.

 > That is the bad news at the center of a new study by a group of
 > scientists including Paul Ehrlich, the Bing Professor of Population
 > Studies in biology and a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods
 > Institute for the Environment. Ehrlich and his co-authors call for
 > fast action to conserve threatened species, populations and habitat,
 > but warn that the window of opportunity is rapidly closing.

 > "[The study] shows without any significant doubt that we are now
 > entering the sixth great mass extinction event," Ehrlich said.

 > Although most well known for his positions on human population,
 > Ehrlich has done extensive work on extinctions going back to his 1981
 > book, Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of
 > Species. He has long tied his work on coevolution, on racial, gender
 > and economic justice, and on nuclear winter with the issue of
 > wildlife populations and species loss.

 > There is general agreement among scientists that extinction rates
 > have reached levels unparalleled since the dinosaurs died out 66
 > million years ago. However, some have challenged the theory,
 > believing earlier estimates rested on assumptions that overestimated
 > the crisis.

 > The new study, published in the journal Science Advances, shows that
 > even with extremely conservative estimates, species are disappearing
 > up to about 100 times faster than the normal rate between mass
 > extinctions, known as the background rate.

 > "If it is allowed to continue, life would take many millions of years
 > to recover, and *our species itself would likely disappear early* on,"
 > said lead author Gerardo Ceballos of the Universidad Autónoma de
 > México.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#501928

On 6/22/15 6:20 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Still Treb will sign out if the thinking is not in the books,and I will sign Bert when I read the books on science,and that way Sam you being on ly a book worm will not get upset.

   Being in books does not make something true, Herb. What
   makes things tend to be true is if they agree with the hard
   data of observation and experiment.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502013

<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> :B::ert Glazier the Swine &
Hate monger & Jewish Jailbird "reber g=emc^2" introduced
himself with "Bert an Change Of Thinking" as/with

>:B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex &
:B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how every thing works,.."
:B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert.
:B:: ***** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert *****
:B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and
:B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. "....
:B:: because "I was mixing sulfur,carbon & iron together
:B:: to make gun powder".Trebert ... and about
:B:: "the S.C. killings when a **black** hate monger". Bert
... and then, tryin to explain away all the above....

Schizoid Swine Glazier wrote:
> > Sam Treb is a quantum computer and is in our twin anti-galaxy.
> > He is 285 years ahead of Earth's time.
> > Our twin universe goes with positrons . Sam I thought you knew this.
> > I posted it many times in 20 years.Treb just jumped in "Hi Sam"  Treb
>
 Sam Wormley wrote:
>    Time to throw Treb under the train Bert.
>
hanson wrote:
Dawn has risen over Sam's Marble head. Kudos!
Glazier, the Swine, posted more then a few times that
he has been Schizophrenic for the last 27 years, and before
that, (G=EMC^2), Glazier Exhibited Micro Cephalic Cretinism...
Glazier show the classic symptoms of being a schizo:
His abnormal social behavior (his Face shitting & Graveyard
vandalism), his failure to recognize what is real and his cons
and his constant, nested lies and plagiarism, that  etc.
>
Schizoid Swine Glazier wrote:
Sam Treb has done me some good,and I know he likes me.
He knows my future as well as all humankind.
He only gives me small bits of the future,and that goes with good reasoning.
I know what you are thinking Sam.
No I'm not crazy.I know its crazy for others,and it takes in an act of 
faith.
Still now that Treb got through there have not been any figure 8 knots in
my vacuum 25 foot cord.
Still Treb will sign out if the thinking is not in the books,and I will sign 
Bert
when I read the books on science,and that way
Sam you being only a book worm will not get upset. Deal  Treb    Bert
>
hanson wrote:
Glazier, you Swine, do you know *why* you are a Swine?
Glazier, you Swine, do you know *that* you are a Swine?
Glazier, do you know that you are an embarrassment for
every Jew, every where, day in & day out, with your 25K posts?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502071

On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>
> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?


At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence, 
research into this area was begun. After years of testing and 
experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these 
claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.

What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.

100% wrong.


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502081

In sci.physics HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
>> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?
> 
> 
> At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
> Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence, 
> research into this area was begun. After years of testing and 
> experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these 
> claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.
> 
> What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.
> 
> 100% wrong.
 
Just like his belief that HAARP was some kind of weather or mind control
and is still going on.

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502213

On 6/23/2015 2:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>>
>>> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
>>> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?
>>
>>
>> At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
>> Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence,
>> research into this area was begun. After years of testing and
>> experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these
>> claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.
>>
>> What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.
>>
>> 100% wrong.
>
> Just like his belief that HAARP was some kind of weather or mind control
> and is still going on.


When you kick the tires of a kook, LOTS of kook beliefs come tumbling 
out. A kook NEVER believes in just one kooky thing.

For instance, I ferreted out the fact that BJ believes in ghosts. Now 
bear in mind that he HATES the term ghost. He thinks that by referring 
to them as 'persistence of consciousness' it makes this belief valid.

And I honestly think we have just scratched the surface of his kookery





-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502239

On 06/24/2015 05:35 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 6/23/2015 2:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
>>>> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?
>>>
>>>
>>> At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
>>> Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence,
>>> research into this area was begun. After years of testing and
>>> experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these
>>> claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.
>>>
>>> What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.
>>>
>>> 100% wrong.
>>
>> Just like his belief that HAARP was some kind of weather or mind control
>> and is still going on.
>
>
> When you kick the tires of a kook, LOTS of kook beliefs come tumbling
> out. A kook NEVER believes in just one kooky thing.
>
> For instance, I ferreted out the fact that BJ believes in ghosts. Now
> bear in mind that he HATES the term ghost. He thinks that by referring
> to them as 'persistence of consciousness' it makes this belief valid.
>
> And I honestly think we have just scratched the surface of his kookery

Jimp, did you EVER see such fantasy as Harlow can generate? Virtually 
EVERYTHING he said above is factually incorrect and can be demonstrated 
as such. He hides the fact that he is sleepless over "gook ghosts" (tm) 
by accusing others like me (who have categorically stated I've never see 
a so-called ghost). He also believes in astrology though he tries to 
hide it by feigning an interest in astronomy.

The difference dear jimp, is that YOU have boots on the ground and have 
considerable credibility. Harlow lives in his fantasy world with Bert 
and underage foreign babes and has never have any credibility here. His 
stories and lies change more often than Herb changes Bud cans.

But he is a million yuks.


-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502398

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:24:46 -0400, benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 06/24/2015 05:35 AM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 6/23/2015 2:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
>>>>> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
>>>> Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence,
>>>> research into this area was begun. After years of testing and
>>>> experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these
>>>> claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.
>>>>
>>>> What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.
>>>>
>>>> 100% wrong.
>>>
>>> Just like his belief that HAARP was some kind of weather or mind control
>>> and is still going on.
>>
>>
>> When you kick the tires of a kook, LOTS of kook beliefs come tumbling
>> out. A kook NEVER believes in just one kooky thing.
>>
>> For instance, I ferreted out the fact that BJ believes in ghosts. Now
>> bear in mind that he HATES the term ghost. He thinks that by referring
>> to them as 'persistence of consciousness' it makes this belief valid.
>>
>> And I honestly think we have just scratched the surface of his kookery
>
>Jimp, did you EVER see such fantasy as Harlow can generate? Virtually 
>EVERYTHING he said above is factually incorrect and can be demonstrated 
>as such. 

     Then you will provide the quotes and MIDs. If you don't, people
might think you're lying.

>He hides the fact that he is sleepless over "gook ghosts" (tm) 
>by accusing others like me (who have categorically stated I've never see 
>a so-called ghost). 

     He's not claiming you've seen one. Only that you believe they
exist.

>He also believes in astrology though he tries to 
>hide it by feigning an interest in astronomy.

     Two different things.

>
>The difference dear jimp, is that YOU have boots on the ground and have 
>considerable credibility. Harlow lives in his fantasy world with Bert 
>and underage foreign babes and has never have any credibility here. His 
>stories and lies change more often than Herb changes Bud cans.
>
>But he is a million yuks.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502177

On 06/23/2015 02:39 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
>> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?
>
>
> At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
> Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence,
> research into this area was begun. After years of testing and
> experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these
> claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.
>
> What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.
>
> 100% wrong.
>
What is a "kook" belief is that first you denied it ever happened and 
then when your nose got rubbed in the stink you backed off and now are 
saying that well, yeah, it happened, but we had stupid reasons for being 
kooky because well, government employees are all ignorant (actually 
pretty good argument).

and then your fantasy takes over again, and now the the program 
supposedly failed (even though those on the project say 
otherwise...shit, what would they know compared to your fantasy life? I 
mean you have SUPERPOWERS and they, well, they were only there!

And then you top it all off with the usual, "that program was not only a 
failure but was terminated back in -------  fill in the blank" That one 
always works almost as well as "I only know what I read in the papers".

And using your "superpowers" you access all classified current programs 
to determine that this one really isn't still going on. Just how 
gullible do you think the American people are? Well, yeah, pretty easy 
to fool but not so easy that the likes of you can do it.

I wonder what life as a professional liar is like? Are journalists 
happy? Are you Spooks happy?  I don't think so. You mad?

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/_

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#502400

On 6/24/2015 1:48 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>
> Have a plan. It is just post science. Leave out all personal stuff.
> Reason when I brag about what thisb 87 year old man is doing the hate
> mongers twist it into "I am lying" So who needs this bad mouthing


The fact that I use a bit of poetic license which you describe as 
'twisting', in no way mitigates the fact that you are a liar.

Here are your choices:

1) Quit. (You tried this, it didn't last)

2) Man up, stop whining and just continue on as usual.

3) Tell the truth from now on. (Very low order of probability)





-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web