Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #502177

Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/23/2015 02:39 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 6/23/2015 1:03 PM, benj wrote:
>>
>> And you think my pointing out that the CIA paid millions for remote
>> viewing research is "kook beliefs"?
>
>
> At the time we thought that the Russians may gain a tactical advantage.
> Obviously this couldn't be allowed, so in order to do due diligence,
> research into this area was begun. After years of testing and
> experiments it was determined that there was absolutely nothing to these
> claims. The program was subsequently terminated. End of story.
>
> What *IS* a kook belief is that you think it's still going on.
>
> 100% wrong.
>
What is a "kook" belief is that first you denied it ever happened and 
then when your nose got rubbed in the stink you backed off and now are 
saying that well, yeah, it happened, but we had stupid reasons for being 
kooky because well, government employees are all ignorant (actually 
pretty good argument).

and then your fantasy takes over again, and now the the program 
supposedly failed (even though those on the project say 
otherwise...shit, what would they know compared to your fantasy life? I 
mean you have SUPERPOWERS and they, well, they were only there!

And then you top it all off with the usual, "that program was not only a 
failure but was terminated back in -------  fill in the blank" That one 
always works almost as well as "I only know what I read in the papers".

And using your "superpowers" you access all classified current programs 
to determine that this one really isn't still going on. Just how 
gullible do you think the American people are? Well, yeah, pretty easy 
to fool but not so easy that the likes of you can do it.

I wonder what life as a professional liar is like? Are journalists 
happy? Are you Spooks happy?  I don't think so. You mad?

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/_

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 11:00 -0700
  Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-21 11:03 -0700
  Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 16:20 -0700
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:26 -0500
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-22 18:30 -0500
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-06-23 09:25 -0700
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 14:39 -0400
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-06-23 18:50 +0000
        Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 05:35 -0400
          Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-24 12:24 -0400
            Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 04:04 -0500
      Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-06-23 22:23 -0400
    Re: Bert an Change Of Thinking HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 05:12 -0400

csiph-web