Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #589891 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 19 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700 |
| Subject | Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| Message-ID | <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> |
Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmkbhc$16j$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
On 7/18/2016 11:37 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How > does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other > particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? particles do not have digestion systems, therefore cannot... "shit" Particles do not have pockets to keep "rat's ass" in to give away as awards. > > If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist > crap. do your thoughts "exist" ? or are they just random firings of unrelated nerve endings ? > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... so Dr Spangoli, Dentist, has you in his chair and you make ah sound, cute. means nothing here, dirtbag.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a98bcd7f-6cab-4cc0-a2dc-3ffc20cdfb6d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589893 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:49:51 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 7/18/2016 11:37 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How > > does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other > > particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > particles do not have digestion systems, therefore cannot... "shit" > Particles do not have pockets to keep "rat's ass" in to give away as awards. > > > > > If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist > > crap. > > do your thoughts "exist" ? > or are they just random firings of unrelated nerve endings ? > > > > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > > so Dr Spangoli, Dentist, has you in his chair and you make ah sound, > cute. means nothing here, dirtbag. Haysoos Martinez! Sergio's throwing a fit! It's more than he can bear. ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| Message-ID | <578DB36C.7381@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or set in motion. a particle is...aware.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| Message-ID | <800b4040-588c-48d0-a88f-9f452752aa2f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589897 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > > a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or > set in motion. > > a particle is...aware. I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap. ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| Message-ID | <578DE44D.11B6@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #589899 |
mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > > > > > a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or > > set in motion. > > > > a particle is...aware. > > I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap. > > ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... to me you're just a chemical scum on the surface of the earth. You like that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| Message-ID | <a600cd24-42aa-41be-ba1f-4c46e4d700f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589909 |
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 1:26:20 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: > > > mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > > > > > > > > a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or > > > set in motion. > > > > > > a particle is...aware. > > > > I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap. > > > > ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > > to me > you're just a > chemical scum > on the surface of > the earth. > > You like that? Certainly. I'm getting to you. Soon, you'll be foaming at the mouth and jumping up and down. I'm gonna like that, too. ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmlhkm$1qlh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #589910 |
On 7/19/2016 3:29 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 1:26:20 AM UTC-7, T > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ......open wide for dentist yawning again... go get some coffee.....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <dvirob9j7e1conoglgq136olds4guqhssf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote: >Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > >If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. > >ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... All particles in the universe know you are an idiot. w.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52fbfc2b-240a-4c41-94bd-ab758097d6ce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589906 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:43:18 PM UTC-7, Helmut Wabnig wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > >Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > > >If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. > > > >ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > All particles in the universe know you are an idiot. > > w. LOL. The truth hurts, I know. The world according to brain-dead relativists: "Everything is relative" thus condemning us to live in a self-referential universe. How stupid is that? What a pathetic bunch of cretins. You assholes need to repent from your lies. Sackcloths and ashes for you! Otherwise, fuck all of you. ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM000537FC44CDAC81@aca41cbd.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #589906 |
Helmut Wabnig wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > >>Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? >> >>If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. >> >>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > All particles in the universe know you are an idiot. Probably not his brane particle. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | xxein1@att.net |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbe49622-87c4-40ce-8ced-5e7b63cfa2d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 12:37:24 AM UTC-4, mapo...@gmail.com wrote: > Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... xxein: So you don't care what time it is, where you are or how fast you are going? I guess that's typical for a pile of crap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4bff9797-2460-45c0-a974-950f97fbe950@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote: > Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > > If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... I'm still waiting for a mental midget in the relativist camp to explain how nature uses frames of reference. Or is an FOR something that Einstein pulled right out of his fucking ass? You know, just like all the other crap that he pulled out of his ass, crap like spacetime, spacetime curvature, geodesics, time dilation, time travel, gravitational waves, etc. Do you fucking morons even realize that Einstein's spacetime is a fucking block universe in which nothing fucking happens? ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmlo7j$5aa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #589935 |
On 7/19/2016 11:04 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... yep, you moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <436121da-70e8-49c2-9b4a-6f1d7fbe4be6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589951 |
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 10:32:40 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 7/19/2016 11:04 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >> > >> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > > > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > yep, you moron. LOL. I knew you liked the laugh, Sergio. I just didn't realize that it had such a powerful effect on you. Hmm. Very interesting. ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmlp6m$6lb$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #589953 |
On 7/19/2016 12:41 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 10:32:40 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 7/19/2016 11:04 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>>
>>
>>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>>
>>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>> yep, you moron.
>
> LOL. I knew you liked the laugh, Sergio. I just didn't realize that
> it had such a powerful effect on you. Hmm. Very interesting.
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
yep, you moron. > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
yep, you moron. > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
yep, you moron.
yep, you moron.
>
the power of c+p, as Wormley knows, it distorts the Universe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmlqht$8ad$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
On 7/18/2016 11:37 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle > know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? It doesn't know. Nor does it need to. There are some properties that are obviously RELATIONS between the particle and the reference frame. Velocity, for example, is not INTRINSIC to the particle -- something that Galileo noticed in the 1600's. Note that the 1600s were a few years before Einstein's birth. > > If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. > > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mapou001@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f9532367-a695-412d-b5ff-2a1986bedef5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #589965 |
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 11:12:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >[crap] > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Fuck you. You're just a stupid ass kisser, a mental midget. But then again, all relativists are ass kissers and mental midgets. ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <134uobp5cm9hut47ag5sd2qlfadr5l497i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #589891 |
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote: >Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland "You see," said my Teacher, "how little your words have done. So far as the Monarch understands them at all, he accepts them as his own – for he cannot conceive of any other except himself – and plumes himself upon the variety of Its Thought as an instance of creative Power. Let us leave this God of Pointland to the ignorant fruition of his omnipresence and omniscience: nothing that you or I can do can rescue him from his self-satisfaction." >How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? > >If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. > >ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web