Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #589925

Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

From jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
Date 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
Organization "Have EDDT, will travel"
Message-ID <PM000537FC44CDAC81@aca41cbd.ipt.aol.com> (permalink)
References <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <dvirob9j7e1conoglgq136olds4guqhssf@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a
particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs
so as to give a rat's ass?
>>
>>If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
>>
>>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
> All particles in the universe know you are an idiot.

Probably not his brane particle.

/BAH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical  composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical  composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical   composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
        Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical   composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
          Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
        Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
  Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400

csiph-web