Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #566498 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-31 14:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 154 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why You Should Care About Nukes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 12:37 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 12:59 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 11:25 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 05:08 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 12:33 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-02 15:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-02 20:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 06:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 16:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 12:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 18:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 21:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 05:45 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:30 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 20:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:23 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 17:52 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 13:10 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 18:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:29 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 19:59 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 17:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 07:14 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 18:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 14:46 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 15:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:46 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-08 03:35 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:51 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 00:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 15:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 20:57 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 06:51 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:09 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:42 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:56 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:29 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:23 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 21:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 11:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:12 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:09 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 15:00 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 06:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 15:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:52 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:20 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 11:00 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 01:20 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 01:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 15:27 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 20:58 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:53 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 11:14 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:59 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:31 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 12:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:53 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:09 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 16:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 16:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-08 03:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:11 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:20 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:15 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:18 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:43 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:28 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-04-02 23:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-29 18:07 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-30 14:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-30 15:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 03:02 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 07:59 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 15:36 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:41 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:31 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 20:11 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 16:04 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-31 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 19:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:44 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:54 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 12:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:31 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 19:13 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:25 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes vishnushelat@gmail.com - 2016-03-31 12:28 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-31 14:13 -0700
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 12:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ne2t7q$jfo$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #568226 |
On 06/04/2016 12:38, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:ndu3em$5f0$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> >>>> Wow! All that debris! Three BILLION pounds of debris! Look at it all! >>>> Huge >>>> piles of it!!! It took them months and months to haul it all out, >>>> 108,000+ >>>> truckloads! I bet you wish you had a piece of that action, driving some >>>> of >>>> those 108,000+ truckloads. Probably union wages, too! But as a failed >>>> truck driver you wouldn't have been allowed to, of course. >> >>> AND YET IT COULD NOT CRUSH THE SURVIVING CORNERS? ROTFLMAO >> >> Asked and answered. >> >> 1) That portion of the building was extremely strong, since the lowest >> floors had to hold up 110 stories of towers. >> >> 2) By sheer luck, the heaviest/most damaging portions of falling debris >> missed those portions > > Keep going because you forgot to list where your physics came from that > buildings do not fall straight down. <G> > Probably where ever other sane persons physics came from. > And don't forget that NIST never ever tried to explain why there were > Surviving Corners to both the Twin Towers or why 8 floors of WTC 7 fell at > free fall speed as if it had been nuked too. <G> > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > " as if it had been nuked", that means you can give us an event you are comparing it to, please give us a link to that event. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne36d5$tlb$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #568226 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>AND YET IT COULD NOT CRUSH THE SURVIVING CORNERS? ROTFLMAO >> >> Asked and answered. >> >> 1) That portion of the building was extremely strong, since the lowest >> floors had to hold up 110 stories of towers. >> >> 2) By sheer luck, the heaviest/most damaging portions of falling debris >> missed those portions >Keep going because you forgot to list where your physics came from that >buildings do not fall straight down. <G> Ordinary physics. Like what you learn in high school and college. Oh, I forgot, you flunked out of high school and no college would let you within a mile of them. >And don't forget that NIST never ever tried to explain why there were >Surviving Corners to both the Twin Towers No need, things usually don't break nice and neat, and neither did the Twin Towers. It was not an unusual result. > or why 8 floors of WTC 7 fell at >free fall speed as if it had been nuked too. <G> As if it had been nuked? So you have examples of other buildings which had been nuked to compare them to Building 7? > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Look at all the debris again!! 1.5 million tons of it!!! Oh, BTW, could you explain how the alleged nukes, if buried where the kookscribbles in that picture say they were, were able to magically blast through solid rock without vaporizing it, vaporize part of Tower 1, magically blast through the central staircase without vaporizing it or harming several people inside (and without those people even noticing a nuclear explosion!) and then vaporize the North Tower above the surviving corners? Also, how were the nukes able to leave behind only 1.5 million tons of debris, instead of 1.5 million tons of debris that would have been left there if there were no nukes? And could you tell us how that search for the mass spectrometry report of the dust samples from the WTC is going? You know, that mass spectrometry report you told us about that shows the two substances present in about equal amounts that can only be produced by nuclear detonations? Roger? Where are you going? Why are you running so fast? Not *again!*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 12:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vZidnVft3eEs0JjKnZ2dnUU7-I_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #568269 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ne36d5$tlb$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>>AND YET IT COULD NOT CRUSH THE SURVIVING CORNERS? ROTFLMAO >>> >>> Asked and answered. >>> >>> 1) That portion of the building was extremely strong, since the lowest >>> floors had to hold up 110 stories of towers. >>> >>> 2) By sheer luck, the heaviest/most damaging portions of falling debris >>> missed those portions > >>Keep going because you forgot to list where your physics came from that >>buildings do not fall straight down. <G> > > Ordinary physics. Like what you learn in high school and college. Oh, I > forgot, you flunked out of high school and no college would let you > within a mile of them. Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> Once again the "Surviving Corners" that you or NIST have never been able to explain http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg but MRR nukes buried deep underground have no problem. Seeing is believing and what I see of your BS is just BS. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 19:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ne3kfr$g41$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #568335 |
On 06/04/2016 18:55, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:ne36d5$tlb$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> >>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>> news:ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> AND YET IT COULD NOT CRUSH THE SURVIVING CORNERS? ROTFLMAO >>>> >>>> Asked and answered. >>>> >>>> 1) That portion of the building was extremely strong, since the lowest >>>> floors had to hold up 110 stories of towers. >>>> >>>> 2) By sheer luck, the heaviest/most damaging portions of falling debris >>>> missed those portions >> >>> Keep going because you forgot to list where your physics came from that >>> buildings do not fall straight down. <G> >> >> Ordinary physics. Like what you learn in high school and college. Oh, I >> forgot, you flunked out of high school and no college would let you >> within a mile of them. > > Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that > collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your > bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> > > Once again the "Surviving Corners" that you or NIST have never been able to > explain > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > but MRR nukes buried deep underground have no problem. > > Seeing is believing and what I see of your BS is just BS. > > Rocky > > I know this was just probably an error on your part, but you left out part of the post you answered. Just to help you I shall repost itbelow. Oh, BTW, could you explain how the alleged nukes, if buried where the kookscribbles in that picture say they were, were able to magically blast through solid rock without vaporizing it, vaporize part of Tower 1, magically blast through the central staircase without vaporizing it or harming several people inside (and without those people even noticing a nuclear explosion!) and then vaporize the North Tower above the surviving corners? Also, how were the nukes able to leave behind only 1.5 million tons of debris, instead of 1.5 million tons of debris that would have been left there if there were no nukes? And could you tell us how that search for the mass spectrometry report of the dust samples from the WTC is going? You know, that mass spectrometry report you told us about that shows the two substances present in about equal amounts that can only be produced by nuclear detonations? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 19:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #568335 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that >collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your >bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. You ran away, instead. And you ran away from this: >Oh, BTW, could you explain how the alleged nukes, if buried where the >kookscribbles in that picture say they were, were able to magically blast >through solid rock without vaporizing it, vaporize part of Tower 1, >magically blast through the central staircase without vaporizing it or >harming several people inside (and without those people even noticing a >nuclear explosion!) and then vaporize the North Tower above the surviving >corners? Also, how were the nukes able to leave behind only 1.5 million >tons of debris, instead of 1.5 million tons of debris that would have been >left there if there were no nukes? And you ran away from this (again!): >And could you tell us how that search for the mass spectrometry report of >the dust samples from the WTC is going? You know, that mass spectrometry >report you told us about that shows the two substances present in about >equal amounts that can only be produced by nuclear detonations? Wow, good job at strengthening your reputation as being "Run Away Roger"!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tKidnZRdqM6h-ZjKnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #568352 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! > >>Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that >>collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your >>bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> > > You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building > that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. > You ran away, instead. You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that collapsing buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the Twin Towers were MRR nuked. See for yourself at: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #568361 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >> >>>Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that >>>collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your >>>bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >> >> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building >> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >> You ran away, instead. >You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that collapsing >buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the >Twin Towers were MRR nuked. K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and RUN AWAY!!!!!! And we've been waiting EVEN LONGER for other examples of buildings being nuked so that we can compare that to the WTC buildings. All you did then was RUN AWAY!!!!!! So where is that mass spectrometer report? Where are the other buildings that were nuked, like (allegedly) the WTC buildings? And tell us how a nuclear explosion can blast through solid rock without destroying it, then blast through one of the Surviving corners without destroying it, vaporize part of the tower, blast through the stairway in Tower 1 without destroying it or hurting anyone inside and then vaporize the tower above the other corner??? (watch Kooktard Roger snip and run away AGAIN!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ne430v$bqv$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #568361 |
On 06/04/2016 20:32, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >> >>> Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that >>> collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your >>> bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >> >> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building >> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >> You ran away, instead. > > You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that collapsing > buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the > Twin Towers were MRR nuked. See for yourself at: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > You didn't answer his question, if you don't answer it, it seems like you are running. Also you edited this bit out, I'll re-enter it for you to make your comments. Oh, BTW, could you explain how the alleged nukes, if buried where the kookscribbles in that picture say they were, were able to magically blast through solid rock without vaporizing it, vaporize part of Tower 1, magically blast through the central staircase without vaporizing it or harming several people inside (and without those people even noticing a nuclear explosion!) and then vaporize the North Tower above the surviving corners? Also, how were the nukes able to leave behind only 1.5 million tons of debris, instead of 1.5 million tons of debris that would have been left there if there were no nukes? And could you tell us how that search for the mass spectrometry report of the dust samples from the WTC is going? You know, that mass spectrometry report you told us about that shows the two substances present in about equal amounts that can only be produced by nuclear detonations? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r1bcgb5jgr4plningl1d5dlicqke04oioa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568226 |
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:38:53 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ndu3em$5f0$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>>
>>>> Wow! All that debris! Three BILLION pounds of debris! Look at it all!
>>>> Huge
>>>> piles of it!!! It took them months and months to haul it all out,
>>>> 108,000+
>>>> truckloads! I bet you wish you had a piece of that action, driving some
>>>> of
>>>> those 108,000+ truckloads. Probably union wages, too! But as a failed
>>>> truck driver you wouldn't have been allowed to, of course.
>>
>>>AND YET IT COULD NOT CRUSH THE SURVIVING CORNERS? ROTFLMAO
>>
>> Asked and answered.
>>
>> 1) That portion of the building was extremely strong, since the lowest
>> floors had to hold up 110 stories of towers.
>>
>> 2) By sheer luck, the heaviest/most damaging portions of falling debris
>> missed those portions
>
>Keep going because you forgot to list where your physics came from that
>buildings do not fall straight down. <G>
>
>And don't forget that NIST never ever tried to explain why there were
>Surviving Corners to both the Twin Towers or why 8 floors of WTC 7 fell at
>free fall speed as if it had been nuked too. <G>
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
You keep linking to a picture that PROVES all of your claims
wrong. Why?
When are you going to post the results regarding the "mass
spectrometry analysis of the dust samples" of the WTC showing "two
items in equal parts that only exist after nuclear detonations"?
You keep living up to your name of Run Away Roger. It's as if you
knowingly LIED. Which, of course, all available evidence shows you
did.
Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <66oatc-pc1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567846 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:ndjtd3$q5g$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>>news:ndi3ve$c5p$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>. . . >>>> >>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>> >>>> You're still obsessed with that photo of that enormous pile of debris >>>> with the kookscribbles all over it? The one that proves that no nukes >>>> were ever used? >> >>>"enormous?" If you wanted to see "enormous" you should have seen the size >>>of the Twin Towers before they were nuked. Now those were "enormous." >> >> Why yes, the towers were enormous! 110 stories tall!! And they left that >> HUGE pile of debris! 1.5 million tons of debris! Three Billion pounds! >> Piled all the way from the lowest sub-basement 70' below street level to >> several stories above it! It took them months and over 106,000 truckloads >> to remove it all!! > > that but MRR nukes explain the Surviving Corners with no problem. MRR stands for minimum residual radiation; the siesmic signature is not effected and there were no seismic signatures on 9/11 so no nukes. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 04:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hnv6gbpvpq5qb2450bfs1ob26ch453kfoa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567846 |
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:44:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:ndjtd3$q5g$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ndi3ve$c5p$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>. . .
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>
>>>> You're still obsessed with that photo of that enormous pile of debris
>>>> with the kookscribbles all over it? The one that proves that no nukes
>>>> were ever used?
>>
>>>"enormous?" If you wanted to see "enormous" you should have seen the size
>>>of the Twin Towers before they were nuked. Now those were "enormous."
>>
>> Why yes, the towers were enormous! 110 stories tall!! And they left that
>> HUGE pile of debris! 1.5 million tons of debris! Three Billion pounds!
>> Piled all the way from the lowest sub-basement 70' below street level to
>> several stories above it! It took them months and over 106,000 truckloads
>> to remove it all!!
>
>ROTFLMAO and yet with all that weight the debris could not crush the
>Surviving Corners of the Twin Towers and you still have no explaination for
>that but MRR nukes explain the Surviving Corners with no problem. <G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>Rest of your garbage was trashed since you have failed to address the above
>over and over and over.
>
When will you be providing us with the results of the mass
spectrometry analysis of the WTC dust samples? You know, the ones
that show "two items in equal parts that only exist after nuclear
detonations"?
I've asked you about it several times, but all you've done is
live up to your name of Run Away Roger. It's as if you realize you've
been caught LYING the whole time.
Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 04:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5ffsfb584ja98kjplrmoo9ap4qqc1o6bh8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566994 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:49:20 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>news:ndi3ve$c5p$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>. . .
>>
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> You're still obsessed with that photo of that enormous pile of debris
>> with the kookscribbles all over it? The one that proves that no nukes
>> were ever used?
>
>"enormous?" If you wanted to see "enormous" you should have seen the size
>of the Twin Towers before they were nuked. Now those were "enormous."
>
110 stories. And when they collapsed they left roughly 1.5
million tons of debris, as seen in the picture you OBSESSIVELY link
to.
>And again, we have no evidence whatsoever that any of the 19 alleged
>hijackers died on 9/11 or that all of those names were even real people.
>
When are you going to post the results regarding the "mass
spectrometry analysis of the dust samples" of the WTC showing "two
items in equal parts that only exist after nuclear detonations"?
You've always lived up to your name of Run Away Roger when asked.
It's as if you were LYING about the existence of these items in equal
parts.
[Cue Roger living up to his name of Run Away Roger.]
Brave Sir [Roger] ran away
Bravely ran away, away
When [the TRUTH] reared its ugly head
He bravely turned his tail and fled
Yes, brave Sir [Roger] turned about
And gallantly he chickened out
Bravely taking to his feet
He beat a very brave retreat
Bravest of the brave, Sir [Roger]!
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vishnushelat@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 12:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d0bf25ec-8936-4661-82f2-b6a86a49b690@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #566498 |
On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 10:34:52 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: > Why You Should Care About Nukes > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnU0bqsyq0 > > > -- > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics > community, and physics-related social issues. Putting to much radio active material to get into food chain. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 14:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ndk3nm$e5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #567014 |
Cloaked as <vishnushelat@gmail.com>,<herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier the Jewish Jailbird and despicable Full-Swine hate mongered and wrote: > Putting to much radio active material to get into food chain, but I'm glad when war breaks out. Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ... which is seen as soon as.... > TreBert <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> "reber g=emc^2" :B::ert Glazier, the Hate monger, introduces hinself with/as > :B:: "I am a proud Jew with a Superiority complex & :B:: an IQ of 122", & "I do know how everything works,.." :B:: "My Grandfathers had tails". -- Trebert :B:: "Being Jewish I know this is so very true" -- Bert. :B:: "I'm a non-bible(torra) Jew. I'm the only Jew that :B:: got 2 form letters from two Popes". Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'll be sitting on Benj's, Saul Levi's & HVAC's face :B:: to take a shit & say: "Open your mouth wide". :B:: "Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And laugh". :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "I'm M&M's Clueless Fuck-faced turd".Bert. :B:: I'm "Siegman Fraud", "Bert, the Bowel Movement". :B:: "I gave G=EMC^2 (wrong & stolen) to the world" :B:: "Israel will drop its first H-bomb 'David' ". TreBert :B:: __"I'm glad when war breaks out"__ Bert :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > :B:: "Even the FBI has me as a trouble maker and :B:: the FBI blocks my phone from calling them. ".... :B:: cuz "I was mixing sulfur, carbon & iron together :B:: to make gun powder" ... & "while I was in custody :B:: of Osceola Sheriff Bob Hansel, for thieving, his :B:: deputies beat the shit out of me. So I bought a :B:: 357 magnum for death threats by Sheriff Bob. :B:: __** "Why am I not loved by all?" --- Bert **__. > about which .... Moderator General "HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> aka "Richard A." aka Harlow Campbell wrote: > "Bert, Seriously. You are the stupidest cocksucking moron who ever came down the Mass Pike. "Bert, you really are a pathetic excuse for a human fucking being". "Bert is a racist. (And he's stupid too)" "TreBert, you are one stupid cocksucker". "Bert, does your stupidity know no bounds?" "Bert, are the stupidest cocksucker on the planet." "Spin THIS, Glazier, you fucking idiot." "Bert get some spelling lessons, you feeble-minded fuck". "Bert, your opinion doesn't count" "Bert you are an idiot." "Bert, you are a clueless cocksucker .... and "Bert you are senile, dazed & confused. Fucked in the head. "a trained cockroach is smarter than Bert" "Bert, you should be arrested" "Bert, I will call the police and tell them that your van seems to be a center for drug activity in the Wal-Mart parking lot".... .... about which.... > Glazier's ex-tutor Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: Glazier, your brain is entangles with a used garbage can. Glazier, "Its a shame" that your science is far worse than the man's on the street. Glazier, your postings are old man's garbage. reber, take your you know it all thinking to your grave . reber, your horseshit gets old.Say hi to Allah for me. reber, you don't believe in science. Glazier, do not post in a science newsgroup. Glazier, quit posting __ your Gutter Science__. Glazier, exit USENET. -- IOW Glazier, beat it!.. > Jim Pennino jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: Glazier, you are a spamming piece of shit... Your Cocaine usage explains a lot of your posts. You are drunk again. Give up and kill yourself. > Astrophysicist "Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote: GLAZIER YOU ARE A LAMEbrain PIECE OF SHIT! Saul Levy > Rocket Scientist Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote: Glazier, you are babbling desperately. Is it sympathy or pity you're grasping for? Stop it, either way. > benj" <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: One only has to read Glazier's posts to see when Bert was lobotomized. But Herb found poster "Double-A" who likes to be like Glazier, but "Alkie-Alkie" is another kook who is as dumb as Bert is! Now they party and frolic!...still waiting "to be loved by all"... > hanson wrote: So Glazier, given your Jewish Superiority complex and your IQ of 122 and you knowing how how everything works, ... how come ended up shitting into a bucket in a 25 year old van that you use as your residence on Wal-Mart's Parking Lot? ..... .... What went wrong, Glazier? > Now, Glazier consider "what will the say when Glazier dies? Are they gonna say he was a kind man? He was a wise man? He had plans? He has wisdom? .... BULLSHIT, MAN!"... <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAixFYnDh4> [D] BULLSHIT,... because Swine Glazier DOES have plans which Glazier, the Swine, announced and posted at the ripe age of eighty (80) when Glazier became a criminal Graveyard Vandal who wrote: > (1) On 25Mar2008 Swine Glazier wrote in: https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3ffe7b2257cf8a9a https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/sci.physics/uYtpFTRnW4k/morPVyJ7_j8J Hanson, I will piss on your grave. And have a good laugh when it seeps down on your face. -- Bert. > Glazier's geriatric decay worsened, along with Glazier's chronic alcoholism and Glazier, the Olde Kacker, became a Coprophile IOW Glazier became a filthy Face Shitter at his age of 86, which Glazier proudly announced & posted... > (2) On 06Dec2014, when the Christian-Hater, Jew-Swine Glazier said to "benj" <nobody@gmail.com>: Reality is you always post under me for you are an ass kisser. For Christmas I'll shit on your kisser. Benj, you can thank me in advance. - TreBert. ... after which... > Glazier, the Criminal Graveyard Vandal & Face Shitter got even worse over the next year and at Glazier's age of 87, Glazier widened his piggish Face-shitting habit, as seen when Glazier threatened... > (3) On 07Feb 2015 & on 08Feb2015, as Swine Glazier wrote: Harlow HVAC, Mr.HVAC@gmail.com, Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net & Jacoby Benj, <nobody@gmail.com>: "I'll be sitting on your face to take a shit & say: "Open wide". Trebert. > (4) The Criminal Swine Glazier refused to stop his practices & rejected to be taken down, because Glazier at his age of 87+, Swine Glazier labeled himself as "Siegman Fraud" which is synonym with "Bowel- movement, actually saying that __ "Glazier is a piece of shit"__. who, to boot, also announced that Glazier is a Transvestite who dons female dresses and a Sarah Palin mask, saying that he has "nice legs"... > hanson wrote: Now Glazier, since you are a curse and an embarrassment, day-in and day-out, to every Jew everywhere, has it dawned on you sorry, geriatric Transie-Swine, that as soon as you have been "put away and under" Google will remove ALL YOUR posts from the USENET and the only thing that will remain and show your legacy, is because: > Glazier the Swine fortunately posted: .... "hanson made me famous".... > hanson wrote So, Glazier you swine you should be grateful to me & not wish me ill like you did above, in your sick hate mongering, since it is only because of hanson, that Web searches show for: > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 27'833 hits & rising --- reber g=emc^2 Face-shitter & Vandal ---- 27'953 hits & rising > cuz of hanson's caring and loving administering badly needed <http://tinyurl.com/G-EMC2-Recall-Therapy> to the mental cripple aka <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier>. ... Shalom
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web