Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #276709
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes |
| Date | 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <ne3t19$kpg$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <C5adnY1AW83LaJnKnZ2dnUU7-IXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <ne36d5$tlb$1@pcls7.std.com> <vZidnVft3eEs0JjKnZ2dnUU7-I_NnZ2d@giganews.com> <ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com> <tKidnZRdqM6h-ZjKnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:ne3n4i$20g$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >> Wow, Roger, you ran away twice, in one post!!! No, three times!!! >> >>>Even if that were true you are unable to show me any other buildings that >>>collapse with "Surviving Corners" so you have not been able to prove your >>>bullshit about the Twin Towers. <G> >> >> You didn't answer when you were asked for another example of a building >> that had been "nuked", so we could compare it to the WTC buildings. >> You ran away, instead. >You are the one running away because you are unable to prove that collapsing >buildings should leave "Surviving Corners" the way they were left when the >Twin Towers were MRR nuked. K00ktard, we've been waiting for MONTHS for you to get back to us about the mass spectrometry of the WTC dust sample, that would prove they were nuked by the presence of the two substances in equal quantity that can only be made by nuclear explosions. All you do is snip the question and RUN AWAY!!!!!! And we've been waiting EVEN LONGER for other examples of buildings being nuked so that we can compare that to the WTC buildings. All you did then was RUN AWAY!!!!!! So where is that mass spectrometer report? Where are the other buildings that were nuked, like (allegedly) the WTC buildings? And tell us how a nuclear explosion can blast through solid rock without destroying it, then blast through one of the Surviving corners without destroying it, vaporize part of the tower, blast through the stairway in Tower 1 without destroying it or hurting anyone inside and then vaporize the tower above the other corner??? (watch Kooktard Roger snip and run away AGAIN!)
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 03:02 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-31 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 19:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:44 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:54 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-04-06 08:52 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:28 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 12:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:31 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 19:13 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 14:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 09:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 15:15 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 10:50 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:18 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 15:11 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:52 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 17:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 23:28 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-05-11 08:40 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-11 20:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 16:18 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-05-11 08:37 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-05-09 09:01 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes francis <francis.mallard@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 14:53 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 18:21 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:13 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes francis <francis.mallard@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-10 11:30 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-05-10 18:25 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:19 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:56 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-11 06:40 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-05-11 08:43 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-11 22:38 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 03:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-04-06 08:51 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-09 18:45 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 03:50 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 05:23 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-10 19:51 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 04:15 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-04-06 08:46 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:25 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 12:21 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-04 23:51 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 12:17 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-04 23:53 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 15:44 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 04:25 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:50 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-04-23 09:44 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-31 13:25 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes francis <francis.mallard@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 14:52 -0700
csiph-web