Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #276694

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes
Date 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <ne36d5$tlb$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <VsGdnR6yfLBa4J_KnZ2dnUU7-f3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <ndu3em$5f0$1@pcls7.std.com> <q6CdnasM9acDXJ_KnZ2dnUU7-c3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com> <C5adnY1AW83LaJnKnZ2dnUU7-IXNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:


>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:ndumk2$5a4$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>AND YET IT COULD NOT CRUSH THE SURVIVING CORNERS?   ROTFLMAO
>>
>> Asked and answered.
>>
>> 1) That portion of the building was extremely strong, since the lowest
>> floors had to hold up 110 stories of towers.
>>
>> 2) By sheer luck, the heaviest/most damaging portions of falling debris
>> missed those portions

>Keep going because you forgot to list where your physics came from that 
>buildings do not fall straight down.  <G>

Ordinary physics. Like what you learn in high school and college.  Oh, I
forgot, you flunked out of high school and no college would let you
within a mile of them.

>And don't forget that NIST never ever tried to explain why there were 
>Surviving Corners to both the Twin Towers

No need, things usually don't break nice and neat, and neither did the
Twin Towers. It was not an unusual result.

> or why 8 floors of WTC 7 fell at 
>free fall speed as if it had been nuked too.  <G>

As if it had been nuked? So you have examples of other buildings which had 
been nuked to compare them to Building 7?

> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Look at all the debris again!! 1.5 million tons of it!!!

Oh, BTW, could you explain how the alleged nukes, if buried where the
kookscribbles in that picture say they were, were able to magically blast
through solid rock without vaporizing it, vaporize part of Tower 1,
magically blast through the central staircase without vaporizing it or
harming several people inside (and without those people even noticing a
nuclear explosion!) and then vaporize the North Tower above the surviving
corners?  Also, how were the nukes able to leave behind only 1.5 million
tons of debris, instead of 1.5 million tons of debris that would have been
left there if there were no nukes?

And could you tell us how that search for the mass spectrometry report of 
the dust samples from the WTC is going?  You know, that mass spectrometry
report you told us about that shows the two substances present in about
equal amounts that can only be produced by nuclear detonations?

Roger?

Where are you going? Why are you running so fast?

Not *again!*

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 03:02 +0000
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 04:07 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 14:49 +0000
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:22 -0500
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-31 12:49 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 19:22 +0000
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:44 -0500
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:06 +0000
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:33 -0500
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 21:33 +0000
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:54 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-04-06 08:52 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:28 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 12:55 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:31 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 19:13 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 14:32 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 09:45 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 15:15 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 10:50 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:18 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 15:11 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:52 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 17:02 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 23:28 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-05-11 08:40 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-11 20:27 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 16:18 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:55 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-05-11 08:37 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-05-09 09:01 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes francis <francis.mallard@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 14:53 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 18:21 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:13 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes francis <francis.mallard@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-10 11:30 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-05-10 18:25 -0400
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 04:01 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:19 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 16:47 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:56 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-11 06:40 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-05-11 08:43 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-11 22:38 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 03:23 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-04-06 08:51 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-09 18:45 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 03:50 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 05:23 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-10 19:51 -0700
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 04:15 -0500
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes edrhodes@hotmail.com - 2016-04-06 08:46 -0700
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:25 +0000
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 12:21 -0700
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-04 23:51 +0100
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:02 -0500
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 12:17 -0700
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-04 23:53 +0100
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes warrenbuckley1@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 15:44 -0700
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 04:25 -0500
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:50 +0100
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:01 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:23 -0500
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-04-23 09:44 -0700
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:19 -0500
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes joeturn <joeturn2@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-31 13:25 -0700
  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes francis <francis.mallard@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-09 14:52 -0700

csiph-web